Genetics, Vol. 148, 743-752, February 1998, Copyright © 1998, Genetics Society of America

The tumorous-head-1 Locus Affects Bristle Number of the Drosophila melanogaster Cuticle

G. Packerta and D. T. Kuhna
a Department of Biology, University of Central Florida, Orlando, Florida 32816-0990

Corresponding author: G. Packert, School of Natural and Health Sciences, Barry University, 11300 Northeastern Second Avenue, Miami Shores, FL 33161-6695.

Communicating Editor: V. G. FINNERTY


*  ABSTRACT
*TOP
*ABSTRACT
*MATERIALS AND METHODS
*RESULTS
*DISCUSSION
*LITERATURE CITED

The tuh-1 maternal effect locus contains two naturally occurring isoalleles, tuh-1h and tuh-1g. Until recently there has been no possibility to distinguish between the tuh-1h and the tuh-1g maternal effects other than evaluating their effect on the Bithorax-Complex (BX-C) Abdominal B (Abd-B) mutant tuh-3. However, in this report we identify a bristle phenotype associated with the tuh-1 locus that has very interesting evolutionary implications. Females homozygous for tuh-1h always produce adult offspring with more bristles than females homozygous or heterozygous for tuh-1g. The effect is global. Increased bristle number occurs in the head, the thorax, and the anterior and posterior abdomen. Females totally deficient for the tuh-1 gene produce offspring with high bristle number. Thus, the bristle phenotype results from the absence of the maternally contributed tuh-1g factor. Genetic evidence shows that the bristle phenotype is caused by the tuh-1 locus and that tuh-1h is completely recessive to tuh-1g. The tuh-1 locus is located at the euchromatin-ß-heterochromatin junction near the centromere of the X chromosome and deficiency analysis places the locus between the lethal genes extra organs (eo) and lethal B20 (lB20). The variance in bristle number attributable to the tuh-1 locus in nature is approximately 10.1%, an indication that the bristle phenotype is most likely a neutral, pleiotrophic side effect of tuh-1.


T UMOROUS-HEAD-1 (tuh-1) is a maternal effect locus with two isoalleles, tuh-1h and tuh-1g (GARDNER and WOOLF 1949 Down). tuh-1 interacts with the tuh-3 gene located in the distal Bithorax-Complex (BX-C). In the presence of the tuh-1h maternal effect, homozygous and heterozygous tuh-3 flies show homeotic defects that transform portions of the eye, the antenna, and the rostralhaut regions into tergite, leg, and genital structures in the adult (POSTLETHWAIT et al. 1972 Down; KUHN et al. 1979 Down; KUHN and PACKERT 1988 Down). Penetrance of these head abnormalities is increased by subjecting embryos to high temperature during the first 24 hr of development (GARDNER and WOOLF 1950 Down). A different phenotype can be observed in the presence of the tuh-1g maternal effect allele. Flies homozygous for the tuh-3 mutation now show genital disc defects resulting in undeveloped testes in males and missing or abnormal external genitalia in males and females (WOOLF 1960 Down, WOOLF 1966 Down, WOOLF 1968B Down; KUHN et al. 1981 Down).

Until recently, no phenotype could be attributed to the non-essential tuh-1 locus and the only possible way to distinguish the two isoalleles was based on their interaction with the tuh-3 mutation. However, during an extensive genetic study of tuh-1, an increase in bristle number was noted on abdomens of offspring from females homozygous for the tuh-1h maternal effect (PACKERT 1995 Down).

This study evaluates (1) the effect the maternal effects exert on the bristle number on the abdomen, the thorax, and the head of the fly and (2) the effects of temperature on bristle number and the developmental rate of Drosophila.


