- THIS ARTICLE
-
Abstract
- Full Text (PDF)
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Torreblanca, J.
- Articles by Casadesús, J.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Torreblanca, J.
- Articles by Casadesús, J.
Synthesis of FinP RNA by Plasmids F and pSLT Is Regulated by DNA Adenine Methylation
Joaquín Torreblancaa, Silvia Marquésa, and Josep Casadesúsaa Departamento de Genética, Facultad de Biología, Universidad de Sevilla, E-41080 Sevilla, Spain
Corresponding author: Josep Casadesús, Departamento de Genética, Facultad de Biología, Universidad de Sevilla, Apartado 1095, Sevilla 41080, Spain., genbac{at}cica.es (E-mail)
Communicating editor: P. L. FOSTER
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
DNA adenine methylase mutants of Salmonella typhimurium contain reduced amounts of FinP, an antisense RNA encoded by the virulence plasmid pSLT. Lowered FinP levels are detected in both Dam- FinO+ and Dam- FinO- backgrounds, suggesting that Dam methylation regulates FinP production rather than FinP half-life. Reduced amounts of F-encoded FinP RNA are likewise found in Dam- mutants of Escherichia coli. A consequence of FinP RNA scarcity in the absence of DNA adenine methylation is that Dam- mutants of both S. typhimurium and E. coli show elevated levels of F plasmid transfer. Inhibition of F fertility by the S. typhimurium virulence plasmid is also impaired in a Dam- background.
METHYLATED bases are present in many genomes and participate in a wide range of biological processes, including gene regulation (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
As an alternative approach to the combination of genome analysis and reverse genetics, we devised a screen for loci regulated by DNA adenine methylation based on classical genetic methods. The screen was designed for Salmonella typhimurium and involved a search for Lac fusions that showed different activity in Dam+ and Dam- backgrounds (![]()
![]()
We describe below the molecular characterization of the original zzv-6306::MudJ fusion, followed by experiments that show that Dam methylation regulates the expression of the tra operon of pSLT. We propose that derepression of the pSLT tra operon in a Dam- background is an indirect effect caused by lowered synthesis of FinP RNA, and present evidence that Dam methylation also regulates synthesis of FinP RNA in the F plasmid. A consequence of FinP shortage in the absence of DNA adenine methylation is that Dam- mutants of both S. typhimurium and E. coli undergo F plasmid transfer at elevated levels.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
Bacterial strains, bacteriophages, and strain construction:
The S. typhimurium and E. coli strains used in this study are listed in Table 1. Transductional crosses using phage P22 HT 105/1 int201 (![]()
![]()
|
Plasmids and transposons:
The episomes F'128 pro+ lac+, F' proAB lacIq lacZ
M15::Tn10, F'128 pro+ lac+ zzf-1831:Tn10dTet, F'128 pro+ lac+ zzf1836::Tn10dCam, and F'T80 his+ were all obtained from J. R. Roth (University of Utah, Salt Lake City). Plasmid pACYC184 is a p15A derivative carrying Camr and Tetr markers (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Construction of plasmid pIZ833:
The E. coli dam gene was isolated from plasmid pTP166 (![]()
![]()
Construction of plasmids pIZ877, pIZ880, and pIZ903:
For construction of a transcriptional fusion traY::lac, a 610-bp SspI-EcoRV fragment from pSLT was cloned on the SmaI site of pIC552 (![]()
The initial step for the construction of a transcriptional fusion traJ::lac was cloning of a 240-bp DraI-EcoRV fragment of pSLT on pBluescript II SK(+) digested with EcoRV and SmaI. The construct was then digested with BamHI and XhoI, and cloned on pIC552 digested with BglII and XhoI. The resulting plasmid, pIZ877, carries the putative traJ promoter of pSLT and some 70 bp of the putative traJ ORF.
Construction of a transcriptional fusion finP::lac was as follows: a 300-bp BamHI-HinfI fragment containing the putative finP promoter was cloned on pBluescript II SK(+). In the fragment cloned, one HinfI site is located in the putative finP gene, while the BamHI site is part of vector DNA. After digestion with HinfI and end filling with Klenow polymerase, the fragment was digested with BamHI and cloned on pBluescript II SK(+) digested with EcoRV and BamHI. The construct was then digested with BamHI and XhoI and cloned on pIC552 digested with BglII and XhoI, to generate pIZ880. This plasmid contains a transcriptional finP::lac fusion and lacks the traJ promoter.
