- THIS ARTICLE
-
Abstract
- Full Text (PDF)
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Hoppe, P. E.
- Articles by Waterston, R. H.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Hoppe, P. E.
- Articles by Waterston, R. H.
A Region of the Myosin Rod Important for Interaction With Paramyosin in Caenorhabditis elegans Striated Muscle
Pamela E. Hoppea and Robert H. Waterstonaa Department of Genetics, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri 63110
Corresponding author: Pamela E. Hoppe, Department of Genetics, Box 8232, Washington University School of Medicine, 4566 Scott Ave., St. Louis, MO 63110., phoppe{at}genetics.wustl.edu (E-mail)
Communicating editor: P. ANDERSON
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
The precise arrangement of molecules within the thick filament, as well as the mechanisms by which this arrangement is specified, remains unclear. In this article, we have exploited a unique genetic interaction between one isoform of myosin heavy chain (MHC) and paramyosin in Caenorhabditis elegans to probe the molecular interaction between MHC and paramyosin in vivo. Using chimeric myosin constructs, we have defined a 322-residue region of the MHC A rod critical for suppression of the structural and motility defects associated with the unc-15(e73) allele. Chimeric constructs lacking this region of MHC A either fail to suppress, or act as dominant enhancers of, the e73 phenotype. Although the 322-residue region is required for suppression activity, our data suggest that sequences along the length of the rod also play a role in the isoform-specific interaction between MHC A and paramyosin. Our genetic and cell biological analyses of construct behavior suggest that the 322-residue region of MHC A is important for thick filament stability. We present a model in which this region mediates an avid interaction between MHC A and paramyosin in parallel arrangement in formation of the filament arms.
WE are interested in the mechanisms that guide the assembly of myosin and the related protein paramyosin into the highly ordered striated muscle thick filament. Whereas models have been proposed for the molecular alignments involved in myosin-myosin and paramyosin-paramyosin assembly, the interaction between myosin and paramyosin has not been as thoroughly explored. Formation of a thick filament of appropriate structure requires molecular information encoded in the myosin heavy chain (MHC) or paramyosin molecule itself, as well as the activity of associated proteins (reviewed in ![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Although MHC and paramyosin assemble with different intermolecular axial staggers both in vitro and in vivo (reviewed in ![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
|
| The C. elegans thick filament |
|---|
C. elegans body wall thick filaments contain two isoforms of MHC, MHC A and MHC B, and the single paramyosin isoform, which is expressed in all muscle cell types of the worm (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Genetic analysis has shown that the two MHC isoforms are functionally distinct. The center of the MHC A-containing region is composed of MHC dimers assembled in an antiparallel tail-to-tail fashion and is the site where filament initiation is thought to occur (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Paramyosin is encoded by the unc-15 gene (WATER- STON et al. 1977). Mutant animals that lack paramyosin are paralyzed and contain hollow thick filaments composed of myosin, which are found generally near the ends of muscle cells, rather than in the region of the contractile apparatus (![]()
![]()
![]()
There is no direct evidence that paramyosin is present under the MHC A-containing region at the center of the thick filament in C. elegans. In molluscs, paramyosin is clearly present in the central region as well as in the length of the filament arms. In these species, MHC can be removed from isolated thick filaments, leaving an intact paramyosin core that can be shown by negative staining to be bipolar (![]()
![]()
![]()
Several thick filament-associated proteins have been identified in C. elegans, but it is not yet known whether their primary role is specification of intermolecular pattern or thick filament stability. The filagenins were identified biochemically as components of the thick filament core (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
| Interaction between the paramyosin mutation e73 and MHC A |
|---|
To elucidate the molecular events required to form a wild-type thick filament, we have investigated a unique genetic interaction between MHC A and a missense paramyosin mutant, unc-15(e73). The e73 mutation results in a single charge change, glutamic acid to lysine, which is thought to increase the affinity of paramyosin for itself during assembly (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Genetic screens for second mutations that could restore motility in an e73 homozygote produced sup-3 alleles, which are mutations at the myo-3 locus that increase the expression of MHC A (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
