- THIS ARTICLE
-
Abstract
- Full Text (PDF)
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Schaaper, R. M.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Schaaper, R. M.
Antimutator Mutants in Bacteriophage T4 and Escherichia coli
Roel M. Schaaperaa Laboratory of Molecular Genetics, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709
Corresponding author: Roel M. Schaaper, Laboratory of Molecular Genetics, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, 111 TW Alexander Dr., Box 12233, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, schaaper{at}niehs.nih.gov (E-mail).
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
Antimutators are mutant strains that have reduced mutation rates compared to the corresponding wild-type strain. Their existence, along with mutator mutants that have higher mutation rates compared to the wild-type strain, are powerful evidence that mutation rates are genetically controlled. Compared to mutator mutants, antimutators have a very distinguishing property. Because they prevent normally occurring mutations, they, uniquely, are capable of providing insight into the mechanisms of spontaneous mutations. In this review, antimutator mutants are discussed in bacteriophage T4 and the bacterium Escherichia coli, with regard to their properties, possible mechanisms, and implications for the sources of spontaneous mutations in these two organisms.
ANTIMUTATORS are genetic mutants that produce mutations at reduced rates compared to the wild-type strain. They are important because they, uniquely, can provide insights into the mechanisms by which spontaneous mutations occur. Mechanistically, antimutators can be thought to increase the efficiency of the normal mutation-prevention systems or, alternatively, decrease the efficiency of error-producing systems. In either case, an understanding of the mechanism by which the antimutator reduces spontaneous mutations provides a direct insight into the mechanisms by which mutations occur in normal cells.
Historically, antimutator strains have received generally less attention than their counterpart, mutators, which produce mutations at elevated frequencies. One reason for this is that antimutators, because of their modest nature, are more difficult to detect and isolate than their highly visible mutator counterparts. In addition, it has been argued (![]()
In trying to understand spontaneous mutations, it is useful to realize that numerous potential sources for spontaneous mutations can be postulated. Figure 1 provides a schematic representation of some of the sources that have been considered. Within each pathway, several genes or gene products operate to reduce the contribution of this pathway. A defect in any of these will increase the mutations through this pathway, likely causing an overall mutator effect. This accounts for the observed multitude of mutator mutants. However, improving the efficiency of error prevention in any pathway, such as in a potential antimutator, while decreasing the number of mutations originating through this pathway, may not lead to a lowering of overall mutation. This will only occur if the particular pathway contributes substantially (e.g., 50% or more) to overall mutations. Thus, the potential to generate antimutator mutants may be limited. ![]()
|
One technical aspect that complicates studies of antimutagenesis is that a perceived absence of mutations does not necessarily imply an antimutator effect. It is also possible that mutations are generated at normal frequencies but that they are somehow inefficiently expressed. This could be because of their incompatibility with the presumed antimutator allele or because of a general growth impairment under the selective conditions. Some possible examples of this will be indicated below.
In the following, I present an overview of some of the properties of antimutators that have been isolated in bacteriophage T4 and in the bacterium Escherichia coli. Specifically, I will summarize what has been learned with regard to their possible mechanisms and what their implications are for the mechanisms of spontaneous mutations.
| Antimutators in bacteriophage T4 |
|---|
In 1969, DRAKE and co-workers reported a survey of an extensive collection of temperature-sensitive (TS) mutants in gene 43 of bacteriophage T4, the gene encoding the T4 DNA polymerase (![]()
![]()
The specificity of the T4 antimutators:
One of the interesting properties of the T4 antimutators, already recognized in the 1969 Nature article, is that they have a defined specificity, i.e., the effect is seen for certain mutations but not for others. It was observed that the antimutator effect was strong when measuring rII alleles reverting by A·T
G ·C transition but not for those reverting by G ·C
A·T transitions. Interestingly, when the G ·C
A·T pathway was induced by the base analogue 5-bromouracil, a strong antimutator effect was readily observed.