Construction of plasmid pIZ900:
A 326-bp EcoRV fragment of pSLT, containing the traJ promoter and a 5' portion of the traJ coding sequence, was cloned on the SmaI site of pBluescript II SK(+) to generate pIZ899. A translational fusion traJ::lac was obtained by cloning the EcoRI-XbaI fragment of pIZ899 on pMD1405 digested with the same enzymes, to generate pIZ900. In addition to the translational fusion traJ::lac, the cloned fragment contains the finP promoter and the complete finP gene.
Media and chemicals:
The E medium of ![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Virulence plasmid curing:
Curing of the virulence plasmid of S. typhimurium was achieved by destabilization of the par locus with a kanamycin-resistant cartridge (![]()
ß-Galactosidase assays:
Levels of ß-galactosidase activity were assayed as described by ![]()
Matings:
Saturated cultures of the donor and the recipient were harvested by centrifugation and washed with NCE medium without carbon source. Aliquots of both strains were then mixed and incubated at 37° for 2 hr, without shaking. After mating, the mixtures were diluted in NCE and spread (both diluted and undiluted) on selective plates. As controls, 0.1 ml of both the donor and the recipient cultures were also spread on selective plates.
Transformation of S. typhimurium:
The transformable strain TR5878 was used as the recipient of plasmids; preparation of competent cells and transformation followed the procedures of ![]()
![]()
Extraction of the S. typhimurium virulence plasmid:
One milliliter of an overnight culture in Luria-Bertani broth was centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 2 min at 4°. The pellet was resuspended in 150 µl of E buffer; 300 µl of lysis solution were then added. After incubating at 65° for 1 hr, the lysate was chilled on ice and shaken for 10 min (until a white precipitate was formed). The preparation was then buffered by adding 150 µl of ice-cold 2 M Tris, shaken gently until it became transparent and centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 20 min in the cold. The supernatant was transferred to a clean tube and mixed with one volume of nonsaturated phenol:chloroform:isoamyl alcohol (25:24:1). After two to three extraction cycles, DNA was precipitated with 2 M sodium acetate and absolute ethanol. The pellet was rinsed with 70% ethanol and resuspended in 10 µl of Tris-EDTA. All preparations were treated with ribonuclease (0.1 mg/ml, final concentration) before storage at -20°.
Standard isolation of plasmid DNA:
Plasmid DNA for both clone analysis and DNA sequencing was obtained by alkaline lysis, without phenol extraction (![]()
Digestion, end modification, and ligation of DNA fragments:
Restriction enzymes were purchased from Promega Biotech (Madison, WI), New England Biolabs (Beverly, MA), and Boehringer Mannheim (Mannheim, Germany). The buffers used were those provided by the supplier. For multiple digestions, we used the "One-phor-all" buffer (Pharmacia Biotech, San Francisco). Deoxyribonucleotides and and Klenow DNA polymerase were purchased from Pharmacia Biotech. T4 polynucleotide ligase was from Boehringer Mannheim; ligation was achieved by incubating >12 hr at 16°. For blunt-end ligation, a low-ATP buffer was used (New England Biolabs).
Electrophoretic separation of DNA fragments:
Electrophoresis of DNA was carried out on agarose gels, and the usual buffer was TBE. However, TAE was used for recovery of DNA fragments from gels. The molecular weight markers used were HindIII-digested lambda DNA and/or the 1-kb ladder from GIBCO-BRL (New York). Gels were stained with ethidium bromide (final concentration, 0.5 µg/ml). For gel photographs, a Polaroid 3000/36° film (Polaroid Co., Cambridge, MA) was used.
DNA hybridization:
Digestion of DNA with restriction enzymes, electrophoretic separation of restriction fragments, DNA denaturation, transfer of DNA from agarose gels to nylon filters, DNA labeling, and DNA hybridization followed the procedures of ![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
DNA sequencing and sequence analysis:
Sequencing reactions were performed with the dideoxy chain termination procedure (![]()
![]()
RNA extraction:
RNA preparations were obtained by guanidine isothiocyanate lysis and phenol/chloroform extraction (![]()
![]()
RNA electrophoresis in polyacrylamide gels:
Samples contained 6 µl of the RNA preparation and 4 µl of loading buffer containing 50% formamide. After 2 min incubation at 94°, the samples were chilled on ice. Electrophoretic separation was carried out on gels prepared with TBE and containing 8% acrylamide and urea 7.5 M. The gels were 12 cm long and 0.75 mm thick. Vertical electrophoretic separation was performed at 250 V.
