- THIS ARTICLE
-
Abstract
- Full Text (PDF)
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Andolfatto, P.
- Articles by Kreitman, M.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Andolfatto, P.
- Articles by Kreitman, M.
Molecular Variation at the In(2L)t Proximal Breakpoint Site in Natural Populations of Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans
Peter Andolfattoa and Martin Kreitmanaa Committee on Genetics, Department of Ecology and Evolution, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637
Corresponding author: Peter Andolfatto, Institute of Cell, Animal and Population Biology, Ashworth Labs, Kings Bldgs., University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH9 3JT Scotland, United Kingdom., peter.andolfatto{at}ed.ac.uk (E-mail)
Communicating editor: A. G. CLARK
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
A previous study of nucleotide polymorphism in a Costa Rican population of Drosophila melanogaster found evidence for a nonneutral deficiency in the number of haplotypes near the proximal breakpoint of In(2L)t, a common inversion polymorphism in this species. Another striking feature of the data was a window of unusually high nucleotide diversity spanning the breakpoint site. To distinguish between selective and neutral demographic explanations for the observed patterns in the data, we sample alleles from three additional populations of D. melanogaster and one population of D. simulans. We find that the strength of associations among sites found at the breakpoint varies between populations of D. melanogaster. In D. simulans, analysis of the homologous region reveals unusually elevated levels of nucleotide polymorphism spanning the breakpoint site. As with American populations of D. melanogaster, our D. simulans sample shows a marked reduction in the number of haplotypes but not in nucleotide diversity. Haplotype tests reveal a significant deficiency in the number of haplotypes relative to the neutral expectation in the D. simulans sample and some populations of D. melanogaster. At the breakpoint site, the level of divergence between haplotype classes is comparable to interspecific divergence. The observation of interspecific polymorphisms that differentiate major haplotype classes in both species suggests that haplotype classes at this locus are considerably old. When considered in the context of other studies on patterns of variation within and between populations of D. melanogaster and D. simulans, our data appear more consistent with the operation of selection than with simple demographic explanations.
THE chromosomal rearrangement In(2L)t is one of four common polymorphic inversions with stable geographic frequency clines in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. While rare in temperate climates, it reaches frequencies of 4060% in tropical populations of Australasia and Africa (![]()
![]()
![]()
In a recent study of nucleotide variation spanning the proximal In(2L)t breakpoint, ![]()
A departure from the neutral prediction for the number of haplotypes can arise as a result of selection or demographic shifts. In particular, a reduction in the number of haplotypes in a sample is expected under models of balancing selection or population subdivision (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Similar haplotype deficiencies have recently been reported at Sod, vermilion, Fbp2, and Su(H) in D. melanogaster (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Distinguishing between selective and demographic explanations for patterns of nucleotide diversity at a particular locus on the basis of data from a single sample is difficult. Here, we expand the polymorphism data set of ![]()
![]()
![]()
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
Population samples and sequencing:
The isolation of the In(2L)t proximal breakpoint (34A89 on the cytological map) and the collection of polymorphism data from a San Jose, Costa Rica D. melanogaster population sample are described by ![]()
![]()
Genomic DNA was prepared from wild-caught females from the Florida City population. Individuals were karyotyped by PCR with the use of standard and In(2L)t-specific primer pairs (![]()
|
Polyethylene glycol (PEG)-precipitated templates were directly sequenced on both strands using a dRhodamine Terminator Cycle sequencing kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) and run on an ABI377XL Automated Sequencer. Sequences were analyzed with ABI Sequence Analysis v3.0 software; contigs were managed with Sequencher v3.0 software. Sequences collected in this study have been deposited into GenBank under accession nos. AF217926, AF217927, AF217928, AF217929, AF217930, AF217931, AF217932, AF217933, AF217934, AF217935, AF217936, AF217937, AF217938, AF217939, AF217940, AF217941, AF217942, AF217943, AF217944, AF217945, AF217946, AF217947, AF217948, AF217949. Intraspecific alignments have been deposited into the EMBL database (ftp://ftp.ebi.ac.uk/pub/databases/embl/align/) under accession nos. DS41064DS41065.
