Genetics, Vol. 156, 711-721, October 2000, Copyright © 2000

The Drosophila mus101 Gene, Which Links DNA Repair, Replication and Condensation of Heterochromatin in Mitosis, Encodes a Protein With Seven BRCA1 C-Terminus Domains

Rochele R. Yamamotoa, J. Myles Axtonb, Yutaka Yamamotoa, Robert D. C. Saundersc, David M. Glovera, and Daryl S. Hendersona
a CRC Cell Cycle Genetics Group, Department of Genetics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EH, United Kingdom,
b Department of Zoology, Oxford University, Oxford OX1 3PS, United Kingdom
c Department of Biological Sciences, The Open University, Milton Keynes MK7 6AA, United Kingdom

Corresponding author: Daryl S. Henderson, Department of Genetics, University of Cambridge, Downing St., Cambridge CB2 3EH, United Kingdom., dsh25{at}mole.bio.cam.ac.uk (E-mail)

Communicating editor: R. S. HAWLEY


*  ABSTRACT
*TOP
*ABSTRACT
*MATERIALS AND METHODS
*RESULTS
*DISCUSSION
*LITERATURE CITED

The mutagen-sensitive-101 (mus101) gene of Drosophila melanogaster was first identified 25 years ago through mutations conferring larval hypersensitivity to DNA-damaging agents. Other alleles of mus101 causing different phenotypes were later isolated: a female sterile allele results in a defect in a tissue-specific form of DNA synthesis (chorion gene amplification) and lethal alleles cause mitotic chromosome instability that can be observed genetically and cytologically. The latter phenotype presents as a striking failure of mitotic chromosomes of larval neuroblasts to undergo condensation of pericentric heterochromatic regions, as we show for a newly described mutant carrying lethal allele mus101lcd. To gain further insight into the function of the Mus101 protein we have molecularly cloned the gene using a positional cloning strategy. We report here that mus101 encodes a member of the BRCT (BRCA1 C terminus) domain superfamily of proteins implicated in DNA repair and cell cycle checkpoint control. Mus101, which contains seven BRCT domains distributed throughout its length, is most similar to human TopBP1, a protein identified through its in vitro association with DNA topoisomerase IIß. Mus101 also shares sequence similarity with the fission yeast Rad4/Cut5 protein required for repair, replication, and checkpoint control, suggesting that the two proteins may be functional homologs.


MORE than 30 genes of Drosophila melanogaster implicated in DNA repair, replication, recombination, and/or cell cycle checkpoint control have been identified through mutations conferring larval hypersensitivity to DNA-damaging agents (reviewed by DUSENBERY and SMITH 1996 Down; SEKELSKY et al. 1998 Down; HENDERSON 1999A Down). The X-linked locus mus101 was among the very first such mutagen-sensitive (mus) genes to be identified. The two original alleles, mus101D1 and mus101D2, confer hypersensitivity to methyl methanesulfonate (MMS), nitrogen mustard, and {gamma}-rays, but not to UV radiation or N-acetyl-2-aminofluorene, a UV mimetic (BOYD et al. 1976 Down). Other alleles of mus101 causing different phenotypes were later isolated: the mus101K451 (fs(1)K451) mutant is both female sterile (KOMITOPOULOU et al. 1983 Down; ORR et al. 1984 Down) and MMS sensitive (this report); mus101lcd and mus101SM are late larval lethals (this report; A. SCHALET, personal communication); and mus101ts1 is a temperature-sensitive lethal (GATTI et al. 1983 Down; SMITH et al. 1985 Down).

The mus101D1 mutant is partially defective in postreplication repair (PRR; BOYD and SETLOW 1976 Down; BROWN and BOYD 1981 Down), as shown by a reduction in the average size of the newly synthesized DNA molecules compared to wild type after UV treatment. Nonirradiated cells from this mutant accumulate high molecular weight DNA molecules more slowly than control cells, suggesting a defect in S phase (BOYD and SETLOW 1976 Down). In common with other PRR mutants, mus101D1 disrupts "magnification" of ribosomal DNA genes in the male germline, a little-understood process that restores the copy number of 18S and 28S rDNA tandem repeats lost through deletion (HAWLEY et al. 1985 Down).

The female sterile mus101K451 mutant was isolated in a screen for mutants affecting eggshell formation (KOMITOPOULOU et al. 1983 Down; ORR et al. 1984 Down). The eggshell abnormalities observed in this mutant result from defective amplification of clusters of chorion protein genes, which is a form of DNA replication specific to follicle cells (for review see CALVI and SPRADLING 1999 Down). The recent finding that the Drosophila homolog of the yeast origin recognition complex 2 (ORC2) subunit is also required for chorion gene amplification (LANDIS et al. 1997 Down) raises the intriguing possibility that Mus101 protein may physically interact with DmORC2 at replication orgins of chorion gene clusters.

Animals hemizygous for mus101ts1 and heterozygous for the autosomal recessive cell marker mwh exhibit high levels of chromosomal instability, evidenced by the frequent occurrence of mwh clones (SMITH et al. 1985 Down). This chromosome instability observed genetically is also observed cytologically: neuroblast cells from hemi- or homozygous mus101ts1 show a striking failure to condense heterochromatic regions of chromosomes (GATTI et al. 1983 Down; SMITH et al. 1985 Down). Similar genetic and cytological phenotypes have been observed for other mus101 alleles (BAKER and SMITH 1979 Down; SMITH et al. 1985 Down; this report).

The phenotypes associated with the various mus101 alleles summarized above suggest roles for the mus101+ gene product in different aspects of chromosome metabolism. It is evident that the molecular cloning of this gene should bring important new insights into the function of its encoded protein. Here we describe the cloning of mus101, achieved through a strategy of chromosome walking and mutation mapping in region 12B. We report that mus101 encodes a protein with seven BRCT (BRCA1 C terminus) domains, a motif originally noted as a repeated region in the carboxy-terminus of the human ovarian and breast cancer protein BRCA1, in the budding yeast checkpoint protein Rad9, and in a human protein that binds to p53, named 53BP1 (KOONIN et al. 1996 Down). More recent additions to the BRCT domain superfamily include the human proteins XRCC1, poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP), DNA ligases III and IV (ALTSCHUL et al. 1997 Down; BORK et al. 1997 Down; CALLEBAUT and MORNON 1997 Down), and TopBP1 (YAMANE et al. 1997 Down) among others. Mus101 is most similar to human TopBP1, a protein identified in a two-hybrid screen through its association with DNA topoisomerase IIß (YAMANE et al. 1997 Down). Mus101 also shares sequence similarity with the fission yeast Rad4/Cut5 protein required for repair, replication, and checkpoint control (FENECH et al. 1991 Down; SAKA and YANAGIDA 1993 Down), suggesting that the two proteins may be functional homologs.


