- THIS ARTICLE
-
Abstract
- Full Text (PDF)
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Krishnan, R.
- Articles by Spencer, F.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Krishnan, R.
- Articles by Spencer, F.
Saccharomyces cerevisiae BUB2 Prevents Mitotic Exit in Response to Both Spindle and Kinetochore Damage
Rajesh Krishnana, Faith Pangilinana, Catherine Leea, and Forrest Spenceraa Institute of Genetic Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21205
Corresponding author: Forrest Spencer, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 720 Rutland Ave./Ross 850, Baltimore, MD 21205., fspencer{at}jhmi.edu (E-mail)
Communicating editor: P. RUSSELL
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
The spindle assembly checkpoint-mediated mitotic arrest depends on proteins that signal the presence of one or more unattached kinetochores and prevents the onset of anaphase in the presence of kinetochore or spindle damage. In the presence of either damage, bub2 cells initiate a preanaphase delay but do not maintain it. Inappropriate sister chromatid separation in nocodazole-treated bub2 cells is prevented when mitotic exit is blocked using a conditional tem1c mutant, indicating that the preanaphase failure in bub2 cells is a consequence of events downstream of TEM1 in the mitotic exit pathway. Using a conditional bub2tsd mutant, we demonstrate that the continuous presence of Bub2 protein is required for maintaining spindle damage-induced arrest. BUB2 is not required to maintain a DNA damage checkpoint arrest, revealing a specificity for spindle assembly checkpoint function. In a yeast two-hybrid assay and in vitro, Bub2 protein interacts with the septin protein Cdc3, which is essential for cytokinesis. These data support the view that the spindle assembly checkpoint encompasses regulation of distinct mitotic steps, including a MAD2-directed block to anaphase initiation and a BUB2-directed block to TEM1-dependent exit.
THE cell division cycle in most eukaryotes is tightly regulated by checkpoints that monitor and ensure appropriate passage past critical steps essential for successful cell division. The spindle assembly checkpoint serves to arrest cells at prometaphase until each sister chromatid pair has achieved bipolar attachment to the spindle (![]()
![]()
Chromatid attachment to the spindle can be affected by impaired spindle microtubules or kinetochores, and the spindle assembly checkpoint is experimentally induced using antimicrotubule drugs such as nocodazole or conditional alleles that interfere with kinetochore protein function. A single unattached kinetochore appears to emit an inhibitory signal through the spindle assembly checkpoint pathway that prevents the onset of anaphase and subsequent mitotic events (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
In contrast, the role of the Bub2 protein has only recently begun to emerge. Like the other BUB and MAD genes, it is not required for cell viability in budding yeast and its absence causes a hypersensitivity to microtubule-depolymerizing drugs (![]()
mutant exhibits a partial preanaphase arrest (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
A role for S. cerevisiae BUB2 in mitotic exit is supported by evidence from characterization of the Schizosaccharomyces pombe homolog cdc16+, which has been shown to regulate both Clb2 protein degradation and cytokinesis (![]()
![]()
This study uses synchronized budding yeast strains to show that bub2
mutants are unable to maintain a mitotic arrest when kinetochore damage is induced. This is significant to our current understanding of the role of BUB2, as it has been suggested that BUB2 is not involved in the cellular response to kinetochore damage but rather senses another (as yet undefined) aspect of spindle structure or function (![]()
![]()
![]()
