Genetics, Vol. 162, 781-784, October 2002, Copyright © 2002

A Mutation in the Promoter of Desaturase 2 Is Correlated With Sexual Isolation Between Drosophila Behavioral Races

Shu Fanga,b, Aya Takahashic, and Chung-I Wua
a Department of Ecology and Evolution, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637,
b Institute of Zoology, Academia Sinica, Nankang, Taipei, Taiwan 115, Republic of China
c Division of Population Genetics, National Institute of Genetics, 1111 Yata, Mishima, 411-8540, Japan

Corresponding author: Chung-I Wu, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637., ciwu{at}uchicago.edu (E-mail)

Communicating editor: M. VEUILLE


*  ABSTRACT
*TOP
*ABSTRACT
*MATERIALS AND METHODS
*RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
*LITERATURE CITED

Examples of genes governing behavioral isolation are scarce. Here we report that a regulatory mutation in desaturase 2, known to determine a pheromonal polymorphism in Drosophila melanogaster females, may be such an example. This mutation is strongly correlated with the mating pattern between the Zimbabwe and cosmopolitan races of this species. These two behavioral races appear to be at the incipient stage of speciation. The desaturase 2 mutation may be one of the many loci underlying the behavioral differences between the two races.


SOME progress has been made toward the molecular elucidation of "speciation genes" in the last decade, mostly in systems of gamete recognition (SWANSON and VACQUIER 1998 Down) or spermatogenesis (TING et al. 1998 Down, TING et al. 2000 Down; see WU 2001 Down for a review). However, no study appears to have successfully identified genes governing behavioral isolation between natural populations or species. A possible "entry point" may be genes controlling the production of cuticular hydrocarbons (CHs), which are contact pheromones in Drosophila. It has been shown that interspecific differences in the CH profile of female Drosophila play a large role in male mate choice (COYNE et al. 1994 Down). Unfortunately, CH differences between species have a complex genetic basis (COYNE and CHARLESWORTH 1997 Down) and cloning the underlying genes may not be straightforward.

It may be easier to unravel the genetic basis of CH differences between conspecific behavioral races, which are at the incipient stage of sexual isolation. Females of many Drosophila melanogaster lines from southern/central Africa (Zimbabwe- or Z-type flies) do not mate with males from other continents (M type, for common melanogaster) in double-choice experiments (WU et al. 1995 Down; HOLLOCHER et al. 1997A Down). Although the Zimbabwe and worldwide populations are still at an incipient stage of speciation, the number of genes controlling the mating behavioral differences exceeds 15 (HOLLOCHER et al. 1997B Down; TING et al. 2001 Down).

African and non-African D. melanogaster females are also known to have different CH profiles (FERVEUR et al. 1996 Down). In Africa and the Caribbean, most females carry the contact pheromone 5,9 heptacosadiene (5,9 HD). In the rest of the world, the major cuticular CH on females is 7,11 heptacosadiene (7,11 HD). We and others have previously determined the genetic basis of this pheromonal difference in females (DALLERAC et al. 2000 Down; TAKAHASHI et al. 2001 Down). In most African and Caribbean flies, an active desaturase gene (desat2) is responsible for the production of 5,9 HD. In non-African flies, a 16-bp deletion in the promoter region of desat2 has led to its inactivation and, as a result, female flies produce predominantly 7,11 HD. We shall refer to the active form of desat2 as wild type (+) and the deletion mutation as the "D" type. The association between the +/D genotype and the 5,9 HD/7,11 HD phenotype is complete among >40 lines measured (TAKAHASHI et al. 2001 Down).