Polymorphism analyses:
Although we report all segregating polymorphisms (Fig 2 and Fig 3), we have restricted our analyses to two-state single-nucleotide polymorphisms and insertion-deletions within each population (see Table 1). The neutral mutation parameter
= 4Neµ, where Ne is the effective population size of the species and µ is the neutral mutation rate, is estimated from both
, the average pairwise difference per base pair (![]()
w; ![]()
![]()
|
|
|
The population recombination rate, C = 4Ner, where r is the recombination rate per base pair per generation, is estimated in three ways. A lower bound for C is based on the minimum number of inferred recombination events in the history of a sample (RM, in ![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
(1 - 2q(1 - q)), where
is the estimate of rates of crossing over per base pair per generation for the cytological band 34A based on laboratory crosses (![]()
![]()
) based on the exchange of distant flanking markers interpolated to the intragenic scale (i.e., several kilobases) are likely to be underestimates of the true rate of exchange (r), since they ignore the added contribution of gene conversion (![]()
Statistical tests of neutral equilibrium and panmictic population models:
Tajima's D statistic (![]()
![]()
2 (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
We use the haplotype test of ![]()
![]()
![]()
| RESULTS |
|---|
Polymorphism and recombination among D. melanogaster samples:
The sampled region spans the proximal In(2L)t breakpoint (Fig 1) and includes 840 bp from region C (within the inverted region) and 160 bp from region D (outside the inverted region). The inversion breakpoint is located between positions 840 and 934 where all sampled In(2L)t chromosomes are fixed for a 94-bp deletion (![]()
,
, and C/
(Table 1) include all biallelic variation in a given population sample (see MATERIALS AND METHODS). Two polymorphisms detected in the Florida City sample (polymorphic sites 77 and 83) as well as one in the Yeppoon sample (polymorphic site 5) were previously interpreted as fixed differences between standard and In(2L)t lineages (![]()
Two features of the data differ between population samples of D. melanogaster (Fig 2). First, the Costa Rican and Miami samples appear to have stronger linkage disequilibrium among sites than Yeppoon and Zimbabwe samples. However, in contrast to previous studies for X-linked loci in various populations of D. melanogaster (![]()
![]()
![]()
0 [constructed random samples (CRS), Table 1]. However, the interpretation of this P value is difficult since this sampled region was preselected because it appeared unusual in this population. Tajima's D was not significantly skewed for CRS of any other population when 0
C
Clab.
Estimates of the population recombination rate also differ among samples. Under neutral equilibrium assumptions, the ratio Chud/
w (Table 1) is an estimate of the expected number of recombination events per mutation in the sample. An independent measure of this quantity based on laboratory estimates of the recombination rate in this chromosomal region (
= 1.47 x 10-8 per base pair per generation; ![]()
![]()
![]()
/µ) of ~4.59.0. If we assume an In(2L)t frequency of 50% and no recombination in inversion heterozygotes, this range becomes ~2.34.5. While the Zimbabwe and Yeppoon samples of standard chromosomes are roughly in agreement with these estimated ranges, Costa Rica and Florida City samples yield a Chud/
w ratio >10-fold smaller than expected (Table 1). Since Chud is a summary of the amount of linkage disequilibrium in a sample (![]()
w, lower than expected Chud/
w reflect stronger linkage disequilibrium in the American samples relative to Yeppoon and Zimbabwe samples. The Chud/
w ratios are uniformly low in CRS (Table 1), likely due to the linkage disequilibrium introduced by In(2L)t chromosomes.