mutants is dependent on the TEM1-mediated signaling of mitotic exit. In addition, we have constructed a conditional BUB2 allele (BUB2tsd) and used it to show that the continuous presence of Bub2 protein is required for spindle assembly checkpoint-mediated arrest to be maintained. BUB2 is not required for the maintenance of the DNA damage checkpoint-mediated mitotic arrest induced in cdc13-1 mutants, precluding a global role for BUB2 in maintaining mitotic arrest in response to diverse triggers. In a yeast two-hybrid screen with Bub2 protein as bait, the septin CDC3 was identified. Recombinant Bub2 and Cdc3 proteins also associate in vitro. Cdc3 belongs to the highly conserved septin family of proteins essential for cytokinesis (![]()
![]()
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
Plasmids and strains:
The bub2tsd allele, a conditional allele with a permisive temperature of 25° and restrictive temperature of 37°, was constructed in plasmid pRaj154 (BUB2 promoter-UBIQUITIN-DHFRts-BUB2-pRS304) by combining the following fragments in a four-way ligation: (i) a 600-bp segment from immediately upstream of the BUB2 open reading frame generated by PCR using oligonucleotides OLF208 (5'-gactacgagctcgctgttgacgggggctcta-3') and OLF209 (5'-cggaattc gcaaaagttaacaag-3') and cut with SacI and SalI; (ii) an EcoRI/HindIII fragment from pJW8 (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
For yeast two-hybrid analysis, the GAL4 DNA-binding domain was fused with a full-length BUB2 open reading frame in plasmid pRaj72, constructed by ligation of a 937-bp PCR amplification product from genomic DNA (using oligonucleotides OLF161 (5'-atccgtcgacccatggagatgacctcaattgaagatctgata-3') and OLF162 (5'-catgccatgggcgtcgacttacggtatatatatgtct gggt-3') into NcoI-SalI-cut pAS2 (gift of S. Elledge) as a NcoI-SalI fragment. Yeast two-hybrid host strains and control plasmids were obtained from S. Elledge (![]()
Yeast transformation and genetic manipulation were performed according to published methods (![]()
) and YRaj140 (cdc13-1) were generated by transforming XhoI-linearized pVL451 (gift of V. Lundblad) into YRaj130 and YRaj127, respectively, under selection for URA3. 5-Fluoroorotic acid-resistant derivatives were subsequently screened for temperature sensitivity at 37°. The introduction of the bub2
::LEU2 deletion has been described previously (![]()
::URA3 disruption plasmid pTR24 (![]()
![]()
::URA3 into wild-type and mad2-1 backgrounds, respectively. The mad2
::HIS3 allele was obtained from M. MAYER and P. HIETER (unpublished results). Conditional Tem1 protein expression was achieved in strains YRaj164, YRaj166, and YRaj169 by transforming strains YFS1214, YFS1215, and AFS387, respectively, with EcoRI-linearized pWS103. The TEM1 conditional degron allele, tem1c, disrupted the resident TEM1 gene. Tem1c-carrying haploids were inviable in glucose media and arrested with separated nuclei.
|
Analysis of new bud formation, mitotic arrest, and viability:
Standard cell culture procedures were followed (![]()
factor synchronization experiments, log phase cells were incubated with 50 µg/ml
factor (Sigma, St. Louis) for 2 hr at 25° followed by washing and release into appropriate medium at the stated temperatures. For visualization of GFP fluorescence, cells were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde. In experiments using nocodazole, drug concentration was at 15 µg/ml. Cells were prepared for microscopy by fixation in 3.7% formaldehyde in SK (20 mM sorbitol, 50 mM phosphate buffer pH 7.5) and staining with 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) at a final concentration of 300 ng/ml. Very large budded, uninucleate cells, indicating a preanaphase delay or arrest morphology, were defined as mother cells containing a single nuclear DNA mass and with a single daughter bud. New bud formation was observed as the presence of a second bud (a total of three connected cell bodies) containing a single nuclear DNA mass.
Cell viability was assayed using microcolony formation as follows. After nonpermissive temperature or nocodazole treatment, cell aliquots were returned either to permissive temperature or nocodazole-free medium, respectively, and plated at a density of
500 cells/cm2 on YPD. Inviable cells were scored as those that failed to produce at least 50 cell bodies/microcolony after incubation for 20 hr, at which time wild-type microcolonies comprised >100 cell bodies. In most cases inviable microcolonies contained <10 cell bodies.
