- THIS ARTICLE
-
Abstract
- Full Text (PDF)
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Friesen, H.
- Articles by Segall, J.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Friesen, H.
- Articles by Segall, J.
SPE3, Which Encodes Spermidine Synthase, Is Required for Full Repression Through NREDIT in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Helena Friesena, Jason C. Tannyb, and Jacqueline Segalla,ba Department of Biochemistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 1A8, Canada
b Department of Molecular and Medical Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 1A8, Canada
Corresponding author: Jacqueline Segall, Department of Biochemistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 1A8 Canada., j.segall{at}utoronto.ca (E-mail).
Communicating editor: F. WINSTON
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
We previously identified a transcriptional regulatory element, which we call NREDIT, that is required for repression of the sporulation-specific genes, DIT1 and DIT2, during vegetative growth of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Repression through this element is dependent on the Ssn6-Tup1 corepressor. In this study, we show that SIN4 contributes to NREDIT-mediated repression, suggesting that changes in chromatin structure are, at least in part, responsible for regulation of DIT gene expression. In a screen for additional genes that function in repression of DIT (FRD genes), we recovered alleles of TUP1, SSN6, SIN4, and ROX3 and identified mutations comprising eight complementation groups of FRD genes. Four of these FRD genes appeared to act specifically in NREDIT-mediated repression, and four appeared to be general regulators of gene expression. We cloned the gene complementing the frd3-1 phenotype and found that it was identical to SPE3, which encodes spermidine synthase. Mutant spe3 cells not only failed to support complete repression through NREDIT but also had modest defects in repression of some other genes. Addition of spermidine to the medium partially restored repression to spe3 cells, indicating that spermidine may play a role in vivo as a modulator of gene expression. We suggest various mechanisms by which spermidine could act to repress gene expression.
SPORULATION of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae is a process of cellular differentiation that begins when MATa/MAT
diploid cells are starved in the presence of a nonfermentable carbon source. As a cell progresses through the events of meiosis and spore wall formation, an ordered series of genetic and morphological changes generates a tetrad of dormant haploid spores that are resistant to environmental insults. A single round of DNA replication is followed by a lengthy prophase during which homologous chromosomes pair and undergo high levels of meiotic recombination. The two meiotic divisions, leading to segregation of homologous chromosomes and then sister chromatids, occur within the nucleus. Prospore membranes begin to form at the spindle pole bodies and expand to engulf each daughter nucleus, as well as some cytoplasm. Deposition of spore wall material then generates a multilayered spore wall, giving rise to four mature spores within the ascal sac (reviewed in ![]()
4 temporally distinct classes of sporulation-specific genes, referred to as early, middle, mid-late, and late on the basis of their time of expression (reviewed in ![]()
![]()
The mid-late sporulation-specific genes are first activated around the time that the meiotic divisions are being completed and synthesis of the spore membrane has begun. The divergently transcribed genes, DIT1 and DIT2, are the only mid-late sporulation-specific genes thus far identified. These genes encode enzymes that are required for biosynthesis of the dityrosine precursor that is incorporated into the outermost layer of the spore wall (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Repression mediated in yeast by the Ssn6-Tup1 corepressor has been studied extensively. Ssn6 (Cyc8) and Tup1 are involved directly in the repression of genes regulated by glucose and by cell type and have been implicated in the direct repression of genes regulated by oxygen and by DNA damage, as well as genes involved in flocculation (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
In this article, we report the identification and preliminary characterization of genes that are required for complete repression through NREDIT, the Ssn6-Tup1-dependent operator controlling mid-late sporulation-specific gene expression. One of these genes is identical to SPE3, which encodes spermidine synthase. We found that cells that could not synthesize spermidine not only failed to support complete repression through NREDIT but also had modest defects in repression of other genes. Because addition of spermidine to the medium partially restored repression to spe3 cells, we suggest that spermidine may have a role in vivo as a modulator of gene expression.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
Media, growth conditions and genetic methods:
Liquid and solid media have been described (![]()
![]()
![]()
Strains:
S. cerevisiae strains used in this study are listed in Table 1. EG123, EG123tup1, and EG123ssn6 were provided by A. JOHNSON and have been described (![]()
![]()
diploid strain obtained by mating W303-1A and W303-1B is referred to as LP112. DY1702 is a derivative of W303-1A in which the SIN4 gene has been replaced with the sin4
::TRP1 allele (![]()
frd mutant strains, and homozygous diploids were selected on SD-Trp-Ura.