RNA hybridization against DNA probes:
After electrophoretic separation of RNA, polyacrylamide gels were treated with cold TBE (0.5x) for 15 min. Transfer to nylon filters was achieved with a Transblot SD Semidry Transfer Cell system from BioRad Laboratories (Richmond, CA). Transfer was allowed to proceed for 1 hr at 400 mA, at intensities below 25 V. Prehybridization and hybridization were as described for DNA hybridization, except that the temperature was 38° and formamide was not used. After transfer, the filters were stained with a solution of 0.3% methylene blue in 0.3 M sodium acetate, pH 5.2, to confirm both the efficiency of transfer and the presence of equivalent amounts of RNA per lane. The probe was end-labeled with [
32P]ATP. After hybridization, the nylon filters were washed twice at room temperature with 6x SSC, 0.1% SDS for 5 min, and twice with 0.6x SSC, 0.1% SDS for 15 min. The latter washes were carried out either at room temperature or at 35°. The filters were then exposed to an X-ray film for 17 days. The FinP probe used was the 20-mer 5'TAATCGCCGATACAGGGAG3'. This sequence is complementary to the 3' end of F-encoded FinP RNA, and the region is 100% conserved in the pSLT plasmid.
| RESULTS |
|---|
Physical mapping of the fusion zzv-6306::MudJ:
The location of the Dam-regulated fusion zzv-6306::MudJ on the virulence plasmid of S. typhimurium was established by a combination of restriction mapping and Southern hybridization. A map of HindIII, BamHI, and BlgII sites in pSLT (![]()
![]()
![]()
|
Sequencing of the boundaries of the insertion zzv-6306::MudJ:
Sequencing of the regions flanking the insertion zzv-6306::MudJ was performed using pSLT DNA extracted from strain SV3003. Sequencing with the MuL primer permitted the identification of 203 nucleotides on one side of the insertion zzv-6306::MudJ (not shown), while priming with MuR failed. A search in the EMBL database using the program FASTA indicated that the stretch of 203 nucleotides sequenced was 84.5% homologous to nucleotides 50705272 of the F plasmid, which correspond to the coding sequence of the traB gene (EMBL accession no.: U01159). The finding that the insertion zzv-6306::MudJ was located in a gene homologous to the traB gene of F prompted a change of the designation zzv-6306::MudJ to traB1:MudJ.
Physical mapping of the traB region of pSLT:
An oligonucleotide that could serve as a probe in Southern hybridization experiments was derived from the traB sequence (see MATERIALS AND METHODS). The region selected is extremely similar in F and pSLT (only three differences in 52 nucleotides) and corresponds to nucleotides 51675218 of the F sequence (EMBL accession no.: U01159). The resulting traB 52-mer, henceforth called "traB probe," was used in Southern hybridization experiments against virulence plasmid DNA from strains LT2 (pSLT) and SV3003 (pSLT traB1::MudJ). Relevant results were as follows:
- i. The traB probe hybridized against a single HindIII fragment, larger than the 21 kb of the DNA size marker, in both pSLT and pSLT traB1::MudJ. This result permitted us to map the MudJ insertion within the HindIII fragment of ~35 kb located between kilobase 11 and kilobase 45 on the pSLT map, which is the only "large" HindIII fragment of pSLT (
SANDERSON et al. 1995 ).
- ii. Single and double digestions of pSLT DNA with EcoRI, SalI, and HindIII, followed by Southern hybridization, indicated that the traB probe hybridized against a EcoRI fragment of 910 kb, as well as with a SalI fragment of 1.2 kb. The EcoRI fragment, whose exact size is 9.5 kb, does not contain any HindIII site, and the 1.2 SalI fragment is devoid of both EcoRI and HindIII sites. These data are shown in the diagram of Figure 1.
Reconstruction of the insertion traB1::MudJ in a pACYC184 derivative:
The 9.5-kb EcoRI fragment of pSLT (Figure 1) was cloned onto pACYC184, a vector compatible with ColE1 derivatives (![]()
Plasmid pIZ830 contains ~4.5 kb of DNA homologous to the 5' boundary of the traB1::MudJ insertion of pSLT, and ~5 kb corresponding to the 3' side of the insertion. These sizes largely exceed the 20 bp estimated as the minimal size for homologous recombination in enteric bacteria (![]()
- i. pIZ830 was transformed into S. typhimurium TR5878, and a P22 HT lysate was obtained on the resulting strain.