Yeast two-hybrid screening:
The plasmid pRaj72 was transformed into the yeast two-hybrid strain CG1945 (CLONTECH). The yeast cDNA library (gift of S. Elledge) was transformed into pRaj72 (GalBD-BUB2 fusion) carrying CG1945, and transformants were directly selected on plates lacking tryptophan, leucine, and histidine and containing 10 mM 3-aminotriazole (3-AT; Sigma). Approximately 10,000 independent transformants were screened, yielding seven colonies with robust and reproducible growth on selective media by 47 days. These colonies were tested for ß-galactosidase activity using the filter assay (![]()
![]()
![]()
In vitro protein interaction assays:
GST-CDC3 fusion and GST proteins were expressed in Escherichia coli DH5-alpha (Life Technologies) from plasmid pRaj134 and pGEX4T-1 (Pharmacia), respectively, and purified according to manufacturer's instructions (Pharmacia). Cell lysis and binding reactions were performed in ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline pH 7.4, 1% Triton X-100. 35S-labeled BUB2 protein was synthesized in vitro using a coupled transcription, translation rabbit reticulo-lysate system (Promega, Madison, WI). Reactions were carried out according to manufacturer's instructions. Equal volumes of plain glutathione beads or beads carrying GST or GST-CDC3 were incubated with 35 µl out of a total of 150 µl of in vitro-translated extract in a total volume of 100 µl on ice for 1 hr. The bead samples were then pelleted, and unbound material was removed in four successive washes with ice-cold binding buffer. After the final wash, proteins were eluted in 50 µl binding buffer containing 10 mM glutathione and 10 µl of 5x SDS polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis sample buffer was added. The samples were boiled and analyzed on duplicate 10% SDS polyacrylamide gels (25 µl volume/lane). One gel was processed for autoradiography and the other for silver staining.
| RESULTS |
|---|
Kinetochore-induced preanaphase arrest requires MAD2 for establishment and BUB2 for maintenance:
CTF13 (![]()
![]()
12% in wild-type cultures, compared to 80% in ctf13-30 cultures at the nonpermissive temperature (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
populations (![]()
Examination of synchronous cultures supports the latter interpretation. ctf13-30 kinetochore damage was induced at a semipermissive temperature (34°) sufficient to induce a preanaphase delay without a significant loss of viability, allowing observation of the delay dynamics as well as the associated impact on viability. ctf13-30 strains lacking MAD2 or BUB2 were compared to isogenic relatives with an intact checkpoint.
-Factor-arrested cultures were released (at t = 0) into pheromone-free medium at 34° and followed for two cell cycles. At each time point, preanaphase delay was measured as the frequency of very large budded uninucleate cells, and viability was measured as the frequency of microcolony-forming units plated at permissive temperature (25°). As expected, strains without a ctf13-30 defect never produce delaying cells and suffer no loss of viability on shift to 34° (Fig 1A and Fig B). In cells with an intact checkpoint, ctf13-30 produces a sustained delay that does not completely subside but accumulates in the next cell cycle (Fig 1A). In contrast, mad2-1 ctf13-30 cells are completely unable to delay and this is accompanied by a steady loss of viability beginning when cells with an intact checkpoint normally start to delay (compare to ctf13-30 at 6080 min; Fig 1A and Fig B). Interestingly, the bub2
ctf13-30 strain initially produces delaying cells to approximately the same level as ctf13-30 cells with an intact checkpoint, but the frequency of delayed cells declines sharply at 120 min (Fig 1A). The population remains synchronous and repeats this pattern through a second cell cycle. The decline at 120 min is accompanied by onset of loss of viability, which appears later in bub2
ctf13-30 than in mad2-1 ctf13-30 mutants (Fig 1A and Fig B). This suggests that BUB2 has a role in delay maintenance while MAD2 is important for delay establishment, and both genes are important for the viability of cells containing kinetochore damage.
|
MAD2 and BUB2 control distinct steps within mitosis, and both control sister chromatid separation:
Exposure of cells to microtubule-destabilizing drugs like nocodazole also induces the spindle assembly checkpoint. At high concentration (15 µg/ml), nocodazole completely blocks formation of a mitotic spindle, and cells arrest in a prometaphase state. Failure of the spindle assembly checkpoint causes these cells to exit mitosis without segregating chromosomes to the spindle poles; they are unable due to the absence of a spindle. In such cells, the appearance of a new cycle can be very simply assayed as new (second) bud formation (![]()
Temporal analysis of the appearance of a new bud in bub2
, mad2
, and mad2
bub2
strains underscored the difference in the roles of the two genes in cells exposed to nocodazole. The onset of new bud formation in mad2
is
30 min earlier than in bub2
cells (Fig 2A). The lag in new bud formation seen in bub2
mutants (relative to mad2
mutants) is consistent with a partial function of the checkpoint. New bud formation in the bub2
mad2
double mutant preceded that in mad2
by 30 min (Fig 2A).