|
Yspe3::HIS3
was constructed in two steps. First, the wild-type diploid strain LP112 was transformed with a 10.3-kb XbaI-XbaI fragment that had been isolated from pG23Tn42 and that contained an spe3::HIS3 allele. Replacement in a His+ transformant of one copy of SPE3 by the spe3::HIS3 allele was confirmed by Southern blot analysis of DNA digested with BglII. The resultant strain was called LP112spe3::HIS3. The spe3::HIS3 allele, which had a Tn1000::HIS3 element (![]()
was obtained by sporulation of cells of LP112spe3::HIS3 that had been transformed with pLG+ NRE76. Progeny derived from a haploid MAT
spore that failed to fully repress the CYC1-NREDIT-lacZ reporter gene were grown in the presence of 5-fluoroorotic acid (5-FOA) (![]()
.
WA-ROX3-LEU2 was constructed by transforming W303-1A with pRS305-ROX3 (see below) that had been digested with BglII. Integration at the ROX3 locus was confirmed by Southern blot analysis of DNA from Leu+ transformants. Yfrd3-1 and Yspe3::HIS3
strains containing an integrated CYC1-lacZ reporter gene or an integrated CYC1-NREDIT lacZ reporter gene were constructed by transformation with YIpLG312 and YIpLG+NRE76 (see below) that had been digested with StuI to target integration to the URA3 locus (![]()
The Escherichia coli strain DH5
was used for propagating plasmids. Strain MC1066 [pyrF74::Tn5(Kmr) leuB trp] was used to select for plasmids containing the yeast LEU2 marker (![]()
Plasmids:
Nonstandard plasmids used in this study are listed in Table 2. Throughout this work, we refer to pLG
312(Bgl) (provided by A. MITCHELL), which is a derivative of pLG
312 (![]()
![]()
|
Plasmid pLG+NRE30 was constructed by annealing the oligonucleotides 5'-GATCCGGGTTCTCTTGCCAAGAAAAAATAAAAAGG-3' and 5'-GATCCCTTTTTATTTTTTCTTGGCAAGAGAACCCG-3' and cloning the double-stranded fragment into the BglII site of pLG312 (![]()
pRS305-ROX3 was constructed by subcloning an ~2.7-kb HindIII-HindIII fragment containing ROX3 from YCp(33)-ROX3H (a gift from RICHARD ZITOMER) into the HindIII site of pRS305 (![]()
![]()
Isolation of frd mutants:
Strain W303-1BT (MAT
) containing pLG+NRE76 was mutagenized to 76% survival with ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS) as described (![]()
Genetic analysis:
Mutants were placed into complementation groups using standard techniques (![]()
strain, DY1702. Allelism with ROX3 was assessed by mating Yfrd13-1 containing pLG+NRE76 with WA-ROX3-LEU2 and analyzing tetrads derived from the resulting diploid strain.
To monitor the relative level of expression of various lacZ reporter genes in the mutant strains, cells that had lost pLG+NRE76 were first selected on medium that contained 5-FOA (![]()
SS, pLG+
2op, and p(-537)DIT1-lacZ. Transformants were patched on SD-Ura plates and incubated at 30°. Patches that had been overlaid with X-Gal-containing agar were examined for relative blueness after 18 hr incubation at 30°.
