- THIS ARTICLE
-
Abstract
- Full Text (PDF)
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Anderson, J. B.
- Articles by Kohn, L. M.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Anderson, J. B.
- Articles by Kohn, L. M.
Mode of Selection and Experimental Evolution of Antifungal Drug Resistance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
James B. Andersona, Caroline Sirjusingha, Ainslie B. Parsonsb, Charles Booneb, Claire Wickensa, Leah E. Cowena, and Linda M. Kohnaa Department of Botany, University of Toronto, Mississauga, Ontario L5L 1C6, Canada
b University of Toronto, Banting and Best Department of Medical Research, Toronto, Ontario M5G 1L6, Canada
Corresponding author: James B. Anderson, University of Toronto, 3359 Mississauga Rd., North Mississauga, ON L5L 1C6, Canada., janderso{at}utm.utoronto.ca (E-mail)
Communicating editor: A. P. MITCHELL
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
We show that mode of selection, degree of dominance of mutations, and ploidy are determining factors in the evolution of resistance to the antifungal drug fluconazole in yeast. In experiment 1, yeast populations were subjected to a stepwise increase in fluconazole concentration over 400 generations. Under this regimen, two mutations in the same two chromosomal regions rose to high frequency in parallel in three replicate populations. These mutations were semidominant and additive in their effect on resistance. The first of these mutations mapped to PDR1 and resulted in the overexpression of the ABC transporter genes PDR5 and SNQ2. These mutations had an unexpected pleiotropic effect of reducing the residual ability of the wild type to reproduce at the highest concentrations of fluconazole. In experiment 2, yeast populations were subjected to a single high concentration of fluconazole. Under this regimen, a single recessive mutation appeared in each of three replicate populations. In a genome-wide screen of
4700 viable deletion strains, 13 were classified as resistant to fluconazole (ERG3, ERG6, YMR102C, YMR099C, YPL056C, ERG28, OSH1, SCS2, CKA2, SML1, YBR147W, YGR283C, and YLR407W). The mutations in experiment 2 all mapped to ERG3 and resulted in the overexpression of the gene encoding the drug target ERG11, but not PDR5 and SNQ2. Diploid hybrids from experiments 1 and 2 were less fit than the parents in the presence of fluconazole. In a variation of experiment 2, haploids showed a higher frequency of resistance than diploids, suggesting that degree of dominance and ploidy are important factors in the evolution of antifungal drug resistance.
RESISTANCE to antimicrobial agents enters microbial populations through mutation or immigration. Resistant genotypes then increase in frequency in response to the natural selection imposed by the presence of the drug. The key determinant of whether resistance spreads and persists in a population is the fitness of these resistant genotypes in the presence and in the absence of an antimicrobial agent (![]()
![]()
For controlling pathogenic fungi, only a small number of different kinds of antifungal drugs are available (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Much of what is known about antifungal drug resistance comes from studies of the yeast Candida albicans, a widespread commensal and important pathogen of humans. In C. albicans, ![]()
106 cells per daily batch transfer, and to the random nature of mutation availability. In smaller populations, the random nature of the various possible mutations for resistance is expected to lend more of an element of chance to the outcome than it does in larger populations in which mutations are more available and selection is more efficient, resulting in more frequent fixation of the fittest genotypes.
In recent studies, we characterized the two divergent programs of adaptation to the presence of FLC in C. albicans (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
In addition to their different patterns of gene expression, the two programs of adaptation in C. albicans had markedly different fitness profiles. The first program, which included overexpression of CDR1 and CRD2, was associated with extremely high fitness both in the presence and in the absence of FLC (![]()
![]()
Although the phenotypic attributes of drug resistance in C. albicans are well studied, genetic analysis is hampered by the inability to make meiotic crosses. In this study, we turned to Saccharomyces cerevisiae, a yeast relatively closely related to C. albicans, but with well-established methods for molecular genetics and functional genomics. Our goal was to test the hypothesis that the mode of selection to which populations are exposed determines the evolution of resistance in experimental populations. Two modes of selection were used in this study: in experiment 1, yeast populations were subjected to a stepwise increase in FLC concentration from low to high over 400 generations; in experiment 2, yeast populations were subjected at the outset to a high concentration of FLC.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
Strains:
The progenitor of all experiments was a prototrophic MATa strain derived from a cross of two strains ("FY69," MATa leu2
GAL2, ATCC 90842 and "S288C-ura3," MAT
ura3, ATCC 90842) closely related to the laboratory standard S288C. The entire URA3 open reading frame (ORF) of this strain was replaced with the KanMX4 cassette flanked by two unique 20-nucleotide bar codes to create five uniquely tagged strains. The PCR primers used to prepare the transforming DNA from plasmid pFA6a-KanMX4 (![]()
![]()
|
Tests of minimum inhibitory concentration of FLC:
These tests were constructed and interpreted according to standard protocol (NATIONAL COMMITTEE FOR CLINICAL LABORATORY STANDARDS 1997) except that 0.5x yeast peptone dextrose (YPD; ![]()
Contamination checks and fitness assays:
With the possibility of uniform evolutionary trajectories of adaptation, it was important to rule out cross-contamination among the replicate populations. The unique tags were used to confirm identity throughout each experiment; no contamination was observed and each tag appeared where expected without exception. The tags were also used as a means for quantifying fitness, or reproductive output, by measuring change in the proportion of strains in mixed cultures over time. To measure fitness, a segment of the URA3 region in the replacement strains was amplified from genomic DNA from mixed cultures with primers AGAAGGTTAATGTGGCTGTGG and GCCATCAAAATGTATGGATGC. Amplicons of 525 bp, which included 279 bp of the remaining URA3 region and 246 bp of KanMX4, were transferred to nylon membranes by capillary blotting and were then probed in succession with 32P-end-labeled oligonucleotides complementary to the tagged regions, as well as with one oligonucleotide complementary to an invariant region within the KanMX4 replacement. There was no detectable cross-hybridization among the tag sequences. Signal intensity was measured with a phosphorimager with appropriate background subtraction (background was usually <1% of the signal). Exposures were timed to yield signals <5% of the saturation capacity of the phosphor screen.