Geographic differentiation between population samples of standard chromosomes:
Pairwise Fst estimates (Table 2, top right) suggest that differentiation between populations is low. Permutation tests described by ![]()
2 statistic reveals haplotype differentiation between Costa Rica and all other populations. No other significant differentiation between haplotypes (
2) is detected in pairwise comparisons of populations. Two of six tests based on site frequencies (K*) have P values near the 0.05 level (Zimbabwe/Costa Rica and Zimbabwe/Florida City). Caution should be exercised in interpreting the P values in Table 2 since they are not corrected for multiple tests. However, these tests do suggest haplotype differentiation between standard chromosomes of Costa Rican and other populations.
|
Polymorphism patterns in a D. simulans population sample:
Fig 3 summarizes polymorphism data for the In(2L)t proximal breakpoint homologue in a North American population of D. simulans. Estimates of
,
, and C/
are given in Table 1. In agreement with previous data from nucleotide variation in D. melanogaster and D. simulans (reviewed in ![]()
from
and S are approximately twofold larger in D. simulans than in D. melanogaster (Fig 2). Unexpectedly, strong associations among polymorphic sites are observed in the D. simulans data set, similar to those seen in North American D. melanogaster samples. The D. simulans data set contains only three detected recombination events (by a four gamete test; ![]()
![]()
|
Divergence between haplotypes matches interspecific divergence:
There is evidence that the major haplotype classes in both species are old relative to divergence between species. Fig 4B and Fig C shows levels of divergence between two "haplotype classes" of the Costa Rican sample of D. melanogaster and our sample of D. simulans. Uncertainty in the alignment between the two species, especially near the breakpoint site, makes a quantitative assessment of divergence (and shared polymorphisms) difficult. However, a tentative alignment between D. melanogaster and D. simulans sequences reveals (qualitatively) that the breakpoint region has elevated interspecific divergence (Fig 4B and Fig C). Strikingly, average pairwise divergence between the two haplotype classes in both species matches or exceeds the estimated divergence between species near the In(2L)t breakpoint site. These observations can only be considered qualitative both because the alignment between D. melanogaster and D. simulans is poor and because the assignment of alleles to haplotype classes is arbitrary.
Shared polymorphisms:
Shaded columns in Fig 2 and Fig 3 show the positions of four trans-specific polymorphisms (sites 9, 64, 76, and 77 in Fig 2; sites 6, 57, 68, and 69 in Fig 3). All are at intermediate frequency (i.e., sampled more than once) in D. simulans and CRS of D. melanogaster. In D. melanogaster, two of the four polymorphisms (9 and 76, Fig 2) differentiate two major standard haplotype classes in the Costa Rican population (AGAG and GKGG). Although sampled only once in the Florida City sample, polymorphism 77 is fixed in In(2L)t chromosomes and forms an inversion-specific haplotype (AGAA; ![]()
Analysis of haplotype structure:
We use the haplotype test of ![]()
0 (P < 0.035) and P decreased monotonically for C > Cmin. For comparison, we constructed CRS for each D. melanogaster population based on its estimated In(2L)t frequencies; 20.8% for Costa Rica, 25.0% for Florida City, 22.9% for Yeppoon, and 58.2% for Zimbabwe (![]()
0 (maximum probabilities: Costa Rica, P < 0.015; Florida City, P < 0.046). Similar tests on CRS for Yeppoon and Zimbabwe (Table 3) do not reject the neutral model when C = Cmin. When we condition simulations on C = Clab, all probabilities become much lower; the null model is rejected for the Yeppoon sample assuming C = Clab (P = 0.0175).
