Genetics, Vol. 151, 667-674, February 1999, Copyright © 1999

A Highly Conserved Sequence in the 3'-Untranslated Region of the Drosophila Adh Gene Plays a Functional Role in Adh Expression

John Parsch1,a,b, Wolfgang Stephan1,b, and Soichi Tandab
a Molecular and Cell Biology Program, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742
b Department of Biology, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742

Corresponding author: John Parsch, Department of Biology, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14627-0211., jnph{at}troi.cc.rochester.edu (E-mail)

Communicating editor: A. G. CLARK


*  ABSTRACT
*TOP
*ABSTRACT
*MATERIALS AND METHODS
*RESULTS
*DISCUSSION
*LITERATURE CITED

Phylogenetic analysis identified a highly conserved eight-base sequence (AAGGCTGA) within the 3'-untranslated region (UTR) of the Drosophila alcohol dehydrogenase gene, Adh. To examine the functional significance of this conserved motif, we performed in vitro deletion mutagenesis on the D. melanogaster Adh gene followed by P-element-mediated germline transformation. Deletion of all or part of the eight-base sequence leads to a twofold increase in in vivo ADH enzymatic activity. The increase in activity is temporally and spatially general and is the result of an underlying increase in Adh transcript. These results indicate that the conserved 3'-UTR motif plays a functional role in the negative regulation of Adh gene expression. The evolutionary significance of our results may be understood in the context of the amino acid change that produces the ADH-F allele and also leads to a twofold increase in ADH activity. While there is compelling evidence that the amino acid replacement has been a target of positive selection, the conservation of the 3'-UTR sequence suggests that it is under strong purifying selection. The selective difference between these two sequence changes, which have similar effects on ADH activity, may be explained by different metabolic costs associated with the increase in activity.


THE Drosophila alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme (ADH; EC 1.1.1.1) and the gene that encodes it, Adh, have been used as a model system for many studies of population genetics, molecular evolution, and molecular biology. ADH is responsible for the detoxification of environmental alcohols (DAVID et al. 1976 Down), and flies lacking ADH activity cannot survive in environments containing moderate levels of alcohol (GIBSON and OAKESHOTT 1982 Down; VAN DELDEN 1982 Down). ADH also plays an important role in the metabolism of ethanol into energy-storage lipids, particularly at the larval stage (GEER et al. 1986 Down, GEER et al. 1991 Down). In D. melanogaster, Adh produces two developmentally regulated transcripts that differ in their 5'-untranslated leaders but are identical in their protein-encoding regions and 3'-untranslated regions (UTRs) (BENYAJATI et al. 1983 Down). Transcripts from a distal promoter are found predominantly in adult tissues, while those from a proximal promoter are found predominantly in larval tissues (BENYAJATI et al. 1983 Down; SAVAKIS et al. 1986 Down). Experiments using P-element-mediated germline transformation have shown that all cis-acting sequence elements required for proper Adh expression are contained within an 8.6-kb SacI-ClaI fragment, which contains the entire Adh mRNA-encoding region and ~5 kb of 5' flanking sequence (upstream from the distal promoter) and 1 kb of 3' flanking sequence (GOLDBERG et al. 1983 Down; LAURIE-AHLBERG and STAM 1987 Down).

Two forms of the ADH protein, designated as Fast (ADH-F) and Slow (ADH-S), which differ by a single amino acid (FLETCHER et al. 1978 Down), have been found at high frequency in worldwide populations of D. melanogaster (OAKESHOTT et al. 1982 Down). In addition, numerous polymorphisms have been detected at silent and noncoding sites within the Adh gene (KREITMAN 1983 Down; LAURIE et al. 1991 Down). ADH-F homozygotes have, on average, two- to threefold higher levels of enzymatic activity than ADH-S homozygotes. This difference is due to two factors, an increase in catalytic efficiency of the ADH enzyme and an increase in the total amount of enzyme in ADH-F flies (CHOUDHARY and LAURIE 1991 Down). Experiments using site-directed mutagenesis and P-element-mediated germline transformation have shown that the Fast/Slow polymorphic site is responsible for the difference in ADH catalytic activity between ADH-F and ADH-S flies (CHOUDHARY and LAURIE 1991 Down). This site, however, has no effect on in vivo concentration of ADH protein, which suggests that other, nonreplacement sites must also play an important role in determining Adh expression levels. For example, a complex nucleotide substitution within the first (adult) Adh intron has been shown to have a significant effect on ADH activity levels (LAURIE and STAM 1994 Down). Interestingly, this intronic sequence has no effect on the concentration of Adh mRNA, suggesting that there may be an interaction between this region of the first intron and other regions of the pre-mRNA during polyadenylation or other processing events that results in a change in the translational efficiency of the mature mRNA (LAURIE and STAM 1994 Down). Other nonreplacement sites that affect levels of Adh expression have been mapped to the protein-encoding region and the 3'-UTR, but have not yet been tested by mutational analysis (STAM and LAURIE 1996 Down).

