- THIS ARTICLE
-
Abstract
- Full Text (PDF)
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Richman, A. D.
- Articles by Nash, D.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Richman, A. D.
- Articles by Nash, D.
Evolution of MHC Class II Eß Diversity Within the Genus Peromyscus
Adam D. Richmana, L. Gerardo Herrerab, and Deanna Nashaa Plant Sciences Department, Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana 59717
b Department of Zoology, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Instituto de Biología, 04510 México D.F., México
Corresponding author: Adam D. Richman, 119 AgBioScience Bldg., Montana State University, Bozeman, MT 59717., arichman{at}montana.edu (E-mail)
Communicating editor: N. TAKAHATA
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
Progress in understanding the evolution of variation at the MHC has been slowed by an inability to assess the relative roles of mutation vs. intragenic recombination in contributing to observed polymorphism. Recent theoretical advances now permit a quantitative treatment of the problem, with the result that the amount of recombination is at least an order of magnitude greater than that of mutation in the history of class II genes. We suggest that this insight allows progress in evaluating the importance of other factors affecting the evolution of the MHC. We investigated the evolution of MHC class II Eß sequence diversity in the genus Peromyscus. We find evidence for extensive recombination in the history of these sequences. Nevertheless, it appears that intragenic recombination alone is insufficient to account for evolution of MHC diversity in Peromyscus. Significant differences in silent variation among subgenera arose over a relatively short period of time, with little subsequent change. We argue that these observations are consistent with the effects of historical population bottleneck(s). Population restrictions may explain general features of MHC evolution, including the large amount of recombination in the history of MHC genes, because intragenic recombination may efficiently regenerate allelic polymorphism following a population constriction.
THE class I and II molecules of the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) responsible for antigen presentation to T-cells are characteristically extremely polymorphic within populations. This variation is believed to be maintained by selection for resistance to pathogens evolving to avoid presentation by MHC molecules (and thereby escape detection by the host immune system; ![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
The relative importance of different mechanisms responsible for generating extensive allelic polymorphism at the MHC has been a contentious issue. Although site variation must arise as de novo mutations, intragenic recombination can generate novel sequences with potentially altered antigen-binding properties. If intragenic recombination is sufficiently frequent, it may be the predominant source of allelic polymorphism (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Recent theoretical advances now permit a quantitative approach to the problem (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Here we present an analysis of comparative data on MHC diversity and allelic polymorphism among a group of closely related rodent species in the genus Peromyscus. We find evidence for extensive recombination in the history of these sequences and show that apparent reciprocal monophyly of MHC polymorphism among subgenera is an artifact of intragenic recombination. However, it appears that intragenic recombination alone is not sufficient to explain the evolution of MHC diversity in Peromyscus. There are large and significant differences in the amount of silent variation among, but not within, subgenera that arose in a relatively short period of time preceding diversification within the subgenera, consistent with the effects of one or more historical population bottleneck(s). More generally, we propose that the interaction of demography and intragenic recombination may explain several puzzling observations on the evolution of MHC diversity, because the recovery of MHC polymorphism following a population bottleneck may differ greatly from the original process of allelic diversification.
| METHODS |
|---|
Sample collections:
Peromyscus maniculatus and P. eremicus were live trapped along a single 400-m transect at San Quintin, Baja California Norte, Mexico. Animals were anesthetized and killed, and spleen and liver tissue samples were removed and immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen. Tissue samples of P. leucopus and P. californicus were furnished by the Peromyscus Stock Center (http://stkctr.biol.sc.edu/).
Sequence acquisition:
MHC class II ß sequences were obtained by reverse transcriptase (RT)-PCR from spleen cDNAs, using locus-specific primers to amplify a sequence spanning most of exon 2 and including the entirety of the PBR. We have previously shown that our methods amplify single-locus variation in Peromyscus (![]()
![]()
Estimates of recombination, mutation, and selection:
Estimates of population recombination (
= 4Nr) from a set of aligned sequences were obtained using the composite-likelihood (CLE) method (![]()
![]()
= 4Nµ), obtained using the finite-series Watterson estimator. Rate variation among sites is not considered in the likelihood model used to estimate recombination, and the method therefore attempts to control for such variation by restricting analysis to those sites showing variation for two alternative alleles, where the frequency of the alternative allele is at least 0.20. Finally, the method-likelihood model used by LDhat to estimate
also does not include selection. The performance of LDhat with respect to estimating
for sequences evolving under balancing selection was evaluated by computer simulation (A. D. RICHMAN, L. G. HERRERA, D. NASH and M. L. SCHIERUP, unpublished results). These simulation results indicate that LDhat does not yield biased estimates of
and
even given the very large amounts of recombination and mutation inferred in the present study.
