- THIS ARTICLE
-
Abstract
- Full Text (PDF)
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Parsch, J.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Parsch, J.
Selective Constraints on Intron Evolution in Drosophila
John Parschaa Department of Biology II, Section of Evolutionary Biology, University of Munich (LMU), Munich 80333, Germany
Corresponding author: John Parsch, Section of Evolutionary Biology, University of Munich (LMU), Luisenstrasse 14, Munich 80333, Germany., parsch{at}zi.biologie.uni-muenchen.de (E-mail)
Communicating editor: S. SCHAEFFER
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
Intron sizes show an asymmetrical distribution in a number of organisms, with a large number of "short" introns clustered around a minimal intron length and a much broader distribution of longer introns. In Drosophila melanogaster, the short intron class is centered around 61 bp. The narrow length distribution suggests that natural selection may play a role in maintaining intron size. A comparison of 15 orthologous introns among species of the D. melanogaster subgroup indicates that, in general, short introns are not under greater DNA sequence or length constraints than long introns. There is a bias toward deletions in all introns (deletion/insertion ratio is 1.66), and the vast majority of indels are of short length (<10 bp). Indels occurring on the internal branches of the phylogenetic tree are significantly longer than those occurring on the terminal branches. These results are consistent with a compensatory model of intron length evolution in which slightly deleterious short deletions are frequently fixed within species by genetic drift, and relatively rare larger insertions that restore intron length are fixed by positive selection. A comparison of paralogous introns shared among duplicated genes suggests that length constraints differ between introns within the same gene. The janusA, janusB, and ocnus genes share two short introns derived from a common ancestor. The first of these introns shows significantly fewer indels than the second intron, although the two introns show a comparable number of substitutions. This indicates that intron-specific selective constraints have been maintained following gene duplication, which preceded the divergence of the D. melanogaster species subgroup.
INTRONIC sequences, which interrupt exons and are removed through splicing, are nearly universal in eukaryotes (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Over evolutionary time, transitions from the short to the long intron size class appear to be rare events (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Further evidence for natural selection acting on intron size comes from the relationship between intron length and recombination rate. ![]()
![]()
![]()
Finally, there is growing evidence for a functional link between intron length and gene expression. ![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
In this article, patterns of nucleotide substitution, insertion, and deletion are analyzed for 15 introns from nine different genes across species of the D. melanogaster species subgroup. The advantage of comparing introns from within this species group is that they are divergent enough (at least 10 million years) for many changes to have occurred, yet similar enough to allow for reliable alignment. Because the phylogenetic relationship of these species is known, it is possible to classify indels as either insertions or deletions in most cases. In addition, the observed sequence changes are those that have been fixed between species and thus are changes that are positively selected, neutral, or only very slightly deleterious. The results indicate that, in general, short introns are not under greater sequence or length constraints than long introns. There is an overall indel bias toward short deletions. However, intron length is relatively well conserved across species, suggesting the selective fixation of less-frequent, longer insertions. Finally, a comparison of paralogous introns shared among duplicated genes suggests that length constraints may be intron-specific and can differ between introns within the same gene.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
Intron-containing sequences that were available from at least seven of the eight species of the D. melanogaster species subgroup (D. melanogaster, D. simulans, D. sechellia, D. mauritiana, D. yakuba, D. teissieri, D. erecta, or D. orena) were downloaded from GenBank. A recently described member of the species group, D. santomea (![]()
To construct a phylogenetic tree of the D. melanogaster species subgroup, protein-encoding sequences from a subset of the above genes for which orthologous sequences were available from the outgroup species, D. pseudoobscura, were used. The accession numbers for the D. pseudoobscura sequences are X64489 (Adh), U82556 (Amyrel), S77099 (janA and janB), and U47871 (Sod). A 50% majority-rule consensus parsimony tree based on the concatenated protein-encoding sequences was generated using PAUP* (![]()
Intron sequences were aligned using a hierarchical approach. That is, the sequences were first aligned within three subsets on the basis of their phylogenetic relationships. The subsets were: (1) D. melanogaster, D. simulans, D. sechellia, and D. mauritiana; (2) D. yakuba and D. teissieri; and (3) D. erecta and D. orena. Initial alignments were performed using ClustalX (![]()
|
|
| RESULTS |
|---|