The main question addressed here is whether the desat2 gene is one of the many loci underlying the mating behavioral differences between the Z- and M-type flies. Since one of the many female mating loci in the Z/M system of D. melanogaster has been crudely mapped to the desat2 region (TING et al. 2001 Down), a positive answer is plausible. In addition, wing vibration, a key element of male courtship, is most efficiently induced by 7,11 HD. The intensity of wing vibration by Canton-S males was a function of the quantity of 7,11 HD on females (ANTONY and JALLON 1982 Down; ANTONY et al. 1985 Down; FERVEUR and SUREAU 1996 Down) and 7,11 HD-rich females induce mating by M-type males more readily than 5,9 HD-rich females (FERVEUR et al. 1996 Down). Two lines of observations have been held against the hypothesis of an association between the Z/M behavioral differences and the CH profile on females. First, the Caribbean lines have the 5,9 HD (FERVEUR et al. 1996 Down) but are behaviorally of the M type. Second, CH rub-off experiments do not have a detectable effect on female mating behavior (COYNE et al. 1999 Down). Nevertheless, it is prudent not to prematurely reject the hypothesis on the basis of these observations. In association studies of complex trait mapping, comparisons should not be made across divergent populations due to linkage disequilibrium between the candidate locus and background variation (LANDER and SCHORK 1994 Down). Thus, the Caribbean flies could have a component of the Z-type behavior that is associated with the desat2 allele but the overall behavior is masked by their M-type genetic background. The rub-off experiments essentially attempted to convert typical M-type females into Caribbean-like females.

To answer the question about the association (or lack of) between the desat2 gene and the Z/M behavior more definitively, we have incorporated the above considerations in a different experimental design. First, we used a double-choice design to include all behavioral components (male choice, female choice, and interactions). Second, we compared lines from the same populations. Although the 7,11 HD type (or the D desat2 allele) is nearly fixed outside of Africa (except in the Caribbean), the + and D alleles segregate at appreciable frequencies in several African populations. In this study, we compared 22 lines from all three populations known to be commonly polymorphic for the desat2 alleles for their mating pattern.


*  MATERIALS AND METHODS
*TOP
*ABSTRACT
*MATERIALS AND METHODS
*RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
*LITERATURE CITED

Fly stocks:
The Zimbabwe isofemale lines were collected from the Sengwa Wildlife Reserve around 1990 (the ZS lines) and near Harare (the ZH lines). The Luangua (LA) lines were from southern Zambia and the Okavanga (OK) lines were from Botswana. These are described in HOLLOCHER et al. 1997A Down. We include all of the lines used in HOLLOCHER et al. 1997A Down with the exception of ZH16, ZH33, ZH34, ZH42, and LA69. (These lines were excluded because they are polymorphic for the desat2 allele. The polymorphism complicates the interpretation of the behavioral measurements as correlants of the desat2 genotype.) One isofemale line from Zimbabwe, Z30, and one from France, FrV3-1 (Fr), were chosen as the standard Z and M lines, respectively.

DNA genotyping:
The genotype at the desat2 locus was determined by the presence or absence of a 16-bp deletion ~150 bp upstream from the desat2 coding sequence (TAKAHASHI et al. 2001 Down). The determination was done by PCR followed by restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis.

Measurement of mating behavior:
We use a double-choice mating design, which measures multiple components of mate choice. Briefly, 55–65 females of the tested line and the same number of M-type females (the Fr line; HOLLOCHER et al. 1997A Down, HOLLOCHER et al. 1997B Down) were released into a cage containing 55–65 males of a strong Z line and the same number of males from the M line. All flies were fed colored food prior to the experiment and the copulating pairs were aspirated out of the cage for identification by food coloring in the gut.

We use the discrimination index (DI; WU et al. 1995 Down; HOLLOCHER et al. 1997A Down) to present the relative mating preference or success in each experiment. , where nij is the number of copulating pairs between type i females and type j males; U, Z, and M designate the tested (U, for unknown), pure Z lines, and pure M lines, respectively. DI = 0 indicates no difference in mating preference and a positive value means the tested females are more Z-like in terms of their mating pattern.

The design is nearly identical with that of HOLLOCHER et al. 1997A Down except that the males used here are Z males rather than M males. In HOLLOCHER et al. 1997A Down, we used males of the tested line against M males. The new method is more sensitive in detecting the mating pattern of females with intermediate Z behavior. When a line is of intermediate Z femaleness, its Z maleness is usually intermediate as well (HOLLOCHER et al. 1997A Down). Such females often mate much more randomly when offered M males and intermediate Z males than when offered M males and strong Z males. Therefore, for the intermediate Z behavior lines, the DI values measured by the modified method are higher than those measured by the method of HOLLOCHER et al. 1997A Down. For example, for LA2 in Table 1. In contrast, the DI value is 1.99 for the same line by the method of HOLLOCHER et al. 1997A Down. For the strong Z lines, the DI values measured by these two methods are similar because males from the tested lines are most often strong Z males. We remeasured all of the lines with a DI value of <2.5 from the three African populations in HOLLOCHER et al.'s study (1997a).