ß-Galactosidase assays:
ß-Galactosidase activity was measured in extracts of cells as described (![]()
The X-Gal overlay assay has been described previously (![]()
Cloning of FRD3:
Strain Yfrd3-1 containing pLG+NRE76 was transformed with a p366-based (CEN4 ARS1) yeast genomic library (ATCC, a gift of N. MACPHERSON and B. ANDREWS; described in ![]()
![]()
DNA sequencing:
The junctions between vector and insert in pG23 and pG51, plasmids which complemented the frd3-1 mutation, were determined by dideoxy sequence analysis of double-stranded DNA (![]()
Transposon mutagenesis:
Tn1000 (
) transposon mutagenesis has been described (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
| RESULTS |
|---|
In a previous study, we found that multiple regulatory elements within the promoter region of the DIT1 gene of S. cerevisiae contribute to its sporulation-specific expression (![]()
![]()
SIN4 contributes to NREDIT-mediated repression:
Because we had previously found that repression through NREDIT requires the Ssn6-Tup1 corepressor (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
(DY1702) cells indicated that NREDIT-mediated repression was reduced 12-fold in sin4 cells (Figure 1); this effect is similar to the ninefold reduction in repression from the
2-Mcm1 operator in sin4 cells (![]()
|
Isolation of mutants with defects in repression through NREDIT:
To identify additional genes that might be involved in mediating NREDIT-dependent repression, we monitored expression of a plasmid-borne CYC1-NREDIT-lacZ reporter gene in cells that had been exposed to the mutagen EMS. By using an overlay assay to detect ß-galactosidase activity in colonies of cells (![]()
diploid homozygous for the frd1-1 allele. One mutant strain, which was completely defective in mating, and therefore could not be placed in a complementation group, was not characterized.
|
Because NREDIT-mediated repression requires the corepressor Ssn6-Tup1 (![]()
, frdX/tup1
, and frdX/sin4
strains (![]()
![]()
Expression of a CYC1-lacZ reporter gene lacking a UAS is elevated in class I mutants:
As the first step in the preliminary characterization of the Yfrd strains, we determined whether reduced repression through NREDIT could be accounted for by a defect in repression of basal transcription. We assessed basal transcription by monitoring expression of a plasmid-borne CYC1-lacZ reporter gene that lacks a UAS. This reporter gene was not expressed in the wild-type strain as monitored by an X-Gal overlay assay, but was expressed in Yfrd11-1, Yfrd12-1, and Yfrd13-1 and, as expected, in Yfrd6-1 and Yfrd6-2, strains that had mutant alleles of SIN4 (Table 3; pLG
SS column). We refer to these strains as class I mutants.
We tested several genes that are known to have a role in repressing basal transcription for identity with class I genes. We found that a plasmid-borne version of ROX3/SSN7 complemented the frd13-1 allele. ROX3 is required for repression of other Ssn6-Tup1-regulated genes [CYC7 (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Class I and class II mutants are defective in repression through both NREDIT and the
2-Mcm1 operator:
We anticipated that reduced repression through NREDIT in some of the mutants that were isolated in our screen would be due to a general defect in operator-mediated repression, particularly in Ssn6-Tup1-dependent repression. To identify at least a subset of such mutants, we monitored expression of ß-galactosidase in Yfrd strains that harbored pLG+
2op, a plasmid that contains the CYC1-lacZ reporter gene under the control of the
2-Mcm1 operator. Repression through this well-characterized operator, which occurs in MAT
cells, requires the Ssn6-Tup1 corepressor (![]()
![]()
![]()
2op column). Additionally, Yfrd10-1, Yfrd11-1, and Yfrd12-2 expressed the
2-Mcm1 operator-containing reporter gene. We refer to those mutants that were defective in repression through both NREDIT and the
2-Mcm1 operator, but that maintained repression of the reporter gene that lacked a UAS as class II mutants (see Table 3) and concluded that they had defects in general operator-mediated repression. ![]()
Candidate genes for FRD10, the only unidentified class II gene, included SRB8, SRB9, SRB10, and SRB11, which encode proteins that interact functionally with the carboxy terminal domain of RNA polymerase II (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
We found that the remaining five strains (Yfrd1-1, Yfrd2-1, Yfrd3-1, Yfrd4-1, and Yfrd5-1), which supported repression through the
2-Mcm1 operator (Table 1), also maintained repression of a CYC1-lacZ gene under the control of the URS1 operator (![]()
In summary, the mutants that we identified on the basis of defects in repression through NREDIT were placed into three different classes. Class I and class II mutants were defective in repression through the NREDIT and
2-Mcm1 operators (Table 3). Class I mutants, which were also defective in maintaining repression of a gene that lacks a UAS, included two strains with mutations in SIN4, one strain with a mutation in ROX3, and two strains with mutations in unidentified genes. Class II mutants, which maintained repression of a gene that lacks a UAS, included three strains with mutations in SSN6, one strain with a mutation in TUP1, and one strain with a mutation in an unidentified gene (Table 3). By these preliminary criteria, the five mutants of class III, which maintained repression of a gene that lacks a UAS and were effective at mediating repression through the
2-Mcm1 operator, appeared to be specifically defective in repression through NREDIT. In further studies, however, we found that Yfrd3-1 and Yfrd4-1 grew slowly in synthetic medium (data not shown). This suggested that the FRD3 and FRD4 genes had roles in addition to their contribution to NREDIT-mediated repression.