Later studies on the specificity of the T4 antimutators were conducted by RIPLEY who showed that, similar to the G·C
A·T transitions, transversions were not reduced by the antimutator alleles. Instead, certain small increases in their frequencies were observed (![]()
![]()
![]()
Possible mechanisms of the T4 antimutators:
![]()
5' exonuclease that functions as a proofreader for polymerase insertion errors. ![]()
![]()
Other, more recent studies have attempted to address the mechanisms responsible for the altered exo/pol ratio in greater detail. DNA-sequencing of mutator and antimutator polymerase genes revealed that many of the T4 mutator mutations resided in the (N-terminal) exonuclease domain, consistent with reduced exonuclease activity (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Possible explanations for the observed specificity of the T4 antimutators:
The model for T4 antimutator mutators in terms of altered partitioning between the exonuclease and the polymerase sites is attractive and supported by the experimental approaches. However, the model does not provide an obvious explanation for why the antimutator effect is observed only for A·T
G ·C transitions and frameshifts in runs. Enhanced mismatch removal has been observed in the case of many different mismatches, including transversion mismatches (![]()
![]()
G ·C transitions (A ·C and/or T·G, the template base stated first) are incompletely proofread due to their facile extension and are therefore most susceptible to increased exonuclease action, yielding a strong antimutator effect. However, in order to explain the absence of antimutator effects for all other mismatches (including the reciprocal C ·A and G ·T mispairs) one would have to assume that these mismatches are already maximally proofread and further proofreading enhancement would not lead to a reduction in the corresponding mutation frequency.
As an alternative, I offer the following explanation. The basic assumption is that as on the E. coli chromosome, mutations in T4 likely originate from various sources, of which DNA replication errors are only one (see Figure 1). (In this context, I define DNA replication errors as those resulting from the intrinsic inaccuracy of the replication of perfect, i.e., undamaged, DNA templates.) Because the ability of T4 to repair its DNA is limited and T4 does not use host repair functions (![]()
A·T transitions might in majority result from deaminated cytosines (hydroxymethyl C in the case of T4). In that case, the absence of an antimutator effect for G ·C
A·T transitions would be readily explained. Likewise, most transversions in T4 might result from DNA damages, at which increased proofreading may not significantly affect the resulting mutation rates. In contrast, A·T
G ·C are the most frequent replication errors (![]()
![]()
A·T transitions induced by base analogues (DRAKE et al. 1966). The analogue-induced G ·C
A·T transitions would now clearly be replication errors.
Next:
For more than three decades, the T4 antimutator system has served as a highly useful model system for understanding the factors involved in DNA replication fidelity. It is likely that this will continue in the near future. Recently (![]()
![]()
| Antimutators in E. coli |
|---|
Antimutator mutants have also been studied in the bacterium E. coli. Below, I will review the three major efforts, spanning three different decades, to isolate antimutator mutants in this organism. In each case, the specific purpose was to use such antimutator mutants to probe the process of spontaneous mutagenesis in this organism. Earlier, sporadic reports on antimutator effects that were not pursued in any detail have already been briefly reviewed (see ![]()
![]()
The E. coli mud strain:
![]()
![]()
![]()
An alternative explanation for the Mud phenotype flows from unpublished data from our laboratory. When the mud mutation was transferred to the strain background normally used in our laboratory, it was noticed that the appearance of valine-resistant mutants on valine-selection plates in mud strains was greatly suppressed on days 2 and 3 but reached normal levels on days 4, 5, and 6. The presence of adenine in the valine plates made the mutants appear normally on day 2. Thus, it appeared that in the absence of adenine, valine-resistant mutants in a mud strain had a growth impairment that delayed their appearance. This delay was confirmed in reconstruction experiments in which purified valine-resistant mutants selected from the mud strain at day 4 were mixed with normal mud cultures. These added, preexisting mutants appeared on day 2 in the presence of adenine but as very small colonies on day 3 that did not reach normal size until day 4 in its absence. Similar experiments performed in the AB1976 background used in the experiments of ![]()
![]()
The Quiñones and Piechocki antimutators:
![]()
Intriguing aspects of this data set are that: (1) so many different loci on the E. coli chromosome appear to control spontaneous mutability, and (2) the reduction in spontaneous mutability (as measured by forward assays) by many of the antimutator alleles is very large (up to 50-fold). These findings are difficult to reconcile with the model that spontaneous mutations are a mixture of largely independent sources. Thus, if one pathway contributes 90% of the spontaneous mutations, a maximally 10-fold reduction can be expected for antimutators that operate within this particular pathway. At the same time, this would preclude finding antimutators in any of the other pathways. Thus, in order to reconcile all the QUIÑONES and PIECHOCKI data one would have to assume that either all antimutators that they isolated work in the same pathway and that this pathway is responsible for up to 98% of all spontaneous mutations (based on a 50-fold reduction) or that a significant overlap exists between the various pathways, such that numerous genes are responsible for mutations emanating through various pathways (largely eliminating the concept of independent pathways). As an alternative, it must be considered that at least some of the mutants are only apparent antimutators, as described for the mud mutation above.
