- THIS ARTICLE
-
Abstract
- Full Text (PDF)
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Naisbit, R. E.
- Articles by Mallet, J.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Naisbit, R. E.
- Articles by Mallet, J.
Hybrid Sterility, Haldane's Rule and Speciation in Heliconius cydno and H. melpomene
Russell E. Naisbit1,a, Chris D. Jigginsa,b, Mauricio Linaresc, Camilo Salazarc, and James Malleta,ba The Galton Laboratory, Department of Biology, University College London, London NW1 2HE, United Kingdom,
b Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Apartado 2072, República de Panamá
c Instituto de Genética, Universidad de los Andes, Santafé de Bogotá, Apartado Aéreo 4976, República de Colombia
Corresponding author: James Mallet, Department of Biology, University College London, 4 Stephenson Way, London NW1 2HE, United Kingdom., j.mallet{at}ucl.ac.uk (E-mail)
Communicating editor: J. B. WALSH
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
Most genetic studies of Haldane's rule, in which hybrid sterility or inviability affects the heterogametic sex preferentially, have focused on Drosophila. It therefore remains unclear to what extent the conclusions of that work apply more generally, particularly in female-heterogametic taxa such as birds and Lepidoptera. Here we present a genetic analysis of Haldane's rule in Heliconius butterflies. Female F1 hybrids between Heliconius melpomene and H. cydno are completely sterile, while males have normal to mildly reduced fertility. In backcrosses of male F1 hybrids, female offspring range from completely sterile to fully fertile. Linkage analysis using the Z-linked triose-phosphate isomerase locus demonstrates a "large X" (Z) effect on sterility. Expression of female sterility varies among crosses in this and a previous study of Heliconius. Sterility may result from the production of normal but infertile eggs, production of small infertile eggs, or from a complete failure to develop ovarioles, which suggests multiple routes to the evolution of hybrid sterility in these Heliconius species. These results conform to the expectations of the "dominance" rather than "faster male" theories of Haldane's rule and suggest that relatively few loci are responsible. The two species are broadly sympatric and hybridize in the wild, so that female hybrid sterility forms one of several strong but incomplete barriers to gene flow in nature. The effect of female sterility is comparable to that of selection against non-mimetic hybrids, while mate choice forms a much stronger barrier to gene transfer.
HALDANE'S rule has proved an enduring generalization. It states that when one sex is absent, rare, or sterile in the F1 offspring of a cross between two races or species, that sex is most commonly the heterogametic sex (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Recently a degree of consensus has been reached that Haldane's rule is largely explained by the "dominance theory," with a contribution in Drosophila from "faster male evolution," and possibly "faster X evolution" (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Birds and Lepidoptera may play an important role in distinguishing the contributions of the three theories. Their females are heterogametic yet both groups still display Haldane's rule. Therefore, heterogamety rather than sex is critical. Faster male theories predict the reverse of Haldane's rule, and models suggest that the dominance theory can produce Haldane effects in females even when opposed by faster evolution of male hybrid sterility (![]()
1/201/30), which could slow the origin of Haldane's rule effects (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Here we study the genetic basis of sterility between Heliconius cydno and H. melpomene (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae). These sister species are sympatric across much of Central and Andean South America below 1500 m (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
A previous study has shown female hybrid sterility between H. melpomene races from French Guiana and those from Panama and Colombia (![]()
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
Collection localities are given in Table 1. Crosses involving H. melpomene rosina and H. cydno chioneus from Panama and H. melpomene melpomene from French Guiana were performed in Gamboa, Republic of Panama, between August 1998 and March 2000. Crosses involving Colombian butterflies were made in La Vega, 50 km northwest of Santafé de Bogotá, Colombia. H. melpomene vulcanus and H. cydno were collected in the west of the Cauca valley, in the Dagua Pass. In this region three races of H. cydno form a hybrid zone among H. cydno zelinde, H. cydno cydnides, and H. cydno weymeri (![]()
|
After mating, females were kept individually in 1 x 1 x 2-m outdoor insectaries and supplied daily with pollen sources (Lantana and Psiguria) and artificial nectar (10% sugar solution). Passiflora vines were provided for oviposition, mainly Passiflora menispermifolia and P. edulis. Eggs were collected daily and kept individually in small plastic pots with moist cotton wool to maintain humidity. To avoid cannibalism caterpillars were reared individually until the third instar and then in groups of two to eight on new growth of P. biflora in Panama and P. edulis in Colombia. After pupation they were transferred to baskets until eclosion. The number of eggs laid, hatch rates, and eclosing butterflies were recorded. Females were dissected to confirm that they had received a spermatophore at mating and to assess the level of ovary development. F1 males and females and female offspring of backcrosses were tested for fertility.