 
View this table:
In this window
In a new window

 
Table 1. Association between Z femaleness and the desat2 alleles


*  RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
*TOP
*ABSTRACT
*MATERIALS AND METHODS
*RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
*LITERATURE CITED

In total, 22 lines from the three African populations that are polymorphic for the desat2 alleles were used in this association study. Each of these 22 lines is monomorphic for either the + or the D desat2 allele. Previous studies have shown that the allelic status (+ or D) at the desat2 locus accurately predicts the CH phenotype of females from >40 different lines (TAKAHASHI et al. 2001 Down; see also COYNE et al. 1999 Down; DALLERAC et al. 2000 Down). Monomorphic populations are of course uninformative. In Table 1, we rank these 22 lines according to the DI value in the double-choice mating design. Measurements are listed separately for each population. Among the ZH lines, the Wilcoxon rank test yields P < 0.05, suggesting a strong correlation between the mating pattern and the desat2 allele carried by the females. The correlation is complete in both the LA and OK populations although the number of lines in each population (6 and 4, respectively) is too small to yield a significant result.

We may also pool the observations from the three polymorphic populations for a statistical test. This is a conservative practice as pooling observations across populations can only weaken the correlation. In other words, an imperfect correlation within each population will always be preserved in the pooled data but a perfect correlation may be destroyed by pooling. Thus, pooling across populations should be done only if the populations are not too divergent in their mean DIs. The ZH, OK, and LA populations broadly overlap in this measurement and are geographically the most adjacent among all collections. In the pooled data, the top 13 lines with high DI values all carry the wild-type desat2 allele (+) and the bottom 7 lines all carry the inactive D allele. Both the Mann-Whitney and Wilcoxon rank tests give P < 0.001.

Higher DI values indicate an excess in mating of the following two combinations, (tested females x Z males) and (M females x M males), over the other two, (tested females x M males) and (M females x Z males). The DI value does not differentiate female choice, male choice, or interactions between them. We thus refer to a high DI value as high Z femaleness without making a distinction between her attractiveness, her mate choice, and the interactions. The interpretation in favor of any mechanism usually entails supplementary observations. In this case, it is more straightforward to interpret the results as male choice (or female attractiveness), in light of the behavioral observations (FERVEUR et al. 1996 Down) as well as in light of the female-limited expression of desat2 (DALLERAC et al. 2000 Down). The exact mechanism may be more complex, involving male choice, female response, and their synergism.

In a separate experiment that allowed the Z- and M-type genomes to mix for 60 generations in five replicates, the resultant lines varied in the degree of Z femaleness, which indeed is strongly correlated with the presence of the wild-type desat2 allele (J. ALIPAZ, S. FANG and C.-I WU, unpublished data). The desat2 allele carried by the female determines her CH phenotype, which affects the relative courtship intensity of Z and M males toward her. It should also be noted that the desat2 locus is only one of the many loci (>7; TING et al. 2001 Down) that determine Z femaleness. Populations may differentiate all, or a subset, of these loci (HOLLOCHER et al. 1997A Down).

The above conclusion necessitates a reevaluation of the genetic make-up of the Caribbean flies, which carry the + desat2 allele but exhibit M-like behavior (Table 1). Since a measurable degree of Z femaleness requires the presence of the Z-type allele at several loci (HOLLOCHER et al. 1997B Down; TING et al. 2001 Down), the effect of a single locus can be observed only when the alleles at other Z-behavior loci are equivalent in the comparison. By this criterion, lines from the same population are appropriate. On the other hand, the Caribbean lines are likely to be of the M genotype at most of the loci. This study suggests that association studies can be adequate for gene mapping, even for very complex traits like mating bias, but the comparison has to be made strictly within populations.