Intron length variation in the D. melanogaster species subgroup:
The data set consists of 15 introns from nine different genes (Table 1). Of the 15 introns, 13 fall into the short-size class (average length range is 53100 bp), and 2 fall into the long-size class (average lengths are 643 and 738 bp). Consistent with previous reports (![]()
|
Comparison of nucleotide substitutions and indels:
A consensus parsimony tree of the D. melanogaster species subgroup based on the concatenated protein-encoding sequences of the Adh, Amyrel, janA, janB, and Sod genes is shown in Fig 1. These genes were chosen due to the availability of an orthologous sequence in D. pseudoobscura, which was used as an outgroup. The same general topology was produced using the concatenated intron sequences of all nine genes used in this study (not shown), although an outgroup sequence could not be used for the introns due to either the lack of an available sequence or ambiguity of alignment. There is some uncertainty as to the relationship of the species of the D. simulans complex (D. simulans, D. sechellia, and D. mauritiana). This uncertainty is likely due to shared ancestral alleles persisting in the three extant species following speciation (![]()
![]()
The "two-clade" structure of the D. melanogaster species subgroup presented in Fig 1 differs slightly from the traditionally assumed phylogeny for this group, which places D. yakuba and D. teissieri in a clade with D. melanogaster and the D. simulans complex species (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
For the entire intron data set, 972 nucleotide substitutions and 176 indels were inferred. The 13 short introns had 486 substitutions and 74 indels, while the 2 long introns had 486 substitutions and 102 indels. The difference in the substitution/indel ratio between short and long introns is significant (
2 = 3.8; P = 0.05). This difference could be due to either an increased rate of indels or a decreased rate of substitutions in long introns relative to short introns. The latter explanation is better supported by the data. Indel rates (corrected for intron length) are very similar between the short and long introns, with short introns showing 0.08 indels/bp and long introns showing 0.06 indels/bp. However, substitution rates differ significantly between the two intron classes, with 0.50 substitutions/bp in short introns and 0.31 substitutions/bp in long introns (
2 = 39.7; P < 0.001). It should be noted that the above comparison of substitution rates is conservative, due to the fact that three of the short intron sequences were available from only seven of the eight species compared in this study. The total number of substitutions inferred by parsimony from an alignment of seven sequences will necessarily be less than (or equal to) that inferred from an alignment of eight sequences. This result suggests greater selective constraint on the DNA sequence of long introns, perhaps because they contain additional regulatory sequences that are subject to purifying selection. However, this interpretation is inconsistent with the observation that conserved intronic regions with presumed regulatory function experience far fewer indels than substitutions in comparisons between D. melanogaster and D. virilis (![]()
Indel size distribution:
Of the 176 indels inferred from the intron alignments, 93 (53%) could be classified as deletions and 56 (32%) could be classified as insertions. The remaining 27 (15%) of the indels were ambiguous. This is due mainly to cases where the indels differed between the two clades within the species subgroup (Fig 1). That is, D. melanogaster, D. simulans, D. sechellia, and D. mauritiana all shared an indel not present in D. yakuba, D. teissieri, D. erecta, or D. orena. For the entire data set, there is a significant excess of deletions relative to insertions (
2 = 9.2; P = 0.002), with a deletion/insertion ratio of 1.66. This pattern holds for both the short and long intron classes. For the short introns, the deletion/insertion ratio is 1.71 (
2 = 4.5; P = 0.035); for the long introns, it is 1.63 (
2 = 4.8; P = 0.029). The above estimate is in reasonable agreement with the 1.35 deletion/insertion ratio reported for indel polymorphisms within D. melanogaster introns (![]()
The indel size distribution is also in good agreement with that observed by ![]()
Lengths of indels occurring along internal and terminal branches:
As mentioned above, 15% of the indels were classified as "ambiguous," because they could not be polarized as either insertions or deletions. It is likely, however, that many of these events represent insertions, because the total intron length is well conserved among species (Table 1) and deletions are predominant among the indels that could be classified (Table 2). In general, the ambiguous indels are longer than those that could be classified as insertions or deletions (Fig 2). The average length of the ambiguous indels is 7.22 bp, while the average length of all other indels (insertions and deletions combined) is 4.18 bp. The length difference between the two classes is highly significant (Mann-Whitney test, P = 0.008). This pattern holds for both the short and long introns: 7.11 bp for ambiguous vs. 3.57 bp for all other indels within the short introns and 7.28 bp for ambiguous vs. 4.65 bp for all other indels within the long introns. The length difference is marginally significant within both the short (Mann-Whitney test, P = 0.066) and long (Mann-Whitney test, P = 0.062) intron classes.