Crosses were attempted in all possible combinations, but very strong asymmetrical mate choice prevented one direction of interspecific cross (H. melpomene female x H. cydno male) from Panama populations, and this direction of cross was obtained only once each using Colombia and French Guiana females (Table 2). Crosses between the two species in Colombia were largely restricted to stocks from within a geographic region. Results from interracial crosses within H. melpomene are described separately (![]()
|
Statistical analysis:
Counts of egg hatch rates were analyzed using a likelihood test based on a ß-binomial model (BETA-BINO program by Ziheng Yang; see ![]()
asymptotically follows a
2 distribution (![]()
![]()
Linkage analysis:
Intron 4 of the sex-linked triose-phosphate isomerase (Tpi) gene was amplified using primers situated in the surrounding exons. Evidence for sex linkage, primer sequences, and PCR conditions is described by ![]()
| RESULTS |
|---|
Crosses between the sister species in Panama:
Female hybrids between H. cydno and H. melpomene were completely sterile (Table 2). In the sympatric Panamanian cross 25 F1 females were tested, producing 209 apparently normal eggs, not one of which hatched. Dissections confirmed that these females had received a spermatophore at mating and had developed normal ovaries (Table 3). Fifteen of the females failed to lay eggs despite surviving >15 days, by which time fertile control broods had invariably begun laying. Male hybrids were fully fertile, and there was no significant difference in hatch rate between their offspring and those of control broods
.
|
Sex ratio across all broods was best described by a simple binomial model with an average proportion of females of 0.516 (support limits 0.491, 0.542), across 1553 adults from 48 broods. There was no evidence for differences in the sex ratio of adults emerging from nine Panama and French Guiana control, F1, and Panama backcross brood classes
, suggesting an absence of Haldane's rule on female inviability.
When fertile F1 males were backcrossed to females of the two parental species, female offspring were recovered showing the full range of fertility but with pronounced bimodality between complete sterility and apparently normal fertility (Table 4A and Table 4B, and Fig 1). In the backcross to H. cydno, complete sterility was usually manifested as a failure to lay eggs, while from the backcross to H. melpomene, sterile females typically laid eggs that did not hatch.
|
|
There was strong linkage between sterility and Z-linked Tpi in female offspring from the backcross to H. melpomene (Table 4A). All six females that were completely sterile had the cydno Tpi insertion, while all five females that showed at least some fertility lacked the insertion and therefore had that region of the H. melpomene Z chromosome
. In contrast, in the backcross to H. cydno there was no association between Tpi genotype and sterility (Table 4B,
).
Crosses between H. melpomene from French Guiana and H. cydno from Panama:
Interspecific hybrid females of this cross were also sterile (Table 2). None of the 10 female offspring of H. cydno female x H. melpomene male laid any eggs. Dissections showed that the failure to lay eggs in these females was due to a complete failure to develop ovaries (Table 3). Only two females could be produced from the reciprocal cross and, although both were sterile, one actually laid eggs. There was also a reduction in F1 male fertility (Table 2). Broods fathered by F1 males had hatch rates of 0.615 ± 0.041 with a H. cydno female and 0.611 ± 0.124 with H. melpomene, significantly lower than the rates of 0.859 ± 0.039 and 0.901 ± 0.027 for control broods of H. cydno and Guiana H. melpomene, respectively
. This is hybrid male sterility, rather than incompatibility when crossing parents of different genotypes, since there was no evidence of a reduction in hatch rate among eggs fertilized by a heterospecific male when F1 and control broods were compared
.
Crosses between Colombian sister species:
In both the Eastern Andean foothills and Cauca valley crosses, female F1 hybrids of H. cydno female x H. melpomene male were completely sterile, either failing to lay eggs or laying eggs that never hatched (Table 2). Hybrid males were fully fertile: hatch rates of their offspring were higher than those of control broods, although not significantly so
. Some partially fertile F1 females were produced in the reciprocal cross of an Eastern Andes H. melpomene female x H. cydno male from the Cauca valley (Table 2). Females were tested from a single brood, with three laying few eggs that never hatched, and the remaining four producing eggs with hatch rates of
20%.