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
Elevated polymorphism at the In(2L)t breakpoint site among standard chromosomes:
Sliding-window analyses of polymorphism in the D. melanogaster (Costa Rica) and D. simulans samples reveal unusually high levels of nucleotide diversity near the In(2L)t breakpoint site (Fig 4A). This pattern is reminiscent of the predicted signature of balancing selection (![]()
![]()
![]()
An argument in favor of heterogeneity in selective constraint across the region is that species polymorphism and divergence appear to be coupled (Fig 4). Indeed, the region immediately spanning the breakpoint appears to have elevated divergence as well as elevated levels of polymorphism (but seemingly lower divergence than that observed between major haplotype classes within each species). Comparisons of polymorphism and divergence for the In(2L)t proximal breakpoint with other loci (i.e., the HKA test of ![]()
![]()
While heterogeneity in levels of constraint may be sufficient to explain levels of nucleotide diversity in the In(2L)t breakpoint region, it cannot explain the unusual distribution of this variation among haplotypes. This feature of the data is difficult to reconcile with a neutral equilibrium model given the rate of recombination expected in this chromosomal region (i.e., Clab; see Table 3). In addition, the several trans-specific polymorphisms in this region tend to fall on the deepest branches of genealogies in samples from both species. This observation can be taken as evidence that some component of this elevated window of nucleotide diversity surrounding the breakpoint is due to the long persistence of polymorphisms rather than simply a higher substitution rate (as suggested by the elevated divergence).
Geographic patterns and haplotype structure in D. melanogaster:
We detect significant geographic differentiation of standard haplotypes between populations of D. melanogaster despite low values of Fst (Table 2). The simplest explanation for the marked reduction in haplotype diversity in American samples is the recent expansion of African populations into the Americas (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Thus, whether considering more populations, loci, or sites, one is led to some feature of the data that makes simple demographic explanations for the D. melanogaster data unlikely. It could be argued that, under demographic models with intermediate levels of recombination, a large variance in patterns of polymorphism is expected after a bottleneck (R. HUDSON, personal communication). All demographic models, however, predict a reduction in the expected genome-wide level of polymorphism in bottlenecked populations. This pattern is not generally observed in the available autosomal data for D. melanogaster.
Comparing patterns in D. melanogaster and D. simulans:
The observation of fewer haplotypes than expected for the In(2L)t proximal breakpoint homologue in D. simulans could again be taken as evidence for a recent range expansion of African populations (as for D. melanogaster above). For example, data for vermilion and G6pd loci show evidence for reduced haplotype diversity in some non-African populations of D. simulans relative to African populations (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
An increasing number of reports of unusual haplotype structure in population samples of both D. melanogaster and D. simulans point to simple explanations, such as those based on the demographic histories of these species. However, while D. melanogaster and D. simulans may have certain similarities in their demographic histories (i.e., a possible recent expansion from Africa), it seems unlikely that these histories will be similar enough to produce identical patterns at any particular locus under investigation. While multiple loci reveal evidence for geographic differentiation in both D. melanogaster and D. simulans (e.g., ![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Selection-based explanations for the unusual linkage disequilibrium patterns observed at the In(2L)t breakpoint site should also be entertained. The expansion of African populations of D. melanogaster and D. simulans into more temperate climates may have been accompanied by selection at many loci. In regions of intermediate recombination, this could lead to considerable heterogeneity in haplotype structure both among loci and among populations. This is a reasonable interpretation of the pattern seen in different populations of D. melanogaster at the In(2L)t breakpoint. It is also possible that the elevated nucleotide diversity, deficiency of haplotypes, and trans-specific polymorphisms that differentiate major haplotype classes are the result of long-standing epistatic interactions. Evidence for selective constraints and putative exons near the In(2L)t breakpoint (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Demography and selection are not mutually exclusive hypotheses and the two forces may in fact interact to produce even greater deviations than expected under either class of models (cf. ![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We thank J. Comeron, R. Hudson, R. Kulathinal, M. Przeworski, S. C. Tsaur, and J. Wall for helpful discussions. R. Hudson and J. Wall provided computer programs. This manuscript was improved with comments from P. Awadalla, W. Eanes, an anonymous reviewer, and especially M. Przeworski. We thank Jean Gladstone for excellent technical assistance and Chung-I Wu for Australian and African fly lines. This research was supported by National Science Foundation grant DEB-9408869 and National Institutes of Health grant R01GM39355 to M.K. P.A. holds a Postgraduate Scholarship from the National Science and Engineering Council of Canada.