- ii. The lysate of TR5878/pIZ830 was then used to transduce SV3003 (pSLT TraB1::MudJ), selecting Tetr transductants.
- iii. After purification and lysogen elimination, one transductant was lysed with P22, and the lysate was used to transduce a pSLT-cured strain (SV3081), selecting Kanr transductants. These were replica-printed to tetracycline plates to score coinheritance of the plasmid-borne tet gene. An isolate carrying Kanr and Tetr markers (a putative recombinant that had incorporated the fusion traB1::MudJ into pIZ830) was the source of plasmid pIZ832. Restriction analysis confirmed that the recombination process had not generated unwanted rearrangements, and that pIZ832 carries the traB1::MudJ insertion in the chloramphenicol gene of pACYC184, with the lacZ gene of the fusion oriented opposite to the cam promoter (Figure 2).

View larger version (23K):
In this window
In a new window
Download PPT slide
Figure 2. (Left) A diagram of fragments generated by HindIII digestion of pIZ832, depending on the orientation of its insert relative to the promoter of the chloramphenicol-resistance gene of pACYC184. For simplicity, a linear plasmid map is shown. Symbols are as follows: H, HindIII; E, EcoRI; S, SalI. pACYC184 contains a single HindIII site ( CHANG and COHEN 1978 ). (Right) Electrophoretic separation of fragments generated by digestion of pIZ832 with EcoRI (lane 2) and HindIII (lane 3). Lane 1 contains the 1-kb DNA ladder.
Effect of DNA adenine methylation on the expression of the traB1::MudJ fusion carried by plasmid pIZ832:
Plasmid pIZ832 was transduced to strains SV3081 (pSLT- dam+) and SV3083 (pSLT- dam-201::Tn10dTet), as well as to derivatives of these strains that carried the compatible, methylase-producing plasmid pIZ833. Batch cultures of the resulting six strains were used to measure ß-galactosidase activities. Figure 3 shows that the ß-galactosidase activity of the traB1::MudJ fusion carried by plasmid pIZ832 was >10-fold higher in the absence of DNA adenine methylation. Thus the impaired levels of expression of the fusion traB1::MudJ in Dam+ and Dam- backgrounds (![]()
|
Cloning, subcloning, sequencing, and sequence analysis of a 4.6-kb fragment of the tra region of pSLT:
The 9.5-kb EcoRI fragment of pSLT was subjected to restriction analysis, to search for sites that might facilitate subcloning. The fragment could be divided into two EcoRI-SalI fragments of 2.4 kb and <0.2 kb, and three SalI fragments of 4.8 kb, 1.2 kb, and 1.1 kb (Figure 1). For the purpose of our study, the most interesting fragments were the 2.4-kb EcoRI-SalI fragment and the SalI fragments of 1.2 kb and 1.1 kb, because most of their DNA sequences lie on the 5' side of the insertion traB1::MudJ (which is located in the 1.2-kb SalI fragment). Thus, further restriction analysis was concentrated on this ~4.7 kb region; relevant sites are shown in Figure 1.
Plasmids carrying subclones of 0.30.9 kb were generated by subcloning on pBluescript II SK(+). Their inserts were sequenced using T7L and T3/pBS primers. In total, the EcoRI-PvuII region of pSLT sequenced has a length of 4649 bp, of which only 450 correspond to the 3' side of the fusion zzv-6306::MudJ. The sequence has been deposited in the EMBL database with the accession number AJ011572.
The sequence of the 4.6-kb EcoRI-PvuII fragment of pSLT was aligned with the tra region of F using the programs Clustal W 1.60 and Seq Vu 1.0.1. Sequences homologous to the traM, traJ, traY, traA, traL, traE, traK, and traB genes of F (nucleotides 6565466, EMBL accession no. U01159) were found. The overall homology was of 72.30%, albeit with significant variations from one region to another. The highest homology degrees were found in the intervals traM-traJ and traA-traB (73.24 and 82.22%, respectively) and the lowest, in the traY-traA interval (45.79%, with gaps and insertions). A survey of potential open reading frames (ORFs) using the program Strider 1.1 indicated that the region contained putative ORFs identical to those found in F: traJ, traY, traA, traL, traE, and traK, as well as the 3' end of traM and the 5' end of traB (see Figure 1). A putative finP gene was also found overlapping with the traJ gene, an arrangement analogous to that found in F (![]()
![]()
Strategy for the identification of a Dam-regulated promoter in pSLT:
In F, the main promoter of the tra operon is located upstream of traY (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
- i. The traY promoter might be directly repressed by Dam methylation. This promoter does not contain GATC sites (neither in F nor in the corresponding region of pSLT). In the latter, the closest GATC lies approximately at position -250 (data not shown, EMBL entry AJ011572). Although this location is farther than any of the known GATC sites that regulate promoters from a distance (
KAHMANN 1983 ;
PLASTERK et al. 1983 ;
BLYN et al. 1990 ;
VAN DER WOUDE et al. 1996 ), the possibility that the traY promoter was directly regulated by Dam methylation was not excluded a priori.