In contrast, extra MHC A poorly suppresses the paramyosin null e1214, but very effectively suppresses the point mutation e73. Failure to suppress the null indicates that increased levels of MHC A cannot directly substitute for paramyosin. Instead, suppression of the missense allele occurs because increased MHC A levels somehow lead to the increased incorporation of the e73 mutant paramyosin into normal thick filaments, so that suppressed animals now exhibit regions of muscle lattice that contain normal thick filaments with electron-dense cores (![]()
![]()
To elucidate the molecular events involved in specifying the MHC-paramyosin interaction during thick filament formation, we are interested in defining the mechanism by which extra MHC A is able to shift the e73 mutant paramyosin from aggregate formation into thick filament formation. As a first step toward defining the MHC-paramyosin interaction at the molecular level, we worked to identify the sequences within the MHC A molecule responsible for e73-suppression activity. Our results define a 322-residue region of the rod that is sufficient for robust e73-suppression activity. The active region contains residues previously implicated as important for filament assembly, but is larger, and thus does not correlate with previously defined activities. While this region is critical for suppression activity, sequences outside this region appear to be required for full activity, arguing that the A-specific suppression involves sequences along a large length of the rod. Our data support a model in which e73 suppression occurs through a parallel MHC A-paramyosin interaction during elongation of the filament arms. Further, our results suggest that an interaction between paramyosin and the 322-residue region of MHC A plays an essential role in thick filament stability.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
DNA constructs:
All clone fragments generated through PCR were sequenced unless otherwise indicated. Italicized bases in oligonucleotides do not match wild-type sequence. Generation of the chimeric myosin constructs has been described (![]()
A truncated MHC A lacking the C-terminal nonhelical tailpiece was constructed by replacing the two consecutive P residues that mark the end of the coiled coil with two in-frame ochre codons. A 300-bp NcoI-KpnI genomic fragment from pPHpucAA was replaced with a PCR fragment amplified with primers TCAGCTTCCATGGCTTAATAAGATGGTTTCCCAATG and CTGCAGTGCCCATACATTGC.
An epitope-tagged version of the MHC B head with the hemagglutinin (HA) tag YPYDVPDYA inserted after the initiator M was generated in unc-54 subclone pPH24aP1 using a PCR technique called splice overlap extension (SOE; ![]()
A coinjection marker detectable in paralyzed worms was constructed using the rol-6 collagen gene promoter region to drive hypodermal green fluorescent protein (GFP) expression. Like the rol-6 message (![]()
2 kbp fragment from pRF4 (![]()
Generation of transgenic lines:
Transformed lines carrying extrachromosomal arrays were generated as described (![]()
Testing transgenic arrays in a paramyosin mutant background:
Most constructs were tested using the dominant rolling associated with the rol-6 plasmid pRF4 as marker in genetic crosses. Some arrays were marked with a plasmid driving GFP expression in the pharynx under the myo-2 promoter, a gift from Aguan Wei. At least two independent arrays were tested for each construct. The arrays were moved from the unc-54 (e190) background in which they were selected into wild type. Then, gld-1(q485) males were mated to wild-type transgenic hermaphrodites, and the transgenic male progeny were used to cross into unc-15(e73) homozygotes. Transgenic progeny were picked singly and allowed to self to identify the phenotypically wild-type balanced line, unc-15 (e73) + / + gld-1(q485). The q485 allele causes a tumorous germline in the adult hermaphrodite (![]()
To generate arrays that could be scored in completely paralyzed animals, the constructs were injected into unc-54(e190) with the rol-6::GFP coinjection marker described above. The lethality of transgenic arrays in animals homozygous for the unc-15 alleles e73, e1214, and su228 was tested by examination of all progeny in a 1-day collection from a single transgenic animal heterozygous for an unc-15 allele balanced by gld-1 (q485). Eggs were allowed to develop for 1 day, and then all transgenic animals were removed from the plate using a fluorescence dissecting microscope and sorted by phenotype. Green Unc animals were picked singly to score viability and brood size. Unhatched eggs were grouped and reexamined the following day; dead animals were mounted on microscope slides with 2% agar pads for viewing on a compound microscope, using fluorescence and Nomarski optics. The remaining progeny were allowed to grow for 12 days, at which time gravid animals (e73 +/ + q485) were picked singly for genotyping, and q485 homozygotes (+ q485) were counted.