Are there genetic variants other than the +/D difference that may also account for the pattern of Table 1? Because D. melanogaster generally exhibits low levels of linkage disequilibrium and because the sequences in the desat2 region indeed show extensive recombination (TAKAHASHI et al. 2001 Down), the observation of Table 1 is not likely to be associated with polymorphism outside of the desat2 region. It should also be noted that the +/D variant in the promoter of desat2 is the only variant that shows a complete concordance with the CH phenotype in the entire 13-kb region where the CH difference was mapped (TAKAHASHI et al. 2001 Down). In light of previous phenotypic studies (COYNE et al. 1994 Down; FERVEUR et al. 1996 Down; DALLERAC et al. 2000 Down; TAKAHASHI et al. 2001 Down), the most parsimonious explanation for the correlation between the mating pattern and the desat2-region genotype is the inactivation of the desat2 gene by the 16-bp deletion in its promoter. That the nonfunctionalization of a gene may play a role in sexual isolation during incipient speciation merely reveals a small corner of the fascinating unknowns in the molecular genetics of species differentiation.


*  ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Ian Boussy, Hope Hollocher, Howard Rundle, and Norman Johnson for their helpful comments. This work was supported by a postdoctoral fellowship from the Ministry of Education, Taiwan, Republic of China, to S. Fang, a JSPS Fellowship for Young Scientists to A. Takahashi, and National Institutes of Health and National Science Foundation grants to C.-I Wu.

Manuscript received May 19, 2002; Accepted for publication June 29, 2002.


*  LITERATURE CITED
*TOP
*ABSTRACT
*MATERIALS AND METHODS
*RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
*LITERATURE CITED

ANTONY, C. and J.-M. JALLON, 1982  The chemical basis for sex recognition in Drosophila melanogaster.. J. Insect Physiol. 28:873-880.

ANTONY, C., T. L. DAVIS, D. A. CARLSON, J.-M. PÉCHINÉ, and J.-M. JALLON, 1985  Compared behavioral responses of male Drosophila melanogaster (Canton S) to natural and synthetic aphrodisiacs. J. Chem. Ecol. 11:1617-1629.

COYNE, J. A. and B. CHARLESWORTH, 1997  Genetics of a pheromonal difference affecting sexual isolation between Drosophila mauritiana and D. sechellia.. Genetics 145:1015-1030.[Abstract]

COYNE, J. A., A. P. CRITTENDEN, and K. MAH, 1994  Genetics of a pheromonal difference contributing to reproductive isolation in Drosophila.. Science 265:1461-1464.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

COYNE, J. A., C. WICKER-THOMAS, and J.-M. JALLON, 1999  A gene responsible for a cuticular hydrocarbon polymorphism in Drosophila melanogaster.. Genet. Res. 73:189-203.[Medline]

DALLERAC, R., C. LABEUR, J.-M. JALLON, D. C. KNIPPLE, and W. L. ROELOFS et al., 2000  A {Delta} 9 desaturase gene with a different substrate specificity is responsible for the cuticular diene hydrocarbon polymorphism in Drosophila melanogaster.. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97:9449-9454.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

FERVEUR, J.-F. and G. SUREAU, 1996  Simultaneous influence on male courtship of stimulatory and inhibitory pheromones produced by live sex-mosaic Drosophila melanogaster.. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B 263:967-973.[Medline]

FERVEUR, J.-F., M. COBB, H. BOUKELLA, and J.-M. JALLON, 1996  World-wide variation in Drosophila melanogaster sex pheromone: behavioural effects, genetic bases and potential evolutionary consequences. Genetica 97:73-80.[Medline]

HOLLOCHER, H., C.-T. TING, F. POLLACK, and C.-I WU, 1997a  Incipient speciation by sexual isolation in Drosophila melanogaster: variation in mating preference and correlation between sexes. Evolution 5:1175-1181.

HOLLOCHER, H., C.-T. TING, M.-L. WU, and C.-I WU, 1997b  Incipient speciation by sexual isolation in Drosophila melanogaster: extensive genetic divergence without reinforcement. Genetics 147:1191-1201.[Abstract]

LANDER, E. S. and N. J. SCHORK, 1994  Genetic dissection of complex traits. Science 265:2037-2048.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

SWANSON, W. J. and V. D. VACQUIER, 1998  Concerted evolution in an egg receptor for a rapidly evolving abalone sperm protein. Science 281:710-712.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

TAKAHASHI, A., S.-C. TSAUR, J. A. COYNE, and C.-I WU, 2001  The nucleotide changes governing cuticular hydrocarbon variation and their evolution in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98:3920-3925.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