Fertile F1 males backcrossed to H. cydno produce female offspring with the full range of fertility (Table 4C and Table 4D, Fig 1B). The ratio of completely sterile to fertile females in backcrosses does not differ significantly between the eastern foothills, Cauca valley, or Panama backcrosses to H. cydno
.
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
Female F1 hybrids between H. cydno and H. melpomene are completely sterile in five of the crosses described here, and their fertility is dramatically reduced in the sixth. In contrast, males have normal fertility in all but one of the crosses, with fertility reduced only in hybrids between H. cydno from Panama and H. melpomene from French Guiana. The lack of variation in sex ratio across control and F1 broods suggests that there are no sex differences in viability. Counting as three examples the Heliconius studies (the interracial melpomene cross and reciprocal cydno x melpomene crosses) brings the total to 17 cases of sex-limited sterility in Lepidoptera, all but one of which conform to Haldane's rule, compared to 71 lepidopteran examples of unisexual hybrid inviability, of which only three do not conform (DAVIES et al. 1997; ![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
The association between sterility and Tpi genotype shown here provides evidence of a large Z (X) effect on sterility, as is common in Drosophila (![]()
![]()
![]()
Here we find sterility in females with the H. cydno Tpi allele on a Panama H. melpomene autosomal background. Interestingly, in hybrids between geographic races of H. melpomene from Panama and French Guiana, sterility is associated with the same Z-linked Tpi marker: in this case it is the French Guiana Tpi that is associated with sterility on a Panama autosomal background while the reverse cross produces no sterility and therefore no association with Tpi (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
W genotype would be phenotypically male under lepidopteran sex determination.
Three different sterility phenotypes appear in female hybrids involving H. melpomene (Table 3):
- In the cross described here between female Panamanian H. melpomene and male H. cydno, F1 females lay normal-sized eggs that never hatch. In this cross alone it is possible that "sterility" is actually produced by zygote inviability or failure of fertilization despite normal spermatophore transfer.
- The sterile eggs of hybrids are much smaller in interracial crosses between female H. melpomene from Panama and male H. melpomene from French Guiana (
JIGGINS et al. 2001A ). (In the reciprocal cross, egg size and fertility are normal.)
- The third sterility phenotype is more extreme: hybrid females between French Guiana H. melpomene and Panama H. cydno fail to develop ovaries at all.
These distinct sterility phenotypes back up evidence from Tpi linkage to suggest that at least some different loci are involved in each case, although a parsimonious explanation of the results involving Panamanian H. melpomene (see previous paragraph) implies some genes in common.
At least four features of these crosses suggest that relatively few loci each of major effect are important in producing sterility:
- The asymmetry seen in crosses between French Guiana and Panama or Colombia H. melpomene implies that few loci are involved, so that, by chance, incompatibilities have arisen in one but not both reciprocal crosses (
MULLER 1942 ).
It has been asserted on the basis of an unpublished analysis that such asymmetry might arise even if large numbers of loci produce sterility (![]()
- there are strong effects of loci linked to Tpi in some crosses but not others, and
- the sterility phenotypes are very different between the different crosses. Neither would be expected if sterility were a polygenic effect of steadily accumulating genetic differences.
Finally,
- the distribution of sterility in the backcrosses is strongly bimodal, with fertile females recovered after only a single generation of backcrossing.
If many loci combine to produce sterility, one might expect to see a range of intermediate fertility levels. Alternatively, if major-effect sterility factors were scattered throughout the genome, most offspring should have low fertility because in the backcrosses there is the opportunity for many additional interactions between dominant and recessive autosomal factors. Tpi-linked sterility on the H. cydno Z chromosome is therefore unusual in comparison with the rest of the genome. While some of these heterogeneities might be explained by multiple genes and threshold effects, the combination of effects seems most easily explained if several (rather than many) genomic regions are important, at least some of which have major effects on sterility.