Effect of frd mutations on expression of a DIT1-lacZ reporter gene:
Our preliminary analysis of the regulation of expression of the DIT1 gene had suggested that there might be a component of repression that is independent of NREDIT (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Quantification of the repression defects in the class III mutants:
We next quantified the repression defects in the Class III mutants by monitoring ß-galactosidase activity in cells harboring pLG+NRE76, pLG+NRE30, or pLG+NRE76 x 2/S, which contain variants of a CYC1-lacZ reporter gene. pLG+NRE76, the plasmid that was used to isolate the mutants, has the 76-bp NREDIT-containing fragment (nucleotides -537 to -461 of DIT1) inserted between the CYC1 UAS and TATA box of the CYC1-lacZ reporter gene; pLG+NRE30 has a 30-bp fragment, which contains the downstream portion of NREDIT and lacks the MSE-like element (nt -493 to -464), inserted between the CYC1 UAS and TATA box of the CYC1-lacZ reporter gene; and pLG+NRE76 x 2/S has two copies of the 76-bp NREDIT fragment upstream of the CYC1 UAS of the CYC1-lacZ fusion gene (![]()
|
In the wild-type strain, expression of the CYC1-NRE-lacZ gene contained in pLG+NRE76 was 500-fold lower than was expression of the CYC1-lacZ reporter gene contained in pLG312 (Figure 2A). The 30-bp fragment containing the downstream portion of NREDIT was a much less efficient repressor element than the full 76-mer; the 30-bp fragment reduced expression of ß-galactosidase 10-fold in wild-type cells (Figure 2B). As shown previously, ß-galactosidase expression from pLG+NRE76 x 2/S was repressed 40-fold relative to expression of the parental reporter gene in pLG312 (![]()
Among the class III mutant strains, Yfrd1-1, Yfrd2-1, and Yfrd5-1 were the most defective in repression through the 76-bp NREDIT-containing fragment; repression was 14- to 40-fold less efficient than in the wild-type strain (Figure 2A). The mutations in the Yfrd3-1 and Yfrd4-1 strains were less deleterious, with repression through the 76-bp-containing fragment being only 9- and 5-fold less efficient, respectively, than in the wild-type strain. This same pattern was found in repression through the 30-bp fragment representing the downstream portion of the 76-bp fragment and in repression directed by the 76-bp fragment positioned upstream of the CYC1 UAS in the CYC1-lacZ reporter gene (Figure 2B). We conclude that the reduced ability of the class III mutants to mediate NREDIT-dependent repression reflects deficiencies in the contribution that the downstream portion of the 76-bp fragment makes to repression.
As a control, we also measured ß-galactosidase activity in cells containing pLG+
2op. In wild-type cells, the presence of the
2-Mcm1 operator led to 500-fold repression of the reporter gene (Figure 2C). Four of the class III mutant strains (Yfrd1-1, Yfrd2-1, Yfrd4-1, and Yfrd5-1) maintained efficient repression of this reporter gene. Yfrd3-1, however, was 3-fold less efficient than the wild-type strain in mediating repression through the
2-Mcm1 operator (Figure 2C). This minor deficiency in repression through the
2-Mcm1 operator in Yfrd3-1 had escaped detection in the less sensitive X-Gal overlay assay (Table 3).
