- THIS ARTICLE
-
Abstract
- Full Text (PDF)
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Fang, S.
- Articles by Wu, C.-I
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Fang, S.
- Articles by Wu, C.-I
A Mutation in the Promoter of Desaturase 2 Is Correlated With Sexual Isolation Between Drosophila Behavioral Races
Shu Fanga,b, Aya Takahashic, and Chung-I Wuaa Department of Ecology and Evolution, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637,
b Institute of Zoology, Academia Sinica, Nankang, Taipei, Taiwan 115, Republic of China
c Division of Population Genetics, National Institute of Genetics, 1111 Yata, Mishima, 411-8540, Japan
Corresponding author: Chung-I Wu, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637., ciwu{at}uchicago.edu (E-mail)
Communicating editor: M. VEUILLE
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
Examples of genes governing behavioral isolation are scarce. Here we report that a regulatory mutation in desaturase 2, known to determine a pheromonal polymorphism in Drosophila melanogaster females, may be such an example. This mutation is strongly correlated with the mating pattern between the Zimbabwe and cosmopolitan races of this species. These two behavioral races appear to be at the incipient stage of speciation. The desaturase 2 mutation may be one of the many loci underlying the behavioral differences between the two races.
SOME progress has been made toward the molecular elucidation of "speciation genes" in the last decade, mostly in systems of gamete recognition (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
It may be easier to unravel the genetic basis of CH differences between conspecific behavioral races, which are at the incipient stage of sexual isolation. Females of many Drosophila melanogaster lines from southern/central Africa (Zimbabwe- or Z-type flies) do not mate with males from other continents (M type, for common melanogaster) in double-choice experiments (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
African and non-African D. melanogaster females are also known to have different CH profiles (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
The main question addressed here is whether the desat2 gene is one of the many loci underlying the mating behavioral differences between the Z- and M-type flies. Since one of the many female mating loci in the Z/M system of D. melanogaster has been crudely mapped to the desat2 region (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
To answer the question about the association (or lack of) between the desat2 gene and the Z/M behavior more definitively, we have incorporated the above considerations in a different experimental design. First, we used a double-choice design to include all behavioral components (male choice, female choice, and interactions). Second, we compared lines from the same populations. Although the 7,11 HD type (or the D desat2 allele) is nearly fixed outside of Africa (except in the Caribbean), the + and D alleles segregate at appreciable frequencies in several African populations. In this study, we compared 22 lines from all three populations known to be commonly polymorphic for the desat2 alleles for their mating pattern.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
Fly stocks:
The Zimbabwe isofemale lines were collected from the Sengwa Wildlife Reserve around 1990 (the ZS lines) and near Harare (the ZH lines). The Luangua (LA) lines were from southern Zambia and the Okavanga (OK) lines were from Botswana. These are described in ![]()
![]()
DNA genotyping:
The genotype at the desat2 locus was determined by the presence or absence of a 16-bp deletion
150 bp upstream from the desat2 coding sequence (![]()
Measurement of mating behavior:
We use a double-choice mating design, which measures multiple components of mate choice. Briefly, 5565 females of the tested line and the same number of M-type females (the Fr line; ![]()
![]()
We use the discrimination index (DI; ![]()
![]()
, where nij is the number of copulating pairs between type i females and type j males; U, Z, and M designate the tested (U, for unknown), pure Z lines, and pure M lines, respectively. DI = 0 indicates no difference in mating preference and a positive value means the tested females are more Z-like in terms of their mating pattern.
The design is nearly identical with that of ![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
for LA2 in Table 1. In contrast, the DI value is 1.99 for the same line by the method of ![]()
|
| RESULTS AND DISCUSSION |
|---|
In total, 22 lines from the three African populations that are polymorphic for the desat2 alleles were used in this association study. Each of these 22 lines is monomorphic for either the + or the D desat2 allele. Previous studies have shown that the allelic status (+ or D) at the desat2 locus accurately predicts the CH phenotype of females from >40 different lines (![]()
![]()
![]()
We may also pool the observations from the three polymorphic populations for a statistical test. This is a conservative practice as pooling observations across populations can only weaken the correlation. In other words, an imperfect correlation within each population will always be preserved in the pooled data but a perfect correlation may be destroyed by pooling. Thus, pooling across populations should be done only if the populations are not too divergent in their mean DIs. The ZH, OK, and LA populations broadly overlap in this measurement and are geographically the most adjacent among all collections. In the pooled data, the top 13 lines with high DI values all carry the wild-type desat2 allele (+) and the bottom 7 lines all carry the inactive D allele. Both the Mann-Whitney and Wilcoxon rank tests give P < 0.001.