Manuscript received May 8, 1999; Accepted for publication December 22, 1999.
| LITERATURE CITED |
|---|
AGUADÉ, M., 1998 Different forces drive the evolution of the Acp26Aa and Acp26Ab accessory gland genes in the Drosophila melanogaster species complex. Genetics 150:1079-1089
AGUADÉ, M., 1999 Positive selection drives the evolution of the Acp29AB accessory gland protein in Drosophila. Genetics 152:543-551
ALVAREZ, G. and C. ZAPATA, 1997 Conditions for protected inversion polymorphism under supergene selection. Genetics 146:717-722[Abstract].
ANDOLFATTO, P. and M. NORDBORG, 1998 The effect of gene conversion on intralocus associations. Genetics 148:1397-1399
ANDOLFATTO, P., J. D. WALL, and M. KREITMAN, 1999 Unusual haplotype structure at the proximal breakpoint of In(2L)t in a natural population of Drosophila melanogaster.. Genetics 153:1297-1311
BEGUN, D. J. and C. F. AQUADRO, 1993 African and North American populations of Drosophila melanogaster are very different at the DNA level. Nature 365:548-550[Medline].
BEGUN, D. J. and C. F. AQUADRO, 1994 Evolutionary inferences from DNA variation at the 6-Phosphogluconate Dehydrogenase locus in natural populations of Drosophilaselection and geographic differentiation. Genetics 136:155-171[Abstract].
BEGUN, D. J. and C. F. AQUADRO, 1995 Molecular variation at the vermilion locus in geographically diverse populations of Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans.. Genetics 140:1019-1032[Abstract].
BÉNASSI, V., S. AULARD, S. MAZEAU, and M. VEUILLE, 1993 Molecular variation of Adh and P6 genes in an African population of Drosophila melanogaster and its relation to chromosomal inversions. Genetics 134:789-799[Abstract].
BÉNASSI, V., F. DEPAULIS, G. K. MEGHLAOUI, and M. VEUILLE, 1999 Partial sweeping of variation at the Fbp2 locus in a West African population of Drosophila melanogaster.. Mol. Biol. Evol. 16:347-353[Abstract].
BRAVERMAN, J. M., R. R. HUDSON, N. L. KAPLAN, C. H. LANGLEY, and W. STEPHAN, 1995 The hitchhiking effect on the site frequency-spectrum of DNA polymorphisms. Genetics 140:783-796[Abstract].
CHARLESWORTH, B., 1974 Inversion polymorphism in a two-locus genetic system. Genet. Res. 23:259-280[Medline].
CHARLESWORTH, D. and B. CHARLESWORTH, 1973 Selection of new inversions in multi-locus genetic systems. Genet. Res. 21:167-183.
COMERON, J. M., M. KREITMAN, and M. AGUADÉ, 1999 Natural selection on synonymous sites is correlated with gene length and recombination in Drosophila. Genetics 151:239-249
DAVID, J. R. and P. CAPY, 1988 Genetic variation of Drosophila melanogaster natural populations. Trends Genet. 4:106-111[Medline].
DEPAULIS, F., L. BRAZIER, and M. VEIULLE, 1999 Selective sweep at the Drosophila melanogaster Suppressor of Hairless locus and its association with the In(2L)t inversion polymorphism. Genetics 152:1017-1024
HASSON, E., I. N. WANG, L. W. ZENG, M. KREITMAN, and W. F. EANES, 1998 Nucleotide variation in the triose-phosphate isomerase (Tpi) locus of Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans.. Mol. Biol. Evol. 15:756-769[Abstract].
FU, Y. X., 1996 New statistical tests of neutrality for DNA samples from a population. Genetics 143:557-570[Abstract].
HALE, L. R. and R. S. SINGH, 1991 Contrasting patterns of genetic structure and evolutionary history as revealed by mitochondrial DNA and nuclear gene-enzyme variation. J. Genet. 70:79-89.