Mutation of FRD genes affects sporulation:
We next tested the Class III mutants for their ability to form spores. Although, to date, the NREDIT element has been identified only in the promoter region of the divergently transcribed DIT1 and DIT2 genes, we considered it likely that this element would also regulate other as-yet-to-be-identified, mid-late sporulation-specific genes. Although we did not detect derepression of the DIT1-lacZ reporter gene in the class III mutants (Table 3), we speculated that inappropriate expression of some of these other hypothetical mid-late sporulation-specific genes during vegetative growth or early sporulation might lead to defects in spore formation.
Homozygous mutant MATa/MAT
frd/frd strains were transferred to sporulation medium, and ascus formation was monitored over a 5-day period. The efficiency of ascus formation in the wild-type strain was 62% after 40 hr in sporulation medium and 72% after 90 hr (Figure 3). The two mutant strains that grew slowly in synthetic medium, YYfrd3-1 and YYfrd4-1, were almost completely deficient in spore formation (<3% of the cells formed asci; Figure 3), and the other three class III mutants, YYfrd1-1, YYfrd2-1, and YYfrd5-1, showed a delay of ~10 hr in the onset of spore formation and about a twofold reduction in the efficiency of ascus formation (Figure 3). Thus, the mutations in the strains assigned to class III led to defects that affected progression through the sporulation program.
|
Cloning FRD3:
During our preliminary characterization of the class III mutants, which was carried out with cells grown on synthetic medium, we noticed that the Yfrd3-1 strain grew more slowly than did the wild-type strain (data not shown). We subsequently discovered that growing Yfrd3-1 on rich medium suppressed both its growth defect and its defect in NREDIT-mediated repression (data not shown). Growing YYfrd3-1 in rich medium (YEPA), rather than in synthetic medium, before transfer to sporulation medium also restored efficient spore formation (data not shown). The phenotypes of the other class III mutants were independent of the growth medium (data not shown). To gain insight into why the Yfrd3-1 strain had a defect in repression through NREDIT that was dependent on its growth medium, we proceeded to clone the FRD3 gene.
Plasmids containing the FRD3 gene were identified by transforming the original Yfrd3-1 strain with a yeast CEN4 LEU2-based genomic library and screening for restoration of repression of the CYC1-NREDIT-lacZ gene. Two plasmids, pG23 and pG51, that complemented both derepression of the CYC1-NREDIT-lacZ gene and the slow growth of Yfrd31 were isolated (Figure 4). Comparison of sequence obtained from the junctions of the genomic inserts with the Saccharomyces Genome Database revealed that the plasmids contained overlapping inserts from chromosome XVI.
|
To determine which of the four ORFs present in the overlapping portions of the genomic inserts of pG23 and pG51 corresponded to FRD3, we subjected pG23 to transposon mutagenesis and identified three plasmids that could no longer complement Yfrd3-1 (see MATERIALS AND METHODS). Sequence analysis with primers that extended outward from the transposon (![]()
![]()
To confirm that SPE3 was FRD3, and not a low-copy suppressor of the frd3-1 mutation, we disrupted the chromosomal copy of the SPE3 gene by integrative transformation with a DNA fragment that contained an spe3::HIS3 allele. This allele contained a Tn1000 transposon with the HIS3 gene inserted 187 nt downstream of the initiator ATG of the SPE3 gene (see MATERIALS AND METHODS). Both the haploid spe3::HIS3 strain and a diploid spe3::HIS3/frd3-1 strain were defective in NREDIT-mediated repression and growth on synthetic medium, suggesting that FRD3 was identical to SPE3. We next sporulated the spe3::HIS3/frd3-1 strain. Although we found that mutation of SPE3 reduced spore viability, some tetrads contained four viable spores. All the progeny of 7 such tetrads and of 12 tetrads that had 2 or 3 viable spores were defective in NREDIT-mediated repression and growth on synthetic medium. We conclude that spe3::HIS3 and frd3-1 are indeed allelic.