Phylogenetic analysis has been used to identify noncoding regions of the Adh gene that may play a functional role in Adh expression. KIRBY et al. 1995 Down used the phylogenetic-comparative method to predict secondary structures of the Adh pre-mRNA and suggest that the patterns of linkage disequilibrium found within the Adh gene of D. pseudoobscura (SCHAEFFER and MILLER 1993 Down) are the result of epistatic selection maintaining RNA pairing stems within intron sequences. Phylogenetic analysis has also identified several short-range RNA pairing stems within the Adh exon 2, as well as two long-range pairings between exon 2 and a highly conserved region of the 3'-UTR (PARSCH et al. 1997 Down). The functional significance of one of these long-range pairings was tested by mutational analysis in D. melanogaster (PARSCH et al. 1997 Down). A site-directed mutation at a silent third-codon position of exon 2, which disrupted a Watson-Crick base pair in the proposed long-range pairing, resulted in a significant reduction in adult ADH activity level. ADH activity was restored to wild-type levels by a second, "compensatory" mutation in the 3'-UTR. The 3'-UTR mutation by itself, however, had no measurable effect on ADH activity levels. Thus, these observations do not fit a simple model of compensatory evolution (PARSCH et al. 1997 Down).

To explore the possible cause of this discrepancy and further examine the role of phylogenetically conserved sequence elements on Adh expression, we investigated a highly conserved sequence located just downstream of the nucleotide site where the single 3'-UTR mutation was made. The high level of conservation within this region suggests that it may have a function that is distinct from that of the proposed RNA secondary structure. To test this hypothesis, in vitro deletion mutagenesis and P-element-mediated germline transformation were used to examine the effects of specific deletions within the conserved 3'-UTR sequence on ADH activity and Adh mRNA levels in D. melanogaster. The results indicate that deletion of the conserved 3'-UTR motif leads to a significant increase in in vivo ADH activity. Since the ADH protein-encoding sequence was not altered during mutagenesis, the observed increase in enzymatic activity must be the result of an increase in Adh gene expression. Thus, the conserved 3'-UTR sequence plays a functional role in the negative regulation of Adh expression.


*  MATERIALS AND METHODS
*TOP
*ABSTRACT
*MATERIALS AND METHODS
*RESULTS
*DISCUSSION
*LITERATURE CITED

Plasmid construction and mutagenesis:
Basic molecular techniques were carried out following the methods of SAMBROOK et al. 1989 Down. All Adh constructs were derived from an 8.6-kb SacI-ClaI fragment of the D. melanogaster Wa-f allele [originally described by KREITMAN 1983 Down]. A pUC18 plasmid containing the entire Adh mRNA-encoding region within a 3.2-kb SalI-ClaI fragment (PARSCH et al. 1997 Down) was used for mutagenesis following the QuikChange (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) procedure. Following mutagenesis, a BamHI-ClaI restriction fragment containing each mutant 3'-UTR was used to replace the corresponding fragment in the original 8.6-kb SacI-ClaI clone. At this point, the entire BamHI-ClaI region subjected to mutagenesis was sequenced using a cycle sequencing method (Life Technologies) to ensure that the desired mutation (and no other changes) was present.

P-element-mediated germline transformation:
The entire 8.6-kb Adh SacI-ClaI fragment of each mutant construct was inserted into the polycloning region of the YES transformation vector, which contains the D. melanogaster yellow (y) gene as a selectable marker (PATTON et al. 1992 Down). Germline transformation of an ADH-null D. melanogaster y w; Adhfn6{Delta}2-3,Sb/TM6 stock was achieved by embryo microinjection (RUBIN and SPRADLING 1982 Down; SPRADLING and RUBIN 1982 Down). At least four independent insertion lines were generated through embryo microinjection for each mutant construct. Additional transformed lines were then generated by mobilization of the YES vector constructs within the original lines through genetic crosses, using the {Delta}2-3 P element as a source of transposase (ROBERTSON et al. 1988 Down; PARSCH et al. 1997 Down). Transformants containing the wild-type 8.6-kb Adh Wa-f genomic fragment were used as a control (PARSCH et al. 1997 Down).

Previous experiments indicated that expression levels of Adh insertions on the X chromosome may be increased due to dosage compensation mechanisms in Drosophila (LAURIE-AHLBERG and STAM 1987 Down; PARSCH et al. 1997 Down). For this reason, only autosomal insertion lines were used for analysis. X chromosome insertion lines were identified as those that produced only y+ female (and only y- male) offspring when transformant males were mated to females of a y w, Adhfn6 stock. Furthermore, to ensure that the transformed lines contained only a single Adh insertion, a Southern blot was performed on genomic DNA prepared from each transformed line. The genomic DNA was digested with three six-cutter restriction enzymes (BglII, SalI, and StuI) and hybridized with a probe derived from the Adh 5' flanking region (PARSCH et al. 1997 Down). The probe hybridizes to a fragment of constant size for the genomic Adh gene and a fragment of unique size for each Adh insertion. A total of 30 independent, autosomal single-insert lines were used for ADH assays, consisting of the wild-type (10), {Delta}1762–1765 (9), {Delta}1766–1769 (4), and {Delta}1762–1769 (7) transformant classes.

ADH assays:
ADH enzymatic activity was measured following the procedure of MARONI 1978 Down, using isopropanol as the substrate. For analysis of adult ADH activity, five 6- to 8-day-old males heterozygous with respect to the Adh insertion were used (PARSCH et al. 1997 Down). Units of ADH activity were measured as micromoles of NAD reduced per minute per milligram of total protein. Total protein was estimated using the method of LOWRY et al. 1951 Down. Differences in ADH activity between mutant and wild-type transformants were tested by analysis of variance (ANOVA) using a model that accounts for position effects within each transformant class (LAURIE-AHLBERG and STAM 1987 Down).