*  MATERIALS AND METHODS
*TOP
*ABSTRACT
*MATERIALS AND METHODS
*RESULTS
*DISCUSSION
*LITERATURE CITED

Drosophila stocks and culture conditions:
The Drosophila stocks, balancer chromosomes, and phenotypic markers described in this work are catalogued in LINDSLEY and ZIMM 1992 Down or FLYBASE 1999 Down, except as noted below. Flies were maintained on standard yeast-cornmeal-agar medium at 25° unless mentioned otherwise.

mus101 lethal alleles:
mus101lcd was recovered from a collection of X-linked lethal mutations induced by hybrid dysgenesis (SIMMONS et al. 1984 Down) that we screened for mitotic mutants. Of 101 lethal lines, 37 produced mutant males dying as late larvae or pupae. These were examined for mitotic defects in squash preparations of brain ganglia from third-instar larvae, essentially as described in GONZALEZ and GLOVER 1993 Down. Two stocks, including mus101lcd, showed obvious differences from wild type in these preparations.

A second late larval lethal allele, mus101SM, was generously provided to us by A. Schalet (Yale University). This mutation arose spontaneously from a cross of wild-type (Amherst) males to females carrying a mei-9 mutation [In(1)dl-49, y31d wa mei-9L1 rb vOf f] (A. SCHALET, personal communication). mus101SM fails to complement the larval lethality of mus101lcd, and both mus101lcd and mus101SM fail to complement the mutagen sensitivity of mus101D1.

Molecular biology:
Standard molecular biology techniques were employed following AUSUBEL et al. 1989 Down and SAMBROOK et al. 1989 Down. The plasmid vectors pBluescript I and II (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) were used for all subcloning. The mus101lcd genomic DNA library was constructed in the {lambda} vector EMBL4 (FRISCHAUF et al. 1983 Down) according to AXTON 1990 Down. Microdissection of polytene chromosome bands 12B1,2 was performed according to SAUNDERS et al. 1989 Down. Cosmids comprising the chromosome walk were recovered from the European Drosophila Genome Project (EDGP) gridded library (SIDEN-KIAMOS et al. 1990 Down) by filter hybridization. Initial localization of the gene garnet (g) to a 6.5-kb EcoRI fragment of the chromosome walk was made through the identification of restriction fragment length polymorphisms (RFLPs) on Southern blots containing genomic DNAs of three garnet mutants [gS2, gS3, and In(1)gw] probed with this fragment. This location was later confirmed by the hybridization of this EcoRI fragment to a garnet cDNA (gift of V. Lloyd, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada).

Creation of Df(1)wLCD by {gamma}-irradiation:
In(1)z+64b9 is a rearranged X chromosome carrying an inversion between 3C1 and 12B9, with w+ at 3C1 not included within the inverted segment (SORSA et al. 1973 Down). In(1)z+64b9 males were irradiated with 45 Gy from a 60Co source and mated to a fourfold excess of balancer-bearing virgin females [either FM7, y wa snx2 v g/DFB, y wa or FM7, y wa snx2 v g/FM6, or y ml(1)]. Balanced lines were established by allowing the F1 progeny to mate inter se, since the irradiated chromosomes were balanced in the F1 females and all the F1 males were FM7 (the DFB and FM6 balancer chromosomes carry lethal mutations). Irradiated chromosomes balanced over FM7 and DFB were scored for garnet and/or white phenotypes in the F1 generation. For irradiated chromosomes balanced over FM6 (~25% of the F1), the F2 generation was examined for visible mutations. The lethality of Df(1)wLCD is not complemented by the duplications Dp(1;f)LJ9 and y+ g+ na+ Y. It also fails to complement the lethality of the LS allele of crm, a gene adjacent to w, indicating that the deficiency extends into one or more lethal loci in 3C.

Creation of new deficiencies in region 12B by transposase-mediated P-element excision:
Deficiencies in region 12B were created by "imprecise excision" of a single P-element transposon in the strain P[w+, ry+E]2 (LEVIS et al. 1985 Down) that we had localized to the distal part of the walk (12B1,2). This P element resides within a 12-kb BamHI fragment found in wild-type DNA (Oregon-R and Canton-S), detected using a 4.7-kb BamHI fragment (B4.7) from the end of the insert in the cosmid 29E9.

To mobilize this element, females homozygous for the P insert were crossed en masse to +/Y; {Delta}2-3(99B), Sb/+ males to generate P/Y; {Delta}2-3(99B), Sb/+ transposase-expressing males in the F1 generation. Such F1 males were crossed to crm/FM7 virgin females and the F2 progeny examined for the presence of phenotypically white, Bar, non-Stubble females (i.e., p*/FM7; +/+, where the asterisk indicates deletion or mutation of the w+ gene of the P insert). Such mutants were crossed individually to FM7 males to establish stocks. Only those chromosomes bearing lethal mutations (i.e., lines in which white-eyed F3 males were not recovered) were kept for further study. A total of 23 lethal mutants were isolated from 1698 F2 crosses. These were analyzed in complementation tests with the lethal mutant mus101SM. Virgin p*/FM7 females were crossed with mus101SM/y+g+na+Y males, and their heterozygous mutant female progeny were examined for viability. These mutants can be divided in two classes: 11 mutants that complement mus101SM and 12 mutants that fail to complement mus101SM. All 12 of the P-element excision mutants that delete mus101 were found to delete garnet as well. This result indicated that the deletions in these mutants extend from the distal part of the walk to the garnet locus or beyond and therefore were not informative with respect to mapping the mus101 locus, since they remove too large a portion of the walk. Five of the 11 strains that complement mus101SM were also tested for their ability to complement garnet. These strains (including p116D, p205A, p281A, and p490D), when heterozygous with g4, have wild-type eye color. The 11 lethal mutants that complement mus101SM were analyzed at molecular level in Southern-blotting experiments to be able to exclude those regions of the walk not containing mus101. In 6 of these mutants, no deletion had occurred proximal to the site of the P insertion. In a 7th mutant, a chromosomal rearrangement appeared to have occurred. None of these mutants were characterized further. The 4 remaining mutants (p116D, p205A, p281A, and p490D) are discussed in RESULTS.

Isolations of cDNA clones:
cDNAs prefixed with an "x" were recovered from a 0–3-hr embryonic library constructed in the vector {lambda}gt10 (POOLE et al. 1985 Down). A {lambda}ZAP 2–14-hr embryonic cDNA library (Stratagene) probed with the mus101 cDNA x99 yielded a single partial-length cDNA. An ovary library constructed in {lambda}gt22a (STROUMBAKIS et al. 1994 Down) was found to be a rich source of mus101 cDNAs.