*  MATERIALS AND METHODS
*TOP
*ABSTRACT
*MATERIALS AND METHODS
*RESULTS
*DISCUSSION
*LITERATURE CITED

Drosophila stocks:
(1) v tuh-1h/Y;+;+, has an attached X chromosome carrying the tuh-1h allele, the recessive mutant marker gene vermilion (v) and is homozygous for the Canton-S 2nd and 3rd chromosomes. (2) FMA3 y 2/Y;+;+, has an attached X chromosome carrying the tuh-1g allele and the recessive mutant yellow (y 2) and is homozygous for the Canton-S 2nd and 3rd chromosomes. (3) y+Y mal 106 is a Y chromosome carrying sections of the base of the X chromosome (regions 19 and 20) and the yellow locus (y+). (4) FM6;+;+, carries an X-chromosome balancer containing multiple inversions, the dominant Bar mutation and tuh-1g and is homozygous for the Canton-S 2nd and 3rd chromosomes. (5) Df GA37;+;+ is deficient for polytene chromosome bands 19E2 to 19F5-6 and homozygous for the Canton-S 2nd and 3rd chromosomes. (6) Df JC4;+;+ is deficient for bands 20A1 to 20E-F and homozygous for the Canton-S 2nd and 3rd chromosomes. (7) Canton-S is a wild-type strain homozygous for tuh-1g. (8) Amherst-56 is a tuh-1g strain used as the background strain for many of the X chromosome deficiencies described above. (9) tuh-1h;+;+ is a wild-type strain homozygous for tuh-1h and homozygous for the Canton-S 2nd and 3rd chromosomes. (10) Oregon-R is a wild-type strain homozygous for tuh-1h. (12) v tuh-1h/Y;I127B and FMA3 y 2/Y; I127B carry a mutant within the BX-C Abdominal-B (Abd-B) gene. (13) Miami are wild type females collected from Miami Shores, Florida, May 1997. Drosophila strains listed are described further in LINDSEY and ZIMM 1992 Down and MIKLOS et al. 1987 Down.

Stock maintenance:
Fly strains were raised at room temperature (RT) on standard Drosophila medium consisting of agar, cornmeal, yeast extract, sucrose, and dextrose (LEWIS 1960 Down). To inhibit fungal growth, proprionic and phosphoric acid were added.

Temperature studies:
For the temperature studies flies were raised at 18° or at 25° on standard Drosophila medium.

Preparation of abdomens:
Abdomens were dissected free from the thorax in water, cut along the dorsal midline, internal soft tissue was removed, the cuticle flattened, and mounted in a drop of Hoyer's mounting medium following the procedure of KUHN and PACKERT 1988 Down. Heads were dissected; the occipital region was removed and mounted in a drop of Hoyer's mounting medium. Wings were mounted in a drop of Hoyer's mounting medium.

Statistical analyses:
Confidence limits of population means were determined by using the formula for the standard error of the mean {sigma} 2/n. An Analysis of Variance, completely randomized design - Model 1 parametric test was performed on bristle number on tergite 7 of Drosophila (WOOLF 1968A Down). The phenotypic variance of bristle number was partitioned into its genotypic and environmental components (FALCONER 1981 Down).


*  RESULTS
*TOP
*ABSTRACT
*MATERIALS AND METHODS
*RESULTS
*DISCUSSION
*LITERATURE CITED

The number of bristles on the posterior abdomen increase in the presence of the tuh-1h maternal effect:
During a genetic analysis of the tuh-1 locus, an increase in bristle number was observed on abdomens of offspring from females carrying the tuh-1h maternal effect. Figure 1, A–G presents the average bristle number on tergite 7 of females derived from the following mothers: (A) v tuh-1h/Y, (B) tuh-1h/tuh-1h, (C) Oregon-R, (D) Canton-S, (E) FMA3 y 2/Y, (F) Amherst 56i, and (G) tuh-1h/FM6. The first three strains (A–C) are homozygous for tuh-1h, D through F are homozygous for tuh-1g and G is heterozygous for tuh-1g/tuh-1h. The results demonstrated a statistically significant increase in bristle number of all strains homozygous tuh-1h. The bristle number for offspring from tuh-1h/FM6 heterozygotes were similar to results obtained for offspring of tuh-1g homozygous mothers. Figure 1 gives the number of abdomens scored (n); mean bristle number () and the 95% confidence limits. The mean number of bristles on tergite 7 was significantly higher in all tuh-1h strains.