- ii. The finP promoter might be activated by Dam methylation; thus, reduced synthesis of FinP RNA would derepress tra expression in a Dam- background. Figure 4 shows the traJ and finP promoters of the F plasmid aligned with the corresponding regions of pSLT. Aside from their high homology, a relevant observation is the presence of a GATC site in the -10 module of the finP promoter of F. This Dam site is also found in the putative finP promoter of pSLT. The finP promoter of F contains a second GATC site near the -35 module; this Dam site is not present in pSLT.

View larger version (18K):
In this window
In a new window
Download PPT slide
Figure 4. Alignment of the
nP and traJ promoters of F with the corresponding regions of pSLT. GATC sites located in or near the promoters are highlighted. The transcription start sites known in the F plasmid are also indicated. - iii. The traJ promoter might be repressed by Dam methylation; thus increased TraJ synthesis would derepress tra expression in a Dam- background. pSLT contains a GATC site upstream of the putative traJ promoter; this Dam site is not found in F (Figure 4).
The search for active promoters in pSLT DNA involved the construction of transcriptional traY::lac, traJ::lac, and finP::lac fusions using the promoter-probe vector pIC552. The background expression of this plasmid in E. coli and S. typhimurium is low (usually, <30 Miller units of ß-galactosidase) and thus facilitates the detection of fair and weak promoter activities (![]()
Construction of a transcriptional fusion traY::lac:
Plasmid pIZ903 carries the 3' end of traJ and the 5' end of traY, properly oriented to permit lacZ expression from the putative traY promoter of pSLT. The fusion proved to be active, thereby indicating the existence of a promoter in the DNA fragment cloned. However, significant differences were not found between Dam+ and Dam- backgrounds, indicating that the traY promoter of pSLT is not directly regulated by DNA adenine methylation (data not shown).
Construction of transcriptional fusions traJ::lac and finP::lac:
Plasmid pIZ877 carries the putative traJ promoter of pSLT and some 70 bp of the putative traJ ORF. The construction generates a transcriptional lac fusion driven by the putative traJ promoter (Figure 5A). The activity of this fusion must reflect only the activity of the traJ promoter, because the lacZ gene of the vector possesses its own ribosome-binding site that cannot be occluded by FinP RNA. In turn, plasmid pIZ880 contains a transcriptional finP::lac fusion and lacks the traJ promoter (Figure 5A).