We have isolated two further cDNAs corresponding to distinct genes, in addition to those reported in RESULTS (Fig 2). Both cDNAs were obtained from a 0–4-hr embryonic cDNA library (BROWN and KAFATOS 1988 Down). cDNA F3 was isolated using the 4.1-kb BamHI fragment (B4.1) from cosmid 29E9. F3 is ~1.5 kb and has no significant homology to any sequence in the database. This cDNA also hybridized to genomic fragment B6.2, immediately distal to B4.1. cDNA F5 hybridized to three independent genomic probes: an 8-kb PstI fragment (P8) from cosmid 110D5; a 15-kb BamHI fragment (B15) from cosmid 165E3; and a 5-kb XbaI fragment (X5) from phage {lambda}A26-7. cDNA F5 is ~3.5 kb and hybridized to genomic fragments spanning an ~30-kb region of the genomic walk, suggesting that the gene corresponding to this cDNA has several introns. cDNA F5 has similarity to a hypothetical 80-kD protein of Saccharomyces cerevisiae (accession no. 731675) and a Caenorhabditis elegans expressed sequence tag (accession no. 3874484).



View larger version (92K):
In this window
In a new window
Download PPT slide
 
Figure 1. Mitotic chromosome defects in mus101lcd neuroblasts. (A) Wild-type XX metaphase. (B) Chromosomes from a mus101lcd/Y larva showing undercondensed pericentric heterochromatin (arrows). (C) Extreme phenotype more typical of mus101lcd/Y, with undercondensed or broken chromosomes. Blocks of chromatin are probably chromatid arms. Brains in A and B were incubated in 10 µM colchicine for 1 hr followed by hypotonic treatment. Bar, ~10 µm.



View larger version (20K):
In this window
In a new window
Download PPT slide
 
Figure 2. Molecular map of region 12B. Genomic region 12B is represented by ~150 kb of cloned DNA. The main map (center) shows the restriction enzyme recognition sites for EcoRI and BamHI, indicated by vertical lines above and below the horizontal line, respectively. Subcloned restriction fragments mentioned in the text are labeled (e.g., B15). EDGP cosmids that comprise the chromosome walk are indicated above the map as overlapping horizontal solid lines. {lambda}A26-7 represents a phage clone. EV8, P8, and X5 represent subcloned restriction fragments (see MATERIALS AND METHODS). The dashed lines above the cosmids represent genomic regions deleted in the indicated deficiency strains; the arrowheads mark the approximate positions of the breakpoints defined molecularly. The triangle in the distal part of the walk (region 12B1,2) represents the site of integration of the P element in the strain P[w+, ry+E]2. The positions of the genes garnet and Yp3 are indicated. Not all of the ~30-kb interval between these two genes is represented on the map; this discontinuity is indicated by the double slash. cDNAs F3 and F5 are referred to in MATERIALS AND METHODS. An expanded view of the region of the walk containing mus101 is shown at the bottom right. The fragments used to search for transcription units and RFLPs are labeled (e.g., B10). The arrows below this map show the identified transcription units and direction of transcription (see text for details). The fragments X9 and B10 were used in germline transformation rescue experiments.

DNA sequencing:
Sequencing reactions were performed using the ABI PRISM big dye terminator cycle sequencing kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). mus101 accession no. is AF257463.

P-element-mediated germline transformation:
Embryos of the genotype w1118/w1118; +/+; {Delta}2-3(68C)/+ were used for injection. A 9-kb XhoI fragment from cosmid 44F7 was subcloned into the transformation vector pW8 (KLEMENZ et al. 1987 Down) to give the rescue construct P[w+, X9]. The 10-kb BamHI fragment from cosmid 22F12 was subcloned into the transformation vector pCaSpeR (PIRROTTA 1988 Down) to form the negative control construct P[w+, B10].

Mutagen sensitivity tests:
These tests were carried out as described in HENDERSON 1999B Down. The mutagen sensitivity of the female sterile mutant mus101K451 has not been documented previously. We have found this mutant to be more sensitive to MMS than either mus101D1 or mus101D2. A dose as low as 0.02% v/v MMS is sufficient to kill all mus101K451 males, compared to doses of 0.04 and 0.07% required to kill mus101D1 and mus101D2 animals, respectively.


*  RESULTS
*TOP
*ABSTRACT
*MATERIALS AND METHODS
*RESULTS
*DISCUSSION
*LITERATURE CITED

Isolation of a new lethal allele of mus101 showing defective condensation of pericentric heterochromatin:
The isolation and cytological characterization of the temperature-sensitive (ts) lethal mutant mus101tsl revealed that mus101 is an essential gene whose wild-type product is necessary for condensation of heterochromatin in mitosis (GATTI et al. 1983 Down). We isolated a further (non-ts) lethal allele, mus101lcd, from a collection of X-linked lethal mutations induced by hybrid dysgenesis (SIMMONS et al. 1984 Down), in a screen for P-induced alleles that would facilitate the molecular cloning of the gene through the recovery of sequences flanking the P element. mus101lcd mutants die as late third-instar larvae or shortly after pupariation and have very small imaginal discs (hence the superscript lcd for lethal-compact-disc). Examination of neuroblasts of mus101lcd/Y third-instar larvae revealed numerous chromosomes with striking undercondensation of pericentric heterochromatic regions (Fig 1B), reminiscent of the mitotic phenotype observed in brains of mus101tsl mutants shortly after they are shifted to the nonpermissive temperature (GATTI et al. 1983 Down). This phenotype may be the earliest to appear in mus101lcd neuroblasts, since most of the mitoses in mus101lcd brains show more extreme defects, characteristically grossly undercondensed chromatin or chromosome breakage (it is difficult to distinguish between these two phenotypes in orcein-stained preparations). A typical example is shown in Fig 1C. These mitotic phenotypes are also observed in neuroblasts of mus101lcd/Df(1)HA92 hemizygous females (not shown). Table 1 summarizes the frequency of observed chromosome condensation defects in mus101lcd larval brains.


 
View this table:
In this window
In a new window

 
Table 1. Mitotic chromosome condensation defects in mus101lcd neuroblasts

Refinement of the cytological map position of mus101:
Although mus101lcd had been induced in a dysgenic cross, in which the strain {pi}2 provided both P-element "ammunition" and a source of transposase, an observed P element in this mutant at region 12C1 was found to be separable by recombination from the mus101lcd mutation. Furthermore, introduction of a transposase source [{Delta}2-3(99B)] into this strain failed to revert the mus101lcd mutation to wild type. Therefore, as an alternative means to isolate the gene we adopted a positional cloning strategy.

The mus101 gene was originally localized to between bands 12A6,7 and 12D3 on the basis of the failure of mus101 mutants to complement Df(1)HA92 (MASON et al. 1981 Down). We obtained a further refinement of the mus101 location by using available T(1;Y) stocks to synthesize interstitial duplications and deficiencies (AXTON 1990 Down) and by creating a small deficiency, Df(1)wLCD, that is missing the cytological interval 12B2-9 and uncovers mus101. These mapping experiments, taken together with the recombination studies of A. Schalet, which had positioned mus101 ~0.1 cM distal to garnet (g; A. SCHALET, personal communication), established the cytological location of mus101 as 12B2-6.