E. coli antimutators with increased DNA replication fidelity:
In view of the possibility that in E. coli multiple, parallel pathways might be contributing to spontaneous mutations, ![]()
Antimutators in the DNA replication pathway were obtained as suppressors of the high mutability of a mismatch-repair-defective mutL strain, using a papillation assay on MacConkeyGal plates (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
To see if the dnaE alleles also conferred an antimutagenic effect in the mismatch-repair-proficient mutL+ background, the alleles were transferred into a wild-type background. Careful measurement of mutant frequencies revealed an approximate twofold reduction in rifampicin-resistant mutants or forward lacI mutants (![]()
![]()
![]()
Importantly, these studies identify that the spontaneous transversion mutations result from DNA replication errors. Conversely, the spontaneous transitions (mostly G ·C
A·T) must be argued to arise from a different source, e.g., DNA damage-related events, such as cytosine deamination, alkylguanine, oxidative damages, etc. The lack of antimutator effect for the transition mutations does not result from the inability of the antimutator alleles to reduce these types of errors, because transitions are effectively reduced in a mismatch-repair-defective background (![]()
![]()
![]()
One important qualification to our conclusions relates to the possibility that the dnaE antimutator alleles not only reduce normal DNA replication errors but also reduce mutations at DNA lesions. This is currently being investigated. Results obtained so far suggest that the dnaE antimutator alleles are effective in reducing mutations in mutT backgrounds, i.e., they prevent Atemplate·(8-oxodGTP) mispairings (![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
In addition to probing the sources of spontaneous mutations, the dnaE antimutators may also be useful for understanding the mechanisms of DNA replication fidelity in E. coli. Data from our laboratory (J.-Y. MO and R. SCHAAPER, unpublished results) measuring the insertion fidelity of purified
subunit from wild-type and the dnaE911 antimutator polymerase indicate that there is no difference between the two polymerases in base insertion fidelity. Thus, the antimutator effect is likely to be exerted in a indirect manner. For example, as in the case of the T4 antimutators, the efficiency of the proofreading step may be enhanced because of impaired extension from mismatched primer termini. However, in addition to this mechanism, an additional pathway must also operate, because we observed that the dnaE antimutator alleles are also highly effective in reducing the mutation rate in proofreading-defective mutD5 and dnaQ926 strains (![]()
![]()
Perspectives:
The approach described above for gaining insight into spontaneous mutagenesis through pathway-specific antimutators can be readily expanded. For example, whether unrepaired DNA uracils (resulting from cytosine deamination) contribute to the frequent occurrence of spontaneous G ·C
A·T transitions, which are not susceptible to dnaE antimutator effects (see above), may be addressed by isolating or creating mutants overexpressing the enzyme DNA uracil-glycosylase, followed by measurement of the effect of such mutations on spontaneous mutagenesis. As another example, the role of oxidative DNA damage in spontaneous mutagenesis could be investigated through mutants with reduced mutability by oxidative agents. Such analysis, using a collection of pathway-specific antimutator mutants, should provide a comprehensive picture of the pathways responsible for spontaneous mutagenesis in E. coli. It will be of interest to extend such analyses to cells growing under a variety of different conditions, including stationary phase in which mutations may arise by different combinations of pathways. Finally, this approach may provide an important paradigm for studies of spontaneous mutagenesis in other organisms.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
I thank D. GORDENIN and H. DRESSMAN for carefully reviewing the manuscript for this paper and for providing helpful suggestions.
| LITERATURE CITED |
|---|
CAPSON, T. L., J. A. PELISKA, B. F. KABOORD, M. W. FREY, and C. LIVELY et al., 1992 Kinetic characterization of the polymerase and exonuclease activities of the gene 43 protein of bacteriophage T4. Biochemistry 31:10984-10994[Medline].
CLAYTON, L. K., M. F. GOODMAN, E. W. BRANSCOMB, and D. J. GALAS, 1979 Error induction and correction by mutant and wild type T4 DNA polymerases: kinetic error discrimination mechanisms. J. Biol. Chem. 254:1902-1912
DRAKE, J. W., 1993 General antimutators are improbable. J. Mol. Biol. 229:8-13[Medline].