View larger version (23K):
In this window
In a new window
Download PPT slide
 
Figure 1. Analysis of bristle number on tergite 7 in females of various genetic backgrounds. (A) v tuh-1h/Y; (B) tuh-1h/tuh-1h; (C) Oregon-R; (D) Canton-S; (E) FMA3 y 2/Y; (F) Amherst 56i; (G) tuh-1h/FM6. n = sample size; = mean number of bristles ± 95% confidence limits. The maternal genotype is indicated. h denotes tuh-1h, g denotes tuh-1g.

To further evaluate the influence of the tuh-1 locus on bristle number, a series of crosses was designed utilizing the free-X tuh-1h chromosome and FM6. Figure 2 outlines the crosses for this study. The number of abdomens analyzed (n); the mean () and 95% confidence are shown in Figure 3 for all generations. The maternal and zygotic genotypes are also indicated for all generations.



View larger version (10K):
In this window
In a new window
Download PPT slide
 
Figure 2. Genetic crosses utilizing the tuh-1h and the tuh-1g isoalleles to evaluate the tuh-1 maternal effect. P = Parental strain, F1 = first generation, F2A through F2C designate F2 generation, F3A through F3G designate F3 generation. 1h denotes tuh-1h, FM6 carries tuh-1g. For each cross females are given on the left, males on the right. Only female offspring were analyzed.



View larger version (42K):
In this window
In a new window
Download PPT slide
 
Figure 3. Analysis of bristle number on tergite 7 in females through 3 generations. See Figure 2 for crosses. P = parental strain, F1 = first generation, F2A through F2C designate F2 generation, F3A through F3H designate F3 generation. n = sample size, = mean number of bristles ± 95% confidence limits. The maternal and the zygotic genotype are indicated. h denotes tuh-1h, g denotes tuh-1g.

Offspring from tuh-1h/tuh-1h homozygous females showed a statistically significant increase in the number of 7th tergite bristles in comparison to offspring from tuh-1g/tuh-1h heterozygous females. The results presented in Figure 3 show that the parental stock (P) and the F1 generation both have a high bristle number even though the parental stock is homozygous for tuh-1h, and the F1 generation is heterozygous for tuh-1h/tuh-1g. These findings indicate that the maternal genotype was responsible for the high bristle number in the F1 generation. The F2 results show that offspring from mothers carrying the tuh-1g maternal effect allele have a reduction in bristle number, regardless whether their offspring are heterozygous tuh-1h/tuh-1g or homozygous tuh-1h/tuh-1h.

The F3A and F3B offspring in Figure 3 were produced by mothers homozygous for tuh-1h who showed low bristle numbers (F2A). All their offspring (F3A and F3B) showed high bristle numbers. The F2B and F2C females (heterozygous for tuh-1h/tuh-1g) produced the F3C-F3H offspring. All of their offspring have a low bristle number, regardless of their being tuh-1h/tuh-1h (F3D, F3F) or tuh-1h/tuh-1g (F3C, F3E, F3G, F3H).

Extensive genetic analysis as well as a deficiency analysis mapped tuh-1 between lethal B20 (lB20) and extra organs (eo) at the base of the X chromosome in salivary chromosome band 20A1 (PYATI 1976 Down; MIKLOS et al. 1988 Down; these data). Df GA37 and Df JC4 both uncover the tuh-1 locus. They are homozygous lethal and balanced over FM6. In the presence of the BX-C mutant tuh-3 their offspring show head defects (KUHN et al. 1993 Down). Thus, one would predict that offspring from deficiency heterozygous mothers should show the increased bristle number as seen in the presence of the tuh-1h allele.