While female sterility is complete in F1 hybrids between a H. cydno female and H. melpomene male, it remains uncertain if sterility is normally present in hybrids from the reciprocal cross since few were produced due to strong behavioral isolation. There is sterility in both directions of cross between H. cydno from Panama and H. melpomene from French Guiana. In the Colombian crosses there is variation among females from the one brood of H. melpomene female by H. cydno male, with some showing complete sterility and others having low fertility with
20% of eggs hatching. This variation within F1 females is difficult to explain, but both parents come from regions where interspecific hybridization occurs, H. melpomene melpomene with H. heurippa in the Eastern Andean foothills and H. cydno with H. melpomene vulcanus in the Cauca valley and Pacific slopes (![]()
![]()
Closely related species of Heliconius typically have several incomplete barriers to gene flow that can include assortative mating, hybrid sterility, selection against hybrids due to increased predation on their non-mimetic color patterns, and the divergent ecology of the parental species (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
80%, so that the total barrier due to F1 and backcross sterility is
0.7 (i.e., 0.5 + 0.5 x 0.5 x 0.8). Ecological incompatibility causing selection by predators against hybrid color patterns is of a similar strength,
50% if similar to that estimated from a H. erato hybrid zone (![]()
64%. Mate choice between the two species is by far the strongest barrier to gene transfer, since the species hybridize extremely rarely in nature, only with great difficulty in no-choice tests, and never in laboratory choice tests (![]()
![]()
![]()
A consequence of these multiple incomplete barriers to gene flow is that certain hybrid genotypes will suffer disproportionately while others escape, creating a selectively permeable species boundary. As in hybrid zones, different regions of the genome will cross the species boundary and introgress with varying ease, with some halted by selective barriers and others relatively unrestricted (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
1 Present address: Laboratoire d'Ecologie Animale et Entomologie, Institut de Zoologie, Université de Neuchâtel, CH-2007 Neuchâtel, Switzerland. ![]()
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We are very grateful to the Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute where the Panamanian crosses were carried out, and to ANAM (Autoridad Nacional del Ambiente) for permission to work in Panama. Fernando Arango kindly let two of us perform crosses at his farm at La Vega village in Colombia. For saving caterpillars from starvation and humans from boredom we thank Richard Woods, Camilla Paresce, Luis Alberto Taylor R., Catalina Estrada, Margarita Beltrán, Lianne O'Donovan, Rebecca Coe, Vanessa Bull, Cris Thompson, Yaneth Sánchez, and Carolina Guaneme. Diana Pérez deserves special thanks for providing partial support to Camilo Salazar during the development of this study. Thanks also go to Ziheng Yang for the use of his BETABINO program to analyze hatch rate data. The project was funded by a Natural Environment Research Council grant and a studentship from the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council. Funding for Colombian crosses was partially provided by Fondo Colombiano de Investigaciones Cientificas y Proyectos Especiales Francisco Jose de Caldas COLCIENCIAS, grant CO-1204-05-510-93, and Fundación Para la Promoción de la Investigación y la Tecnología del Banco de la República, grant 734.
Manuscript received July 2, 2001; Accepted for publication May 8, 2002.
| LITERATURE CITED |
|---|
BARTON, N. H., 1979 Gene flow past a cline. Heredity 43:333-339.
BARTON, N. H., 1983 Multilocus clines. Evolution 37:454-471.
BATESON, W., 1909 Heredity and variation in modern lights, pp. 85101 in Darwin and Modern Science, edited by A. C. SEWARD. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
BELTRÁN, M., C. D. JIGGINS, V. BULL, M. LINARES, and J. MALLET et al., 2002 Phylogenetic discordance at the species boundary: comparative gene genealogies among Heliconius butterflies. Mol. Biol. Evol. in press.
BENSON, W. W., 1978 Resource partitioning in passion vine butterflies. Evolution 32:493-518.
BROWER, A. V. Z., 1996 Parallel race formation and the evolution of mimicry in Heliconius butterflies: a phylogenetic hypothesis from mitochondrial DNA sequences. Evolution 50:195-221.
BROWN, K. S., 1979 Ecologia geográfica e evolução nas florestas neotropicais. Universidade Estadual de Campinas, São Paulo, Brasil.
CHARLESWORTH, B., J. A. COYNE, and N. H. BARTON, 1987 The relative rates of evolution of sex chromosomes and autosomes. Am. Nat. 130:113-146.