Antibody staining:
Embryos were fixed with paraformaldehyde and methanol and stained using the methods of ![]()
| RESULTS |
|---|
Sequences within the MHC A rod confer e73-suppression activity in chimeric myosins:
Genetic screens for suppressors of the motility defects associated with the paramyosin mutant unc-15(e73) produced sup-3 mutations, which are genomic duplications of the myo-3 locus that increase MHC A expression (see Introduction). No comparable mutations were isolated at the unc-54 locus, suggesting that excess MHC B could not supply e73-suppression activity. To test this hypothesis directly, we generated transgenic arrays of wild-type unc-54 genomic sequence, both by direct injection into e73 homozygotes and by crossing arrays selected for unc-54(e190) rescue into an unc-15(e73) background (see MATERIALS AND METHODS). Overexpression of MHC B produced no improvement in motility of e73 homozygotes, nor did it cause any apparent adverse effects.
The differential function of the two MHC isoforms as revealed by the MHC A-specific suppression of unc-15(e73) provided an opportunity to probe the interaction of the MHC and paramyosin proteins during thick filament formation in vivo. To identify the MHC A sequences essential for e73 suppression activity, we generated transgenic arrays using chimeric MHC constructs, which contained different regions of MHC A and MHC B, and tested these arrays for e73 suppression in the manner described above. Because sup-3 alleles (genomic duplications that increase expression of MHC A) suppress the unc-15(e73) motility defects more strongly than they suppress unc-54(e190) defects (![]()
![]()
The results from the first set of constructs, diagrammed in Fig 2, indicate that the MHC A sequences encoding the rod confer e73 suppression activity in chimeric myosins. Chimera 2, which contains the N-terminal half of MHC A, including transcriptional regulatory elements, the motor domain, and the light-chain-binding sites, fails to suppress e73, indicating that these sequences are not sufficient for activity. Sequences encoding the MHC A C-terminal nonhelical tailpiece are not required, since replacement with MHC B sequences in chimera 4, or removal to produce a truncated MHC A in construct T1, does not affect suppression activity. In contrast, chimera 4, which contains the entire MHC A rod, exhibits suppression activity comparable to that of the wild-type MHC A construct in both motility and cell structure (Fig 3), indicating that suppression is mediated through the coiled-coil sequences that constitute the filament-forming region of the molecule.
|
|
A 322-residue region of the C-terminal MHC A rod is sufficient for suppression:
To elucidate the molecular events underlying the genetic interaction between MHC A and paramyosin, we used chimeric myosin constructs to identify the critical MHC A rod residues. Results from constructs included in Fig 4 define a 322-amino-acid region of the C-terminal rod, contained in chimera 11, that is sufficient for marked suppression of the motility and structural defects associated with the e73 mutation. However, although the suppression activity of chimera 11 is sufficient to restore motility and egg laying, none of the obtained transgenic lines could provide the degree of improvement in muscle cell structure and motility that was easily obtained with chimera 4, which contains the entire MHC A rod. As shown in Fig 3D, the best suppression obtained with chimera 11 showed significant improvement in muscle cell structure, but small birefringent aggregates remained in every cell.