Molecular cloning of region 12B by chromosome walking:
Molecular entry into the 12B region was gained using several approaches. Although the P element at 12C1 in the mus101lcd line was not responsible for the mus101 mutation (see above), its molecular cloning nonetheless provided the first step toward the isolation of the mus101 gene. Characterization of a recovered clone revealed that the P element at 12C1 had inserted adjacent to the Yolk protein 3 (Yp3) gene. This flanking genomic DNA was used in turn as a probe to identify cloned wild-type genomic segments (as phages and cosmids) from 12C1 and, more distally, into region 12B6,7. Recovered EDGP cosmids belonging to this contig (12.2) include 7C5, 22F12, and 189B8 (Fig 2). Microdissection of polytene chromosome bands 12B1,2 and PCR amplification of the recovered DNA provided probes corresponding to the distal part of 12B. EDGP cosmids belonging to this contig (12.6) include 29E9, 36G4, 94D8, and 110D5 (Fig 2). Contig 12.2 was extended distally with the isolation of the cosmid 44F7, and the two contigs were joined and the relative orientation of contig 12.6 established by the isolation of the bridging cosmid, 165E3.

The locations of two important landmarks on the chromsome walk were identified: the distal breakpoint of Df(1)wLCD near the distal end of the walk and the garnet locus in its proximal part (Fig 2). These two landmarks define the boundaries of the genomic region containing mus101 (see above), an interval of ~90 kb.

Creation of new deficiencies in region 12B by excision of a marked P element:
We sought to create new deficiencies in region 12B through transposase-mediated excision of a single P element located in the distal part of the walk in the strain P[w+, ry+E]2 (LEVIS et al. 1985 Down; Fig 2). To enrich for such deletion mutants, we screened for loss of the w+ marker of P[w+, ry+E]2 associated with organismal lethality. Four of 23 mutants generated in this way (p116D, p205A, p281A, and p490D) were informative with respect to narrowing the location of mus101; each had a deletion extending proximally from the site of insertion of the P element into the region covered by the chromosome walk (Fig 2). The most proximal breakpoint, that of deficiency p490D (Df(1)p490D), is near the distal end of the BamHI fragment B15 (Fig 2). This result positioned mus101 to within the interval defined by this breakpoint distally and the garnet locus proximally, ~30 kb of cloned DNA.

Pinpointing the location of mus101:
To further narrow the location of mus101 we sought to determine whether any of the mus101 alleles showed a RFLP in the ~30-kb interval between the breakpoint of Df(1)p490D and garnet. To achieve this we used subcloned BamHI and EcoRI fragments to probe Southern blots of genomic DNAs of mus101 mutants. Of the various probes used, only the fragment B10 detected RFLPs in the lethal mutant mus101lcd and in the mutagen-sensitive strains mus101D1 and mus101D2 (not shown). The presence of RFLPs in three independent mus101 mutant alleles detected by the B10 probe thus identified this genomic fragment as a putative mus101 locus. This possibility was further strengthened because B10 partially overlaps a 6.5-kb EcoRI fragment that we had shown to contain garnet, which mapping experiments had placed proximal but very near to mus101 (see above).

Identification of transcription units in the mus101 region:
We used two methods to identify transcription units in the mus101 region: Northern blotting and isolation of cDNAs. Northern blots of total RNA extracted from 0- to 4-hr wild-type embryos were probed separately with the contiguous genomic fragments E2.9, B0.9, and B10 (Fig 2). Probe E2.9 detected an ~3-kb transcript (corresponding to transcription unit "A" in Fig 2). Probe B10 detected two transcripts, of ~5 kb and ~3.5 kb (corresponding to mus101 and garnet, respectively). Probe B0.9, distal to B10, also recognized the ~5-kb transcript, indicating that this transcription unit spans the B0.9 and B10 restriction fragments.

We used a 9-kb XhoI fragment (X9) that partially overlaps fragments E2.9, B10, and E6.5 and contains the entire B0.9 fragment (Fig 2) to recover cDNAs corresponding to the three transcripts detected by Northern analysis. Six partial cDNAs belonging to three different classes were isolated: garnet (x91, x94, x95, and x96) (OOI et al. 1997 Down), transcription unit "A" (x93), and mus101 (x99). A homology search using the BLASTX program (ALTSCHUL et al. 1997 Down) revealed that the partial sequence of the cDNA x93 is similar to the human clone KIAA0544 (NAGASE et al. 1998 Down; accession no. 3043612) and to the C. elegans locus CEC11H1 (accession no. Z70205), identified in the genome project. Although no function has been assigned to these loci, KIAA0544 has significant similarity to human cell growth regulators and apoptosis inhibitors (NAGASE et al. 1998 Down).

A BLASTX search using the x99 sequence revealed similarity to a human cDNA (NAGASE et al. 1996 Down), which in turn is similar to the Schizosaccharomyces pombe rad4+/cut5+ gene (FENECH et al. 1991 Down; SAKA and YANAGIDA 1993 Down). rad4/cut5 mutants show sensitivity to a variety of DNA-damaging agents, and the Rad4/Cut5 protein is essential for S phase (SAKA et al. 1994 Down) and important in a DNA replication checkpoint. The similar phenotypes presented by mus101 and rad4/cut5 mutants suggested that a gene corresponding to cDNA x99 was a very strong candidate for mus101. Therefore we sought and recovered additional cDNAs using x99 as a probe (see MATERIALS AND METHODS).

Identification of the mus101 gene by P-element-mediated germline transformation:
To confirm the cloning of mus101, we designed two genomic constructs for use in P-element-mediated germline transformation experiments. The X9 fragment referred to above was selected as a rescue fragment (Fig 2). This fragment was predicted to contain a complete mus101 gene together with truncated versions of transcription unit "A" and garnet. The B10 fragment, which is missing ~2 kb of promoter elements and coding region from the 5' end of mus101, was selected as a negative control. The construct P[w+, X9] fully rescued the phenotypes of all mus101 alleles tested (Table 2). In constrast, the construct P[w+, B10] rescued none of the mus101 mutant phenotypes. These experiments prove that mus101 corresponds to the identified gene between transcription unit "A" and garnet depicted in Fig 2.


 
View this table:
In this window
In a new window

 
Table 2. Rescue of mus101 mutant phenotypes by P-element-mediated germline transformation

Genomic organization of mus101:
We determined the complete genomic sequence of mus101 (~5.3 kb) by sequencing both the distal 6 kb and very proximal end of the X9 restriction fragment (~700 bp). The distal end of X9 overlaps transcription unit "A" (620 bp), and the proximal end overlaps garnet. Conceptual translation of the mus101 sequence revealed that it encodes a polypeptide with a predicted molecular weight of 158 kD and a calculated pI of 6.4. The gene contains no introns. There are three in-frame methionines at the N terminus of the predicted protein at positions 1, 5, and 7. The region upstream of the first ATG has the best match to the Drosophila consensus sequence for translation initiation (CAVENER and RAY 1991 Down). However, it is also possible that the ATGs corresponding to the methionines at positions +5 and +7 are used to initiate translation, since the region upstream of these ATGs also has considerable similarity to the CAVENER and RAY 1991 Down consensus sequence.