For each strain in a mixed culture, the number of doublings was calculated as log2(Rf x Df/Ri x Di), where Rf is the ratio of the signal for the tag to the signal for the invariant probe at the end of the incubation and Ri is the corresponding ratio at the beginning of a batch culture. Df is the optical density (530 nm) at the end of the incubation and Di is the optical density at the beginning. For pairs of tagged strains, calibrations were constructed by diluting one stationary-phase culture in six twofold increments into another culture and vice versa. For each tagged strain, the ratio of the signal for the tag to the invariant probe was plotted as a function of the proportion of the strain in the mixed culture. The mean R2 for all calibrations was 0.99.
At each time point of experiment 1, cells from the -80° archive were streaked out on YPD agar and a single colony was used to establish a 10-ml overnight culture. The rationale for choosing single colonies, rather than mass cultures, for fitness assays was that resistance evolved rapidly in experiment 1, most likely resulting in near fixation of the fittest genotype. The fitness of each strain was measured relative to the progenitor at 0, 16, 32, 64, and 128 µg/ml FLC by mixing stationary cultures of P1 ("P" means progenitor; the number indicates the tag), D2, D3, and D4 ("D" means propagated in increasing concentrations of the drug; the number indicates the tag) in the proportions 0.50, 0.17, 0.17, and 0.17, respectively. These mixtures were propagated in two successive batch cultures of 0.5x YPD with 100-fold dilution at the time of transfer. The number of cell doublings over each daily increment was summed for the total period. The other fitness tests were done in exactly the same way except that strains were mixed in equal proportions in pairs. In some of the tests, the progenitor strain was P5 ("P" means progenitor; the number indicates the tag).
Construction of hybrid diploids and isolation of tetrads:
The progenitors P1 and P5 and the evolved lines D2, D3, and D4 at generation 400 were diploidized by transforming with URA3-based plasmid pCY709, which contains the HO gene under its own promoter. Transformants were cultured overnight in medium without uracil and then colonies that had lost the plasmid were identified on medium with 5-FOA (![]()
diploidy was confirmed by the criteria of lack of ability to mate, ability to sporulate, and increased cell size relative to haploids. Diploid strains were allowed to sporulate and tetrads of spores were isolated by the standard method (![]()
Quantification of mRNA transcripts:
Northern hybridizations were used to quantify mRNA levels corresponding to PDR5, SNQ2, FLR1, and ERG11 relative to a standard, YEF3, and were performed exactly as described by ![]()
Genome-wide screen for fluconazole resistance:
Approximately 4700 MATa haploid deletion strains from the S. cerevisiae deletion consortium were maintained in an ordered array on 16 single-well agar plates of 86 x 128 mm at a density of 768 strains per plate (384 individual strains in duplicate). Strains were robotically pinned onto 0.5x YPD + adenine medium containing 64 µg/ml FLC and incubated at 30° for 2 days. Strains viable at this drug concentration were identified as putative suppressors of fluconazole sensitivity. Resistant strains were individually confirmed with spot assays; four 10-fold serial dilutions starting at OD = 1 were spotted onto media containing 64 µg/ml FLC and growth was compared to a wild-type control after 2 days at 30°. Strains that grew on the FLC plates at all dilutions were classified as "strongly resistant," strains that grew only when OD > 0.01 were classified as "moderately resistant," and strains that grew only at OD = 1 were classified as "mildly resistant." Strains not growing at any dilutions were classified as "not resistant."