|
Suppression activity is lost upon division of the 322-residue region into two segments of 152 and 170 residues in chimeras 12 and 13, respectively. The 322-amino-acid minimal region contains two smaller domains that have been proposed to play important roles in myosin and paramyosin assembly: the 170-residue region sufficient for myo-3 rescue (![]()
![]()
![]()
MHC chimeras that act as dominant enhancers of e73:
To determine the ability of rod sequences outside the 322-residue region to confer suppression activity, we tested chimeras containing N-terminal portions of the MHC A rod. Chimeras 2, 9, and 10 were tested and found to have no effect on the motility of e73 homozygotes (Fig 5A). As was found with constructs containing C-terminal rod regions of MHC A (Fig 4), testing more N-terminal MHC A rod regions revealed that the ability of a chimera to suppress e73 did not correlate with MHC A-specific filament initiation activity, indicating that these are separable functions.
|
However, in performing genetic crosses designed to move chimera 7 arrays selected for unc-54(e190) rescue into an e73 background (see MATERIALS AND METHODS), we were unable to recover a transgenic e73 homozygote. Close examination of self progeny from e73/+ balanced hermaphrodites carrying the chimera 7 transgene revealed dead L1 animals arrested at the twofold stage of elongation (Pat phenotype), which is characteristic of mutations that cause severe defects in body wall muscle function (![]()
![]()
![]()
To more easily follow the transgenic arrays in inviable or completely paralyzed animals, we constructed a coinjection marker that drives GFP expression in the hypodermis (see MATERIALS AND METHODS), which can be visualized using a fluorescence dissecting microscope. Using this marker, we tested chimeras 7, 2, and 8 in a balanced strain heterozygous for e73 and closely examined all transgenic progeny (see MATERIALS AND METHODS). The results (Fig 5B) indicate that chimeras containing large regions of the N-terminal MHC A rod, but lacking the C-terminal MHC A region necessary for e73 suppression, act as enhancers of the e73 phenotype, resulting in either lethality or a more severe Unc phenotype. The strongest, most penetrant enhancement of e73 defects was obtained with transgenic arrays of chimera 7, which contains MHC B sequences in the 322-residue C-terminal rod and MHC A residues in the remaining rod. The majority of transgenic e73 homozygotes showed the Pat phenotype. Chimera 8, which also contains MHC B residues in the 322-residue region but only a subset of the MHC A residues found in chimera 7, produced an enhancement of the e73 phenotype, but the effects were more variable and less penetrant.
The observed synthetic lethality of the chimera 7 transgene in an unc-15(e73) background occurs in animals that are wild type for both MHC genes and thus presumably have normal levels of wild-type MHCs A and B. This indicates that the construct has "antimorphic" or "dominant negative" character, acting as a poison to the thick filament. In a wild-type unc-15 background, the chimera 7 transgenes are able to rescue null mutations in either the myo-3 or unc-54 loci, indicating that the chimera can function in both filament initiation and elongation, respectively. To determine whether the dominant negative action of chimera 7 was due to an allele-specific interaction with the e73 mutant protein, we tested the chimera 7 array in other paramyosin mutant backgrounds. The chimera caused similar lethality in two other severe paramyosin mutants (Fig 6), indicating that the interaction is not allele specific. Instead, a more general loss of paramyosin function, coupled with the expression of chimera 7, is responsible for the synthetic lethality.
|
Synthetic lethality is associated with defects in embryonic movement:
To gain insight into the cause of the synthetic lethality of the myosin chimera in paramyosin mutants, we used time-lapse video microscopy through Nomarski optics to determine the stage at which defects in embryonic movement appeared. For comparison, we first characterized the movement of unc-15 homozygous embryos that did not express the chimeric myosin. Although both unc-15 mutants e73 and e1214 exhibit a striking paralysis in larval and adult stages, the movement of the mutant animals within the eggshell is not obviously different from wild type. Like wild type (![]()
![]()
To determine the synthetic lethal phenotype of chimera 7 in an unc-15 background, collections of eggs from a transgenic heterozygous unc-15/ + balanced mother were videotaped during embryogenesis. Although the onset of muscle twitches occurred correctly at the 1.5-fold stage, the e73 animals carrying the chimera 7 array never exhibited vigorous movement or rolling and arrested elongation at the 2-fold stage (Fig 6). Thus the synthetic lethality is associated with a severe disruption in early muscle function.