ADH activity levels were measured for different developmental stages and parts of the body using the above method, with the following modifications: For embryonic and larval assays, transformants homozygous for the appropriate Adh insertion were crossed to a y w; Adhfn6 stock to produce offspring heterozygous with respect to Adh insertion. Freshly laid eggs were collected ~1 hr after oviposition and incubated for an additional 19 hr at room temperature. A total of 40 20-hr heterozygous embryos were used for each ADH assay. Larval assays were performed on preparations of 20 heterozygous larvae collected at each instar stage. For body part assays, 20 6- to 8-day-old heterozygous males were dissected and preparations from head, legs, thorax, and abdomen were used for separate ADH assays.

Analysis of Adh mRNA levels:
Individual wild-type and {Delta}1762–1765 transformed lines exhibiting ADH activities typical of their respective transformant class were subjected to quantitative Northern blot analysis. Total RNA was prepared from 10, 6- to 8-day-old males heterozygous for the Adh insertion using TRIzol reagent (Life Technologies) and following the manufacturer's protocol. Northern blotting was performed as descibed in SAMBROOK et al. 1989 Down, with ~0.5 µg of RNA loaded into each lane of the gel. The Adh probe was prepared from a PCR product spanning bases 739–1924 of the Wa-f allele (KREITMAN 1983 Down) and was labeled with [32P]dATP using the RadPrime DNA labeling system (Life Technologies). As a control for equal sample loading, the blot was simultaneously hybridized with a probe prepared from a genomic clone of the D. melanogaster Dras2 gene (BISHOP and CORCES 1988 Down). The Adh probe detects a transcript of 1.1 kb, while the Dras2 probe detects a transcript of 1.6 kb. Relative estimates of Adh mRNA levels were obtained by scanning densitometry using the Alpha Imager 2000 (Alpha Innotech Corporation). Because of the high concentration of Adh mRNA relative to Dras2 mRNA, two separate exposures of the same filter were used for mRNA quantitation. A short exposure (20 min) was used for Adh, while a longer (2-hr) exposure was used for Dras2. All exposures were carried out at -80° using BioMax (Eastman Kodak, Rochester, NY) film with the manufacturer's intensifying screen.


*  RESULTS
*TOP
*ABSTRACT
*MATERIALS AND METHODS
*RESULTS
*DISCUSSION
*LITERATURE CITED

3'-UTR sequence organization:
Previous phylogenetic analysis has identified a completely conserved sequence within the 3'-UTR of Adh sequences from 10 different Drosophila species spanning three subgenera (PARSCH et al. 1997 Down). The sequence consists of 8 bases (AAGGCTGA). Of the 8 bases (AAGTCTGA), 7 are conserved in the Adh-2 sequence of the Mediterranean fruit fly, Ceratitis capitata. In all cases, the highly conserved sequence is located between the stop codon and the polyadenylation signal. The length of sequence separating these landmarks, however, varies among species. Species from the subgenus Sophophora, as well as D. hydei and D. mulleri from the subgenus Drosophila, show a similar sequence organization (Figure 1). In these species, the highly conserved 8-base sequence is located 74–115 bases downstream of the stop codon and 24–45 bases upstream of the polyadenylation signal. The two Hawaiian species from the subgenus Drosophila (D. affinidisjuncta and D. silvestris) have a very different organization of their 3'-UTRs. In these two species, the conserved 8-base motif is located much farther from the stop codon (236–240 bases) and much closer to the polyadenylation signal (6–7 bases). The D. lebanonensis 3'-UTR is similar to that of the Sophophora species, though the distance between the conserved 8-base sequence and the polyadenylation site is greater (82 bases). The medfly sequence resembles the Sophophora sequences in its distance between the stop codon and the conserved 8-base sequence (101 bases), but the distance between the conserved sequence and the polyadenylation signal is much shorter (4 bases) and is more similar to that found in the Hawaiian species.



View larger version (18K):
In this window
In a new window
Download PPT slide
 
Figure 1. Organization of the Adh 3'-UTR. The region depicted begins with the stop codon (leftmost solid box) and ends at the polyadenylation site. The highly conserved eight-base motif is shown as a hatched box and the polyadenylation signal is shown as a solid box. The separating sequences are shown as open boxes, drawn approximately to scale. mel, D. melanogaster; tei, D. teisseri; ere, D. erecta; psu, D. pseudoobscura; amb, D. ambigua; hyd, D. hydei; mul, D. mulleri; aff, D. affinidisjuncta; sil, D. silvestris; leb, D. lebanonensis; med, Ceratitis capitata.

Deletion analysis of the highly conserved 3'-UTR sequence:
To test the functional significance of the highly conserved 3'-UTR sequence, in vitro deletion mutagenesis was performed on the wild-type D. melanogaster Adh gene. Three separate deletions were made within the conserved eight-base sequence: {Delta}1762–1765, which deleted the first four bases of the eight-base motif; {Delta}1766–1769, which deleted the last four bases; and {Delta}1762–1769, which deleted the entire eight-base sequence. The mutant constructs were introduced into the D. melanogaster genome through P-element-mediated germline transformation, and the ADH activity of the transgenic flies was measured spectrophotometrically as micromoles of NAD reduced per minute per milligram of total protein (multiplied by 100). For all three deletion constructs, there was a greater than twofold increase in ADH activity relative to transformed lines containing the wild-type Adh gene (Figure 2). The average ADH activity of wild-type transformants was 103.2 units. The average activities of {Delta}1762–1765, {Delta}1766–1769, and {Delta}1762–1769 transformants were 226.9, 219.1, and 220.3 units, respectively. The difference in ADH activity level was highly significant (P < 0.001) for comparisons of all deletion lines with wild type. There were, however, no significant differences in activity levels among transformants containing the three deletion constructs. Thus, deletion of all or part of the highly conserved eight-base sequence has the same effect in increasing ADH activity. Under the assumption that the three deletions are functionally equivalent, we chose to focus on one of the deletions ({Delta}1762–1765, for which we had the greatest number of transformed lines) and selected a line that showed an average level of ADH activity for its transformant class for further characterization (see below).