The amount of population selection (S) was estimated as

(![]()
is the intensity of selection, estimated as the ratio of the average nonsynonymous substitutions per nonsynonymous site to the number of synonymous substitutions per synonymous site (Kn/Ks) for recently diverged pairs of alleles. The latter estimate of
is necessitated by extensive saturation of nonsynonymous sites in the PBR for highly divergent allelic comparisons. It was not possible to obtain estimates of S for P. californicus or P. leucopus due to limited samples that did not permit estimation of
. Estimates of S are not strictly comparable to those presented by ![]()
Pairwise statistics:
A hierarchical analysis of sequence variation within and among subgenera (see Fig 1) was performed using AMOVA, implemented in Arlequin (![]()
|
The proportional amounts of substitution at silent (ps) and nonsilent (pn) sites were estimated using the method of ![]()
![]()
![]()
Genealogical analyses:
The (unrooted) genealogy for Eß sequences was obtained using the minimum evolution method implemented in PAUP* (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
| RESULTS |
|---|
Allelic polymorphism:
A total of 14 class II Eß alleles were identified in P. eremicus (20 individuals and 37 chromosomes examined), compared to 16 alleles in P. maniculatus (22 individuals and 41 chromosomes examined; ![]()
Estimates of recombination, mutation, and selection:
Estimates of population recombination (
) are large for all Peromyscus taxa, exceeding the maximum amount of recombination evaluated (Table 1). Other methods for detecting recombination find similarly abundant evidence for recombination in these sequences (![]()
and
greatly exceed estimates for nuclear genes not experiencing balancing selection (![]()
greatly exceeds that of
for all taxa, indicating that the amount of recombination per base pair greatly exceeds that of mutation in the history of MHC variation.
|
Estimates of population selection (S) indicate as expected that selection is the most important factor in accounting for observed MHC diversity within species (Table 1). Estimates of the intensity of selection (
) are similarly high in P. maniculatus and P. eremicus (5.7 and 5.9, respectively), indicating strong balancing selection. Differences in S are therefore largely due to differences in the average number of nonsynonymous substitutions at PBR sites (17.3 and 13.8, respectively, for P. maniculatus and P. eremicus).
Extensive recombination detected, inferred in our study, has implications for estimates of S, which does not include the effects of recombination. Although the estimate of
is not sensitive to recombination (![]()
![]()
Hierarchical AMOVA:
The majority of all variation (57%) is found at the sites of the PBR, which account for just 24 of the 99 (amino acid) sites in the analysis, and nearly 80% of all PBR variation is found within species (Table 2). Non-PBR sites show a similar pattern, with the overall result that most sequence variation is found within rather than among species, accounting for 72.5% of all site variation.
|
Despite the fact that the large majority of variation is found within rather than among species, there is nevertheless significant structuring of sequence variation at all hierarchical levels, for both PBR and non-PBR sites. There is also a consistent difference in the amount of structure between PBR and non-PBR sites, with PBR sites showing more limited structure at all levels (Table 2).
Nonsynonymous and synonymous substitution:
There are significant differences in the amount of average pairwise silent sequence variation among, but not within, subgenera (Table 3). P. eremicus and P. californicus (subgenus Haplomylomys) show significantly reduced synonymous variation at both PBR and non-PBR sites compared to P. maniculatus and P. leucopus (subgenus Peromyscus). There is no similar trend for differences among the subgenera in nonsynonymous variation, at either PBR or non-PBR sites.
|
Genealogical analyses:
The unrooted genealogy for Peromyscus Eß sequences indicates complete reciprocal monophyly among Peromyscus subgenera, with high bootstrap support (Fig 2). A similar topology was obtained using only synonymous pairwise distances (Fig 3). The position of the root is not shown because its position is uncertain. A root is not required to infer complete monophyly of Eß polymorphism in at least one of the subgenera.