Construction of isogenic MATa/a and MAT
/
diploids:
Recovery of diploids homozygous for mating type followed the procedure of ![]()
diploid (P1) was transformed with pGAL1-HO and transformants were grown overnight in rich medium containing galactose as a carbon source. Colonies that had lost pGAL1-HO were identified on medium with 5-FOA. Colonies that secreted either pheromone were located by replica plating to medium containing cells highly sensitive to one or the other pheromone (strains SY2014, MAT
ste3
306::LEU2 sst2
and SY2625, MATa bar1
). Colonies secreting pheromone were identified by the presence of a halo of growth inhibition in the background cells. The putative homozygous diploids did not sporulate and had cell volumes greater than those of the haploids.
| RESULTS |
|---|
Experiment 1:
Mutation and fitness:
Three haploid MATa-tagged strains, D2, D3, and D4, were propagated separately in 10-ml batch cultures of 0.5x YPD, with daily transfer of 0.1 ml of the stationary-phase culture to 9.9 ml of fresh medium for an average of 6.6 generations per day. The concentration of FLC was 16 µg/ml for the first 100 generations, 32 µg/ml for the second 100 generations, 64 µg/ml for the third 100 generations, and 128 µg/ml for the fourth 100 generations, for a total of 400 generations. Samples of populations were archived at -80° in 15% glycerol at 0, 100, 200, 300, and 400 generations.
The entire fitness surface for experiment 1 is shown in Fig 1. At generation 0, none of the tagged strains had been subjected to FLC and all responded similarly to the various concentrations of FLC. All populations underwent >13 doublings in the absence of FLC and 78 doublings even at 128 µg/ml of FLC. By generation 100, populations D2, D3, and D4 all showed enhanced fitness at 16 and 32 µg/ml FLC, but not at higher concentrations of the drug. Unexpectedly, the fitness of the progenitor was significantly higher than that of the evolved populations D2, D3, and D4 at generation 100 when measured in 64 and 128 µg/ml FLC. This effect was reproducible on agar medium with 128 µg/ml FLC (Fig 2); the progenitor produced small colonies that stopped growing after 1 day, but the evolved populations produced even smaller colonies indicating fewer cell divisions, a result consistent with the fitness assays. At generation 200, populations D2, D3, and D4 had higher fitness at all concentrations of FLC, except at 128 µg/ml, in which the fitness of the evolved and progenitor populations was approximately equal. By generations 300 and 400, populations D2, D3, and D4 showed higher fitness than the progenitor in all concentrations of FLC. At no time in the experiment was the fitness of D2, D3, and D4 less than that of the progenitor P1 in the absence of FLC; no fitness cost of resistance was evident.
|
|
Genetic analysis: The following observations showed that D2, D3, and D4 each accumulated two semidominant mutations in the same two unlinked chromosomal regions in the same order during experiment 1 and that the two mutations were approximately additive in their effect on MIC of FLC.
To measure the degree of dominance, six hybrid diploids were constructed by mating MATa and MAT
meiotic offspring of diploid D2, D3, and D4, which had MICs of 256 µg/ml, with those of the progenitor diploid P1, which had a MIC of 16 µg/ml. The six hybrid diploids had intermediate MIC values of 64 or 128 µg/ml (Table 2), indicating semidominance. These same six hybrid diploids had levels of fitness intermediate between the P1 and the D2, D3, and D4 homozygous, nonhybrid diploids in 128 µg/ml FLC, again indicating semidominance. All diploids showed approximately equal fitness in the absence of FLC (Table 2).
|
To examine segregation of mutations, the six hybrid diploids representing crosses between P1 and D2, D3, and D4 were allowed to sporulate and meiotic tetrads were analyzed. A total of 8 tetrads were interpreted as parental ditypes, 7 as nonparental ditypes, and 30 as tetratypes (see Fig 3 for examples of each). This ratio closely approximates the expected 1:1:4 ratio of parental ditypes, nonparental ditypes, and tetratypes expected with segregation of alleles at two unlinked loci with a large combined gene-to-centromere distance. Our interpretation of these segregation patterns is that one mutant gene determines a greater level of resistance (MIC 64 µg/ml) than the other (MIC 32 µg/ml) and that both mutant genes together confer an even higher level of resistance. There was no ambiguity about which mutations came first in experiment 1: the larger jumps in MIC, which were accompanied by point mutations in PDR1 (see below) and elevated expression of PDR5 and SNQ2 (see below), all occurred in the first 100 generations. The mutations of lesser effect on MIC became apparent only in subsequent generations.
|
In addition to the six hybrid diploids of P1 with D2, D3, and D4 at generation 400, six hybrid diploids were also constructed among the fluconazole-resistant D2, D3, and D4 at generation 400. Each of these hybrids had the same MIC of 256 µg/ml FLC as the parent diploid versions of D2, D3, and D4 (Table 2) and had the same high levels of fitness in 128 µg/ml FLC as the nonhybrid diploids and their predecessor haploids. Meiotic offspring of hybrids among D2, D3, and D4 showed no segregation for resistance to fluconazole; in a total of 34 tetrads from these hybrids, all spores had MICs of 256 µg/ml. This result showed that the two determinants of resistance in D2, D3, and D4 were located in the same chromosomal regions.