|
The effect of DNA adenine methylation on the activity of the traJ::lac and finP::lac fusions carried by plasmids pIZ877 and pIZ880 is shown in Figure 5B. The traJ::lac fusion did not show significant differences in Dam+ and Dam- hosts. In contrast, the finP::lac fusion was more active (around fourfold) in a Dam+ background. These results indicate that the Dam-regulated gene is finP. Not surprisingly, the putative finP promoter of pSLT contains a GATC site in its -10 module (Figure 4), like other Dam-regulated promoters (![]()
![]()
Construction of a translational fusion traJ::lac:
Plasmid pIZ900 carries a translational fusion traJ::lac, as well as the finP promoter and the complete finP gene (Figure 6A). The effect of DNA adenine methylation on the activity of the traJ::lac fusion of pIZ900 is also shown in Figure 6B. Unlike the transcriptional traJ::lac fusion, which was insensitive to Dam methylation, the translational traJ::lac fusion becomes derepressed in a Dam- background. This expression pattern suggests that translation of traJ mRNA encoded by the pSLT plasmid is inhibited by FinP RNA, as in F (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
|
Effect of Dam methylation on the production of pSLT-encoded FinP RNA:
Northern hybridization experiments were carried out to compare the production of FinP RNA in Dam+ and Dam- hosts of S. typhimurium. The probe used was an oligonucleotide complementary to FinP RNA (see MATERIALS AND METHODS). Total RNA was extracted from strains SV3003 and SV3069. Twenty micrograms of RNA per lane was loaded and RNA molecules were separated by electrophoresis on an 8% polyacrylamide gel in the presence of 7.5 M urea. The results, exemplified by the autoradiogram of Figure 7, were unambiguous: higher amounts of FinP RNA were detected in a Dam+ background. Differences in FinP RNA content were also detected in Dam+ and Dam- hosts that carried pIZ832 but not pSLT (SV3093 and SV3095, respectively; data not shown). These pSLT-lacking strains do not produce the FinP-stabilizing protein FinO (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
|
Effect of Dam methylation on the production of F-encoded FinP RNA:
The effect of Dam methylation on the synthesis of F-encoded FinP RNA was investigated in E. coli, using derivatives of strains AB1157 and GM3819 in which we had introduced the episome F' proAB lacIq lacZ
M15::Tn10. Total cellular RNA was extracted from both strains, and Northern hybridization was performed as described above, except that higher amounts of RNA were used (100 µg of RNA per well). Larger amounts of FinP RNA were detected in the Dam+ strain (Figure 8). A side (but highly reproducible) observation was that the levels of F-encoded FinP RNA were consistently smaller than those of pSLT, both in Dam+ and Dam- backgrounds (compare Figure 7 and Figure 8). This observation may reflect the absence of a functional finO gene in the F plasmid (![]()
|
Effect of Dam methylation on F plasmid transfer:
The detection of lower amounts of F-encoded FinP RNA in Dam- mutants of E. coli suggested the possibility that F plasmid transfer was derepressed in the absence of DNA adenine methylation. The hypothesis received indirect support from the observation that the traB1::MudJ fusion of pSLT, located in a region highly homologous to F, is expressed at elevated levels in a Dam- background (![]()
![]()
![]()
To examine the effect of Dam methylation on F plasmid transfer, matings between E. coli strains were performed. Use of F primes instead of the wild-type F element facilitated the detection of transconjugants by either complementation or selection of dominant antibiotic-resistance markers. Donors were derivatives of the isogenic strains AB1157 and GM3819 carrying either of the F primes F'128 pro+ lac+ zzf-1831::Tn10dTet or F'128 pro+ lac+ zzf-1836::Tn10dCam. The recipients were GM28 and GM33. Prototrophic, Tetr or Camr transconjugants were selected. Figure 9 shows data for F'128 pro+ lac+ zzf-1836::Tn10dTet. The frequencies of F-prime transfer increased around fourfold when one of the mating strains were Dam-, and one order of magnitude in the Dam- x Dam- mating. Crosses involving F'128 pro+ lac+ zzf-1831:Tn10dCam gave similar results, and the highest transfer frequency was detected in the Dam- x Dam- cross (data not shown). The latter observation can be explained as an amplification effect: in Dam- x Dam- crosses, derepression of F transfer, combined with the presence of excess recipients and the long mating times allowed, permits a swift increase of the donor population. Differential growth is unlikely to be involved, because the matings were performed in buffer. Moreover, Dam+ and Dam- strains in E. coli do not show significant differences in viability (![]()
![]()
![]()
|
Effect of Dam methylation on pSLT-mediated inhibition of F fertility:
If derepression of F plasmid transfer in a Dam- background is indeed caused by reduced synthesis of FinP RNA, a prediction is that the virulence plasmid of S. typhimurium should fail to inhibit F fertility in a Dam- background: pSLT-encoded FinO will not be able to protect FinP RNA is the latter is absent or scarce. The prediction was tested by comparing the frequencies of F-prime transfer between Dam+ and Dam- strains of S. typhimurium. The F primes used were F'128 pro+ lac+, F'128 pro+ lac+ zzf-1836::Tn10dCam, F'128 pro+ lac+ zzf-1831:Tn10dTet, and F'T80 his+. To construct the donor strains, the F primes were conjugally transferred to pairs of isogenic Dam+ and Dam- strains that carried either of the deletions
proAB47 or
his-9533 (and thus permitted the selection of F-primer transfer by complementation). The recipients were pairs of isogenic Dam+ and Dam- strains whose genotype permitted easy donor counterselection.