View larger version (20K):
In this window
In a new window
Download PPT slide
 
Figure 2. Average ADH activity of wild-type, {Delta}1762–1765, {Delta}1766–1769, and {Delta}1762–1769 transformed lines. Activity is given in units of micromoles of NAD reduced per minute per milligram of total protein (multiplied by 100). Error bars represent the least significant difference at the 5% level. Least significant differences were calculated for individual comparisons, with the activity of each mutant line being compared to wild type.

Developmental stage and body-part ADH activity:
Deletion of the highly conserved 3'-UTR sequence clearly leads to a significant increase in adult ADH activity (Figure 2). To determine whether or not this increase is present at different developmental stages, we performed additional ADH assays on eggs, larvae, and adults of wild-type and {Delta}1762–1765 transformants. The results are shown in Figure 3 and clearly indicate that there is an increase in ADH activity at all larval and adult stages. ADH activity could not be distinguished from background during the embryonic stage of either wild-type or {Delta}1762–1765 lines (Figure 3). The overall developmental pattern of ADH expression appears to be similar in both wild-type and {Delta}1762–1765 flies, with relatively low levels of ADH activity in larvae (slightly increased during second and third instar stages) and much higher levels in adults. Although the ADH activity of {Delta}1762–1765 transformants is greater than that of wild-type transformants at all adult stages, the difference in activity level is not constant throughout adult development (Figure 3). Within the first 3 days, both wild-type and {Delta}1762–1765 flies show the highest levels of ADH activity. The difference between wild-type and {Delta}1762–1765 activity is ~1.3-fold at these early adult stages. After day 3, the activity of both wild-type and {Delta}1762–1765 transformants appears to level off and the difference in ADH activity is approximately 2-fold (Figure 3). Such a developmental pattern in activity level may be indicative of a negative regulatory mechanism in which one or more components are not fully expressed until later in development (after day 2).



View larger version (31K):
In this window
In a new window
Download PPT slide
 
Figure 3. Average ADH activity of wild-type (hatched boxes) and {Delta}1762–1765 (solid boxes) transformants at different developmental stages. Activity was measured for eggs (E), first instar larvae (1L), second instar larvae (2L), third instar larvae (3L), and adults of various days of age (0–1, 1–2, 2–3, 4, 6, 8). Units of ADH activity are the same as in Figure 2. Error bars represent the range of activities observed at each developmental stage.

The ADH activity of various parts of the body was also examined in order to determine whether deletion of the highly conserved 3'-UTR sequence affected the spatial distribution of Adh expression in adult flies. Activity was measured for preparations of head, legs, thorax, and abdomen from both wild-type and {Delta}1762–1765 transformants (Figure 4). The results indicate that there is an increase in ADH activity in all {Delta}1762–1765 body part preparations relative to wild type (Figure 4). This difference in activity level is roughly twofold for all preparations and is thus similar to the difference measured in whole adult flies (Figure 2).



View larger version (23K):
In this window
In a new window
Download PPT slide
 
Figure 4. Average ADH activity of various body part preparations of wild-type (hatched boxes) and {Delta}1762–1765 (solid boxes) transformants. Adult flies (6–8 days of age) from each line were dissected and activity was measured separately for preparations from head, legs, thorax, and abdomen. Units of ADH activity are the same as in Figure 2. Activity is scaled by the total amount of soluble protein isolated from each preparation. Error bars represent the range of activities observed for each preparation.

Comparison of wild-type and mutant mRNA levels:
Northern blot analysis was used to estimate the levels of Adh mRNA in wild-type and {Delta}1762–1765 transformants. Figure 5 shows the results of a Northern blot of two separate preparations of total RNA from adult flies of each transformant class. The blot was hybridized with an Adh probe, as well as a Dras2 probe, which served as a control for equal sample loading. Each probe detected only a single band corresponding to the mature transcript of the appropriate size. The relative amount of Adh mRNA in each lane was determined from band density (standardized by the density of the Dras2 band in the same lane). Figure 5 indicates that there is a clear increase in Adh mRNA levels in {Delta}1762–1765 transformants relative to wild type. The difference in Adh mRNA concentration was estimated to be 2.4-fold; thus the increase in ADH activity in the 3'-UTR deletion lines (Figure 2) can be accounted for by an underlying increase in Adh mRNA.



View larger version (79K):
In this window
In a new window
Download PPT slide
 
Figure 5. Adh mRNA levels in wild-type (WT) and {Delta}1762–1765 ({Delta}) transformants. Two separate preparations of total RNA from adult flies (6–8 days of age) of each transformant class were used for quantitative Northern blot analysis. The blot was hybridized with an Adh probe that detects a mature transcript of 1.1 kb. As a control, the blot was simultaneously hybridized with a Dras2 probe that detects a transcript of 1.6 kb. Relative amounts of Adh mRNA were estimated based on band density (corrected by the amount of total RNA in each lane). Because of the high concentration of Adh mRNA relative to Dras2 mRNA, two separate exposures of the same filter were used for mRNA quantitation (see MATERIALS AND METHODS). The ratio of Adh mRNA in {Delta}1762–1765 to wild-type transformants is 2.4:1.