As a control for the genetic analyses above, homozygous, nonhybrid diploid versions of P1 and D2, D3, and D4 at generation 400 were also allowed to sporulate and 510 tetrads were analyzed from each. No segregation in the levels of MIC was observed in any of these tetrads. The spore progeny of diploid D2, D3, and D4 were all highly resistant (MIC 256 µg/ml) and those of diploid P1 had the basal level of resistance (MIC 16 µg/ml).
To further characterize the FLC-resistant phenotypes, the expression of four genes known to play a role in resistance to FLC was measured. From generation 100 on, populations D2, D3, and D4 all overexpressed the ABC transporter genes PDR5 and SNQ2, three- to fourfold with respect to P1 and all of its derivatives (Table 3). None of these same strains overexpressed the major facilitator gene FLR1, the expression of which was barely detectable in any of the strains assayed in this study (data not shown). The expression of ERG11 was more variable in D2, D3, and D4, with no consistent trend (Table 3). The hybrid diploids between P1 and D2, D3, and D4 expressed PDR5 and SNQ2 at a level between that of the progenitor and parents evolved for 400 generations in FLC. Three tetrads representing parental ditypes, nonparental ditypes, and tetratypes for the two segregating genes from experiment 1 were also assayed for expression of the same set of four genes (Fig 3). In all cases, the putative genotype interpreted as containing the first mutation expressed PDR5 and SNQ2 at a high level approximately equal to the evolved parents and all genotypes interpreted as lacking the first mutation expressed PDR5 and SNQ2 at basal levels.
|
Spores of these tetrads were also examined for ability to reproduce in 128 µg/ml FLC on agar medium. Genotypes from these tetrads containing only the first resistance mutation showed the same fitness deficit in 128 µg/ml FLC as did D2, D3, and D4 at generation 100 (see Fig 2), at which time only the first mutations had become established.
Mapping of mutations:
The semidominant nature of the first mutations from experiment 1 and their effects on the expression of PDR5 and SNQ2 were consistent with the action of known mutations in PDR1 or PDR3 (![]()
![]()
background lacking G418 resistance. This strain was then crossed with the PDR1 and PDR3 knockout strains, both of which carried the KanMX4 cassette with G418 resistance at the deletion site and had MICs of 16 µg/ml FLC or lower. In the cross with the PDR1 knockout strain, all 30 tetrads were parental ditype with two FLC-resistant spores and two FLC-sensitive, G418-resistant spores. The unknown resistance mutation was therefore tightly linked to PDR1. In the cross with the PDR3 knockout strain, all tetrads also segregated 1:1 for resistant vs. sensitive, but the G418 resistance (encoded at the PDR3 knockout site) did not cosegregate with low resistance. This indicates that the first mutations from experiment 1 were not in the same chromosomal region as PDR3.
The first resistance mutations in D2, D3, and D4 were further pinpointed to PDR1 by sequencing both DNA stands of the entire PDR1 ORF plus the flanking intergenic regions in the progenitor P1 and in D2, D3, and D4 at generations 100 and 400. A single mutation was observed in each of the three evolved lines at generations 100 and 400. Each mutation was near the carboxy terminus of the predicted polypeptide, near the activation domain (![]()
The second mutations in experiment 1: Although the second mutations in experiment 1 remain unidentified, certain genes can be excluded as candidates. Since the second mutations were semidominant, they are not likely to be the result of simple loss of function and are therefore not likely to correspond to any of the FLC-resistant, gene-deletion strains described below under experiment 2. Also, because the second mutations did not affect the expression of PDR5 and SNQ2, the regulator PDR3 is not a likely candidate. Further transcriptional profiling may provide clues about the nature of the second mutations.
Experiment 2:
Mutation and fitness:
Three haploid MATa-tagged strains, O1, O2, and O3 ("O" means selection in a single high concentration of FLC; the number indicates the tag), were spread directly on medium containing 128 µg/ml FLC. On each plate, 104 cells from an overnight culture in 0.5x YPD were distributed as evenly as possible. Because wild-type cells undergo seven to nine doublings in the presence of FLC, cell numbers on each plate reached 15 x 106 within 2 days (see below). Large, continuously growing colonies were picked after 45 days of incubation. Three mutants of O1, O2, and O3, respectively, all had MICs of 256 µg/ml of FLC.