Experiments of transfer of F'128 pro+ lac+ zzf-1836::Tn10dCam between Dam+ and Dam- strains of S. typhimurium are summarized in Figure 10. Transconjugants were selected on LB supplemented with chloramphenicol (to select plasmid transfer) and tetracycline (to counterselect the donor, because the recipient carried the insertion zfi-6303::Tn10dTet). In each experiment, the frequency of F-prime transfer was calculated as the quotient between the number of transconjugants (per milliliter of mating mixture) and the number of donors (per milliliter of culture). The highest conjugation frequencies, ~100 times over the Dam+ x Dam+ cross, were obtained in matings in which both the donor and the recipient were Dam- (Figure 10A). However, the conjugation frequency also increased in crosses in which only one of the mating strains was Dam-, especially when the Dam- partner happened to be the donor (40-fold increase over the wild-type cross). Crosses involving F primes F'128 pro+ lac+, F'128 pro+ lac+ zzf-1831:Tn10dTet, and F'T80 his+ gave similar results: the absolute transfer frequencies ranged from <10-7 to <10-4, depending on both the F prime assayed and the genotype (Dam+ or Dam-) of the mating strains. The relative conjugal transfer frequencies were higher when one of the partners was Dam-, and the highest rates were found, as in the E. coli matings, in the Dam- x Dam- cross (data not shown).
|
An interesting difference between the E. coli and S. typhimurium matings affects the wild-type (Dam+ x Dam+) cross, which yielded higher frequencies of F-prime transfer in E. coli. This observation, made for the first time four decades ago (![]()
![]()
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
The fusion zzv-6306::MudJ, originally described as a novel locus repressed by DNA adenine methylation (![]()
nP gene was also found overlapping with traJ, an arrangement identical to that found in F (reviews: ![]()
![]()
nding was the high homology between the
nP and traJ promoters of F and the corresponding regions of pSLT (Figure 4).
Search for traY, traJ, and
nP promoters in pSLT DNA was carried out by constructing lac fusions in vitro, using DNA sequence data as a chart for cloning. Transcriptional lac fusions constructed in the promoter-probe vector pIC552 were then assayed in Dam+ and Dam- hosts. All the fusions were active, indicating that traY, traJ, and
nP promoters do exist in pSLT. However, neither of the traJ or traY promoters showed Dam-dependent activity (Figure 5 and data not shown). In contrast, the
nP::lac fusion showed higher activity in Dam+ background, a pattern opposite to that described for the original traB1::MudJ fusion (Figure 5). The
nding that the Dam-regulated promoter is
nP, rather than traJ or traY, receives direct support from sequence data: the putative
nP promoter of pSLT contains a GATC site overlapping with its -10 module (Figure 4).
The opposite effects of Dam methylation on the expression of
nP::lac and traB1::lac fusions can be tentatively explained by analogy with the F plasmid. The main promoter of the tra operon of F is located upstream of traY (![]()
nP exert opposite effects on tra expression. The TraJ product is a positive regulator of tra expression and acts at the traY promoter (![]()
![]()
nP gene (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
nP::lac fusion is less active in a Dam- background (Figure 5). Lowered synthesis of FinP RNA can be expected to increase translation of traJ mRNA; increased TraJ synthesis will then enhance tra operon expression. This model, summarized in Table 2, is supported by several lines of evidence:
- i. Direct RNA quantitation by Northern hybridization con
rms that FinP RNA is scarce in a Dam- background (Figure 7).
View this table:
In this window
In a new window
Table 2. Model for regulation of tra operon expression by DNA adenine methylation - ii. Translational (but not transcriptional) traJ::lac fusions become derepressed in a Dam- background, indicating that reduced synthesis of FinP RNA can be correlated with increased translation of traJ mRNA (Figure 5 and Figure 6).
- iii. Variations of FinP levels in response to Dam methylation are observed in the absence of FinO (e.g., in a pSLT- host strain), suggesting that the effect of Dam methylation is exerted upon FinP synthesis, and not upon FinP half-life.