Higher DI values indicate an excess in mating of the following two combinations, (tested females x Z males) and (M females x M males), over the other two, (tested females x M males) and (M females x Z males). The DI value does not differentiate female choice, male choice, or interactions between them. We thus refer to a high DI value as high Z femaleness without making a distinction between her attractiveness, her mate choice, and the interactions. The interpretation in favor of any mechanism usually entails supplementary observations. In this case, it is more straightforward to interpret the results as male choice (or female attractiveness), in light of the behavioral observations (![]()
![]()
In a separate experiment that allowed the Z- and M-type genomes to mix for 60 generations in five replicates, the resultant lines varied in the degree of Z femaleness, which indeed is strongly correlated with the presence of the wild-type desat2 allele (J. ALIPAZ, S. FANG and C.-I WU, unpublished data). The desat2 allele carried by the female determines her CH phenotype, which affects the relative courtship intensity of Z and M males toward her. It should also be noted that the desat2 locus is only one of the many loci (>7; ![]()
![]()
The above conclusion necessitates a reevaluation of the genetic make-up of the Caribbean flies, which carry the + desat2 allele but exhibit M-like behavior (Table 1). Since a measurable degree of Z femaleness requires the presence of the Z-type allele at several loci (![]()
![]()
Are there genetic variants other than the +/D difference that may also account for the pattern of Table 1? Because D. melanogaster generally exhibits low levels of linkage disequilibrium and because the sequences in the desat2 region indeed show extensive recombination (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We thank Ian Boussy, Hope Hollocher, Howard Rundle, and Norman Johnson for their helpful comments. This work was supported by a postdoctoral fellowship from the Ministry of Education, Taiwan, Republic of China, to S. Fang, a JSPS Fellowship for Young Scientists to A. Takahashi, and National Institutes of Health and National Science Foundation grants to C.-I Wu.
Manuscript received May 19, 2002; Accepted for publication June 29, 2002.
| LITERATURE CITED |
|---|
ANTONY, C. and J.-M. JALLON, 1982 The chemical basis for sex recognition in Drosophila melanogaster.. J. Insect Physiol. 28:873-880.
ANTONY, C., T. L. DAVIS, D. A. CARLSON, J.-M. PÉCHINÉ, and J.-M. JALLON, 1985 Compared behavioral responses of male Drosophila melanogaster (Canton S) to natural and synthetic aphrodisiacs. J. Chem. Ecol. 11:1617-1629.
COYNE, J. A. and B. CHARLESWORTH, 1997 Genetics of a pheromonal difference affecting sexual isolation between Drosophila mauritiana and D. sechellia.. Genetics 145:1015-1030.[Abstract]
COYNE, J. A., A. P. CRITTENDEN, and K. MAH, 1994 Genetics of a pheromonal difference contributing to reproductive isolation in Drosophila.. Science 265:1461-1464.
COYNE, J. A., C. WICKER-THOMAS, and J.-M. JALLON, 1999 A gene responsible for a cuticular hydrocarbon polymorphism in Drosophila melanogaster.. Genet. Res. 73:189-203.[Medline]
DALLERAC, R., C. LABEUR, J.-M. JALLON, D. C. KNIPPLE, and W. L. ROELOFS et al., 2000 A
9 desaturase gene with a different substrate specificity is responsible for the cuticular diene hydrocarbon polymorphism in Drosophila melanogaster.. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97:9449-9454.
FERVEUR, J.-F. and G. SUREAU, 1996 Simultaneous influence on male courtship of stimulatory and inhibitory pheromones produced by live sex-mosaic Drosophila melanogaster.. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B 263:967-973.[Medline]
FERVEUR, J.-F., M. COBB, H. BOUKELLA, and J.-M. JALLON, 1996 World-wide variation in Drosophila melanogaster sex pheromone: behavioural effects, genetic bases and potential evolutionary consequences. Genetica 97:73-80.[Medline]
HOLLOCHER, H., C.-T. TING, F. POLLACK, and C.-I WU, 1997a Incipient speciation by sexual isolation in Drosophila melanogaster: variation in mating preference and correlation between sexes. Evolution 5:1175-1181.
HOLLOCHER, H., C.-T. TING, M.-L. WU, and C.-I WU, 1997b Incipient speciation by sexual isolation in Drosophila melanogaster: extensive genetic divergence without reinforcement. Genetics 147:1191-1201.[Abstract]
LANDER, E. S. and N. J. SCHORK, 1994 Genetic dissection of complex traits. Science 265:2037-2048.