*  DISCUSSION
*TOP
*ABSTRACT
*MATERIALS AND METHODS
*RESULTS
*DISCUSSION
*LITERATURE CITED

Noncoding regions of genes, such as introns and UTRs, typically show much higher levels of sequence divergence than do protein-encoding regions (LI and GRAUR 1991 Down). Such a pattern is found for the Drosophila Adh gene. The Adh protein-encoding region is sufficiently conserved to allow for an unambiguous alignment of sequences from within the genus Drosophila (SULLIVAN et al. 1990 Down; PARSCH et al. 1997 Down). The Adh noncoding regions, however, show too much divergence for unambiguous alignment across the entire genus (SULLIVAN et al. 1990 Down; PARSCH et al. 1997 Down). In addition to the many nucleotide substitutions that have occurred within the 3'-UTR, there have also been numerous insertion/deletion events. The result is that the overall 3'-UTR length varies from 152 to 293 bases within the genus.

Given the high level of DNA sequence divergence within the 3'-UTR, it is remarkable that a perfectly conserved eight-base sequence can be found between the stop codon and the polyadenylation signal in every Drosophila species analyzed (Figure 1). The most distantly related Drosophila species are estimated to have diverged from a common ancestor 60 million years ago (AYALA et al. 1996 Down; KWIATOWSKI et al. 1997 Down). The sequence is also conserved (though not perfectly) in the Adh-2 sequence of the Mediterranean fruit fly, which is estimated to have diverged from the Drosophila lineage 100 mya (AYALA et al. 1996 Down; KWIATOWSKI et al. 1997 Down). This high level of conservation suggests that the 3'-UTR sequence may be of functional significance, a hypothesis that was tested experimentally using the techniques of in vitro deletion mutagenesis and P-element-mediated germline transformation.

Deletion of the first four bases, the last four bases, or the entire eight-base sequence led to a significant increase in adult ADH activity relative to that of wild-type flies (Figure 2), indicating that this sequence does play a functional role in Adh gene expression. The activity increase was approximately twofold for each deletion construct and there was no significant difference in ADH activity among transformants containing different deletion constructs (Figure 2). These results, along with the high level of sequence conservation, suggest that the entire eight-base motif must be intact for the sequence to function properly. It is possible, however, that certain substitutions within the eight-base consensus sequence do not disrupt function. This idea is supported by the observation that the eight-base motif is not perfectly conserved in the medfly, though its effect on Adh expression in the medfly is unknown.

What molecular mechanism lies behind the twofold increase in ADH activity caused by deletion of the conserved 3'-UTR sequence? Because deletion of the UTR sequence has no effect on the amino acid sequence of the ADH protein, the difference in activity must be the result of an increase in the amount of ADH protein. One possibility is that the 3'-UTR deletion mutations lead to a disruption of the Adh mRNA secondary structure. A portion of the conserved eight-base motif (bases 1762–1764) is involved in a phylogenetically predicted long-range pairing with bases 810–812 of exon 2 (PARSCH et al. 1997 Down). The 810–812/1762–1764 pairing, however, appears to be quite weak in D. melanogaster, consisting of two AU base pairs and one GU wobble pair. Disruption by a mutation at site 819 of a stronger long-range pairing (three GC pairs) between bases 817 and 819/1756 and 1758 resulted in a 15% reduction in Adh expression (PARSCH et al. 1997 Down). It thus seems unlikely that the disruption of the weaker pairing stem would result in the observed 100% increase in Adh expression. Furthermore, the {Delta}1766–1769 mutation does not disrupt the 810–812/1762–1764 pairing, yet results in a 100% increase in Adh expression (Figure 2). This suggests that, though it may be involved in a long-range RNA-RNA pairing, the eight-base 3'-UTR motif also has a function in Adh regulation that is unrelated to RNA secondary structure. The regulatory function may explain why we did not observe a reduction in ADH activity in our previous experiment in which we made a site-directed mutation at position 1756 (PARSCH et al. 1997 Down). It may be that this single nucleotide change adjacent to the conserved motif also leads to an increase in Adh expression that masks any reduction in expression caused by the disruption of the 817–819/1756–1758 pairing. In fact, our previous results indicate that there is a slight increase in ADH activity in transformed lines with the 1756 mutation, though this increase is not significant (PARSCH et al. 1997 Down).

A second possibility is that the 3'-UTR motif is involved in an RNA processing event that affects the translation rate of the mature mRNA. LAURIE and STAM 1994 Down report that a noncoding sequence within the first Adh intron affects the amount of ADH protein in adult flies without affecting levels of Adh mRNA and suggest that this sequence may function in polyadenylation. The highly conserved 3'-UTR sequence, though it is located just upstream of the polyadenylation signal in all species analyzed, does not appear to function through the same mechanism as the intronic sequence. Results of Northern blot analysis indicate that there is a greater amount of Adh mRNA present in deletion lines than in wild-type lines (Figure 5). The difference in mRNA level appears to be equal to the difference in ADH activity between mutant and wild-type lines (Figure 2 and Figure 5), and thus it is likely that the increase in the amount of ADH protein is the result of an underlying increase in mRNA levels.

The increased amount of Adh mRNA found in the deletion mutants could be the result of an increase in either Adh transcription rate or Adh mRNA stability. While the results of this study do not rule out the possibility of an increased level of Adh transcription in the mutant lines, this explanation seems unlikely for several reasons. All known regulatory elements that affect Adh transcription have been mapped to the 5' flanking region of the gene, including the enhancer sequences required for proper larval and adult Adh expression. While transcription enhancing/silencing sequences have been identified within the 3'-UTR of other genes (LE CAM and LEGRAVEREND 1995 Down; MCDONOUGH and DENERIS 1997 Down), such sequences appear to be exceedingly rare and so far have been reported only for highly regulated mammalian genes. The short length of the conserved sequence (eight bases) and the fact that its location appears to be constrained to a specific region of the 3'-UTR upstream of the polyadenylation signal also make it unlikely that it is involved in transcriptional control.