|
Our results differ somewhat from others recently reported (![]()
![]()
and mad2
cell populations is inverted or indistinguishable, respectively. Appearance of a new bud as an indicator of a new cell cycle measures an event located far downstream of the control point of interest at the metaphase/anaphase transition. Perhaps differences in laboratory strain genetic background create different rate-limiting steps in mitotic progression. Alternatively, closely spaced time points may be required to reproducibly discern differences between mutants. In agreement with ![]()
![]()
A direct comparison of MAD2 and BUB2 function in the control of the metaphase/anaphase transition is provided by the visualization of GFP-marked sister chromatids (![]()
, bub2
, and mad2
bub2
double mutants was assayed in synchronous populations.
-Factor-arrested cells were released into medium containing nocodazole at 15 µg/µl and aliquots removed every 30 min for analysis. Sister chromatid separation occurred with identical kinetics in mad2
and mad2
bub2
double mutants (Fig 2B), indicating that for this phenotype MAD2 gene function is epistatic to BUB2. Sister chromatid separation occurred 90 min later in bub2
cells (Fig 2B), indicating that BUB2 plays a role in preventing sister chromatid separation at prometaphase arrest. Wild-type cells maintain arrest throughout the duration of this experiment. Our observations confirm and extend results presented by ![]()
This analysis is consistent with the working hypothesis that bub2
cells establish but do not maintain a prometaphase arrest in the presence of nocodazole. Interestingly, this assay directly measures an effect on the morphological transition known to be controlled by the MAD2-dependent checkpoint step and indicates that sister chromatid separation accompanies the mitotic exit allowed in cells that lack BUB2.
The sister chromatid separation phenotype of bub2
cells requires the mitotic exit network:
The sister chromatid separation seen in bub2
cells exposed to nocodazole may be due either to activation of the normal CDC20-directed mechanism for Pds1 protein degradation or to an indirect effect of premature mitotic exit. Anaphase normally accompanies a CDC20-mediated degradation of Pds1 protein. However, it has been demonstrated that mitotic exit, when induced in cells lacking CDC20 function, by overexpression of Hct1 protein leads to degradation of Pds1 protein (![]()
on sister chromatid separation in cells exposed to nocodazole, when the mitotic exit pathway is blocked.
Tem1 protein is a GTPase essential for the activation of the phosphatase CDC14 and the mitotic exit pathway (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
-factor. Following arrest, cells were released into galactose-free, glucose-containing medium to extinguish Tem1 protein function in cells that have the conditional allele (tem1c) and aliquots were removed at various time points for analysis. Whereas mad2-1 tem1 cells showed separated sister chromatids, bub2
tem1 cells maintained sister chromatid cohesion for the duration of the experiment (Fig 3). Thus, the mitotic exit pathway functions downstream of TEM1 are responsible for the sister chromatid separation in bub2
mutants but are not required for sister chromatid separation in mad2
mutants.
|
BUB2 is not required for maintenance of DNA damage-induced arrest:
The arrests induced by spindle damage or DNA damage are mediated by stabilization of Pds1p (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Cells with the temperature-sensitive cdc13-1 mutation accumulate single-stranded DNA under nonpermissive conditions and exhibit a DNA damage checkpoint-dependent arrest (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
double mutant strains were synchronized in
-factor and then released under restrictive (37°) or permissive (25°) conditions for cdc13-1. Under restrictive conditions, arrest was evidenced by accumulation of large budded cells with undivided nuclei (Fig 4A). The cdc13-1 bub2
double mutant behaved just like the cdc13-1 single mutant. Thus, while both the DNA damage- and spindle damage-induced checkpoints act through stabilization of Pds1p to prevent anaphase, only the spindle damage-induced checkpoint breaks down prematurely in the absence of Bub2 protein.
|
Interestingly, the DNA damage arrest phenotype is epistatic to the spindle damage arrest phenotype. This was tested in cells subjected to both cdc13-1-induced DNA damage as well as nocodazole-induced spindle damage in the presence and absence of BUB2 function. Comparison of arrest competence was measured by scoring the frequency of cells exhibiting new bud formation. cdc13-1 and cdc13-1 bub2
strains were released from
-factor arrest at restrictive (37°) or permissive (25°) temperature into rich medium containing 15 µg/ml nocodazole. The cdc13-1-induced arrest was maintained in the bub2
background in the presence of nocodazole. The bub2
strain showed new bud formation at both 25° and 37° as expected while the cdc13-1 bub2
double mutant showed new bud formation only at 25° and not at 37° (Fig 4B).