SWANSON, W. J. and V. D. VACQUIER, 1998 Concerted evolution in an egg receptor for a rapidly evolving abalone sperm protein. Science 281:710-712.
TAKAHASHI, A., S.-C. TSAUR, J. A. COYNE, and C.-I WU, 2001 The nucleotide changes governing cuticular hydrocarbon variation and their evolution in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98:3920-3925.
TING, C.-T., S.-C. TSAUR, M.-L. WU, and C.-I WU, 1998 A rapidly evolving homeobox at the site of a hybrid sterility gene. Science 282:1501-1504.
TING, C.-T., S.-C. TSAUR, and C.-I WU, 2000 The phylogeny of closely related species as revealed by the genealogy of a speciation gene, Odysseus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97:5313-5316.
TING, C.-T., A. TAKAHASHI, and C.-I WU, 2001 Incipient speciation by sexual isolation in Drosophila: concurrent evolution at multiple loci. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98:6709-6713.
WU, C.-I, 2001 The genic view of the process of speciation. J. Evol. Biol. 14:851-865.
WU, C.-I, H. HOLLOCHER, D. J. BEGUN, C. F. AQUADRO, and Y. XU, 1995 Sexual isolation in Drosophila melanogaster: a possible case of incipient speciation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92:2519-2523.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
B. Foley, S. F. Chenoweth, S. V. Nuzhdin, and M. W. Blows Natural Genetic Variation in Cuticular Hydrocarbon Expression in Male and Female Drosophila melanogaster Genetics, March 1, 2007; 175(3): 1465 - 1477. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Korol, E. Rashkovetsky, K. Iliadi, and E. Nevo Drosophila flies in "Evolution Canyon" as a model for incipient sympatric speciation PNAS, November 28, 2006; 103(48): 18184 - 18189. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Osada, M. H. Kohn, and C.-I Wu Genomic Inferences of the cis-Regulatory Nucleotide Polymorphisms Underlying Gene Expression Differences between Drosophila melanogaster Mating Races Mol. Biol. Evol., August 1, 2006; 23(8): 1585 - 1591. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. J. Greenberg and C.-I Wu Molecular Genetics of Natural Populations Mol. Biol. Evol., May 1, 2006; 23(5): 883 - 886. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. J. Greenberg, J. R. Moran, S. Fang, and C.-I Wu Adaptive Loss of an Old Duplicated Gene During Incipient Speciation Mol. Biol. Evol., February 1, 2006; 23(2): 401 - 410. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Marcillac, F. Bousquet, J. Alabouvette, F. Savarit, and J.-F. Ferveur A Mutation With Major Effects on Drosophila melanogaster Sex Pheromones Genetics, December 1, 2005; 171(4): 1617 - 1628. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Gleason, J.-M. Jallon, J.-D. Rouault, and M. G. Ritchie Quantitative Trait Loci for Cuticular Hydrocarbons Associated With Sexual Isolation Between Drosophila simulans and D. sechellia Genetics, December 1, 2005; 171(4): 1789 - 1798. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Marcillac, B. Houot, and J.-F. Ferveur Revisited Roles of Drosophila Female Pheromones Chem Senses, January 1, 2005; 30(suppl_1): i273 - i274. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Marcillac and J.-F. Ferveur A set of female pheromones affects reproduction before, during and after mating in Drosophila J. Exp. Biol., October 15, 2004; 207(22): 3927 - 3933. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. H. Kohn, S. Fang, and C.-I Wu Inference of Positive and Negative Selection on the 5' Regulatory Regions of Drosophila Genes Mol. Biol. Evol., February 1, 2004; 21(2): 374 - 383. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. J. Greenberg, J. R. Moran, J. A. Coyne, and C.-I Wu Ecological Adaptation During Incipient Speciation Revealed by Precise Gene Replacement Science, December 5, 2003; 302(5651): 1754 - 1757. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. A. Wray, M. W. Hahn, E. Abouheif, J. P. Balhoff, M. Pizer, M. V. Rockman, and L. A. Romano The Evolution of Transcriptional Regulation in Eukaryotes Mol. Biol. Evol., September 1, 2003; 20(9): 1377 - 1419. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. L. Roelofs and A. P. Rooney Molecular genetics and evolution of pheromone biosynthesis in Lepidoptera PNAS, August 5, 2003; 100(16): 9179 - 9184. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
- THIS ARTICLE
-
Abstract
- Full Text (PDF)
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Fang, S.
- Articles by Wu, C.-I
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Fang, S.
- Articles by Wu, C.-I