|
The D. melanogaster species subgroup is composed of two clades of closely related species separated by relatively long internal branches. Most of the ambiguous indels occur on these internal branches and cannot be classified as either insertions or deletions due to the lack of an appropriate outgroup sequence. However, some indels are classified as ambiguous if they overlap with other indels occurring within a particular clade. Of the 27 ambiguous indels, 24 fall into the first category (average length is 7.88 bp) and 3 fall into the second category (average length is 2.00 bp). When the indels are classified as either internal branch or terminal branch (Fig 1), there is a highly significant length difference with internal branch indels averaging 7.88 bp and the terminal branch indels averaging 4.14 bp (Mann-Whitney test, P = 0.0017). The length difference between internal branch and terminal branch indels is significant for both the short and long introns. For short introns, internal branch indels average 7.88 bp and terminal branch indels average 3.53 bp (Mann-Whitney test, P = 0.019). For long introns, internal branch indels average 7.88 bp and terminal branch indels average 4.60 bp (Mann-Whitney test, P = 0.033).
Length constraints on paralogous introns:
The janA, janB, and ocn genes arose through two separate gene duplication events, both of which predate the divergence of the D. melanogaster species subgroup (![]()
![]()
2 = 11.8; P < 0.001), indicating different rates of indel accumulation in the two introns. The difference is unlikely to be explained by indel-specific mutational differences, because the introns are only 125 bp apart within each gene and the three genes lie in tandem within a 2.5-kb region of chromosome arm 3R. Thus it appears that selective constraints with regard to indels may differ among short introns within the same gene. In the case of janA, janB, and ocn, the first paralogous intron appears to be under much stronger selective constraints to maintain length than the second.
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
A comparison of 15 orthologous intron sequences from eight species of the D. melanogaster species subgroup revealed a total of 176 indels that have occurred since the divergence of the species subgroup
10 million years ago. Of the indels that could be classified as either insertions or deletions, there was a significant excess of deletions (deletion/insertion ratio is 1.66). Furthermore, the vast majority of the indels were <10 bp in length (90% for deletions, 94% for insertions). These results are comparable to those reported by ![]()
![]()
![]()
A bias toward deletions has been observed in studies of "dead-on-arrival" non-LTR retrotransposons in the D. melanogaster and D. virilis species groups (![]()
![]()
![]()
4 to 8. The same qualitative pattern is also seen for the introns examined in this study (Table 2), although the deletion bias is not as extreme. This is likely due to the fact that introns are under constraints for proper splicing and that indel mutations that disrupt splicing and alter the protein sequence encoded by a gene will quickly be eliminated from the population by purifying selection (![]()
There is an overall bias toward deletions relative to insertions in introns (Table 2), but there is not a significant difference between deletion and insertion lengths. This suggests that, in general, introns should evolve toward shorter lengths. However, it is clear that introns maintain relatively constant lengths over evolutionary time (Table 1; ![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
The above model is supported by the observation that internal branch indels are significantly longer than terminal branch indels. The former are indels that occur on the branches separating the two major clades of the D. melanogaster species subgroup (Fig 1) and cannot be classified as either insertions or deletions due to the lack of an appropriate outgroup sequence. However, the observation that intron length is well conserved between the two clades (Table 1) and is generally well conserved between more distantly related species (![]()
![]()
![]()
The process described above should be continuous and not limited to only the internal branches of the phylogeny. However, it may be difficult to detect such an effect from the terminal branch indels, especially with a limited sample size of introns. This is because the ratchet model requires the successive fixation of multiple small deletions before a large insertion is favored by selection. The terminal branch species used in the current analysis typically differ by 5% or less in noncoding DNA sequence. Since indel rates are
1520% of substitution rates (Table 2), only one indel is likely to occur along a particular terminal branch in a short intron. Thus there is little opportunity for the ratchet process to function over relatively short time scales. It should also be noted that the model does not require that all deletions be deleterious and all insertions beneficial. Selection for (or against) indels occurs only after intron length falls below a minimum required for efficient splicing. As can be seen from Fig 2, large deletions (>10 bp) do become fixed within the short intron class. However, it is noteworthy that the three large deletions detected within this sample occur within three of the larger introns of this size class (23 bp in janA intron 2, 11 bp in janB intron 1, and 11 bp in rux).