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
Inference of complete allelic turnover is artifactual:
Genealogical analysis indicates reciprocal monophyly of Eß sequences among Peromyscus subgenera, suggesting independent derivation of MHC variation in one or both taxa (Fig 2). However, this result appears to be an artifact of extensive recombination in the history of these sequences. If all variation within one or both subgenera were independently derived, this predicts extensive differences among the subgenera at degenerate sites at shared amino acid polymorphism. In fact, just 1 of 19 polymorphic amino acid positions shared among at least three species (Fig 1) shows variation consistent with this expectation. For the remaining 18 sites where all taxa share identical codon usage, we determined the probability of this observation assuming independent derivation of shared polymorphisms, using the frequency of usage for alternative codons for all taxa. This procedure requires identifying which polymorphism represents the derived state for each site; we chose the polymorphism with the lowest probability of independent derivation as the ancestral state, a very conservative approach. The resulting probability is nevertheless extremely small (P < 0.0001). We conclude that significant evidence for abundant ancestral shared polymorphism contradicts the inference from genealogical analysis.
The preceding argument indicates that extensive recombination has grossly affected inference of the allelic genealogy. In fact, the amounts of recombination estimated here (Table 1; see also A. D. RICHMAN, L. G. HERRERA, D. NASH and M. L. SCHIERUP, unpublished results) well exceed those inferred in a previous study of recombination at the MHC (![]()
indirectly, from distortion of the shape of the allelic genealogy (![]()
![]()
> 1. Here we estimate
> 100 for all taxa, suggesting that the sites of balancing selection will in fact exhibit significantly increased variability. This of course is in accord with our results, given that sites of the PBR show conspicuously higher levels of substitution compared to other sites within exon 2 (Table 3).
Despite evidence for extensive intragenic recombination in the history of Peromyscus taxa, this process alone appears insufficient to account for the evolution of sequence differences among Peromyscus subgenera. If recombination alone were responsible for the observation of reciprocal monophyly of Eß sequence polymorphism among the subgenera, we would expect to observe a similar pattern of lineage sorting within the subgenera as well. The species within subgenera diverged
3.5 and 4 MYA (Fig 4) and therefore have been evolving in isolation for a total of 7 and 8 million years. Nevertheless, species within subgenera do not show reciprocal monophyly for Eß sequences (Fig 2). By contrast, the sequence differences responsible for the inference of reciprocal monophyly among the subgenera arose within the period preceding speciation within the subgenera, a total of
5.5 million years (Fig 4). It appears that importance of intragenic recombination in homogenizing MHC variation has varied over time, with its effects more pronounced in the period preceding diversification of species within the subgenera compared to more recently.
|
Evolutionary change in MHC sequences was apparently much more rapid during the period preceding diversification of species within the subgenera compared to more recently. Large, significant differences in silent diversity among but not within subgenera (Table 3) are due almost entirely to variation shared between species within the subgenera, indicating these differences are ancestral; estimates of silent diversity are little affected by removal of site variation found in single species (not shown). Differences in silent variation among the subgenera must therefore have arisen in the period preceding speciation within the subgenera, a short period of time (5.5 million years) compared to the total divergence time of species within the subgenera (15 million years). Comparing differences in PBR silent diversity within vs. among subgenera (Table 3), minimally 10 times the amount of change occurred between vs. within the subgenera, in little more than one-third the time, suggesting a difference in evolutionary rate within vs. among subgenera of
27-fold. A similar argument can be made regarding the evolution of nonsilent fixed differences, which are largely responsible for the inference of reciprocal monophyly of Eß polymorphism among subgenera. The three fixed amino acid differences observed between the subgenera must have arisen prior to diversification of the subgenera. This suggests that about eight to nine fixed differences should be observed within the subgenera, but none are observed (Fig 1).