Addition of spermidine to synthetic medium partially suppresses the frd3 phenotype:
The biosynthetic pathway for polyamines in yeast and other organisms has been determined from biochemical and genetic studies (for review see ![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
To test whether derepression of the CYC1-NREDIT-lacZ reporter gene in Yfrd3-1 cells grown in minimal medium was a direct effect of a deficiency of spermidine in this medium, we monitored repression of this reporter gene in cells grown in synthetic medium that had been supplemented with various concentrations of spermidine (Figure 5). Addition of spermidine to 10-8 M increased repression of the CYC1-NREDIT-lacZ reporter gene ~2-fold; addition of spermidine to 10-4 M, the highest concentration tested, increased repression of the CYC1-NREDIT-lacZ reporter gene ~10-fold. Higher concentrations of spermidine led to significant changes in the pH of the medium (data not shown) and were not tested for their effects on gene expression. Addition of spermidine to 10-4 M to our presporulation synthetic medium also restored ascus formation in the YYfrd3-1 strain to the wild-type level (data not shown). Addition of spermidine to the sporulation medium only, however, did not permit efficient ascus formation (data not shown).
|
These experiments clearly indicated that it was an absence of spermidine that led to deficient repression of the CYC1-NREDIT-lacZ reporter gene in the Yfrd3-1 strain and to the sporulation defect in YYfrd3-1. In contrast, the two- to threefold defect in repression through the
2-Mcm1 operator that we had observed in the Yfrd3-1 strain grown in minimal medium (Figure 2C) was not suppressed by spermidine (Figure 5). It is possible that exogenous spermidine was required at a concentration higher than 10-4 M to correct for this latter defect.
Phenotype of a spe3::HIS3 allele:
We next compared the phenotype of Yfrd3-1 with the phenotype of Yspe3::HIS3
, a strain that contained a disrupted spe3::HIS3 allele (see above). Yspe3::HIS3
was viable on minimal medium although, like Yfrd3-1, it grew more slowly than did the wild-type strain. The plasmid-borne CYC1-NREDIT-lacZ reporter gene was derepressed to the same extent in Yfrd3-1 and Yspe3::HIS3
grown in minimal medium; NREDIT-mediated repression was 43-fold in the mutant cells vs. 350-fold in wild-type cells (Figure 6A). Overall, therefore, the mutant strains were ~8-fold less efficient than the wild-type strain at mediating repression through NREDIT. Supplementing the medium with spermidine restored NREDIT-mediated repression in the mutant strains to within threefold of the level of repression observed in the wild-type strain (Figure 6A). Similar results were obtained on examination of expression of an integrated CYC1-NREDIT-lacZ reporter gene; NREDIT-mediated repression was 22- and 31-fold in Yfrd3-1 and Yspe3::HIS3
, respectively, vs. 110-fold in the wild-type strain (Figure 6B). Addition of spermidine to the medium reduced expression of the integrated reporter gene in both mutant strains to the same low level as in the wild-type strain (Figure 6B). Because the extent of derepression of the CYC1-NREDIT-lacZ gene in Yspe3::HIS3
was no greater than in Yfrd3-1, we conclude that the frd3-1 allele was a null allele.
|
In these experiments, we found that the frd3-1 and spe3::HIS3 alleles led to a modest increase in expression of our control CYC1-lacZ reporter gene in cells grown in minimal medium; this increase was suppressed by addition of spermidine to the medium (Figure 6). We note that throughout this study we have reported the efficiency of repression relative to expression of the control CYC1-lacZ reporter gene in the same strain; thus, the changes in repression that we present as fold-effects reflect changes in NREDIT activity only.
In summary, we uncovered SPE3 (FRD3) as a gene that is required for efficient repression through NREDIT, but is dispensable for repression of basal transcription. In our preliminary characterization of the mutant FRD strains, we had classified Yfrd3-1 as a class III mutant because it appeared to be specifically defective in NREDIT-mediated repression. We have reassigned Yfrd3-1 to the class II group of mutants, however, because we noted that Yfrd3-1, in addition to a conditional slow-growth phenotype, had general defects in gene expression. Mutation of SPE3 (FRD3) not only led to less efficient repression through NREDIT but also caused a two- to threefold reduction in repression through the
2-Mcm1 operator and a two- to threefold increase in expression of our control CYC1-lacZ reporter gene when cells were grown in minimal medium. Because some of these defects could be partially suppressed by the addition of spermidine to the medium, we conclude that one role of spermidine may be to modulate gene expression.