Indels were partitioned into three categories (insertion, deletion, and ambiguous) using parsimony and assuming the relationship shown in Fig 1. This tree is strongly supported by several methods of phylogenetic reconstruction used in this article (see RESULTS) and by other recent molecular analyses (![]()
![]()
![]()
Comparison of indel rates in the paralogous introns of the janA, janB, and ocn genes indicates that the level of selective constraint on intron length may vary between introns within the same gene. Of the two paralogous introns shared among these three genes, the first shows significantly fewer length changes than the second when compared among species of the D. melanogaster species subgroup. Several observations indicate that this difference cannot be explained by different mutational processes in the two introns. First, the introns are only 125 bp apart within each gene and all three genes lie in tandem within a genomic region of 2.5 kb. It is extremely unlikely that mutation rates could vary so extensively over a very small portion of the genome. Second, the two paralogous introns show similar numbers of nucleotide substitutions among species (Table 2), suggesting equal mutation rates with respect to single base changes. Finally, a comparison of intraspecific polymorphism (which is expected to be less sensitive to weak selection than interspecific divergence) in these introns suggests equal mutation rates (![]()
Comparison of the lengths of the two introns among the three paralogous genes suggests that the difference in selective constraint most likely predates the divergence of the D. melanogaster species subgroup. Among the three genes, the first intron shows relatively little length variation, ranging from 50 bp (ocn in D. orena) to 58 bp (janA in all species). The second intron shows much greater length differences among the paralogs, ranging from 48 bp (ocn in D. sechellia) to 106 bp (janA in D. simulans and D. mauritiana). The conservation of intron length across the paralogs is surprising, given that the selective constraints on protein-encoding sequences appear to differ among the three genes. The janA, janB, and ocn genes show significant differences from each other in their nonsynonymous/synonymous substitution rates, indicating that they have likely undergone functional divergence following duplication (![]()
The observation that two short introns within the same gene are under different length constraints is difficult to explain. Could it be that intron order plays a role? Perhaps the first intron of a gene is under stronger length constraints than are subsequent introns. This possibility is not supported by the limited data that are available. Aside from janA, janB, and ocn, only one of the other genes surveyed, Adh, contains multiple short introns (considering the two short introns of the adult transcriptional unit). In Adh, the first short intron shows 10 indels and 34 substitutions, while the second short intron shows 10 indels and 45 substitutions. The difference in the indel/substitution ratio is not significant (
2 = 0.31; P = 0.58). Furthermore, the janB gene contains a 5' intron that is not present in janA or ocn (Fig 3). This intron does not appear to be under stronger length constraints than the two subsequent janB introns. The length of the first janB intron ranges from 58 bp in D. melanogaster to 69 bp in D. orena. This intron shows an indel/substitution ratio of 0.17, which is comparable to that of the third intron (0.12 indels/substitution), but much greater than that of the second intron, which is invariant in length across the entire species subgroup. Additional interspecific comparisons of paralogous and other genes containing multiple introns are needed to determine if the pattern seen in the janA, janB, and ocn genes is common. If so, it would indicate that intron-length evolution cannot be accurately modeled as a general process in which all introns within a particular size or recombination class are under the same selective constraints, but rather that unique constraints applying to individual introns must also be taken into account. Further studies of substitution and indel rates in long introns are needed to elucidate differences in selective constraint between introns of the two size classes.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
I thank Tina Hambuch, David de Lorenzo, Wolfgang Stephan, Colin Meiklejohn, and Justin Blumenstiel for constructive comments on the manuscript. This work was supported by funds from the University of Munich (LMU).
Manuscript received May 5, 2003; Accepted for publication August 11, 2003.
| LITERATURE CITED |
|---|
ASHBURNER, M., 1989 Drosophila: A Laboratory Handbook. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.
BERGMAN, C. M. and M. KREITMAN, 2001 Analysis of conserved noncoding DNA in Drosophila reveals similar constraints in intergenic and intronic sequences. Genome Res. 11:1335-1345.
BLUMENSTIEL, J. P., D. L. HARTL, and E. R. LOZOVSKY, 2002 Patterns of insertion and deletion in contrasting chromatin domains. Mol. Biol. Evol. 19:2211-2225.