Two sequence motifs involved in post-transcriptional regulation of gene expression have been identified within the 3'-UTRs of D. melanogaster genes involved in the Notch signaling pathway (LAI and POSAKONY 1997 Down; LEVITEN et al. 1997 Down). These sequences, designated as the Brd box (AGCTTTA) and the GY box (GTCTTCC), have been shown to mediate negative regulation of both transcript and protein levels in vivo (LAI and POSAKONY 1997 Down). The Brd box and the GY box of the E(spl)m4 gene are both perfectly conserved between D. melanogaster and D. hydei and are located within a region of the 3'-UTR just upstream of the polyadenylation signal (LAI and POSAKONY 1997 Down). While the highly conserved Adh 3'-UTR sequence (AAGGCTGA) does not match either of the above motifs, it is similar to the Brd box in its core sequence of GCT and in having an A at the first and last position of the motif. The medfly Adh 3'-UTR motif (AAGTCTGA) does not share the core sequence of GCT found in the Brd box, but does share four consecutive bases with the GY box (GTCT). The similarity of the Adh 3'-UTR sequence to these other conserved motifs, along with its role in the negative regulation of mRNA and protein levels, suggests that it may function through a similar mechanism. Though genes containing Brd box and GY box motifs are expressed in cells of the peripheral nervous system during development, the regulatory function of the Brd box has been shown to be both spatially and temporally general (LAI and POSAKONY 1997 Down). This general effect on protein and transcript levels is thus similar to that observed in the Adh 3'-UTR deletion experiments. The Brd box, however, differs from the Adh 3'-UTR sequence in that the former is often found in multiple copies (LAI and POSAKONY 1997 Down), while the latter is found only as a single copy in all of the Adh sequences analyzed (Figure 1).

While the exact molecular mechanism responsible for the increase in Adh expression observed in the 3'-UTR deletion mutants remains obscure, the overall phenotypic effect of the deletions is clearly a large increase in in vivo ADH activity. This implies that the eight-base 3'-UTR sequence plays a negative regulatory role in Adh expression in wild-type flies. The finding that such a negative regulatory element is highly conserved is unexpected in light of previous population genetic and molecular evolutionary studies of Adh. For example, the amino acid replacement that distinguishes the Fast and Slow ADH allozymes in D. melanogaster results in an approximatly twofold increase in ADH activity in Fast homozygotes, yet there does not appear to be purifying selection against this replacement. On the contrary, it appears that the Fast allele has risen to high frequency relatively recently and may be favored by selection, at least in some environments (OAKESHOTT et al. 1982 Down; KREITMAN 1983 Down; AQUADRO et al. 1986 Down; MERCOT et al. 1994 Down). Similarly, an intronic polymorphism that is typically associated with Adh-f alleles has been shown to increase ADH activity levels and also appears to be a target of positive selection (LAURIE et al. 1991 Down; BERRY and KREITMAN 1993 Down; LAURIE and STAM 1994 Down). These observations raise the question of why nucleotide changes within the highly conserved 3'-UTR sequence are strongly selected against, while changes at other sites that have the same phenotypic effect on ADH activity appear to be selectively favorable.

A clear difference between the effect on ADH activity caused by deletion of the conserved 3'-UTR sequence and that caused by the Fast/Slow amino acid replacement is that the 3'-UTR deletion results in an increase in mRNA levels, while the amino acid replacement affects only the catalytic efficiency of the ADH enzyme, not the amount of Adh mRNA. Thus, even though these two sequence changes may have nearly identical phenotypic effects when measured as in vivo ADH activity, the phenotypes may differ greatly (twofold) when measured as in vivo Adh mRNA levels. Similarly, other naturally occurring polymorphisms within the D. melanogaster Adh gene have been shown to affect the total amount of ADH protein in adult flies, resulting in an increase in in vivo ADH activity, without affecting levels of Adh mRNA (LAURIE and STAM 1988 Down, LAURIE and STAM 1994 Down; STAM and LAURIE 1996 Down). It is thus likely that any potential benefit of increased ADH activity caused by disruption of the 3'-UTR sequence is outweighed by the cost of maintaining such high concentrations of Adh mRNA. The translation of an amount of mRNA greater by twofold may have a large energetic cost and may occupy a substantial fraction of the available ribosomes within the cytoplasm, leaving them unavailable for the translation of other cellular proteins. ADH may be particularly sensitive to such effects because it is expressed at very high levels, accounting for an estimated 1–2% of the total translational activity in wild-type adult flies (BENYAJATI et al. 1980 Down).


*  FOOTNOTES

1 Present address: Department of Biology, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14627. Back


*  ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank John Braverman and Steve Mount for helpful discussions and suggestions during the course of this research. We also thank Darryn Potosky for technical assistance in the laboratory. Two anonymous reviewers provided valuable comments on the manuscript. This work was funded in part by National Institutes of Health grant GM-58405.

Manuscript received July 15, 1998; Accepted for publication October 19, 1998.