Interestingly, e1214 null homozygous embryos that carry the chimera 7 transgene showed the same terminal elongation defect as transgenic e73 homozygotes, arresting at the twofold stage. However, these animals exhibited a less severe defect in early movement. Compared to the transgenic e73 homozygotes, these animals move more vigorously and show clear attempts at coordinated movement, including incomplete rolling. This is the opposite of what would be expected on the basis of severity of the paramyosin alleles alone, since e1214 homozygotes are more severely paralyzed than e73 homozygotes.
Synthetic lethality is associated with filament instability:
To gain insight into the cause of the synthetic lethality, we used an epitope-tagged version of chimera 7 to follow the behavior of the molecule in vivo. Because attaching the GFP tag to either the N or C terminus of MHC A resulted in impaired function in vivo (P. E. HOPPE and R. H. WATERSTON, unpublished observations), we fused the smaller HA tag to the N terminus of chimera 7. Analysis of transgenic lines demonstrated that the tagged protein rescues the motility defects of the unc-54 null and assembles normally during embryogenesis (Fig 7A and Fig B). However, most arrays containing an HA-tagged construct could not be passed through males in genetic crosses, indicating that the HA tag may be causing subtle behavioral defects.
|
The observation that synthetic lethality is associated with early defects in movement is consistent with either a disruption in early organization or a defect in filament stability, where structures assemble correctly but cannot be maintained. To distinguish between these possibilities, we collected eggs from a balanced line e73/+ carrying a transgenic copy of the HA-tagged chimera 7 and stained for the HA tag and for endogenous MHC A. Because the q485 balancer is sterile, one-fourth of the transgenic embryos identified by the anti-HA antibody are e73 homozygotes. Prior to the twofold stage, both endogenous MHC A and the chimera 7 protein exhibit an organized staining pattern that is no worse than that of the e73 homozygote, which has been described (![]()
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
We have exploited an isoform-specific interaction between MHC and paramyosin to identify a region of MHC critical for interaction with paramyosin in vivo. Expression of chimeric myosins in an unc-15(e73) mutant background has defined a 322-residue region of the C-terminal MHC A rod that is sufficient for robust suppression of the phenotypic defects associated with this paramyosin missense allele. The 322-residue region is necessary, since all chimeras containing MHC B sequences in this domain fail to suppress e73. Further, chimeras containing MHC B sequences in this C-terminal domain and MHC A sequences in a larger part of the N-terminal rod have the opposite effect, acting as dominant enhancers of the e73 phenotype, resulting in severe embryonic paralysis and death. These data strongly implicate the 322-residue region as a site critical for functional MHC A-paramyosin interactions.
MHC A sequences along a large length of rod contribute to isoform-specific function:
The ability of a chimeric myosin to suppress e73 depends both upon its expression level and the amount of MHC A rod residues contained within the chimera. Transgenic arrays of chimera 4, which contains the entire MHC A rod, produced better suppression of the e73 structural and motility defects than sup-3(e1407), the strongest sup-3 allele previously published (![]()
![]()
![]()
Our results show that at least the 322-residue region at the C terminus of the MHC A rod must be present in a chimeric myosin for suppression to occur. However, comparison of the degree of improvement in motility and muscle cell structure achieved by arrays expressing chimera 4 (which contains the entire MHC A rod) and arrays expressing chimera 11 (which contains only the minimal MHC A 322-residue active region) suggests that the intrinsic suppression activity of these two constructs is different (Fig 3). Because the chimera 11 arrays tested in e73 are able to dramatically improve movement in unc-54(e190), which requires higher levels of MHC A than e73 suppression, we believe the reduced suppression obtained with chimera 11 as compared to chimera 4 reflects a difference in suppression activity of the chimeras, rather than a failure to obtain sufficient protein expression. Therefore, our data suggest that rod residues outside the critical region also play a role in the isoform-specific interaction of wild-type MHC A with paramyosin. However, the unstable nature of the transforming arrays precludes sufficiently accurate protein quantification to confirm this hypothesis.