TING, C.-T., S.-C. TSAUR, M.-L. WU, and C.-I WU, 1998  A rapidly evolving homeobox at the site of a hybrid sterility gene. Science 282:1501-1504.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

TING, C.-T., S.-C. TSAUR, and C.-I WU, 2000  The phylogeny of closely related species as revealed by the genealogy of a speciation gene, Odysseus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97:5313-5316.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

TING, C.-T., A. TAKAHASHI, and C.-I WU, 2001  Incipient speciation by sexual isolation in Drosophila: concurrent evolution at multiple loci. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98:6709-6713.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

WU, C.-I, 2001  The genic view of the process of speciation. J. Evol. Biol. 14:851-865.

WU, C.-I, H. HOLLOCHER, D. J. BEGUN, C. F. AQUADRO, and Y. XU, 1995  Sexual isolation in Drosophila melanogaster: a possible case of incipient speciation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92:2519-2523.[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
GeneticsHome page
B. Foley, S. F. Chenoweth, S. V. Nuzhdin, and M. W. Blows
Natural Genetic Variation in Cuticular Hydrocarbon Expression in Male and Female Drosophila melanogaster
Genetics, March 1, 2007; 175(3): 1465 - 1477.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
A. Korol, E. Rashkovetsky, K. Iliadi, and E. Nevo
Drosophila flies in "Evolution Canyon" as a model for incipient sympatric speciation
PNAS, November 28, 2006; 103(48): 18184 - 18189.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
N. Osada, M. H. Kohn, and C.-I Wu
Genomic Inferences of the cis-Regulatory Nucleotide Polymorphisms Underlying Gene Expression Differences between Drosophila melanogaster Mating Races
Mol. Biol. Evol., August 1, 2006; 23(8): 1585 - 1591.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
A. J. Greenberg and C.-I Wu
Molecular Genetics of Natural Populations
Mol. Biol. Evol., May 1, 2006; 23(5): 883 - 886.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
A. J. Greenberg, J. R. Moran, S. Fang, and C.-I Wu
Adaptive Loss of an Old Duplicated Gene During Incipient Speciation
Mol. Biol. Evol., February 1, 2006; 23(2): 401 - 410.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
F. Marcillac, F. Bousquet, J. Alabouvette, F. Savarit, and J.-F. Ferveur
A Mutation With Major Effects on Drosophila melanogaster Sex Pheromones
Genetics, December 1, 2005; 171(4): 1617 - 1628.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
J. M. Gleason, J.-M. Jallon, J.-D. Rouault, and M. G. Ritchie
Quantitative Trait Loci for Cuticular Hydrocarbons Associated With Sexual Isolation Between Drosophila simulans and D. sechellia
Genetics, December 1, 2005; 171(4): 1789 - 1798.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
F. Marcillac, B. Houot, and J.-F. Ferveur
Revisited Roles of Drosophila Female Pheromones
Chem Senses, January 1, 2005; 30(suppl_1): i273 - i274.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
F. Marcillac and J.-F. Ferveur
A set of female pheromones affects reproduction before, during and after mating in Drosophila
J. Exp. Biol., October 15, 2004; 207(22): 3927 - 3933.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
M. H. Kohn, S. Fang, and C.-I Wu
Inference of Positive and Negative Selection on the 5' Regulatory Regions of Drosophila Genes
Mol. Biol. Evol., February 1, 2004; 21(2): 374 - 383.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
A. J. Greenberg, J. R. Moran, J. A. Coyne, and C.-I Wu
Ecological Adaptation During Incipient Speciation Revealed by Precise Gene Replacement
Science, December 5, 2003; 302(5651): 1754 - 1757.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
G. A. Wray, M. W. Hahn, E. Abouheif, J. P. Balhoff, M. Pizer, M. V. Rockman, and L. A. Romano
The Evolution of Transcriptional Regulation in Eukaryotes
Mol. Biol. Evol., September 1, 2003; 20(9): 1377 - 1419.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
W. L. Roelofs and A. P. Rooney
Molecular genetics and evolution of pheromone biosynthesis in Lepidoptera
PNAS, August 5, 2003; 100(16): 9179 - 9184.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]