The fitness of the strains from experiment 2 was compared to that of the progenitor and the resistant strains from experiment 1 (Table 4) in competitive growth assays containing 128 µg/ml FLC. The fitness of O1, O2, and O3 was substantially higher than that of P5, but less than that of D2, D3, and D4. The fitness of O1, O2, and O3 in the absence of FLC was the same as that of all of the other strains, including the progenitor; no fitness cost of resistance was detected.
|
Genetic analysis:
The following results showed that O1, O2, and O3 each contained a single recessive mutation for resistance that mapped to the same chromosomal region. The MICs of the heterozygous diploid hybrids of O1, O2, and O3 with P1 were all 16 µg/ml, indicating that the resistance determinant was recessive with respect to MIC. The fitness of these same hybrid diploids, however, was somewhat higher (9.7 ± 0.5 doublings) than that of the competitor progenitor diploid P5 (7.4 ± 0.3 doublings) in 128 µg/ml FLC, indicating that the resistance determinant was not completely recessive with respect to this criterion. These same heterozygous hybrid diploids were allowed to sporulate and all 30 tetrads dissected showed a 1:1 ratio for MICs of 16 and 256 µg/ml; this indicated the segregation of a single mutation. When O1 and O3 were crossed with a MAT
, FLC-resistant (MIC 256 µg/ml) segregant from the cross of O2 with P1, the hybrid diploids had MICs of 256 µg/ml and none of 29 meiotic tetrads examined showed any segregation; all spores showed MICs of 256 µg/ml. This showed that the mutations in O1, O2, and O3 were each located in the same chromosomal region. O1, O2, and O3 consistently overexpressed ERG11 relative to P1, but PDR5, SNQ2, and FLR1 were all expressed at levels similar to that of P1 (Table 3).
Mapping of the mutation:
To identify the recessive mutation from experiment 2, we first took a comprehensive and unbiased approach to identify FLC-resistant yeast mutants. Approximately 4700 viable haploid deletion mutants were screened for FLC resistance. Because these strains are viable, this set should be highly enriched for loss-of-function mutations with minimal fitness defects. In total, 13 deletion mutants displayed a FLC-resistant phenotype (Fig 4). This set of FLC-resistant strains is significantly enriched for genes classified within the Munich Information Center for Protein Sequences database (http://mips.gsf.de) as functioning in lipid, fatty-acid, and isoprenoid biosynthesis (P = 7.7 x 10-5; ![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
|
On the basis of these screen data, the resistance mutations in O1, O2, and O3 from experiment 2 were placed in a MAT
background and then crossed with the ERG3 knockout strain. From these crosses, all of the 35 tetrads tested showed no segregation for FLC resistance; all spores had MICs of 256 µg/ml FLC. The mutations in experiment 2 are therefore located in the same chromosomal region as ERG3. Like the O1, O2, and O3 mutants, the ERG3 deletion strain has a MIC of 256 µg/ml FLC and overexpresses ERG11 at greater than threefold. This effect of the ERG3 knockout on the expression of ERG11 was reported previously (![]()
Hybrids from experiments 1 and 2:
Hybrid diploids were constructed between O1, O2, and O3 and P1, D2, D3, and D4 (Table 5). The MIC of the hybrids of strains O1, O2, and O3 with D2, D3, and D4 was either 64 or 128 µg/ml, similar to hybrids of D2, D3, and D4 with P1 (Table 1). The fitness of these same hybrids was higher (mean 11.7 ± 0.9) than that of diploid P5 (7.9 ± 0.6 doublings) in 128 µg/ml FLC. Hybrids between O1, O2, and O3 and all other strains expressed ERG11 at basal levels, a result consistent with the recessive nature of these mutations with respect to the MIC of FLC. In the hybrids between O1, O2, and O3 and D2 and D3, expression levels of PDR5 and SNQ2 were about equal to those of the hybrids of D2, D3, and D4 with P1, a result consistent with the semidominant nature of the first mutation in the evolved populations established above for experiment 1. In contrast, in the hybrids between O1, O2, and O3 and D2 and D3, the PDR5 message was present at levels about equal to those of D2, D3, and D4, a result more consistent with full dominance. The reason for the difference in expression levels of SNQ2 and PDR5 in the hybrids between experiments 1 and 2 is not known.
|
Differential response of haploids and diploids to strong selection:
Because the mutations for resistance in experiment 1 were semidominant, while those from experiment 2 were recessive, we examined the effect of ploidy on the frequency of resistance at 128 µg/ml FLC. In another version of experiment 2, equivalent numbers of isogenic haploid (MATa and MAT
) and diploid (MATa/
, MATa/a, and MAT
/
) strains were spread on 0.5x YPD containing 128 µg/ml FLC. More colonies appeared among haploid than among diploid cells subjected to this kind of selection (Fig 5, Table 6). Those colonies that did appear among diploid cells were observed after only 2 days. Among the haploid cells a few resistant colonies were evident by day 2, but the majority of colonies appeared later. We conclude that the haploids had a greater frequency of mutant phenotypes than the diploids. The nature of the mutations in these experiments has not yet been investigated.