HAMBLIN, M. T. and C. F. AQUADRO, 1996 High nucleotide sequence variation in a region of low recombination in Drosophila simulans is consistent with the background selection model. Mol. Biol. Evol. 13:1133-1140[Abstract].
HAMBLIN, M. T. and C. F. AQUADRO, 1997 Contrasting patterns of nucleotide sequence variation at the glucose dehydrogenase (Gld) locus in different populations of Drosophila melanogaster.. Genetics 145:1053-1062[Abstract].
HAMBLIN, M. T. and M. VEUILLE, 1999 Population structure among African and derived populations of Drosophila simulans: evidence for ancient subdivision and recent admixture. Genetics 153:305-317
HARADA, K., S. I. KUSAKABE, T. YAMAZAKI, and T. MUKAI, 1993 Spontaneous mutation rates in null and band-morph mutations of enzyme loci in Drosophila melanogaster.. Jpn. J. Genet. 68:605-616[Medline].
HUDSON, R. R., 1987 Estimating the recombination parameter of a finite population model without selection. Genet. Res. 50:245-250[Medline].
HUDSON, R. R., 1990 Gene genealogies and the coalescent process, pp. 144 in Oxford Surveys in Evolutionary Biology, Vol. 7, edited by D. J. FUTUYMA and J. ANTONOVICS. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
HUDSON, R. R., 1993 The how and why of generating gene genealogies, pp. 2336 in Mechanisms of Molecular Evolution, edited by N. TAKAHATA and A. G. CLARK. Japan Scientific Society, Tokyo.
HUDSON, R. R. and N. F. KAPLAN, 1985 Statistical properties of the number of recombination events in the history of a sample of DNA sequences. Genetics 111:147-164
HUDSON, R. R. and N. F. KAPLAN, 1988 The coalescent process in models with selection and recombination. Genetics 120:831-840
HUDSON, R. R., M. KREITMAN, and M. AGUADÉ, 1987 A test of neutral molecular evolution based on nucleotide data. Genetics 116:153-159
HUDSON, R. R., D. D. BOOS, and N. F. KAPLAN, 1992a A statistical test for detecting geographic subdivision. Mol. Biol. Evol. 9:138-151[Abstract].
HUDSON, R. R., M. SLATKIN, and W. P. MADDISON, 1992b Estimating levels of gene flow from DNA sequence data. Genetics 132:583-589[Abstract].
HUDSON, R. R., K. BAILEY, D. SKARECKY, J. KWIATOWSKI, and F. J. AYALA, 1994 Evidence for positive selection in the Superoxide Dismutase (Sod) region of Drosophila melanogaster.. Genetics 136:1329-1340[Abstract].
HUDSON, R. R., A. G. SÁEZ, and F. J. AYALA, 1997 DNA variation at the Sod locus of Drosophila melanogaster: an unfolding story of natural selection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94:7725-7729
IRVIN, S. D., K. A. WETTERSTRAND, C. M. HUTTER, and C. F. AQUADRO, 1998 Genetic variation and differentiation at microsatellite loci in Drosophila simulans: evidence for founder effects in New World populations. Genetics 150:777-790
KAPLAN, N., R. R. HUDSON, and M. IIZUKA, 1991 The coalescent process in models with selection, recombination and geographic subdivision. Genet. Res. 57:83-91[Medline].
KAPLAN, N. L., R. R. HUDSON, and C. H. LANGLEY, 1989 The hitchhiking effect revisited. Genetics 123:887-899
KIMURA, M., 1956 A model of a genetic system which leads to closer linkage by natural selection. Evolution 10:278-287.
KIRBY, D. A. and W. STEPHAN, 1996 Multi-locus selection and the structure of variation at the white gene of Drosophila melanogaster.. Genetics 144:635-645[Abstract].
KNIBB, W. R., 1982 Chromosomal inversion polymorphism in Drosophila melanogaster II. Geographic clines and climatic associations in Australasia, North America and Asia. Genetica 58:213-221.