One possible explanation for variation in the rate of evolution over time is that interspecific hybridization resulting in extensive introgression at the Eß locus within but not among the subgenera caused an apparent reduction in the rate of evolution more recently, by reintroducing variation that had become fixed in different species. This explanation requires that extensive introgression occurred relatively recently within both subgenera; otherwise there would be an expected accumulation of fixed differences in the subgenera comparable to that observed among the subgenera. The conspicuous difference in the amount of shared lineages among vs. within subgenera (see Fig 2) also suggests that introgression would have to have occurred relatively recently. However, there is no evidence for recent introgression at the MHC Eß locus in either subgenus, as indicated by the very large differences among alleles found in different species. Most importantly, a hypothesis of hybridization within subgenera cannot explain the evolution of large differences in the amount of genetic variation among the subgenera (Table 2 and Table 3).
In contrast to the preceding hypothesis of interspecific hybridization, directional selection could account for accelerated evolution of Eß sequences among the subgenera. However, we argue that this explanation is implausible given abundant evidence of balancing selection in the history of these sequences (Table 1). Balancing selection would oppose the decrease in variation due to directional selection. The large reduction in silent variation among subgenera suggests that directional selection would have to be both strong enough to overwhelm balancing selection (![]()
A more likely explanation for rapid evolution of the MHC in Peromyscus is an event for which there is ample precedent, an historic change in effective population size resulting in a significant reduction in MHC polymorphism (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
To explain our result that the importance of intragenic recombination has varied over time, we propose that demographic history modulates the importance of intragenic recombination at the MHC. All else being equal, the selective advantage of a novel allelic specificity under balancing selection is an inverse function of the number of alleles maintained in a population. This means that the relative selective advantage of a novel specificity arising given limited polymorphism resulting from a population bottleneck is greater than that of a new specificity arising under equilibrium conditions. Therefore the effective rate of incorporation of these new alleles will vary as a function of the strength of selection for new allelic specificities, which in turn is a function of the demographic history of the population. If new specificities arise partly or mainly as a result of intragenic recombination, the (effective) rate of recombination will also vary as a function of the demographic history of the population.
The proposed interaction between recombination and population bottlenecks may explain the relatively large variation in the amount of silent diversity at MHC genes among closely related taxa (Table 3). As described above, silent variation, which is not the direct target of balancing selection, is both less likely to be sampled during a bottleneck event and less likely to be evenly redistributed during recovery of MHC polymorphism, compared to selected variation. Other studies of MHC polymorphism provide empirical support for this hypothesis. Madagascan lemurs are believed to have undergone a severe bottleneck in MHC diversity as a result of overwater colonization and show a significant reduction in silent polymorphism at MHC class II DRB genes compared to chimps (![]()
![]()
![]()
A conspicuous result in this study is the very large amount of recombination compared to mutation in the history of samples of MHC polymorphism. Although it is possible that the recombination rate is simply higher than the mutation rate, we suggest that an additional contributing factor may be a selective advantage for novel intragenic recombinants under balancing selection at the MHC. One possibility is that intragenic recombination is more likely than de novo mutation to generate allelic sequences that differ by multiple substitutions from other allelic sequences already represented in the population. If this translates into an altered spectrum of antigens presented to T-cells, novel intragenic recombinants may be more likely to be selected for as a result (![]()
![]()
An alternative explanation for apparent high rates of recombination at class II genes is a site-specific signal for recombination (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
In conclusion, we have proposed that population bottleneck(s) is responsible for both rapid evolutionary change and an episodic increase in the effective rate of recombination at the MHC class II Eß gene in Peromyscus. Conversely, the rate of evolutionary change and recombination may be relatively slow given extensive polymorphism at the MHC maintained in the absence of demographic constrictions, because of the reduced selective advantage of novel allelic specificities. The persistence of historical differences in MHC diversity among Peromyscus subgenera over millions of generations is consistent with this latter expectation, suggesting that demographic constrictions are rare event(s) in the history of Peromyscus taxa. More generally, the persistence of historical differences in MHC diversity for millions of years indicates that MHC variation is far from being an ahistorical document overwritten by repeated intragenic recombination events. We suggest that the task now is to determine how best to read this historical record, taking into account quantitative estimates of intragenic recombination.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
The authors thank the following for research and/or collecting permission: The Secretary of Foreign Relations of Mexico (Permit DAN 02578); the Secretary of Environment, Natural Resources, and Fisheries of Mexico (Permit DOO 02.5075); and the U.S. Forest Service (Permit CHIS-98-011). We thank Angelica Narvaez of the Office of the Environment, Science, and Technology Affairs in the U.S. Embassy in Mexico City for logistical assistance; and M. Schierup and Y. Satta for comments. Grant support from the U.S. National Science Foundation and National Geographic Society is gratefully acknowledged.