DRAKE, J. W., E. F. ALLEN, S. A. FORSBERG, R.-M. PREPARATA, and E. O. GREENING, 1969 Genetic control of mutation rates in bacteriophage T4. Nature 221:1128-1132[Medline].
FIJALKOWSKA, I. J. and R. M. SCHAAPER, 1993 Antimutator mutations in the a subunit of Escherichia coli DNA polymerase III: identification of the responsible mutations and alignment with other DNA polymerases. Genetics 134:1039-1044[Abstract].
FIJALKOWSKA, I. J. and R. M. SCHAAPER, 1995 Effects of Escherichia coli dnaE antimutator alleles in a proofreading-deficient mutD5 strain. J. Bacteriol. 177:5979-5986
FIJALKOWSKA, I. J. and R. M. SCHAAPER, 1996 Mutants in the Exo I motif of Escherichia coli dnaQ : defective proofreading and inviability due to error catastrophe. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93:2856-2861
FIJALKOWSKA, I. J., R. L. DUNN, and R. M. SCHAAPER, 1993 Mutants of Escherichia coli with increased fidelity of DNA replication. Genetics 134:1023-1030[Abstract].
FIJALKOWSKA, I. J., R. L. DUNN, and R. M. SCHAAPER, 1997 Genetic requirements and mutational specificity of the Escherichia coli SOS mutator activity. J. Bacteriol. 179:7435-7445
FOSTER, P. L., G. GUDMUNDSSON, J. M. TRIMARCHI, H. CAI, and M. F. GOODMAN, 1995 Proofreading-defective DNA polymerase II increases adaptive mutation in Escherichia coli. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92:7951-7955
GEIGER, J. R. and J. F. SPEYER, 1977 A conditional antimutator in E. coli.. Mol. Gen. Genet. 153:87-97[Medline].
HARRIS, R. S., H. J. BULL, and S. M. ROSENBERG, 1997 A direct role for DNA polymerase III in adaptive reversion of a frameshift mutation in Escherichia coli. Mutat. Res. 375:19-24[Medline].
KELMAN, Z. and M. O'DONNELL, 1995 DNA polymerase III holoenzyme: structure and function of a chromosomal replicating machine. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 64:171-200[Medline].
KUNKEL, T. A., R. M. SCHAAPER, R. A. BECKMAN, and L. A. LOEB, 1981 On the fidelity of DNA replication: effect of the next nucleotide on proofreading. J. Biol. Chem. 256:9883-9889
LYONS, S. M., J. F. SPEYER, and P. F. SCHENDEL, 1985 Interaction of an antimutator gene with DNA repair pathways in Escherichia coli K12. Mol. Gen. Genet. 198:336-347[Medline].
MUZYCZKA, N., R. L. POLAND, and M. J. BESSMAN, 1972 Studies on the biochemical basis of spontaneous mutation. I. A comparison of the deoxyribonucleic acid polymerases of mutator, antimutator, and wild type strains of bacteriophage T4. J. Biol. Chem. 247:7116-7122
OLLER, A. R. and R. M. SCHAAPER, 1994 Spontaneous mutation in Escherichia coli containing the dnaE911 DNA polymerase antimutator allele. Genetics 138:263-270[Abstract].
PAVLOV, Y. I., V. V. SUSLOV, P. V. SHCHERBAKOVA, T. A. KUNKEL, and A. ONO et al., 1996 Base analog N6-hydroxylaminopurine mutagenesis in Escherichia coli : genetic control and molecular specificity. Mutat. Res. 357:1-15[Medline].
QUIÑONES, A. and R. PIECHOCKI, 1985 Isolation and characterization of Escherichia coli antimutators: a new strategy to study the nature and origin of spontaneous mutations. Mol. Gen. Genet. 201:315-322[Medline].
REHA-KRANTZ, L. J., 1988 Amino acid changes coded by bacteriophage T4 DNA polymerase mutator mutants: relating structure to function. J. Mol. Biol. 202:711-724[Medline].
REHA-KRANTZ, L. J., 1995 Learning about DNA polymerase function by studying antimutator DNA polymerases. Trends Biochem. Sci. 20:136-140[Medline].