A second observation supporting the hypothesis that sequences along the length of the rod contribute to isoform-specific function comes from our analysis of the dominant negative effects resulting from expression of myosin chimeras that lack MHC A residues in the C-terminal rod in a paramyosin mutant background. The severity of the defects produced by a given chimera correlates with the number of MHC A residues contained in the N-terminal rod. Chimera 7, containing MHC A residues in all 762 rod positions outside the 322-residue region, produced the most severe enhancement of the e73 defects. Chimera 8, with 532 MHC A residues in the N-terminal rod, also increased the severity of e73 defects, but its effects were less penetrant. Division of the 762-residue MHC A rod region contained in chimera 7 into three subdomains in chimeras 2 (230 MHC A residues), 9 (264), and 10 (268) produced no detectable effects in e73. This argues for participation of residues along the length of the rod in determining myosin behavior in vivo.
The mechanism of e73 suppression:
Our genetic and cell biological analyses offer some insight into the mechanism by which overexpression of MHC A results in increased incorporation of mutant paramyosin into normal thick filaments. Our cell biological study of the HA-tagged chimera 7 construct is consistent with the hypothesis that the 322-residue MHC A domain plays an important role in filament stability. In the presence of chimera 7, MHC staining in e73 animals appears organized in early stages of development. However, staining of later animals exhibiting the synthetic lethal phenotype shows a marked disruption in thick filament organization (Fig 7E and Fig F), suggesting that the lattice was not maintained after the onset of vigorous contractions.
The proposed role of the 322-residue region in filament stability, rather than in filament formation or contractile activity, is consistent with the known behavior of chimera 7 in other mutant backgrounds. Chimera 7 can rescue null mutations in either MHC locus (myo-3 or unc-54) when wild-type paramyosin is present. Therefore, the chimera 7 protein must have motor function and must be capable of assembling in antiparallel and parallel arrangement to form the filament center and arms, respectively. In addition, we found that animals exhibiting the synthetic lethal phenotype can have both cells where chimera 7 is well organized and cells showing drastic defects in both chimera 7 and endogenous MHC A organization. Thus, chimera 7 protein must be capable of assembling into well-organized structures within at least some cells of the e73 homozygote. Coupled with the lack of discernible defects in any early embryos we examined, our data point to a primary defect in filament maintenance rather than filament formation.
The proposal that an MHC A-paramyosin interaction is critical for filament stability fits in well with what is known about the function of the two wild-type proteins. Paramyosin, MHC A, and the filagenins form the stable core structure that remains after removal of MHC B by treatment with high salt (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
The restoration of motility through the overexpression of MHC A in an e73 mutant is correlated with an increased number of normal thick filaments (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
How does the action of the 322-residue region in mediating a stable interaction between MHC A and paramyosin lead to the production of an increased number of functional thick filaments? One possible mechanism of e73 suppression is based on the known function of MHC A at the filament center where myosin assembles in antiparallel fashion. In this model, an increased level of MHC A causes the nucleation of more filament centers, increasing the likelihood that a mutant paramyosin molecule will contact and contribute to a growing filament rather than joining a mutant assemblage. However, if MHC A-mediated suppression of e73 acted at the level of filament initiation, we would expect that chimeric MHCs capable of rescuing myo-3 lethality would also be able to suppress e73. Because these two activities require different critical regions within the MHC A molecule, our data suggest that e73 suppression function does not correspond to filament initiation, which presumably requires MHC A to assemble through antiparallel interactions.