Taken together, these data confirm that the arrest mechanisms employed in response to DNA and spindle damage are distinct and that the BUB2-controlled negative regulation of mitotic exit is not essential for the development of a robust DNA damage-mediated arrest.
Continuous function of Bub2 protein is required for maintenance of spindle assembly checkpoint-mediated arrest:
To test whether Bub2 protein is required continuously once the spindle assembly checkpoint-mediated arrest has been established, we constructed a conditional bub2 allele (BUB2tsd) using a "temperature-sensitive degron" (![]()
![]()
|
Bub2 protein exhibits a physical interaction with the septin protein Cdc3:
To better understand the role of BUB2 through its interactions with other genes, a two-hybrid screen (![]()
![]()
|
cdc3-1 cells appear to have an intact spindle assembly checkpoint and show no synthetic lethality in bub2
or BUB2 overexpression backgrounds (not shown). BUB2 has a well-conserved homologue in the distantly related fungus S. pombe (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
The spindle assembly checkpoint controls the timing of the metaphase-to-anaphase transition, inhibiting sister chromatid separation until all chromatid pairs have achieved bipolar spindle attachment. However, mitotic progression is also controlled at a later point prior to the execution of events leading to exit and cytokinesis (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
A key issue in the description of these two activities of the spindle assembly checkpoint is whether or not they represent a branched response following a common initiation signal. The MAD2-dependent pathway is clearly induced by an unattached or defective kinetochore (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
strains (![]()
ctf13-30 double-mutant population exhibits a transient accumulation of delayed cells indicating that kinetochore damage-induced arrest is established but is not maintained. Thus a kinetochore damage-induced checkpoint arrest requires Bub2 protein for its full function in two independent assays. We suggest therefore that the MAD2- and BUB2-dependent pathways are both triggered by a signal from an unattached kinetochore.
Analysis of mad2 bub2 double mutants indicates that these two genes act in additive functions within mitosis, in general agreement with previously published work (![]()
![]()
![]()
The sister chromatid separation seen in nocodazole-exposed bub2
cells could be explained either as an indirect consequence of onset of mitotic exit and late mitotic APC activity or as a direct consequence of in-ability to hold off anaphase. This latter possibility would be supported by the observation that under normal conditions the degradation of Pds1p is essential for subsequent degradation of Clb2p and for mitotic exit (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
tem1 cells, which do not exit mitosis, do maintain sister chromatid cohesion in nocodazole is direct evidence that inappropriate sister chromatid separation seen in bub2 cells is due to the onset of the exit pathway. This is consistent with the observation that overexpression of Tem1 protein mimics a bub2 phenotype in nocodazole-treated cells (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
In theory, the importance of a regulatory block to mitotic exit when anaphase is delayed would be encountered in other preanaphase blocks. The initial characterization of bub2 mutants indicated that BUB2 was not required for maintenance of
-factor or hydroxyurea-induced arrests in G1 or S phase, respectively (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
While the mechanism by which BUB2 maintains a spindle damage-induced arrest is not apparent, the bub2tsd allele indicates the presence of an active and continuous role for the Bub2 protein in the maintenance of the mitotic arrest induced by nocodazole. Recent work on the roles of DBF2 kinase in late mitosis (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
In a yeast two-hybrid screen for proteins that interact with BUB2 we isolated the Cdc3 protein, a septin essential for cytokinesis (![]()
Although the biological steps affected by a candidate BUB2/CDC3 interaction have not yet been defined, a rapidly growing body of circumstantial evidence suggests several interesting views. While Cdc3 protein localizes predominantly to the mother-bud neck (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
In summary, we demonstrate that BUB2 acts in a pathway that is required for maintenance of the spindle assembly checkpoint-mediated arrest and that this pathway is required even when kinetochore damage is the inducer of arrest. Furthermore, the continuous presence of the Bub2 protein is required for this role and such a requirement is consistent with the proposed role for BUB2 in regulating GTPase activity of Tem1 protein. The premature breakdown of metaphase in bub2
cells is a consequence of activation of the TEM1-directed mitotic exit pathway and does not precede the TEM1-directed step. We have noted that the BUB2-controlled step is irrelevant in cells arrested at metaphase by the DNA damage checkpoint, suggesting that Bub2 protein function is not a universal requirement for preventing mitotic exit until anaphase has occurred. Finally, we have uncovered an intriguing physical association of Bub2 protein with Cdc3, a septin that functions in cytokinesis and cell morphogenesis. Experimental analysis of the relationships among essential mitotic events and their control will likely continue to reveal layers in a network of coordinate regulation governing the many ordered processes that comprise the division of one cell into two.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
C. Albright, R. Deshaies, J. Dohmen, S. Elledge, P. Hieter, M. Longtine, V. Lundblad, M. Mayer, A. Murray, and A. Straight kindly provided plasmids and strains. We thank A. Hoyt, O. Cohen-Fix, and an anonymous reviewer for helpful comments on the manuscript. This work was supported by National Institutes of Health grant GM-50842 to F.S.