COYNE, J. A., 1985 The genetic basis of Haldane's rule. Nature 314:736-738.[Medline]
COYNE, J. A. and H. A. ORR, 1989a Patterns of speciation in Drosophila. Evolution 43:362-381.
COYNE, J. A., and H. A. ORR, 1989b Two rules of speciation, pp. 180207 in Speciation and Its Consequences, edited by D. OTTE and J. A. ENDLER. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
COYNE, J. A. and H. A. ORR, 1997 "Patterns of speciation in Drosophila" revisited. Evolution 51:295-303.
DAVIES, N., A. AIELLO, J. MALLET, A. POMIANKOWSKI, and R. E. SILBERGLIED, 1997 Speciation in two neotropical butterflies: extending Haldane's rule. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B 264:845-851.
DOBZHANSKY, T., 1936 Studies on hybrid sterility. II. Localization of sterility factors in Drosophila pseudoobscura hybrids. Genetics 21:113-135.
EDWARDS, A. W. F., 1972 Likelihood. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
GILBERT, L. E., 2003 Adaptive novelty through introgression in Heliconius wing patterns: evidence for shared genetic "tool box" from synthetic hybrid zones and a theory of diversification, in Ecology and Evolution Taking Flight: Butterflies as Model Systems, edited by C. L. BOGGS, W. B. WATT and P. R. EHRLICH. University of Chicago Press, Chicago in press.
HALDANE, J. B. S., 1922 Sex ratio and unisexual sterility in hybrid animals. J. Genet. 12:101-109.
HALDANE, J. B. S., 1924 A mathematical theory of natural selection and artificial selection. Part 1. Cambr. Phil. Soc. Trans. 23:19-41.
HOLLOCHER, H. and C.-I WU, 1996 The genetics of reproductive isolation in the Drosophila simulans clade: X vs. autosomal effects and male vs. female effects. Genetics 143:1243-1255.[Abstract]
JIGGINS, C. D. and J. MALLET, 2000 Bimodal hybrid zones and speciation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 15:250-255.[Medline]
JIGGINS, C. D., W. O. MCMILLAN, P. KING, and J. MALLET, 1997 The maintenance of species differences across a Heliconius hybrid zone. Heredity 79:469-505.
JIGGINS, C. D., M. LINARES, R. E. NAISBIT, C. SALAZAR, and Z. H. YANG et al., 2001a Sex-linked hybrid sterility in a butterfly. Evolution 55:1631-1638.[Medline]
JIGGINS, C. D., R. E. NAISBIT, R. L. COE, and J. MALLET, 2001b Reproductive isolation caused by colour pattern mimicry. Nature 411:302-305.[Medline]
KIRKPATRICK, M. and V. RAVIGNÉ, 2002 Speciation by natural and sexual selection: models and experiments. Am. Nat. 159:S22-S35.
LAURIE, C. C., 1997 The weaker sex is heterogametic: 75 years of Haldane's rule. Genetics 147:937-951.[Medline]
LINARES, M., 1989 Adaptive microevolution through hybridization and biotic destruction in the Neotropics. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Texas, Austin, TX.
LINARES, M., 1997 Origin of neotropical mimetic biodiversity from a three-way hybrid zone of Heliconius cydno butterflies, pp. 93108 in Tropical Biodiversity and Systematics: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Biodiversity and Systematics in Tropical Ecosystems, edited by H. ULRICH. Zoologisches Forschungsinstitut und Museum Alexander Koenig, Bonn, Germany.
MALLET, J., 1986 Hybrid zones of Heliconius butterflies in Panama and the stability and movement of warning colour clines. Heredity 56:191-202.
MALLET, J. and N. H. BARTON, 1989 Strong natural selection in a warning-color hybrid zone. Evolution 43:421-431.
MALLET, J. and L. E. GILBERT, 1995 Why are there so many mimicry rings? Correlations between habitat, behaviour and mimicry in Heliconius butterflies. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 55:159-180.
MALLET, J., W. O. MCMILLAN, and C. D. JIGGINS, 1998a Estimating the mating behavior of a pair of hybridizing Heliconius species in the wild. Evolution 52:503-510.
MALLET, J., W. O. MCMILLAN and C. D. JIGGINS, 1998b Mimicry and warning color at the boundary between races and species, pp. 390403 in Endless Forms: Species and Speciation, edited by D. J. HOWARD and S. H. BERLOCHER. Oxford University Press, New York.