A second, related model for suppression activity is that rather than initiating more filament centers, higher levels of MHC A increase the likelihood that an initiation event will succeed in producing a functional filament. In this model (Fig 8A and Fig B), suppression occurs because increased levels of MHC A cause expansion of the central MHC A-containing zone to occupy a larger fraction of the filament arms (![]()
![]()
|
The genesis of the synthetic lethal interaction between e73 and chimera 7 can also be explained in the context of this model for suppression activity (Fig 8C). Because chimera 7 contains a large amount of MHC A rod sequences, its partial MHC A-like activity leads to the addition of the chimeric protein to the growing filament centers present in e73 animals in the areas where wild-type MHC A assembles. However, because the chimera lacks MHC A sequences within the 322-residue region, it does not form sufficiently stable contacts with paramyosin. Therefore, the filament breaks when contractions begin, decreasing the number of functional filaments in the cell below the critical number required for viability. Because chimera 7 also causes synthetic lethality in the paramyosin null, although the defects in embryonic movement are less severe, this model requires that chimera 7 forms less stable contacts with surrounding MHC molecules than does MHC A, which also leads to filament breakage.
The more severe phenotype observed in the e73 transgenic animals suggests that the presence of mutant paramyosin is more detrimental in the background of the chimera 7 transgene than the complete absence of paramyosin. The increased severity of the synthetic lethal phenotype in the e73 background, as compared to the e1214 background, may be due to the aberrant aggregates of paramyosin. These aggregates may act to further weaken the contractile apparatus by recruiting thick filament proteins, such as MHC (![]()
In light of this model that MHC A-mediated suppression of e73 occurs in the filament arms, we find an intriguing correlation between the e73-suppression domain and the model proposed for the intermolecular axial stagger between paramyosin molecules assembled in parallel (Fig 8D). If MHC A-paramyosin assembly occurs with this same stagger, the region of overlap between the two molecules coincides with the 322-residue region. The borders of our minimal 322-residue region could then be explained because MHC A sequences throughout this segment contribute to the avid interaction with paramyosin at the MHC A C terminus. However, as discussed above, our data point to the participation of N-terminal MHC A rod residues in MHC A-paramyosin interaction in vivo. In the context of this model for the intermolecular stagger, the N-terminal MHC A rod sequences would provide the site of contact to a different paramyosin (or myosin) rod region in an adjacent molecule.
The role of the 322-residue region:
How do sequences within the 322-residue region mediate the MHC A-paramyosin interaction? One model is that thick filament-associated proteins bind this region of MHC A and supply the link to the appropriate region of the paramyosin molecule. The observation that sequences along the length of the rod contribute to isoform-specific behavior could result from the distribution of binding sites for one or more associated proteins throughout the coiled coil. The UNC-45 protein has been shown to co-localize with MHC B but not MHC A (![]()
![]()
![]()
A second potential mechanism is that the active region of MHC A binds to paramyosin directly. A role in direct MHC-paramyosin interaction is consistent with what is known about the function of the smaller domains contained within the 322-residue region. The vertebrate ACD was defined biochemically using purified rod fragments (![]()
![]()
![]()
The model that matching hydrophobic rod exteriors and perhaps other shared sequence features support the more avid MHC A-paramyosin interaction can also be invoked to explain the isoform-specific ability of MHC A to suppress the e73 phenotype. In this model, the two MHC A-specific activities, filament initiation and e73 suppression, both result from a more hydrophobic MHC A coat. However, the critical regions for these two activities are different because filament initiation requires molecules to assemble in antiparallel configuration, whereas e73 suppression is mediated through parallel interactions between MHC and paramyosin. Therefore, the active regions we have defined are regions of the molecule that are involved in distinct steps of the assembly pathway. This idea has precedent in Acanthamoeba, where different regions of the rod have been associated with distinct steps in minifilament assembly (![]()
![]()
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We thank Henry Epstein and Irving Ortiz for the 5-14 antibody. Tim Schedl and members of his laboratory provided the gld-1(q485) allele, the use of their microscopes for photography, and many helpful suggestions. We thank Ross Francis for help with polarized light microscopy and photography. We thank Chelly Hresko and Ross Francis for scientific discussions, and Tim Schedl, Chelly Hresko, and Daniela Gerhard for critical reading of the manuscript. We are grateful to Monika Arora for her assistance with the HA-tag construct and with assembly of the manuscript. Mutant strains were received from the Caenorhabditis Genetics Center. This work was supported by U.S. Public Health Service grant GM23833 and a Muscular Dystrophy Association grant awarded to R. H. Waterston, as well as National Research Service Award Fellowship 5 F32 GM12412-03 awarded to P. E. Hoppe.