KREITMAN, M., 1983 Nucleotide polymorphism at the Alcohol Dehydrogenase locus of Drosophila melanogaster.. Nature 304:412-417[Medline].
KREITMAN, M. and R. R. HUDSON, 1991 Inferring the evolutionary histories of the Adh and Adh-dup loci in Drosophila melanogaster from patterns of polymorphism and divergence. Genetics 127:565-582[Abstract].
LABATE, J. A., C. H. BIERMANN, and W. F. EANES, 1999 Nucleotide variation at the runt locus in Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans.. Mol. Biol. Evol. 16:724-731[Abstract].
LACHAISE, D., M. L. CARIOU, J. R. DAVID, F. LEMEUNIER, and L. TSACAS et al., 1988 Historical biogeography of the Drosophila melanogaster species subgroup. Evol. Biol. 22:159-225.
LI, W. H., 1997 Molecular Evolution. Sinauer Press, Sunderland, MA.
MAYNARD-SMITH, J. and J. HAIGH, 1974 The hitch-hiking effect of a favorable gene. Genet. Res. 23:23-35[Medline].
MORIYAMA, E. N. and J. R. POWELL, 1996 Intraspecific nuclear DNA variation in Drosophila. Mol. Biol. Evol. 13:261-277[Abstract].
NEI, M., 1987 Molecular Evolutionary Genetics. Columbia University Press, New York.
NORDBORG, M., 1997 Structured coalescent processes on different time scales. Genetics 146:1501-1514[Abstract].
ROZAS, J. and R. ROZAS, 1999 DnaSP version 3: an integrated program for molecular population genetics and molecular evolutionary analysis. Bioinformatics 15:174-175
SLATKIN, M. and T. WIEHE, 1998 Genetic hitchhiking in a subdivided population. Genet. Res. 71:155-160[Medline].
STROBECK, C., 1987 Average number of nucleotide differences in a sample from a single subpopulation: a test for population subdivision. Genetics 117:149-153
TAJIMA, F., 1983 Evolutionary relationship of DNA sequences in finite populations. Genetics 105:437-460
TAJIMA, F., 1989 Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism. Genetics 123:585-595
TSAUR, S. C., C. T. TING, and C. I. WU, 1998 Positive selection driving the evolution of a gene of male reproduction, Acp26Aa, of Drosophila: II. Divergence versus polymorphism. Mol. Biol. Evol. 15:1040-1046[Abstract].
WALL, J. D., 1999 Recombination and the power of statistical tests of neutrality. Genet. Res. 74:65-79.
WASSERMAN, M., 1968 Recombination-induced chromosomal heterosis. Genetics 58:125-139
WATTERSON, G. A., 1975 On the number of segregating sites in genetical models without recombination. Theor. Popul. Biol. 7:256-276[Medline].
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Bhutkar, S. W. Schaeffer, S. M. Russo, M. Xu, T. F. Smith, and W. M. Gelbart Chromosomal Rearrangement Inferred From Comparisons of 12 Drosophila Genomes Genetics, July 1, 2008; 179(3): 1657 - 1680. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. L. Turner, M. T. Levine, M. L. Eckert, and D. J. Begun Genomic Analysis of Adaptive Differentiation in Drosophila melanogaster Genetics, May 1, 2008; 179(1): 455 - 473. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. T. Levine and D. J. Begun Evidence of Spatially Varying Selection Acting on Four Chromatin-Remodeling Loci in Drosophila melanogaster Genetics, May 1, 2008; 179(1): 475 - 485. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Sanchez-Gracia and J. Rozas Unusual Pattern of Nucleotide Sequence Variation at the OS-E and OS-F Genomic Regions of Drosophila simulans Genetics, April 1, 2007; 175(4): 1923 - 1935. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Kirkpatrick and N. Barton Chromosome Inversions, Local Adaptation and Speciation Genetics, May 1, 2006; 173(1): 419 - 434. [Abstr |