CARVALHO, A. B. and A. G. CLARK, 1999 Intron size and natural selection. Nature 401:344.[Medline]
CASTILLO-DAVIS, C. I., S. L. MEKHEDOV, D. L. HARTL, E. V. KOONIN, and F. A. KONDRASHOV, 2002 Selection for short introns in highly expressed genes. Nat. Genet. 31:415-418.[Medline]
CHOI, T., M. HUANG, C. GORMAN, and R. JAENISCH, 1991 A generic intron increases gene expression in transgenic mice. Mol. Cell. Biol. 11:3070-3074.
COMERON, J. M. and M. KREITMAN, 2000 The correlation between intron length and recombination in Drosophila: dynamic equilibrium between mutational and selective forces. Genetics 156:1175-1190.
DEUTSCH, M. and M. LONG, 1999 Intron-exon structures of eukaryotic model organisms. Nucleic Acids Res. 27:3219-3228.
GRAUR, D., and W.-H. LI, 2000 Fundamentals of Molecular Evolution, Ed 2. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
HOLSTEGE, F. C., E. G. JENNINGS, J. J. WYRICK, T. I. LEE, and C. J. HENTGARTNER et al., 1998 Dissecting the regulatory circuitry of a eukaryotic genome. Cell 95:717-728.[Medline]
HUELSENBECK, J. P. and F. RONQUIST, 2001 MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogeny. Bioinformatics 17:754-755.
KLIMAN, R. M., P. ANDOLFATTO, J. A. COYNE, F. DEPAULIS, and M. KREITMAN et al., 2000 The population genetics of the origin and divergence of the Drosophila simulans complex species. Genetics 156:1913-1931.
KO, W.-Y., R. M. DAVID, and H. AKASHI, 2003 Molecular phylogeny of the Drosophila melanogaster species subgroup. J. Mol. Evol. 57:562-573.[Medline]
LACHAISE, D., M. HARRY, M. SOLIGNAC, F. LEMEUNIER, and V. BENASSI et al., 2000 Evolutionary novelties in islands: Drosophila santomea, a new melanogaster sister species from Sao Tome. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 267:1487-1495.[Medline]
LLOPART, A., J. M. COMERON, F. G. BRUNET, D. LACHAISE, and M. LONG, 2002 Intron presence-absence polymorphism in Drosophila driven by positive Darwinian selection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99:8121-8126.
LONG, M. and M. DEUTSCH, 1999 Association of intron phase with conservation at splice site sequences and evolution of spliceosomal introns. Mol. Biol. Evol. 16:1528-1534.[Abstract]
MORIYAMA, E. N., D. A. PETROV, and D. L. HARTL, 1998 Genome size and intron size in Drosophila.. Mol. Biol. Evol. 15:770-773.[Medline]
MOUNT, S. M., C. BURKS, G. HERTZ, G. D. STORMO, and O. WHITE et al., 1992 Splicing signals in Drosophila: intron size, information content, and consensus sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 20:4255-4262.
NIXON, J. E., A. WANG, H. G. MORRISON, A. G. MCARTHUR, and M. L. SOGIN et al., 2002 A spliceosomal intron in Giardia lamblia.. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99:3701-3705.
PALMITER, R. D., E. P. SANDGREN, M. R. AVARBOCK, D. D. ALLEN, and R. L. BRINSTER, 1991 Heterologous introns can enhance expression of transgenes in mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88:478-482.
PARSCH, J., C. D. MEIKLEJOHN, and D. L. HARTL, 2001a Patterns of DNA sequence variation suggest the recent action of positive selection in the janus-ocnus region of Drosophila simulans.. Genetics 159:647-657.
PARSCH, J., C. D. MEIKLEJOHN, E. HAUSCHTECK-JUNGEN, P. HUNZIKER, and D. L. HARTL, 2001b Molecular evolution of the ocnus and janus genes in the Drosophila melanogaster species subgroup. Mol. Biol. Evol. 18:801-811.
PETROV, D. A. and D. L. HARTL, 1998 High rate of DNA loss in the Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila virilis species groups. Mol. Biol. Evol. 15:293-302.[Abstract]
PETROV, D. A., E. R. LOZOVSKAYA, and D. L. HARTL, 1996 High intrinsic rate of DNA loss in Drosophila. Nature 384:346-349.[Medline]
POWELL, J. R., 1997 Progress and Prospects in Evolutionary Biology: The Drosophila Model. Oxford University Press, New York.
PTAK, S. E. and D. A. PETROV, 2002 How intron splicing affects the deletion and insertion profile in Drosophila melanogaster.. Genetics 162:1233-1244.