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
Our results show that the mode of selection is a strong determinant of the mechanism of drug resistance that is favored in a fungal population. The two different selection regimens used in this study resulted in the appearance of completely different mechanisms of resistance. In both experiments 1 and 2, contamination was ruled out by the presence of the marker tags and parallel evolution was the rule. Under the stepwise selection regimen of experiment 1, two successive mutations that were semidominant and approximately additive in their effect on resistance appeared independently in three different populations. In contrast, under the single exposure to high concentrations of FLC in experiment 2, one recessive mutation appeared independently in three different populations. Although the population sizes and transfer regimens differed between experiment 1 and 2, additional evidence suggests that the different outcomes are not sensitive to these factors and that the nature of the selection applied is the main determinant. When progenitor cells were grown in liquid cultures at high FLC concentrations (64 or 128 µg/ml), the loss of function in ERG3 was always the mutation favored (data not shown). Although additional loss-of-function mutations equivalent to the 12 other gene deletions in Fig 4 probably occurred in the experimental populations under strong selection, these would not be expected to rise to high frequency because their fitness is much less than that of the ERG3 mutations in high FLC concentrations.
The recruitment of two divergent kinds of resistance to FLC in S. cerevisiae populations is reminiscent of the two divergent kinds of resistance found in experimental populations of C. albicans (![]()
![]()
The two divergent pathways of resistance recruited in populations under different kinds of selection showed no immediate advantage when combined in hybrids. The F1 hybrids containing all three resistance mutations as heterozygotes had lower MIC and fitness in high concentrations of FLC than did either parent alone. Further evidence from meiotic offspring of these hybrids (data not shown) suggests that haploids containing all three mutations merely show the maximum MIC of the parents. That none of the mutations in experiments 1 and 2 are fully dominant with respect to MIC or fitness and that different modes of selection favor different kinds of resistance make it unlikely for both mechanisms to predominate together in diploid populations evolving in the presence of FLC and in the absence of genetic exchange between cell lineages.
In both experiments 1 and 2, fitness was measured in addition to MIC to detect any reduction of fitness in the absence of the drug that might accompany the evolution of resistance. Despite the rapid appearance of resistance in both experiments 1 and 2, where a fitness cost might have been expected, none was detected in any of the strains. If such a cost exists, it was too small to be detected under the conditions used here. This result is similar to that found in experimental populations of C. albicans, in which the majority of resistant strains showed no significant fitness cost, and for the few that did, the cost was slight and was eliminated with further evolution (![]()
Although no cost of resistance was found where it was expected, there was a strong and unexpected fitness deficit in D2, D3, and D4 at generation 100 of experiment 1 at the two highest concentrations of FLC. This fitness cost was statistically significant and repeatable even when the progenitor and generation 100 strains were grown separately (Fig 2). In effect, the first mutations (PDR1), which confer resistance to the lower concentrations of FLC, actually reduce the ability of cells to reproduce at higher concentrations of the drug, relative to the progenitor (Fig 2). The presence of these PDR1 mutations can therefore render additional resistance mutations, including the ERG3 mutations favored in experiment 2, unavailable in high concentrations of fluconazole due to insufficient population size. For example, when populations from generation 100 of experiment 1 were plated on medium with 128 µg/ml FLC (exactly as in experiment 2), population expansion was severely limited and accumulation of further resistance mutations did not occur (data not shown).
This discrepancy between MIC and fitness similar to that observed at generation 100 of experiment 1 has been noted before (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
If the two different kinds of resistance to FLC are representative of the evolutionary capabilities of S. cerevisiae in general, then ploidy may play a role in the rate of evolution of FLC resistance in S. cerevisiae. The effects of mutation availability and dominance on the evolution of haploids and diploids are discussed by ![]()
How might this study be relevant to the evolution of antifungal drug resistance by fungal pathogens in animal hosts? If divergent outcomes resulted from the different selection regimens in these experiments, then the host environment may be even more conducive to divergence in the evolution of antifungal drug resistance. An animal host represents a highly structured physical environment in which the concentration of a drug is anything but uniform throughout the body and over time. The potential for different kinds of selection to operate would therefore likely be far greater within an animal host than within the artificial and highly uniform experimental populations studied here. Another factor that may favor divergence in the evolution of drug resistance in an animal host is that the effective sizes of fungal populations in the highly structured environment are undoubtedly smaller than those studied here, lending even more of an element of chance to the local outcome of evolution. Finally, fungal pathogens vary in ploidy. For example, C. albicans is diploid, while Cryptococcus neoformans and Aspergillus fumigatus are haploid (![]()
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We thank P. Philippsen (Biozentrum, University of Basel, Switzerland) for pFA6a-KanMX4 and V. Voynov (Whitehead Institute, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA) for pGAL1-HO. This work was supported by research grants from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada to J.B.A. and L.M.K., respectively. Fluconazole was a gift from Pfizer Canada.