*  LITERATURE CITED
*TOP
*ABSTRACT
*MATERIALS AND METHODS
*RESULTS
*DISCUSSION
*LITERATURE CITED

AQUADRO, C. F., S. F. DESSE, M. M. BLAND, C. H. LANGLEY, and C. C. LAURIE-AHLBERG, 1986  Molecular population genetics of the alcohol dehydrogenase gene region of Drosophila melanogaster.. Genetics 114:1165-1190[Abstract/Free Full Text].

AYALA, F. J., E. BARRIO, and J. KWIATOWSKI, 1996  Molecular clock or erratic evolution? A tale of two genes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93:11729-11734[Abstract/Free Full Text].

BENYAJATI, C., N. WANG, A. REDDY, E. WEINBERG, and W. SOFER, 1980  Alcohol dehydrogenase in Drosophila: isolation and characterization of messenger RNA and cDNA clone. Nucleic Acids Res. 23:5649-5667.

BENYAJATI, C., N. SPOEREL, H. HAYMERLE, and M. ASHBURNER, 1983  The messenger RNA for alcohol dehydrogenase in Drosophila melanogaster differs in its 5' end in different developmental stages. Cell 22:125-133.

BERRY, A. and M. KREITMAN, 1993  Molecular analysis of an allozyme cline: alcohol dehydrogenase in Drosophila melanogaster on the east coast of North America. Genetics 134:869-893[Abstract].

BISHOP, J. G. and V. G. CORCES, 1988  Expression of an activated ras gene causes developmental abnormalities in transgenic Drosophila melanogaster.. Genes Dev. 2:567-577[Abstract/Free Full Text].

CHOUDHARY, M. and C. C. LAURIE, 1991  Use of in vitro mutagenesis to analyze the difference in Adh expression associated with the allozyme polymorphism in Drosophila melanogaster.. Genetics 129:481-488[Abstract].

DAVID, J. R., C. BOCQUET, M. ARENS, and P. FOUILLET, 1976  The role of alcohol dehydrogenase in the tolerance of Drosophila melanogaster to aliphatic alcohols: utilization of an ADH null mutant. Biochem. Genet. 14:989-997[Medline].

FLETCHER, T. S., F. J. AYALA, D. R. THATCHER, and G. K. CHAMBERS, 1978  Structural analysis of the ADHs electromorph of Drosophila melanogaster.. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 75:5609-5612[Abstract/Free Full Text].

GEER, B. W., S. W. MCKECHNIE, and M. L. LANGEVIN, 1986  The effect of dietary ethanol on the composition of lipids of Drosophila melanogaster larvae. Biochem. Genet. 24:51-69[Medline].

GEER, B. W., S. W. MCKECHNIE, P. W. H. HEINSTRA, and M. J. PYKA, 1991  Heritable variation in ethanol tolerance and its association with biochemical traits in Drosophila melanogaster.. Evolution 45:1107-1119.

GIBSON, J. B., and J. G. OAKESHOTT, 1982 Tests of the adaptive significance of the alcohol dehydrogenase polymorphism in Drosophila melanogaster: paths, pitfalls, and prospects, pp. 291–306 in Ecological Genetics and Evolution, edited by J. S. F. BARKER and W. T. STARMER. Academic Press, Sydney, Australia.

GOLDBERG, D. A., J. W. POSAKONY, and T. MANIATIS, 1983  Correct developmental expression of a cloned alcohol dehydrogenase gene transduced into the Drosophila germ line. Cell 34:59-73[Medline].

KIRBY, D. A., S. V. MUSE, and W. STEPHAN, 1995  Maintenance of pre-mRNA secondary structure by epistatic selection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92:9047-9051[Abstract/Free Full Text].

KREITMAN, M., 1983  Nucleotide polymorphism at the alcohol dehydrogenase locus of Drosophila melanogaster.. Nature 304:412-417[Medline].

KWIATOWSKI, J., M. KRAWCZYK, M. JAWORSKI, D. SKARECKY, and F. J. AYALA, 1997  Erratic evolution of glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase in Drosophila chymomyza, and Ceratitis.. J. Mol. Evol. 44:9-22[Medline].

LAI, E. and J. POSAKONY, 1997  The Bearded box, a novel 3' UTR sequence motif, mediates negative post-transcriptional regulation of Bearded and Enhancer of split complex gene expression. Development 124:4847-4856[Abstract].

LAURIE, C. C. and L. F. STAM, 1988  Quantitative analysis of RNA produced by Slow and Fast alleles of Adh in Drosophila melanogaster.. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 85:5161-5165[Abstract/Free Full Text].

LAURIE, C. C. and L. F. STAM, 1994  The effect of an intronic polymorphism on alcohol dehydrogenase expression in Drosophila melanogaster.. Genetics 138:379-385[Abstract].

LAURIE, C. C., J. T. BRIDGHAM, and M. CHOUDHARY, 1991  Associations between DNA sequence variation and variation in expression of the Adh gene in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster.. Genetics 129:489-499[Abstract].

LAURIE-AHLBERG, C. C. and L. F. STAM, 1987  Use of P-element-mediated transformation to identify the molecular basis of naturally occurring variants affecting Adh expression in Drosophila melanogaster.. Genetics 115:129-140[Abstract/Free Full Text].

LE CAM, A. and C. LEGRAVEREND, 1995  Transcriptional repression, a novel function for 3' untranslated regions. Eur. J. Biochem. 231:620-627[Medline].

LEVITEN, M., E. LAI, and J. POSAKONY, 1997  The Drosophila gene Bearded encodes a novel small protein and shares 3' UTR sequence motifs with multiple Enhancer of split complex genes. Development 124:4039-4051[Abstract].

LI, W.-H., and D. GRAUR, 1991 Fundamentals of Molecular Evolution. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.