Further upstream, at positions -377 to -370 and -352 to -345 with respect to the first ATG, are two DRE (DNA replication-related element) motifs. DRE is a cis-acting positive regulatory element (TATCGATA) present in the promoters of a variety of genes, including those encoding proteins with functions in DNA replication, transcription, translation, signal transduction, and cell cycle control (MATSUKAGE et al. 1995 Down). We have not carried out extensive searches for other regulatory motifs in this region.

mus101 encodes a protein with seven BRCT domains and is similar to the human protein TopBP1:
Searches of the databases using the PSI-BLAST program (ALTSCHUL et al. 1997 Down) for proteins similar to Mus101 revealed the highest scores for a human protein first described as having similarity to the fission yeast Rad4/Cut5 gene product (NAGASE et al. 1996 Down). This human protein is identical to TopBP1, a protein identified through its in vitro binding to DNA topoisomerase IIß (YAMANE et al. 1997 Down). In addition to TopBP1 and Rad4/Cut5, proteins showing significant similarity to Mus101 are C. elegans clone F37D6.1, Arabidopsis thaliana clone T10M13.12, the Drosophila protein Pebble (Pbl) required for cytokinesis (PROKOPENKO et al. 1999 Down), the mouse transforming protein Ect2, and the human DNA repair protein XRCC1.

All these proteins have BRCT domains, a module composed of ~100 amino acids with a characteristic hydrophobic profile, easily identified in a hydrophobic cluster analysis plot (CALLEBAUT and MORNON 1997 Down). In fact, the regions of highest similarity that these proteins show with Mus101 are in the BRCT domains, with the exception of TopBP1 and the C. elegans clone F37D6.1, where the regions of similarity extend beyond the BRCT domains. As an example, Fig 3A shows the similarities between the highly conserved BRCT domain I in Mus101, TopBP1, C. elegans clone F37D6.1, Rad4/Cut5, Pbl, and Ect2. The number and distribution of BRCT domains in these proteins are compared in Fig 3B.



View larger version (29K):
In this window
In a new window
Download PPT slide
 
Figure 3. A comparison of proteins structurally related to Mus101. (A) Alignment of the primary structures of BRCT domain I from Mus101, TopBP1, C. elegans clone F37D6.1, fission yeast Rad4/Cut5, Drosophila Pebble (Pbl), and mouse Ect2. The boxed residues are highly conserved and the boldface residues conserved among BRCT domains, according to CALLEBAUT and MORNON 1997 Down. (B) Comparison of the number and distribution of BRCT domains in Mus101, TopBP1, F37D6.1, Rad4/Cut5, Pbl, and Ect2. BRCT domains are represented by solid ovals. The diamond labeled TCS and the circle labeled PSC represent regions of homology shared by Mus101 and human TCOF1 and Drosophila posterior sex comb proteins, respectively. The open ovals labeled DH and the boxes labeled PH of Pbl and Ect2 represent Dbl and pleckstrin homology domains, respectively (PROKOPENKO et al. 1999 Down).

The pairwise alignment of Mus101 and TopBP1 generated using the BLAST2 program (TATUSOVA and MADDEN 1999 Down) is shown in Fig 4. Both proteins have similar size: Mus101 is 1425 and TopBP1 is 1522 amino acids long. The human TopBP1 protein has eight BRCT domains, the greatest number of domains so far observed in a single protein (YAMANE et al. 1997 Down). Mus101 has seven BRCT domains, and their distribution is similar to those of TopBP1, with only the central BRCT domain (VI) of TopBP1 not represented in Mus101 (Fig 3B). The N-terminal and central part of Mus101 has 24% identity and 42% similarity to the N terminus of TopBP1. This region contains the Mus101 and TopBP1 BRCT domains I, II, III, IV, and V. The C terminus of Mus101 has 33% identity and 51% similarity with the C terminus of TopBP1. This region contains the Mus101 BRCT domains VI and VII and the TopBP1 BRCT domains VII and VIII.



View larger version (61K):
In this window
In a new window
Download PPT slide
 
Figure 4. BLAST2 alignment of Mus101 and TopBP1. (A) Alignment of the N-terminal-to-central regions of Mus101 and TopB1. Identity, 206/828 (24%); positives, 361/828 (42%); gaps, 95/828 (11%). Residues comprising each BRCT domain are boxed. Domains were predicted on the basis of CALLEBAUT and MORNON 1997 Down and through comparisons of multiple sequence alignments of BRCT domain-containing proteins. Actual domains may include up to five or six additional residues at each end. (B) Alignment of the C-terminal regions of Mus101 and TopBP1. The BRCT domain names VI and VII refer to the Mus101 protein; the homologous domains in TopBP1 are VII and VIII, respectively. Identity, 67/200 (33%); positives, 104/200 (51%); gaps, 19/200 (9%).

The region between BRCT domains V and VI of the Mus101 protein that does not have similarity to TopBP1 contains two distinct subregions with similarity to other proteins. Residues 825–909 of Mus101 share 27% identity and 46% similarity with the C terminus of human treacle protein (TCOF1), a putative nucleolar trafficking phosphoprotein that is defective in patients with Treacher Collins syndrome, a craniofacial developmental disease (WISE et al. 1997 Down). Residues 1046 to 1129 of Mus101 are 26% identical (38% similar) to the C terminus of Drosophila posterior sex combs (Psc) protein. Psc is a product of one of the Polycomb group genes (Pc-G). Pc-G genes are needed to maintain patterns of expression of homeotic genes during Drosophila development by repression of target genes (for review see PIRROTTA 1995 Down).


*  DISCUSSION
*TOP
*ABSTRACT
*MATERIALS AND METHODS
*RESULTS
*DISCUSSION
*LITERATURE CITED

We have molecularly cloned the mus101 gene and found it to encode a predicted protein of 1425 amino acids containing seven BRCT modules distributed throughout its length. The number and position of BRCT domains vary in different proteins. For example, BRCA1, Rad9, and XRCC1 each have two domains in their C termini, Ect2 has two domains in its N terminus, and Rad4/Cut5 has two domains in its N terminus and two domains in the central part of the protein (BORK et al. 1997 Down; CALLEBAUT and MORNON 1997 Down). The majority of proteins described so far have on average two to four BRCT domains, although some have a greater number, like the C. elegans clone F37D6.1, of unknown function, which has six domains (BORK et al. 1997 Down; CALLEBAUT and MORNON 1997 Down) and TopBP1, which has eight (YAMANE et al. 1997 Down). It has been suggested by CALLEBAUT and MORNON 1997 Down and BORK et al. 1997 Down that BRCT domains may be sites for interaction between proteins implicated in the maintenance of the genome in response to damage. The knowledge of such interactions is beginning to shed light upon poorly understood repair mechanisms. Examples are accumulating showing that BRCT domain-containing proteins can participate not only in different aspects of DNA repair and cell cycle checkpoint control, but also in other essential cellular processes, like transcription (ANDERSON et al. 1998 Down; GOWEN et al. 1998 Down; KLEIMAN and MANLEY 1999 Down; XU et al. 1999 Down; ZHONG et al. 1999 Down).