Manuscript received September 25, 2002; Accepted for publication January 7, 2003.
| LITERATURE CITED |
|---|
ADAMS, A., D. E. GOTTSCHLING, C. A. KAISER and T. STEARNS, 1997 Methods in Yeast Genetics. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.
ANDERSSON, D. I. and B. R. LEVIN, 1999 The biological cost of antibiotic resistance. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2:489-493.[Medline]
BEH, C. T., L. COOL, J. PHILLIPS, and J. RINE, 2001 Overlapping functions of the yeast oxysterol-binding protein homologues. Genetics 157:1117-1140.
COWEN, L. E., D. SANGLARD, D. CALABRESE, C. SIRJUSINGH, and J. B. ANDERSON et al., 2000 Evolution of drug resistance in experimental populations of Candida albicans.. J. Bacteriol. 182:1515-1522.
COWEN, L. E., L. M. KOHN, and J. B. ANDERSON, 2001 Divergence in fitness and evolution of drug resistance in experimental populations of Candida albicans.. J. Bacteriol. 183:2971-2978.
COWEN, L. E., A. NANTEL, M. S. WHITEWAY, D. Y. THOMAS, and D. C. TESSIER et al., 2002a Population genomics of drug resistance in Candida albicans.. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99:9284-9289.
COWEN, L. E., J. B. ANDERSON, and L. M. KOHN, 2002b Evolution of drug resistance in Candida albicans.. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 56:139-165.[Medline]
DERISI, J., B. VAN DEN HAZEL, P. MARC, E. BALZI, and P. BROWN et al., 2000 Genome microarray analysis of transcriptional activation in multidrug resistance yeast mutants. FEBS Lett. 470:156-160.[Medline]
GACHOTTE, D., J. ECKSTEIN, R. BARBUCH, T. HUGHES, and C. ROBERTS et al., 2001 A novel gene conserved from yeast to humans is involved in sterol biosynthesis. J. Lipid Res. 42:150-154.
GEORGOPAPADAKOU, N. H. and T. J. WALSH, 1994 Human mycoses: drugs and targets for emerging pathogens. Science 264:371-373.
HUGHES, T. R., M. J. MARTON, A. R. JONES, C. J. ROBERTS, and R. STOUGHTON et al., 2000 Functional discovery via a compendium of expression profiles. Cell 102:109-126.[Medline]
KAGIWADA, S., K. HOSAKA, M. MURATA, J. NIKAWA, and A. TAKATSUKI, 1998 The Saccharomyces cerevisiae SCS2 gene product, a homolog of a synaptobrevin-associated protein, is an integral membrane protein of the endoplasmic reticulum and is required for inositol metabolism. J. Bacteriol. 180:1700-1708.
KOLACZKOWSKA, A. and A. GOFFEAU, 1999 Regulation of pleiotropic drug resistance in yeast. Drug Resist. Updat. 2:403-414.[Medline]
KOLACZKOWSKA, A., M. KOLACZKOWSKI, A. DELAHODDE, and A. GOFFEAU, 2002 Functional dissection of Pdr1p, a regulator of multidrug resistance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.. Mol. Genet. Genomics 267:96-106.[Medline]
LEVIN, B. R., V. PERROT, and N. WALKER, 2000 Compensatory mutations, antibiotic resistance and the population genetics of adaptive evolution in bacteria. Genetics 154:985-997.
LUPETTI, A., R. DANESI, M. CAMPA, M. DEL TACCA, and S. KELLY, 2002 Molecular basis of resistance to azole antifungals. Trends Mol. Med. 8:76-81.[Medline]
MARCHETTI, O., J. M. ENTENZA, D. SANGLARD, J. BILLE, and M. P. GLAUSER et al., 2000 Fluconazole plus cyclosporine: a fungicidal combination effective against experimental endocarditis due to Candida albicans. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 44:2932-2938.
MARR, K. A., T. R. RUSTAD, J. H. REX, and T. C. WHITE, 1999 The trailing end point phenotype in antifungal susceptibility testing is pH dependent. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 43:1383-1386.
NATIONAL COMMITTEE FOR CLINICAL LABORATORY STANDARDS, 1997 Reference method for broth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts. Approved standard M27-A. Wayne, PA.