Figure 4 outlines the genetic crosses utilizing Df JC4 and Figure 5 provides the results of the Df JC4 analysis, while Figure 6 summarizes the Df GA37 analysis. The Df JC4/FM6 stock females show a low bristle number (Figure 5, P generation) due to the presence of the tuh-1g maternal effect allele present in the FM6 chromosome. All their offspring show a low bristle number (Figure 5, Figure F1). The Df JC4/tuh-1h F1 mothers with low bristle number produce offspring that have high bristle number counts irrespective of their being Df JC4/tuh-1h or Df JC4/FM6 (Figure 5, Figure F2A and F2B). These data show that Df JC4 acts like tuh-1h. Note that the bristle number for Df JC4/FM6 (P) is significantly lower than the number for the F1 (Df JC4/tuh-1h). These results have been obtained consistently and we believe that these differences are probably not due to tuh-1 but may be due to the loss of ribosomal genes in Df JC4 having an additional suppressive effect on bristles number (FRANKHAM et al. 1980 Down).



View larger version (12K):
In this window
In a new window
Download PPT slide
 
Figure 4. Genetic crosses utilizing Df JC4 to evaluate the tuh-1 maternal effect. P = parental strain, F1 = first generation, F2A and F2B designate F2 generation, F3A through F3D designate F3 generation. 1h denotes tuh-1h, FM6 carries tuh-1g. For each cross females are given on the left, males on the right. Only female offspring were analyzed.



View larger version (26K):
In this window
In a new window
Download PPT slide
 
Figure 5. Analysis of bristle number on tergite 7 in females utilizing Df JC4 to evaluate the tuh-1 maternal effect. See Figure 4 for crosses. P = parental strain, F1 = first generation, F2A and F2B designate F2 generation, F3A through F3D designate F3 generation. n = sample size, = mean number of bristles ± 95% confidence limits. Df denotes Df JC4, h denotes tuh-1h, g denotes tuh-1g, * indicates tuh-1h or Df JC4.



View larger version (28K):
In this window
In a new window
Download PPT slide
 
Figure 6. Analysis of bristle number on tergite 7 in females utilizing Df GA37 to evaluate the tuh-1 maternal effect. See Figure 4 for crosses. P = parental strain, F1 = first generation, F2A and F2B designate F2 generation, F3A through F3D designate F3 generation. n = sample size, = mean number of bristles ± 95% confidence limits. Df denotes Df GA37, h denotes tuh-1h, g denotes tuh-1g, * indicates tuh-1h or Df GA37.

Offspring designated F3A and F3B in Figure 5 are offspring from females of the genotype tuh-1h/tuh-1h or the genotype Df JC4/tuh-1h (F2A), and once again show high bristle numbers, while offspring designated F3C and F3D are offspring from females heterozygous Df JC4/FM6 or tuh-1h/FM6 (F2B) and show lower bristle numbers. This is expected of mothers hemizygous or heterozygous for tuh-1g. Although the differences are not significant, there is a tendency for F3 females to have more bristles if their fathers are tuh-1h/Y rather than tuh-1g/Y. This tendency was shown in Figure 5 where the tuh-1h/Y fathers (F2A) yielded offspring with higher bristle number than offspring from tuh-1g/Y fathers (F2B). Because the deficiencies and the free-X tuh-1h maternal effect chromosome carry no additional markers it was not possible in these crosses to determine homozygous tuh-1h females from females of the genotype Df JC4/tuh-1h.

The results of the Df GA37 analysis are shown in Figure 6. Df GA37 was substituted for Df JC4. The crosses are not shown since they were the same as outlined for Df JC4 (Figure 4). Figure 6 presents the statistical comparison between the P, F1, F2, and F3 generation females. The Df GA37/FM6 strain shows a low bristle number due to the presence of the tuh-1g maternal effect allele present in the FM6 chromosome. Df GA37/tuh-1h F1 mothers with low bristle number produce offspring with high bristle numbers irrespective of their being Df GA37/tuh-1h or Df GA37/FM6 (F2A and F2B).