Manuscript received March 8, 2000; Accepted for publication May 30, 2000.
| LITERATURE CITED |
|---|
ALEXANDRU, G., W. ZACHARIE, A. SCHLEIFFER, and K. NASMYTH, 1999 Sister chromatid separation and chromosome re-duplication are regulated by different mechanisms in response to spindle damage. EMBO J. 18:2707-2721[Medline].
BAI, C. and S. J. ELLEDGE, 1997 Gene identification using the yeast two-hybrid system. Methods Enzymol. 283:141-156[Medline].
COHEN-FIX, O. and D. KOSHLAND, 1997 The anaphase inhibitor of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Pds1p is a target of the DNA damage checkpoint pathway. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94:14361-14366
COHEN-FIX, O. and D. KOSHLAND, 1999 Pds1p of budding yeast has dual roles: inhibition of anaphase initiation and regulation of mitotic exit. Genes Dev. 13:1950-1959
COHEN-FIX, O., J. M. PETERS, M. W. KIRSCHNER, and D. KOSHLAND, 1996 Anaphase initiation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is controlled by the APC-dependent degradation of the anaphase inhibitor Pds1p. Genes Dev. 10:3081-3093
DOHENY, K. F., P. K. SORGER, A. A. HYMAN, S. TUGENDREICH, and F. SPENCER et al., 1993 Identification of essential components of the S. cerevisiae kinetochore. Cell 73:761-774[Medline].
DOHMEN, R. J., P. WU, and A. VARSHAVSKY, 1994 Heat-inducible degron: a method for constructing temperature sensitive mutants. Science 263:1273-1276
ELLEDGE, S. J., 1998 Mitotic arrest: Mad2 prevents sleepy from waking up the APC. Science 279:999-1000. [comment]
FANG, G., H. YU, and M. W. KIRSCHNER, 1998 The checkpoint protein MAD2 and the mitotic regulator CDC20 form a ternary complex with the anaphase-promoting complex to control anaphase initiation. Genes Dev. 12:1871-1883
FANKHAUSER, C., J. MARKS, A. REYMOND, and V. SIMANIS, 1993 The S. pombe cdc16 gene is required both for maintenance of p34cdc2 kinase activity and regulation of septum formation: A link between mitosis and cytokinesis? EMBO J. 12:2697-2704[Medline].
FESQUET, D., P. J. FITZPATRICK, A. L. JOHNSON, K. M. KRAMER, and J. H. TOYN et al., 1999 A Bub2p-dependant spindle checkpoint pathway regulates the Dbf2p kinase in budding yeast. EMBO J. 18:2424-2434[Medline].
FIELD, C. M. and D. KELLOG, 1999 Septins: Cytoskeletal polymers or signalling GTPases? Trends Cell Biol. 10:387-394.