The protein most closely resembling Mus101 in searches of the current databases is TopBP1, which interacts with DNA topoisomerase IIß (Topo IIß). This interaction is mediated through the C terminus of TopBP1, where two consecutive BRCT domains are located (YAMANE et al. 1997 Down). Topo IIß is a member of the type II subfamily of topoisomerases that generates transient double-strand breaks to catalyze topological changes in DNA (AUSTIN and MARSH 1998 Down). YAMANE et al. 1997 Down have speculated that TopBP1 may function in the repair of strand breaks resulting from a failure of the DNA rejoining reaction of Topo IIß. This hypothesis is supported by their more recent finding that regions of TopBP1 containing BRCT domains are able to bind nicked circular and linear DNA molecules, but not intact circular DNA (YAMANE and TSURUO 1999 Down).

D. melanogaster has only a single Topo II isoform, present in at least three separate functional pools: one for chromosome condensation, one for chromosome segregation, and one pool that remains associated with the chromosome throughout the cell cycle (SWEDLOW et al. 1993 Down). Drosophila Topo II associates with Barren, a member of the condensin/cohesin family of proteins necessary for segregation of sister chromatids at mitosis (BHAT et al. 1996 Down). Drosophila Topo II was also recently identified as a component of the chromatin-remodeling factor CHRAC (chromatin-accessibility complex; VARGA-WEIZ et al. 1997 Down), suggesting a structural role for this protein in chromatin organization. The C-terminal region of TopBP1 that interacts with Topo IIß has 33% identity and 51% similarity with Mus101. It is possible that Mus101 is a functional homolog of TopBP1 and that Mus101 also binds Topo II. Such a putative interaction between Mus101 and Topo II, if it were specific to heterochromatic regions, could explain the failure of heterochromatin to condense properly in the lethal mutants mus101lcd and mus101ts1.

Mus101 BRCT domains I and II are very similar to BRCT domains I and II of the fission yeast replication checkpoint protein Rad4/Cut5 and the oncogene product Ect2, regions that are important to the roles of these proteins in cell cycle control. Truncation of the N-terminal region of Ect2 to remove these two BRCT domains increases its transforming activity, suggesting that this region has a negative effect on cell division (MIKI et al. 1993 Down). The N terminus of Rad4/Cut5 containing these BRCT domains is essential for complementation of the temperature-sensitive phenotype in rad4/cut5 mutants. Moreover, its overexpression blocks cell division (SAKA and YANAGIDA 1993 Down). The localization of the mutations in three independent rad4/cut5 alleles revealed the same amino acid substitution T45M in the conserved stretch VTHLIA in BRCT domain I (SAKA et al. 1997 Down; see Fig 3A). This mutation prevents the interaction of Rad4/Cut5 with the DNA replication and DNA damage checkpoint protein Crb2 (SAKA et al. 1997 Down).

There are many similarities between mus101 and rad4+/cut5+. Both are essential genes and both are required for DNA repair. They also both encode members of the BRCT superfamily, with similar BRCT domains I and II. Rad4/Cut5 is a component of the replication checkpoint control system (SAKA and YANAGIDA 1993 Down) and together with Crb2 forms a complex with the checkpoint protein Chk1. It has been suggested by SAKA et al. 1997 Down that these proteins may form a checkpoint sensor-transmitter pathway to arrest cell cycle progression. Is Mus101 also necessary for the DNA replication checkpoint? In S. pombe, the replication checkpoint has been categorized into two classes: one activated by a defect in the replication machinery (mutations in polymerases and ligases) and the other activated by limitation of normal nucleotide supply [effected by hydroxyurea (HU) treatment or mutation of cdc22]. Rad4/Cut5 is necessary for both checkpoints, whereas Crb2 is necessary only for the nucleotide supply checkpoint (SAKA et al. 1997 Down). Tests of mus101D1, mus101D2, and mus101K451 larvae have revealed wild-type levels of sensitivity to HU (BANGA et al. 1986 Down; R. R. YAMAMOTO and D. S. HENDERSON, unpublished results), suggesting that the nucleotide supply checkpoint is still largely intact in these mutants and perhaps highlighting a functional distinction between Rad4/Cut5 and Mus101.


*  ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank A. Schalet, A. Carpenter, M. Gatti, B. Baker, V. Lloyd, D. Sinclair, E. Frei, and S. Krishnan for providing fly stocks or cloned DNA and helpful information. We are grateful to F. Cullen, L. Campbell, C. Salles, D. Callister, and A. Bain for expert technical assistance, and past and present members of the lab for support and helpful discussion, especially P. Deak, E. Wojcik, H. Ohkura, R. Wiegand, and S. Brand. R.R.Y. was funded by the Brazilian agency CNPq. This work was made possible by grants from the Cancer Research Campaign.

Manuscript received February 22, 2000; Accepted for publication June 8, 2000.


*  LITERATURE CITED
*TOP
*ABSTRACT
*MATERIALS AND METHODS
*RESULTS
*DISCUSSION
*LITERATURE CITED

ALTSCHUL, S. F., T. L. MADDEN, A. A. SCHAFFER, J. ZHANG, and Z. ZHANG et al., 1997  Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 25:3389-3402[Abstract/Free Full Text].

ANDERSON, S. F., B. P. SCHLEGEL, T. NAKAJIMA, E. S. WOLPIN, and J. D. PARVIN, 1998  BRCA1 protein is linked to the RNA polymerase II holoenzyme complex via RNA helicase A. Nat. Genet. 19:254-256[Medline].

AUSTIN, C. A. and K. L. MARSH, 1998  Eukaryotic DNA topoisomerase IIß. Bioessays 20:215-226[Medline].

AUSUBEL, F., R. BRENT, R. E. KINGDOM, D. D. MOORE, J. G. SEIDMAN et al., 1989 Short Protocols in Molecular Biology. John Wiley & Sons, New York.

AXTON, J. M., 1990 Genetic and molecular analysis of mitotic chromosome condensation in Drosophila. Ph.D. Thesis. Imperial College of Science and Technology, London.

BAKER, B. S. and D. A. SMITH, 1979  The effects of mutagen-sensitive mutants of Drosophila melanogaster in nonmutagenized cells. Genetics 92:833-847[Abstract/Free Full Text].

BANGA, S. S., R. SHENKAR, and J. B. BOYD, 1986  Hypersensitivity of Drosophila mei-41 mutants to hydroxyurea is associated with reduced mitotic chromosome stability. Mutat. Res. 163:157-165[Medline].

BHAT, M. A., A. V. PHILP, D. M. GLOVER, and H. J. BELLEN, 1996  Chromatid segregation at anaphase requires the barren product, a novel chromosome-associated protein that interacts with Topoisomerase II. Cell 87:1103-1114[Medline].