MCMILLAN, W. O., C. D. JIGGINS, and J. MALLET, 1997 What initiates speciation in passion-vine butterflies? Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94:8628-8633.
MULLER, H. J., 1940 Bearings of the Drosophila work on systematics, pp. 185268 in The New Systematics, edited by J. S. HUXLEY. Oxford University Press, London/New York.
MULLER, H. J., 1942 Isolating mechanisms, evolution and temperature. Biological Symp. 6:71-125.
NAISBIT, R. E., C. D. JIGGINS, and J. MALLET, 2001 Disruptive sexual selection against hybrids contributes to speciation between Heliconius cydno and Heliconius melpomene.. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B 268:1849-1854.[Medline]
ORR, H. A., 1993 Haldane's rule has multiple genetic causes. Nature 361:532-533.[Medline]
ORR, H. A., 1997 Haldane's rule. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 28:195-218.
PRESGRAVES, D. C. and H. A. ORR, 1998 Haldane's rule in taxa lacking a hemizygous X. Science 282:952-954.
PROWELL, D. P., 1998 Sex linkage and speciation in Lepidoptera, pp. 309319 in Endless Forms: Species and Speciation, edited by D. J. HOWARD and S. H. BERLOCHER. Oxford University Press, New York.
RIESEBERG, L. H., J. WHITTON, and K. GARDNER, 1999 Hybrid zones and the genetic architecture of a barrier to gene flow between two sunflower species. Genetics 152:713-727.
SMILEY, J., 1978a Plant chemistry and the evolution of host specificity: new evidence from Heliconius and Passiflora.. Science 201:745-747.
SMILEY, J. T., 1978b The host plant ecology of Heliconius butterflies in northeastern Costa Rica. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Texas, Austin, TX.
SPERLING, F. A. H., 1993 Mitochondrial DNA variation and Haldane's rule in the Papilio glaucus and P. troilus species groups. Heredity 71:227-233.
TRUE, J. R., B. S. WEIR, and C. C. LAURIE, 1996 A genome-wide survey of hybrid incompatibility factors by the introgression of marked segments of Drosophila mauritiana chromosomes into Drosophila simulans.. Genetics 142:819-837.[Abstract]
TURELLI, M., 1998 The causes of Haldane's rule. Science 282:889-891.
TURELLI, M. and D. J. BEGUN, 1997 Haldane's rule and X-chromosome size in Drosophila.. Genetics 147:1799-1815.[Abstract]
TURELLI, M. and H. A. ORR, 1995 The dominance theory of Haldane's rule. Genetics 140:389-402.[Abstract]
TURELLI, M. and H. A. ORR, 2000 Dominance, epistasis and the genetics of postzygotic isolation. Genetics 154:1663-1679.
WAAGE, J. K., J. T. SMILEY, and L. E. GILBERT, 1981 The Passiflora problem in Hawaii: prospects and problems of controlling the forest weed P. mollissima (Passifloraceae) with Heliconiine butterflies. Entomophaga 26:275-284.
WU, C.-I and A. W. DAVIS, 1993 Evolution of postmating reproductive isolation: the composite nature of Haldane's rule and its genetic bases. Am. Nat. 142:187-212.
WU, C.-I, N. A. JOHNSON, and M. F. PALOPOLI, 1996 Haldane's rule and its legacy: Why are there so many sterile males? Trends Ecol. Evol. 11:281-284.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Y. Tao, S. Chen, D. L. Hartl, and C. C. Laurie Genetic Dissection of Hybrid Incompatibilities Between Drosophila simulans and D. mauritiana. I. Differential Accumulation of Hybrid Male Sterility Effects on the X and Autosomes Genetics, August 1, 2003; 164(4): 1383 - 1397. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Beltran, C. D. Jiggins, V. Bull, M. Linares, J. Mallet, W. O. McMillan, and E. Bermingham Phylogenetic Discordance at the Species Boundary: Comparative Gene Genealogies Among Rapidly Radiating Heliconius Butterflies Mol. Biol. Evol., December 1, 2002; 19(12): 2176 - 2190. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
- THIS ARTICLE
-
Abstract
- Full Text (PDF)
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Naisbit, R. E.
- Articles by Mallet, J.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Naisbit, R. E.
- Articles by Mallet, J.