LOWRY, O. H., N. J. ROSEBROUGH, A. L. FARR, and R. J. RANDALL, 1951  Protein measurements with the Folin phenol reagent. J. Biol. Chem. 193:265-275[Free Full Text].

MARONI, G., 1978  Genetic control of alcohol dehydrogenase levels in Drosophila.. Biochem. Genet. 16:509-523[Medline].

MCDONOUGH, J. and E. DENERIS, 1997  ß43': an enhancer displaying neural-restricted activity is located in the 3'-untranslated exon of the rat nicotinic acetylcholine receptor ß4 gene. J. Neurosci. 17:2273-2283[Abstract/Free Full Text].

MERCOT, H., D. DEFAYE, P. CAPY, E. PLA, and J. R. DAVID, 1994  Alcohol tolerance, ADH activity, and ecological niche of Drosophila species. Evolution 48:746-757.

OAKESHOTT, J. G., J. B. GIBSON, P. R. ANDERSON, W. R. KNIBB, and D. G. ANDERSON et al., 1982  Alcohol dehydrogenase and glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase clines in Drosophila melanogaster on different continents. Evolution 36:86-96.

PARSCH, J., S. TANDA, and W. STEPHAN, 1997  Site-directed mutations reveal long-range compensatory interactions in the Adh gene of Drosophila melanogaster.. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94:928-933[Abstract/Free Full Text].

PATTON, J. S., X. V. GOMES, and P. K. GEYER, 1992  Position-independent germline transformation in Drosophila using a cuticle pigmentation gene as a selectable marker. Nucleic Acids. Res. 20:5859-5860[Free Full Text].

ROBERTSON, H. M., C. R. PRESTON, R. W. PHILLIS, D. M. JOHNSON-SCHLITZ, and W. K. BENZ et al., 1988  A stable genomic source of P element transposase in Drosophila melanogaster.. Genetics: 118:461-470[Abstract/Free Full Text].

RUBIN, G. M. and A. C. SPRADLING, 1982  Genetic transformation of Drosophila with transposable element vectors. Science 218:348-353[Abstract/Free Full Text].

SAMBROOK, J., E. F. FRITSCH and T. MANIATIS, 1989 Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, Ed. 2. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.

SAVAKIS, C. M., M. ASHBURNER, and J. H. WILLIS, 1986  The expression of the gene coding for alcohol dehydrogenase during the development of Drosophila melanogaster.. Dev. Biol. 114:194-207.

SCHAEFFER, S. W. and E. L. MILLER, 1993  Estimates of linkage disequilibrium and the recombination parameter determined from segregating nucleotide sites in the alcohol dehydrogenase region of Drosophila pseudoobscura.. Genetics 135:541-552[Abstract].

SPRADLING, A. C. and G. M. RUBIN, 1982  Transposition of cloned P-elements into Drosophila germ line chromosomes. Science 218:341-347[Abstract/Free Full Text].

STAM, L. F. and C. C. LAURIE, 1996  Molecular dissection of a major gene effect on a quantitative trait: the level of alcohol dehydrogenase expression in Drosophila melanogaster.. Genetics 144:1559-1564[Abstract].

SULLIVAN, D. T., P. W. ATKINSON, and W. T. STARMER, 1990  Molecular evolution of the alcohol dehydrogenase genes in the genus Drosophila. Evol. Biol. 24:107-147.

VAN DELDEN, W., 1982  The alcohol dehydrogenase polymorphism in Drosophila melanogaster.. Evol. Biol. 15:187-222.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
GeneticsHome page
J. Parsch
Functional Analysis of Drosophila melanogaster Gene Regulatory Sequences by Transgene Coplacement
Genetics, September 1, 2004; 168(1): 559 - 561.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
J. F. Baines, J. Parsch, and W. Stephan
Pleiotropic Effect of Disrupting a Conserved Sequence Involved in a Long-Range Compensatory Interaction in the Drosophila Adh Gene
Genetics, January 1, 2004; 166(1): 237 - 242.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
Y. Chen and W. Stephan
Compensatory evolution of a precursor messenger RNA secondary structure in the Drosophila melanogaster Adh gene
PNAS, September 30, 2003; 100(20): 11499 - 11504.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Mol GenetHome page
J. Duan, M. S. Wainwright, J. M. Comeron, N. Saitou, A. R. Sanders, J. Gelernter, and P. V. Gejman
Synonymous mutations in the human dopamine receptor D2 (DRD2) affect mRNA stability and synthesis of the receptor
Hum. Mol. Genet., February 1, 2003; 12(3): 205 - 216.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
J. E. Oppentocht, W. van Delden, and L. van de Zande
Isolation and Characterization of the Genomic Region from Drosophila kuntzei Containing the Adh and Adhr Genes
Mol. Biol. Evol., July 1, 2002; 19(7): 1026 - 1040.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
G. Pesole, S. Liuni, G. Grillo, F. Licciulli, F. Mignone, C. Gissi, and C. Saccone
UTRdb and UTRsite: specialized databases of sequences and functional elements of 5' and 3' untranslated regions of eukaryotic mRNAs. Update 2002
Nucleic Acids Res., January 1, 2002; 30(1): 335 - 340.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
J. Parsch, J. A. Russell, I. Beerman, D. L. Hartl, and W. Stephan
Deletion of a Conserved Regulatory Element in the Drosophila Adh Gene Leads to Increased Alcohol Dehydrogenase Activity but Also Delays Development
Genetics, September 1, 2000; 156(1): 219 - 227.
[Abstract] [Full Text]