Manuscript received August 15, 2002; Accepted for publication February 5, 2003.
| LITERATURE CITED |
|---|
BERGSTROM, T. F., A. JOSEFSSON, H. A. ERLICH, and U. GYLLENSTEN, 1998 Recent origin of HLA-DRB1 alleles and implications for human evolution. Nat. Genet. 18:237-242.[Medline]
BROWN, J. H., T. S. JARDETZKY, J. C. GORGA, L. J. STERN, and R. G. URBAN et al., 1993 Three-dimensional structure of the human class II histocompatibility antigen HLA-DR1. Nature 364:33-39.[Medline]
DOHERTY, P. C. and R. M. ZINKERNAGEL, 1975 Enhanced immunological surveillance in mice heterozygous at the H-2 gene complex. Nature 256:50-52.[Medline]
EDWARDS, S. V., K. CHESNUT, Y. SATTA, and E. K. WAKELAND, 1997 Ancestral polymorphism of Mhc class II genes in mice: implications for balancing selection and the mammalian molecular clock. Genetics 146:655-668.[Abstract]
ELLEGREN, H., G. HARTMAN, M. JOHANSSON, and L. ANDERSSON, 1993 Major histocompatibility complex monomorphism and low levels of DNA fingerprinting variability in a reintroduced and rapidly expanding population of beavers. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90:8150-8153.
ENGEL, S. R., K. M. HOGAN, J. F. TAYLOR, and S. K. DAVIS, 1998 Molecular systematics and paleobiogeography of the South American sigmodontine rodents. Mol. Biol. Evol. 15:35-49.[Abstract]
FEARNHEAD, P. and P. DONNELLY, 2001 Estimating recombination rates from population genetic data. Genetics 159:1299-1318.
FELSENSTEIN, J., 1996 PHYLIP (Phylogeny Inference Package). Department of Genetics, University of Washington, Seattle.
GO, Y., Y. SATTA, Y. KAWAMOTO, G. RAKOTOARISOA, and A. RANDRIANJAFY et al., 2002 Mhc-DRB genes evolution in lemurs. Immunogenetics 54:403-417.[Medline]
GYLLENSTEN, U. B., M. SUNDVALL, and H. A. ERLICH, 1991 Allelic diversity is generated by intraexon sequence exchange at the DRB1 locus of primates. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88:3686-3690.
HASEGAWA, M., H. KISHINO, and T. YANO, 1987 Man's place in Hominoidea as inferred from molecular clocks of DNA. J. Mol. Evol. 26:132-147.[Medline]
HEDRICK, P. W., K. M. PARKER, G. A. GUTIERREZ-ESPELETA, A. RATTINK, and K. LIEVERS, 2000 Major histocompatibility complex variation in the Arabian oryx. Evol. Int. J. Org. Evol. 54:2145-2151.
HUDSON, R. R., 2002 Two-locus sampling distributions and their application. Genetics 160:1231-1241.
HUGHES, A. L. and M. YEAGER, 1998 Natural selection at major histocompatibility complex loci of vertebrates. Annu. Rev. Genet. 32:415-435.[Medline]
KLEIN, J., Y. SATTA, N. TAKAHATA, and C. O'HUIGIN, 1993 Trans-specific Mhc polymorphism and the origin of species in primates. J. Med. Primatol. 22:57-64.[Medline]
KUMAR, S., K. TAMURA, I. B. JAKOBSEN, and M. NEI, 2001 MEGA2: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis software. Bioinformatics 17:1244-1245.
MCVEAN, G. A. T., P. AWADALLA, and P. FEARNHEAD, 2001 A coalescent-based method for detecting recombination from gene sequences. Genetics 160:1231-1241.
MIKKO, S. and L. ANDERSSON, 1995 Low major histocompatibility complex class II diversity in European and North American moose. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92:4259-4263.