BORK, P., K. HOFMANN, P. BUCHER, A. F. NEUWALD, and S. F. ALTSCHUL et al., 1997  A superfamily of conserved domains in DNA damage-responsive cell cycle checkpoint proteins. FASEB J. 11:68-76[Abstract].

BOYD, J. B. and R. B. SETLOW, 1976  Characterization of postreplication repair in mutagen-sensitive strains of Drosophila melanogaster.. Genetics 84:507-526[Abstract/Free Full Text].

BOYD, J. B., M. D. GOLINO, T. D. NGUYEN, and M. M. GREEN, 1976  Isolation and characterization of X-linked mutants of Drosophila melanogaster which are sensitive to mutagens. Genetics 84:485-506[Abstract/Free Full Text].

BROWN, N. H. and F. C. KAFATOS, 1988  Functional cDNA libraries from Drosophila embryos. J. Mol. Biol. 203:425-437[Medline].

BROWN, T. C. and J. B. BOYD, 1981  Postreplication repair-defective mutants of Drosophila melanogaster fall into two classes. Mol. Gen. Genet. 183:356-362[Medline].

CALLEBAUT, I. and J.-P. MORNON, 1997  From BRCA1 to RAP1: a widespread BRCT module closely associated with DNA repair. FEBS Lett. 400:25-30[Medline].

CALVI, B. R. and A. C. SPRADLING, 1999  Chorion gene amplification in Drosophila: a model for metazoan origins of DNA replication and S-phase control. Methods 18:407-417[Medline].

CAVENER, D. R. and S. C. RAY, 1991  Eukaryotic start and stop translation sites. Nucleic Acids Res. 25:3185-3192.

DUSENBERY, R. L. and P. D. SMITH, 1996  Cellular responses to DNA damage in Drosophila melanogaster.. Mutat. Res. 364:133-145[Medline].

FENECH, M., A. M. CARR, J. MURRAY, F. Z. WATTS, and A. R. LEHMANN, 1991  Cloning and characterization of the rad4 gene of Schizosaccharomyces pombe, a gene showing short regions of sequence similarity to the human XRCC1 gene. Nucleic Acids Res. 19:6737-6741[Abstract/Free Full Text].

FLYBASE,, 1999  The FlyBase database of the Drosophila Genome Projects and community literature. Nucleic Acids Res. 27:85-88. Available from http://flybase.bio.indiana.edu/[Abstract/Free Full Text].

FRISCHAUF, A.-M., H. LEHRACH, A. POUSTKA, and N. MURRAY, 1983  Lambda replacement vectors carrying polylinker sequences. J. Mol. Biol. 170:827-842[Medline].

GATTI, M., D. A. SMITH, and B. S. BAKER, 1983  A gene controlling condensation of heterochromatin in Drosophila melanogaster.. Science 221:83-85[Abstract/Free Full Text].

GONZALEZ, C., and D. M. GLOVER, 1993 Techniques for studying mitosis in Drosophila, pp. 143–175 in The Cell Cycle: A Practical Approach, edited by P. FANTES and R. BROOKS. IRL Press, Oxford.

GOWEN, L. C., A. V. AVRUSTSKAYA, A. M. LATOUR, B. H. KOLLER, and S. A. LEADON, 1998  BRCA1 required for transcription-coupled repair of oxidative damage. Science 281:1009-1012[Abstract/Free Full Text].

HAWLEY, R. S., C. H. MARCUS, M. L. CAMERON, R. L. SCHWARTZ, and A. E. ZITRON, 1985  Repair-defect mutations inhibit rDNA magnification in Drosophila and discriminate between meiotic and premeiotic magnification. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 82:8095-8099[Abstract/Free Full Text].

HENDERSON, D. S., 1999a  DNA repair defects and other mustakes in Drosophila melanogaster.. Methods 18:377-400[Medline].

HENDERSON, D. S., 1999b Isolating DNA repair mutants of Drosophila melanogaster, pp. 17–30 in DNA Repair Protocols: Eukaryotic Systems, edited by D. S. HENDERSON. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ.

KLEIMAN, F. E. and J. L. MANLEY, 1999  Functional interaction of BRCA1-associated BARD1 with polyadenylation factor CstF-50. Science 285:1576-1579[Abstract/Free Full Text].

KLEMENZ, R., U. WEBER, and W. J. GEHRINGER, 1987  The white gene as a marker in a new P-element vector for gene transfer in Drosophila.. Nucleic Acids Res. 15:3947-3959[Abstract/Free Full Text].

KOMITOPOULOU, K., M. GANS, L. H. MARGARITIS, F. C. KAFATOS, and M. MASSON, 1983  Isolation and characterization of sex-linked female-sterile mutants in Drosophila melanogaster with special attention to eggshell mutants. Genetics 105:897-920[Abstract/Free Full Text].

KOONIN, E. V., S. F. ALTSCHUL, and P. BORK, 1996  BRCA1 protein products: functional motifs. Nat. Genet. 13:266-268[Medline].

LANDIS, G., R. KELLEY, A. C. SPRADLING, and J. TOWER, 1997  The k43 gene, required for chorion gene amplification and diploid replication, encodes the Drosophila homolog of yeast origin recognition complex subunit 2. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94:3888-3892[Abstract/Free Full Text].

LEVIS, R., T. HAZELRIGG, and G. M. RUBIN, 1985  Separable cis-acting elements for expression of the white gene of Drosophila.. EMBO J. 4:3489-3499[Medline].

LINDSLEY, D. L., and G. G. ZIMM, 1992 The Genome of Drosophila melanogaster. Academic Press, San Diego.

MASON, J. M., M. M. GREEN, K. E. S. SHAW, and J. B. BOYD, 1981  Genetic analysis of X-linked mutagen-sensitive mutants of Drosophila melanogaster.. Mutat. Res. 81:329-343[Medline].

MATSUKAGE, A., F. HIROSE, Y. HAYASHI, K. HAMADA, and M. YAMAGUCHI, 1995  The DRE sequence TATCGATA, a putative promoter-activating element for Drosophila melanogaster cell-proliferation-related genes. Gene 166:233-236[Medline].

MIKI, T., S. L. SMITH, J. E. LONG, A. EVA, and T. P. FLEMING, 1993  Oncogene Ect2 is related to regulators of small GTP-binding proteins. Nature 362:462-465[Medline].

NAGASE, T., N. SEKI, K. ISHIKAWA, M. OHIRA, and Y. KAWARABAYASI et al., 1996  Prediction of the coding sequences of unidentified human genes. VI. The coding sequences of 80 new genes (KIAA0201-KIAA0280) deduced by analysis of cDNA clones from cell line KG-1 and brain. DNA Res. 3:321-329[Abstract].

NAGASE, T., K. ISHIKAWA, N. MIYAJIMA, A. TANAKA, and H. KOTANI et al., 1998  Prediction of the coding sequences of unidentified human genes. IX. The complete sequences of 100 new cDNA clones from brain which can code for large proteins in vitro. DNA Res. 5:31-39[Abstract].