Manuscript received April 6, 2000; Accepted for publication June 19, 2000.
| LITERATURE CITED |
|---|
AO, W. and D. PILGRIM, 2000 Caenorhabditis elegans UNC-45 is a component of muscle thick filaments and colocalizes with myosin heavy chain B, but not myosin heavy chain A. J. Cell Biol. 148:375-384
ARDIZZI, J. P. and H. F. EPSTEIN, 1987 Immunochemical localization of myosin heavy chain isoforms and paramyosin in developmentally and structurally diverse muscle cell types of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans.. J. Cell Biol. 105:2763-2770
BARRAL, J. M. and H. F. EPSTEIN, 1999 Protein machines and self assembly in muscle organization. Bioessays 21:813-823[Medline].
BARRAL, J. M., C. C. BAUER, I. ORITZ, and H. F. EPSTEIN, 1998 Unc-45 mutations in Caenorhabditis elegans implicate a CRO1/She4p-like domain in myosin assembly. J. Cell Biol. 143:1215-1225
BARSTEAD, R. J. and R. H. WATERSTON, 1991 Vinculin is essential for muscle function in the nematode. J. Cell Biol. 114:715-724
BROWN, S. J. and D. L. RIDDLE, 1985 Gene interactions affecting muscle organization in Caenorhabditis elegans.. Genetics 110:421-440
COHEN, C. and D. A. D. PARRY, 1998 A conserved C-terminal assembly region in paramyosin and myosin rods. J. Struct. Biol. 122:180-187[Medline].
COHEN, C., D. E. LANAR, and D. A. D. PARRY, 1987 Amino acid sequence and structural repeats in Schistosome paramyosin match those of myosin. Biosci. Rep. 7:11-16[Medline].
DEITIKER, P. R. and H. F. EPSTEIN, 1993 Thick filament substructures in Caenorhabditis elegans: evidence for two populations of paramyosin. J. Cell Biol. 123:303-311
EPSTEIN, H. F. and J. N. THOMSON, 1974 Temperature-sensitive mutation affecting myofilament assembly in C. elegans.. Nature 250:579-580[Medline].
EPSTEIN, H. F., R. H. WATERSTON, and S. BRENNER, 1974 A mutant affecting the heavy chain of myosin in Caenorhabditis elegans.. J. Mol. Biol. 90:291-300[Medline].
EPSTEIN, H. F., D. M. MILLER, I. ORTIZ, and G. C. BERLINER, 1985 Myosin and paramyosin are organized about a newly identified core structure. J. Cell Biol. 100:904-915
EPSTEIN, H. F., I. ORITZ, and L. A. T. MCKINNON, 1986 The alteration of myosin compartmentation in specific mutants of Caenorhabditis elegans.. J. Cell Biol. 103:985-993
EPSTEIN, H. F., I. ORITZ, and G. C. BERLINER, 1987 Assemblages of multiple thick filaments in nematode mutants. J. Muscle Res. Cell Motil. 8:527-536[Medline]

-helical coiled-coil domain or "rod," represented here by a long rectangle. The MHC rod is divided into the 40 28-residue zones described by 