ORR, H. A. and S. P. OTTO, 1994 Does diploidy increase the rate of adaptation? Genetics 136:1475-1480.[Abstract]
PALTAUF, F., S. KOHLWEIN and S. A. HENRY, 1992 Regulation and compartmentalization of lipid synthesis in yeast, pp. 415500 in The Molecular and Cellular Biology of the Yeast Saccharomyces: Gene Expression, edited by E. W. JONES, J. R. PRINGLE and J. R. BROACH. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.
REX, J. H., M. A. PFALLER, T. J. WALSH, V. CHATURVEDI, and A. ESPINEL-INGROFF et al., 2001 Antifungal susceptibility testing: practical aspects and current challenges. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 14:643-658.
REYES, G. and M. A. GHANNOUM, 2000 Antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts: uses and limitations. Drug Resist. Updat. 3:14-19.[Medline]
REYNOLDS, T. B. and G. R. FINK, 2001 Baker's yeast, a model for fungal biofilm formation. Science 291:878-881.
ROBINSON, M. D., J. GRIGULL, N. MOHAMMAD, and T. R. HUGHES, 2002 FunSpec: a web-based cluster interpreter for yeast. Bioinformatics 3:35.
SANGLARD, D., F. ISCHER, D. CALABRESE, M. DE MICHELI, and J. BILLE, 1998 Multiple resistance mechanisms to azole antifungals in yeast clinical isolates. Drug Resist. Updat. 1:255-265.
SATO, M., S. FUJISAKI, K. SATO, Y. NISHIMURA, and A. NAKANO, 2001 Yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae has two cis-prenyltransferases with different properties and localizations. Implication for their distinct physiological roles in dolichol synthesis. Genes Cells 6:495-506.[Abstract]
SHERMAN, S. and J. HICKS, 1991 Micromanipulation and dissection of asci. Methods Enzymol. 194:21-37.[Medline]
TAYLOR, J. W., D. M. GEISER, A. BURT, and V. KOUFOPANOU, 1999 The evolutionary biology and population genetics underlying fungal strain typing. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 12:126-146.
WACH, A., A. BRACHAT, R. POHLMANN, and P. PHILIPPSEN, 1994 New heterologous modules for classical or PCR-based gene disruptions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 10:1793-1808.[Medline]
WINZELER, E. A., D. D. SHOEMAKER, A. ASTROMOFF, H. LIANG, and K. ANDERSON et al., 1999 Functional characterization of the S. cerevisiae genome by gene deletion and parallel analysis. Science 285:901-906.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. P. Otto, M. R. Servedio, and S. L. Nuismer Frequency-Dependent Selection and the Evolution of Assortative Mating Genetics, August 1, 2008; 179(4): 2091 - 2112. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Schuller, Y. M. Mamnun, H. Wolfger, N. Rockwell, J. Thorner, and K. Kuchler Membrane-active Compounds Activate the Transcription Factors Pdr1 and Pdr3 Connecting Pleiotropic Drug Resistance and Membrane Lipid Homeostasis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mol. Biol. Cell, December 1, 2007; 18(12): 4932 - 4944. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Collins, J. de Meaux, and C. Acquisti Adaptive Walks Toward a Moving Optimum Genetics, June 1, 2007; 176(2): 1089 - 1099. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. J. Riggle and C. A. Kumamoto Transcriptional Regulation of MDR1, Encoding a Drug Efflux Determinant, in Fluconazole-Resistant Candida albicans Strains through an Mcm1p Binding Site Eukaryot. Cell, December 1, 2006; 5(12): 1957 - 1968. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. B. Anderson, N. Ricker, and C. Sirjusingh Antagonism between Two Mechanisms of Antifungal Drug Resistance. Eukaryot. Cell, August 1, 2006; 5(8): 1243 - 1251. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Selmecki, A. Forche, and J. Berman Aneuploidy and Isochromosome Formation in Drug-Resistant Candida albicans. Science, July 21, 2006; 313(5785): 367 - 370. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Coste, V. Turner, F. Ischer, J. Morschhauser, A. Forche, A. Selmecki, J. Berman, J. Bille, and D. Sanglard A Mutation in Tac1p, a Transcription Factor Regulating CDR1 and CDR2, Is Coupled With Loss of Heterozygosity at Chromosome 5 to Mediate Antifungal Resistance in Candida albicans Genetics, April 1, 2006; 172(4): 2139 - 2156. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. E. Cowen and S. Lindquist Hsp90 Potentiates the Rapid Evolution of New Traits: Drug Resistance in Diverse Fungi Science, September 30, 2005; 309(5744): 2185 - 2189. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
|

), D3 (
), and D4 (x) from experiment 1 in 0128 µg/ml FLC.