SCHAEFFER, S. W., 2002 Molecular population genetics of sequence length diversity in the Adh region of Drosophila pseudoobscura.. Genet. Res. 80:163-175.[Medline]
SIMPSON, A. G., E. K. MACQUARRIE, and A. J. ROGER, 2002 Eukaryotic evolution: early origin of canonical introns. Nature 419:270.[Medline]
STEPHAN, W., V. S. RODRIGUEZ, B. ZHOU, and J. PARSCH, 1994 Molecular evolution of the metallothionein gene Mtn in the melanogaster species group: results from Drosophila ananassae.. Genetics 138:135-143.[Abstract]
SWOFFORD, D. L., 2000 PAUP*: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and Other Methods), Version 4. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
THOMPSON, J. D., T. J. GIBSON, F. PLEWNIAK, F. JEANMOUGIN, and D. G. HIGGINS, 1997 The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 25:4876-4882.
TING, C. T., S. C. TSAUR, and C.-I WU, 2000 The phylogeny of closely related species as revealed by the genealogy of a speciation gene, Odysseus.. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97:5313-5316.
YANICOSTAS, C., P. FERRER, A. VINCENT, and J.-A. LEPESANT, 1995 Separate cis-regulatory sequences control expression of serendipity ß and janus A, two immediately adjacent Drosophila genes. Mol. Gen. Genet. 246:549-560.[Medline]
YU, J., Z. YANG, M. KIBUKAWA, M. PADDOCK, and D. PASSEY et al., 2002 Minimal introns are not "junk.". Genome Res. 12:1185-1189.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. S. Hughes, C. O. Buckley, and D. E. Neafsey Complex Selection on Intron Size in Cryptococcus neoformans Mol. Biol. Evol., February 1, 2008; 25(2): 247 - 253. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Xue, A. P. Rooney, M. Kajikawa, N. Okada, and W. L. Roelofs Novel sex pheromone desaturases in the genomes of corn borers generated through gene duplication and retroposon fusion PNAS, March 13, 2007; 104(11): 4467 - 4472. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. C. Presgraves Intron Length Evolution in Drosophila Mol. Biol. Evol., November 1, 2006; 23(11): 2203 - 2213. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Xie, C. Wu, and L. Xiong Genomic Organization, Differential Expression, and Interaction of SQUAMOSA Promoter-Binding-Like Transcription Factors and microRNA156 in Rice Plant Physiology, September 1, 2006; 142(1): 280 - 293. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Dupanloup and H. Kaessmann Evolutionary simulations to detect functional lineage-specific genes Bioinformatics, August 1, 2006; 22(15): 1815 - 1822. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. L. Halligan and P. D. Keightley Ubiquitous selective constraints in the Drosophila genome revealed by a genome-wide interspecies comparison Genome Res., July 1, 2006; 16(7): 875 - 884. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. J. Begun, H. A. Lindfors, M. E. Thompson, and A. K. Holloway Recently Evolved Genes Identified From Drosophila yakuba and D. erecta Accessory Gland Expressed Sequence Tags Genetics, March 1, 2006; 172(3): 1675 - 1681. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Akashi, W.-Y. Ko, S. Piao, A. John, P. Goel, C.-F. Lin, and A. P. Vitins Molecular Evolution in the Drosophila melanogaster Species Subgroup: Frequent Parameter Fluctuations on the Timescale of Molecular Divergence Genetics, March 1, 2006; 172(3): 1711 - 1726. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Boulesteix, M. Weiss, and C. Biemont Differences in Genome Size Between Closely Related Species: The Drosophila melanogaster Species Subgroup Mol. Biol. Evol., January 1, 2006; 23(1): 162 - 167. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. J. Begun and H. A. Lindfors Rapid Evolution of Genomic Acp Complement in the melanogaster Subgroup of Drosophila Mol. Biol. Evol., October 1, 2005; 22(10): 2010 - 2021. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Llopart, D. Lachaise, and J. A. Coyne Multilocus Analysis of Introgression Between Two Sympatric Sister Species of Drosophila: Drosophila yakuba and D. santomea Genetics, September 1, 2005; 171(1): 197 - 210. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Ometto, W. Stephan, and D. De Lorenzo Insertion/Deletion and Nucleotide Polymorphism Data Reveal Constraints in Drosophila melanogaster Introns and Intergenic Regions Genetics, March 1, 2005; 169(3): 1521 - 1527. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
|