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
In this study, we have further characterized NREDIT-mediated repression. This negative element directs Ssn6-Tup1-dependent repression of the sporulation-specific DIT1 and DIT2 genes in vegetative cells (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Three classes of frd mutants:
To gain further insight into the mechanism of NREDIT-mediated repression, we isolated mutants that were defective in repression of a CYC1-NREDIT-lacZ reporter gene. We tentatively assigned these FRD (function in repression of DIT) mutants, which represented 12 complementation groups, to three classes. We note that although some genes were isolated more than once, this screen was not saturating.
Class I mutants, in which basal transcription was increased, included strains with mutations in SIN4 and ROX3/SSN7 and two strains with mutations in unidentifed genes. ROX3, which encodes a component of the mediator complex of RNA polymerase II holoenzyme (![]()
![]()
![]()
Mutant strains that appeared to be specifically defective in NREDIT-mediated repression were assigned to class III. These strains are good candidates for having a mutation in a gene(s) encoding an NREDIT-binding protein(s). We found that mutation of the class III FRD genes caused only a partial loss of repression through NREDIT. It is possible that these genes encode proteins that do not have a key role in establishing a repression complex or that these frd alleles are not null alleles. The incomplete defects in repression seen for the class III FRD mutants could also reflect partial functional redundancies among the class III FRD gene products.
Identification of FRD3 as SPE3:
A major finding of this study was the demonstration that FRD3 is identical to SPE3, the gene encoding spermidine synthase. SPE3 has been cloned recently as a gene complementing the spermidine auxotrophy of a spe3-1 mutant strain (![]()
In contrast to the report by ![]()
mutant is unable to grow on synthetic medium to which no spermidine has been added, we found that an spe3::HIS3 mutant was able to grow, albeit slowly, on such medium. This discrepancy could be due to the presence of trace amounts of spermidine in our synthetic medium, but not in that used by ![]()
![]()
Role for spermidine in modulating gene expression:
Spermidine is the predominant polyamine in yeast with intracellular concentrations in the millimolar range (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
We have found that growth in minimal medium of yeast cells that cannot synthesize spermidine leads to defects in gene expression. The most dramatic defect that we observed was in NREDIT-mediated repression: mutation of SPE3 (FRD3) led to an ~8-fold reduction in repression of a CYC1-NREDIT-lacZ gene reporter (Figure 2A, Figure 6A). Additionally, we found that spe3 (frd3) mutants expressed a CYC1-lacZ reporter gene at a two to threefold higher level than did wild-type cells and were two- to threefold less efficient than were wild-type cells in mediating repression through the
2-Mcm1 operator. Both the defect in repression through NREDIT and the overexpression of the CYC1-lacZ gene were partially suppressed by the addition of spermidine to the growth medium. Thus, the elevated expression of the CYC1-NREDIT-lacZ reporter gene in spe3 (frd3) cells grown in minimal medium may be the combined effect of a defect in repression through NREDIT and a defect in modulating the activity of the CYC1 UAS. We note that in this study we have reported the efficiency of NREDIT-mediated repression relative to expression of the control CYC1-lacZ reporter gene in the same strain; thus, the fold-effects that we refer to reflect changes in NREDIT activity only. Our data, therefore, clearly indicate that the predominant effect of spermidine on restoring repression to the CYC1-NREDIT-lacZ reporter gene in an spe3 strain is through its effects on NREDIT.
Spermidine could act to modulate gene expression in various ways. Its effect could be indirect; spermidine-induced changes in processes such as translational fidelity (![]()
![]()
Spermidine, which has a polybasic character similar to that of histones, could also modulate gene expression by promoting localized changes in DNA structure. Indeed, in vitro, spermidine binds to DNA and promotes its compaction (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()