MIKKO, S., K. ROED, S. SCHMUTZ, and L. ANDERSSON, 1999 Monomorphism and polymorphism at Mhc DRB loci in domestic and wild ruminants. Immunol. Rev. 167:169-178.[Medline]
NEI, M. and T. GOJOBORI, 1986 Simple methods for estimating the numbers of synonymous and nonsynonymous substitutions. Mol. Biol. Evol. 3:418-426.[Abstract]
O'BRIEN, S. J. and N. YUHKI, 1999 Comparative genome organization of the major histocompatibility complex: lessons from the Felidae. Immunol. Rev. 167:133-144.[Medline]
RICHMAN, A. D., G. HERRERA, and D. NASH, 2001 MHC class II beta sequence diversity in the deermouse (Peromyscus maniculatus): implications for models of balancing selection. Mol. Ecol. 10:2765-2773.[Medline]
RICHMAN, A. D., G. HERRERA, and D. NASH, 2002 Characterization of Peromyscus MHC Class II beta sequences by LA RT-PCR and DGGE. Eur. J. Immunogenet. 29:213-217.[Medline]
RICHMAN, A. D., L. G. HERRERA, D. NASH, and M. SCHIERUP, 2003 Relative roles of mutation vs. recombination in generating allelic polymorphism at an MHC class II locus in Peromyscus maniculatus. Genet. Res. in press.
RIDDLE, B. R., D. J. HAFNER, and L. F. ALEXANDER, 2000 Phylogeography and systematics of the Peromyscus eremicus species group and the historical biogeography of North American warm regional deserts. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 17:145-160.[Medline]
SATTA, Y., 1997 Effects of intra-locus recombination of HLA polymorphism. Hereditas 127:105-112.[Medline]
SATTA, Y., C. O'HUIGIN, N. TAKAHATA, and J. KLEIN, 1994 Intensity of natural selection at the major histocompatibility complex loci. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91:7184-7188.
SATTA, Y., H. KUPFERMANN, Y. J. LI, and N. TAKAHATA, 1999 Molecular clock and recombination in primate Mhc genes. Immunol. Rev. 167:367-379.[Medline]
SCHIERUP, M. H., A. M. MIKKELSEN, and J. HEIN, 2001 Recombination, balancing selection and phylogenies in MHC and self-incompatibility genes. Genetics 159:1833-1844.
SCHNEIDER, S., D. ROESSLI and L. EXCOFFIER, 2001 Arlequin: A Software for Population Genetics Analysis. Genetics and Biometry Laboratory, University of Geneva, Geneva.
SWOFFORD, D. L., 1998 Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and Other Methods). Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
TAKAHATA, N., 1995 MHC diversity and selection. Immunol. Rev. 143:225-247.[Medline]
TAKAHATA, N. and M. NEI, 1990 Allelic genealogy under overdominant and frequency-dependent selection and polymorphism of major histocompatibility complex loci. Genetics 124:967-978.[Abstract]
TAKAHATA, N. and Y. SATTA, 1998a Improbable truth in human MHC diversity? Nat. Genet. 18:204-206.[Medline]
TAKAHATA, N. and Y. SATTA, 1998b Selection, convergence, and intragenic recombination in HLA diversity. Genetica 102(103):157-169.
TAKAHATA, N., Y. SATTA, and J. KLEIN, 1992 Polymorphism and balancing selection at major histocompatibility complex loci. Genetics 130:925-938.[Abstract]
UYENOYAMA, M. K., 1997 Genealogical structure among alleles regulating self-incompatibilty in natural populations of flowering plants. Genetics 147:1389-1400.[Abstract]
VAN DER WALT, J. M., L. H. NEL, and A. R. HOELZEL, 2001 Characterization of major histocompatibility complex DRB diversity in the endemic South African antelope Damaliscus pygargus: a comparison in two subspecies with different demographic histories. Mol. Ecol. 10:1679-1688.[Medline]
VINCEK, V., C. O'HUIGIN, Y. SATTA, N. TAKAHATA, and P. T. BOAG et al., 1997 How large was the founding population of Darwin's finches? Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B 264:111-118.
- THIS ARTICLE
-
Abstract
- Full Text (PDF)
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Richman, A. D.
- Articles by Nash, D.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Richman, A. D.
- Articles by Nash, D.


50% are indicated.