REHA-KRANTZ, L. J. and R. L. NONAY, 1994 Motif A of bacteriophage T4 DNA polymerase: role in primer extension and DNA replication fidelity. Isolation of new antimutator and mutator DNA polymerases. J. Biol. Chem. 269:5635-5643
RIPLEY, L. S., 1975 Transversion mutagenesis in bacteriophage T4. Mol. Gen. Genet. 141:23-40[Medline].
RIPLEY, L. S. and N. B. SHOEMAKER, 1983 A major role for bacteriophage T4 DNA polymerase in frameshift mutagenesis. Genetics 103:353-366
RIPLEY, L. S., B. W. GLICKMAN, and N. B. SHOEMAKER, 1983 Mutator versus antimutator activity of a T4 DNA polymerase mutant distinguishes two different frameshifting mechanisms. Mol. Gen. Genet. 189:113-117[Medline].
SANTOS, M. E. and J. W. DRAKE, 1994 Rates of spontaneous mutation in bacteriophage T4 are independent of host fidelity determinants. Genetics 138:553-564[Abstract].
SCHAAPER, R. M., 1993a Base selection, proofreading and mismatch repair during DNA replication in Escherichia coli. J. Biol. Chem. 268:23762-23765
SCHAAPER, R. M., 1993b The mutational specificity of two Escherichia coli dnaE antimutator alleles as determined from lacI mutation spectra. Genetics 134:1031-1038[Abstract].
SCHAAPER, R. M., 1996 Suppressors of Escherichia coli mutT : antimutators for DNA replication errors. Mutat. Res. 350:17-23[Medline].
SCHAAPER, R. M. and R. L. DUNN, 1991 Spontaneous mutation in the Escherichia coli lacI gene. Genetics 129:317-326[Abstract].
SCHAAPER, R. M. and R. L. DUNN, 1997 Effect of E. coli dnaE antimutator mutants on mutagenesis by the base analog N4-aminocytidine. Mutat. Res. in press.
SPACCIAPOLI, P. and N. G. NOSSAL, 1994a A single mutation in bacteriophage T4 DNA polymerase (A737V, tsL141) decreases its processivity as a polymerase and increases its processivity as a 3'
5' exonuclease. J. Biol. Chem. 269:438-446
SPACCIAPOLI, P. and N. G. NOSSAL, 1994b Interaction of DNA polymerase and DNA helicase within the bacteriophage T4 replication complex. Leading strand synthesis by the T4 DNA polymerase mutant A737V (tsL141) requires the T4 gene 59 helicase assembly protein. J. Biol. Chem. 269:447-455
SPEYER, J. F., 1965 Mutagenic DNA polymerase. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Comm. 21:6-8[Medline].
STOCKI, S. A., R. L. NONAY, and L. J. REHA-KRANTZ, 1995 Dynamics of bacteriophage T4 DNA polymerase function: identification of amino acid residues that affect switching between polymerase and 3'
5' exonuclease activities. J. Mol. Biol. 254:15-28[Medline].
WANG, J., A. K. M. A. SATTAR, C. C. WANG, J. D. KARAM, and W. H. KONIGSBERG et al., 1997 Crystal structure of a pol
family replication DNA polymerase from bacteriophage RB69. Cell 89:1087-1099[Medline].
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Lynch The Cellular, Developmental and Population-Genetic Determinants of Mutation-Rate Evolution Genetics, October 1, 2008; 180(2): 933 - 943. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Gawel, P. T. Pham, I. J. Fijalkowska, P. Jonczyk, and R. M. Schaaper Role of Accessory DNA Polymerases in DNA Replication in Escherichia coli: Analysis of the dnaX36 Mutator Mutant J. Bacteriol., March 1, 2008; 190(5): 1730 - 1742. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. J. Gerrish, A. Colato, A. S. Perelson, and P. D. Sniegowski Complete genetic linkage can subvert natural selection PNAS, April 10, 2007; 104(15): 6266 - 6271. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. K. Pfeiffer and K. Kirkegaard A single mutation in poliovirus RNA-dependent RNA polymerase confers resistance to mutagenic nucleotide analogs via increased fidelity PNAS, June 10, 2003; 100(12): 7289 - 7294. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
- THIS ARTICLE
-
Abstract
- Full Text (PDF)
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Schaaper, R. M.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Schaaper, R. M.