FRASCHINI, R., E. FORMENTI, G. LUCCHINI, and S. PIATTI, 1999 Budding yeast Bub2 is localized at spindle pole bodies and activates the mitotic checkpoint via a different pathway from MAD2. J. Cell Biol. 145:979-991
FURGE, K. A., K. WONG, J. ARMSTRONG, M. BALASUBRAMANIAN, and C. F. ALBRIGHT, 1998 Byr4 and Cdc16 form a two component GTPase activating protein for Spg1 GTPase that controls septation in fission yeast. Curr. Biol. 8:947-954[Medline].
GARDNER, R., C. W. PUTNAM, and T. W. WEINERT, 1999 RAD53, DUN1 and PDS1 define two parallel G2/M checkpoint pathways in budding yeast. EMBO J. 18:3173-3185[Medline].
GARVIK, B., M. CARSON, and L. HARTWELL, 1995 Single-stranded DNA arising at telomeres in cdc13 mutants may constitute a specific signal for the RAD9 checkpoint. Mol. Cell. Biol. 15:6128-6138[Abstract].
GUTHRIE, C., and G. R. FINK (Editors), 1991. Methods in Enzymology: Guide to Yeast Genetics and Molecular Biology, Vol. 194. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
HARDWICK, K. G., R. LI, C. MISTROT, R. H. CHEN, and P. DANN et al., 1999 Lesions in many different spindle components activate the spindle checkpoint in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae.. Genetics 152:509-518
HOYT, M. A., L. TOTIS, and B. T. ROBERTS, 1991 S. cerevisiae genes required for cell cycle arrest in response to loss of microtubule function. Cell 66:507-517[Medline].
HWANG, L. H., L. F. LAU, D. L. SMITH, C. A. MISTROT, and K. G. HARDWICK et al., 1998 Budding yeast Cdc20: a target of the spindle checkpoint. Science 279:1041-1044. [see comments]
JAMES, P., J. HALLADAY, and E. A. CRAIG, 1996 Genomic libraries and a host strain designed for highly efficient two-hybrid selection in yeast. Genetics 144:1425-1436[Abstract].
JASPERSON, S. L., J. F. CHARLES, R. L. TINKER-KULBERG, and D. O. MORGAN, 1998 A late mitotic regulatory network controlling cyclin destruction in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.. Mol. Biol. Cell 9:2803-2817
KALLIO, M., J. WEINSTEIN, J. R. DAUM, D. J. BURKE, and G. J. GORBSKY, 1998 Mammalian p55CDC mediates association of the spindle checkpoint protein Mad2 with the cyclosome/anaphase-promoting complex, and is involved in regulating anaphase onset and late mitotic events. J. Cell Biol. 141:1393-1406
KIM, H. B., B. K. HAARER, and J. R. PRINGLE, 1991 Cellular morphogenesis in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell cycle: localization of the CDC3 gene product and the timing of events at the budding site. J. Cell Biol. 112:535-544
KIM, S. H., D. P. LIN, S. MATSUMOTO, A. KITAZONO, and T. MATSUMOTO, 1998 Fission yeast Slp1: an effector of the Mad2-dependent spindle checkpoint. Science 279:1045-1047. [see comments]
LI, R., 1999 Bifurcation of the mitotic checkpoint pathway in budding yeast. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96:4989-4994
LI, R. and A. W. MURRAY, 1991 Feedback control of mitosis in budding yeast. Cell 66:519-531. (erratum: Cell 79: following 388).[Medline].
LIM, H. H. and U. SURANA, 1996 Cdc20, a beta-transducin homologue, links RAD9-mediated G2/M checkpoint control to mitosis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.. Mol. Gen. Genet. 253:138-148[Medline].
LIM, H. H., P. Y. GOH, and U. SURANA, 1998 Cdc20 is essential for the cyclosome-mediated proteolysis of both Pds1 and Clb2 during M phase in budding yeast. Curr. Biol. 8:231-234[Medline].
LONGTINE, M., H. FARES, and J. R. PRINGLE, 1999 Role of the yeast Gin4p protein kinase in septin assembly and the relationship between septin assembly and septin function. J. Cell Biol. 143:719-736
MINET, M., P. NURSE, P. THURIAUX, and J. M. MITCHISON, 1979 Uncontrolled septation in a cell division cycle mutant of the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe.. J. Bacteriol. 137:440-446
MORGAN, D. O., 1999 Regulation of the APC and the exit from mitosis. Nat. Cell Bi