OOI, C. E., J. E. MOREIRA, E. C. DELL'ANGELICA, G. POY, and D. A. WASSARMAN et al., 1997  Altered expression of a novel adaptin leads to defective pigment granule biogenesis in the Drosophila eye color mutant garnet.. EMBO J. 16:4508-4518[Medline].

ORR, W., K. KOMITOPOULOU, and F. KAFATOS, 1984  Mutants supressing in trans chorion gene amplification in Drosophila.. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 81:3773-3777[Abstract/Free Full Text].

PIRROTTA, V., 1988 Vectors for P-element transformation, pp. 437–456 in Vectors: A Survey of Molecular Cloning Vectors and Their Uses, edited by R. L. RODRIGUEZ and D. T. DENHARDT. Butterworths, Boston.

PIRROTTA, V., 1995  Chromatin complexes regulating gene expression in Drosophila.. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 5:466-472[Medline].

POOLE, S. J., L. M. KAUVAR, B. DREES, and T. KORNBERG, 1985  The engrailed locus of Drosophila: structural analysis of an embryonic transcript. Cell 40:37-43[Medline].

PROKOPENKO, S. N., A. BRUMBY, L. O'KEEFE, L. PRIOR, and Y. HE et al., 1999  A putative exchange factor for Rho1 GTPase is required for initiation of cytokinesis in Drosophila. Genes Dev. 13:2301-2314[Abstract/Free Full Text].

SAKA, Y. and M. YANAGIDA, 1993  Fission yeast cut5+, required for S phase onset and M phase restraint, is identical to the radiation-damage repair gene rad4+. Cell 74:383-393[Medline].

SAKA, Y., P. FANTES, T. SUTANI, C. MCINERY, and J. CREANOR et al., 1994  Fission yeast cut5 links nuclear chromatin and M phase regulator in the replication checkpoint control. EMBO J. 13:5319-5329[Medline].

SAKA, Y., F. ESASHI, T. MATSUSAKA, S. MOCHIDA, and M. YANAGUIDA, 1997  Damage and replication checkpoint control in fission yeast is ensured by interactions of Crb2, a protein with BRCT motif, with Cut5 and Chk1. Genes Dev. 11:3387-3400[Abstract/Free Full Text].

SAMBROOK, J., E. F. FRITSCH and T. MANIATIS, 1989 Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.

SAUNDERS, R. D. C., D. M. GLOVER, M. ASHBURNER, I. SIDÉN-KIAMOS, and C. LOUIS et al., 1989  PCR amplification of DNA microdissected from a single polytene chromosome band: a comparison with conventional microcloning. Nucleic Acids Res. 17:9027-9033[Abstract/Free Full Text].

SEKELSKY, J. J., K. C. BURTIS, and R. S. HAWLEY, 1998  Damage control: the pleiotropy of DNA repair genes in Drosophila melanogaster.. Genetics 148:1587-1598[Abstract/Free Full Text].

SIDÉN-KIAMOS, I., R. D. C. SAUNDERS, L. SPANOS, T. MAJERUS, and J. TREANOR et al., 1990  Towards a physical map of the Drosophila melanogaster genome: mapping of cosmid clones within defined genomic divisions. Nucleic Acids Res. 18:6261-6270[Abstract/Free Full Text].

SIMMONS, M. J., J. D. RAYMOND, N. A. JOHNSON, and T. M. FAHEY, 1984  A comparison of mutation rates for specific loci and chromosome regions in dysgenic hybrid males of Drosophila melanogaster.. Genetics 106:85-94[Abstract/Free Full Text].

SMITH, D. A., B. S. BAKER, and M. GATTI, 1985  Mutations in genes encoding essential mitotic functions in Drosophila melanogaster.. Genetics 110:647-670[Abstract/Free Full Text].

SORSA, V., M. M. GREEN, and W. BEERMAN, 1973  Cytogenetic fine structure and chromosomal localisation of the white gene in Drosophila melanogaster.. Nature New Biol. 245:34-37[Medline].

STROUMBAKIS, N. D., Z. LI, and P. P. TOLIAS, 1994  RNA- and single-stranded DNA-binding (SSB) proteins expressed during Drosophila melanogaster oogenesis: a homolog of bacterial and eukaryotic mitochondrial SSBs. Gene 143:171-177[Medline].

SWEDLOW, J. R., J. W. SEDAT, and D. A. AGARD, 1993  Multiple chromosomal populations of topoisomerase II detected in vivo by time-lapse, three dimensional wide-field microscopy. Cell 73:97-108[Medline].

TATUSOVA, T. A. and T. L. MADDEN, 1999  BLAST 2 sequences, a new tool for comparing protein and nucleotide sequences. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 174:247-250. (erratum: FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 177: 187–188.)[Medline].

VARGA-WEIZ, P. D., M. WILM, E. BONTE, K. DUMAS, and M. MANN et al., 1997  Chromatin-remodelling factor CHRAC contains the ATP-ases ISWI and topoisomerase II. Nature 388:598-602[Medline].

WISE, C. A., L. C. CHIANG, W. A. PAZNEKAS, M. SHARMA, and M. M. MUSY et al., 1997  TCOF1 gene encodes a putative nuclear phosphoprotein that exhibits mutations in Treacher Collins Syndrome throughout its coding region. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94:3110-3115[Abstract/Free Full Text].

XU, X., Z. WEAVER, S. P. LINKE, C. LI, and J. GOTAY et al., 1999  Centrosome amplification and a defective G2-M cell cycle checkpoint induce genetic instability in BRCA1 exon 11 isoform-deficient cells. Mol. Cell 3:389-395[Medline].

YAMANE, K. and T. TSURUO, 1999  Conserved BRCT regions of TopBP1 and the tumor suppressor BRCA1 bind strand breaks and termini of DNA. Oncogene 18:5194-5203[Medline].

YAMANE, K., M. KAWABATA, and T. TSURUO, 1997  A DNA-topoisomerase-II-binding protein with eight repeating regions similar to DNA-repair enzymes and to cell-cycle regulator. Eur. J. Biochem. 250:794-799[Medline].

ZHONG, Q., C. F. CHEN, S. LI, Y. CHEN, and C.-C. WANG et al., 1999  Association of BRCA1 with the hRad50-hMre11-p95 complex and the DNA damage response. Science 285:747-750[Abstract/Free Full Text].




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
GeneticsHome page
B. R. Calvi, B. A. Byrnes, and A. J. Kolpakas
Conservation of Epigenetic Regulation, ORC Binding and Developmental Timing of DNA Replication Origins in the Genus Drosophila
Genetics, November 1, 2007; 177(3): 1291 - 1301.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
Y. Jeon, K. Y. Lee, M. J. Ko, Y. S. Lee, S. Kang, and D. S. Hwang
Human TopBP1 Participates in Cyclin E/CDK2 Activation and Preinitiation Complex Assembly during G1/S Transition
J. Biol. Chem.,