The existence of a GATC site in the
nP promoter of F (Figure 4, data from EMBL entry U01159), exactly at the same position found in pSLT, raised the question of whether synthesis of FinP RNA in the F plasmid might be likewise controlled by Dam methylation. Northern hybridization experiments showed that synthesis of FinP RNA by the F plasmid is impaired in Dam- mutants of E. coli (Figure 8). Thus a tentative conclusion is that the methylation state of the
nP promoter regulates FinP RNA synthesis in both F and pSLT. The model that the
nP promoter is only active in the methylated state has an intriguing side, because the GATC site found in the -10 module of the IS10 transposase gene has been previously shown to exert an opposite effect on promoter activity: the IS10 transposase promoter is inactive when the GATC site is methylated (![]()
nP promoters overlap with opposite edges of the -10 module, thus leaving open the possibility that this difference may explain their opposite effects on promoter activity. An alternative possibility is that these GATC sites exert different functions: while the GATC site of the IS10 promoter appears to modify directly the af
nity of the promoter for RNA polymerase (![]()
nP promoter might prevent binding of an hypothetical repressor.
If different levels of F-encoded FinP RNA are synthesized by Dam+ and Dam- hosts, a prediction is that F plasmid transfer should be affected by the methylation state of host DNA. This hypothesis was investigated by performing matings between Dam+ and Dam- mutants of E. coli, and the transfer frequencies of F-prime plasmids were found to increase 4- to 10-fold in the absence of DNA adenine methylation (Figure 9). This observation can be easily accommodated in the regulatory circuit of F-plasmid transfer: lack of Dam methylation reduces the level of the main transfer inhibitor, FinP RNA, and a consequence is that the tra operon of F becomes derepressed. Although the F plasmid is naturally derepressed because of lack of FinO product (![]()
![]()
![]()
nO.
The effect of dam mutations on F-plasmid transfer is even better observed in S. typhimurium, where repression of F fertility by the pSLT plasmid reduces by more than one order of magnitude the frequencies of F-prime transfer among Dam+ hosts (Figure 10). Like other virulence plasmids from Salmonella, pSLT is nonconjugative (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
nO gene (![]()
cient in a Dam+ background because FinO action requires the presence of FinP.
At the present stage of knowledge, the physiological signi
cance of controlling FinP synthesis by DNA adenine methylation is unknown. If molecular analysis con
rms that Dam methylation acts directly at the
nP promoter, the following two alternative models will emerge.
- i. Unmethylation and hemi-methylation may be equivalent signals, and the
nP promoter may be inactive when hemi-methylated. In this case, a tentative model might be that Dam methylation is used to couple
nP expression to plasmid replication. Transient hemi-methylation after passage of the replication fork would cause a brief repression of FinP synthesis and thus an increase of tra expression during a short lapse of the replication cycle. A mechanism of this kind would be analogous (but opposite) to that described for IS10 transposase synthesis (ROBERTS et al. 1985 ).
- ii. The methylation state of the
nP promoter might be controlled by cellular factors. Stably undermethylated GATC sites have been detected in the E. coli genome (RINGQUIST and SMITH 1992 ;
WANG and CHURCH 1992 ;
HALE et al. 1994 ), and current evidence suggests that undermethylation is a consequence of protein binding (
WANG and CHURCH 1992 ;
HALE et al. 1994 ;
CASADESUS and TORREBLANCA 1996 ). Hindrance of GATC remethylation during two consecutive rounds of DNA replication generates unmethylated Dam sites (
BRAATEN et al. 1991 ,
BRAATEN et al. 1994 ). Regulation of the
nP promoter might involve binding of a hypothetical repressor to the GATC site of the -10 module, thereby preventing RNA polymerase binding and/or transcription initiation. A mechanism of this kind would be analogous to that described for mom, with the difference that OxyR binds to GATC sites located upstream of the mom promoter (BOLKER and KAHMANN 1989 ). An attractive aspect of this model is that it envisages the possibility of regulating the methylation state of the
nP promoter. If this view were correct, further investigation might lead to the discovery of mechanisms that regulate FinP synthesis (and hence conjugal transfer of DNA) in response to physiological or environmental signals.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
This study was supported by grant PM97-0148-CO2-02 from the Dirección General de Enseñanza Superior e Investigación Cientí
ca (DGES) of the Government of Spain. We are grateful to Martin Marinus, Pat Higgins, and Rick Gourse for helpful discussions, to Mike Mahan for advice in primer design, and to Eva Camacho and Marjan van der Woude for critical reading of the manuscript. Strains were kindly provided by Martin Marinus, Martin Drummond, John Roth, and Ken Sanderson. The assistance of Gloria Chacón, Ana Moreno, José Córdoba, and Luis Romanco is also acknowledged.
Manuscript received October 27, 1998; Accepted for publication February 14, 1999.
| LITERATURE CITED |
|---|