Offspring designated F3A and F3B in Figure 6 are offspring from mothers either homozygous tuh-1h/tuh-1h or heterozygous Df GA37/tuh-1h (F2A). These offspring show a high bristle number in comparison to offspring designated F3C and F3D from mothers heterozygous tuh-1h/FM6 or Df GA37/FM6 (F2B). As in the Df JC4 analysis, there was a tendency for higher bristle numbers when the father was tuh-1h/Y.

In the final series of crosses, Df GA37/Df JC4 females were tested (Figure 7). Deficiency heterozygotes are viable and fertile but do not carry any genetic markers that would allow a distinction among themselves and tuh-1h females in the F2 and F3 generations. To construct a deficiency strain, Df JC4/FM6 females were crossed to Df GA37/y+Ymal106 males. Once again the P (Df JC4/FM6) and the F1 (Df JC4/Df GA37) generation show a low bristle number as expected since in each case their mothers were hemizygous for the tuh-1g maternal effect allele (Figure 7). Note the extremely low bristle number for the Df JC4/FM6 female parents. The F1 Df GA37/Df JC4 females are deficient for tuh-1 and their offspring (F2A and F2B) show high bristle numbers. These results were expected since the Df GA37/Df JC4 F1 females should behave like tuh-1h homozygotes.



View larger version (32K):
In this window
In a new window
Download PPT slide
 
Figure 7. Analysis of bristle number on tergite 7 in females utilizing Df JC4 and Df GA37 to evaluate the tuh-1 maternal effect. P = parental strain, F1 = first generation, F2A and F2B designate F2 generation, F3A through F3E designate F3 generation. n = sample size, = mean number of bristles ± 95% confidence limits, Df denotes Df JC4 or Df GA37, h denotes tuh-1h, g denotes tuh-1g, * indicates tuh-1h or Df JC4 or Df GA37.

Offspring designated F3A and F3B in Figure 7 are offspring from females of the genotype tuh-1h/tuh-1h or Df GA37/tuh-1h or Df JC4/tuh-1h (F2A) and show high bristle numbers. Offspring designated F3C, F3D, and F3E are offspring from females heterozygous tuh-1h/FM6 or Df GA37/FM6 or Df JC4/FM6 (F2B) and show low bristle numbers, as expected of mothers hemi- or heterozygous for tuh-1g. These data demonstrate that offspring of females that are deficient for the tuh-1 locus behave like offspring of tuh-1h homozygous females. As in the previous studies, there was a tendency of higher bristle number in the presence of tuh-1h/Y males. However, there was one exception (Figure 7) where tuh-1h/Y fathers (F3A) did not produce offspring with more bristles than offspring from tuh-1g fathers (F3B).

Evaluation of bristle number on the head, the wing blade, and anterior and posterior abdomen:
To determine whether the effect of the tuh-1 locus on bristle number is restricted to the posterior abdomen or has global effects influencing bristle number on the entire adult cuticle, an additional study was initiated. Two attached X chromosomes, v tuh-1h/Y and FMA3 y 2/Y (tuh-1g maternal effect) were utilized in this study. Both strains were homozygous for the Canton-S 2nd and 3rd chromosomes. The statistical analysis is presented in Figure 8. The results clearly demonstrate that T7, T3, and the occipital bristles (posterior head) are dramatically increased among offspring from v tuh-1h/Y mothers when compared to offspring from the FMA3 y 2/Y mothers. Although the tendency is in the same direction for the wing blade, the differences were not statistically significant.



View larger version (25K):
In this window
In a new window
Download PPT slide
 
Figure 8. Evaluation of bristle number on anterior and posterior abdomen, head and wing blade. n = sample size, = mean number of bristles ± 95% confidence limits. h denotes tuh-1h, g denotes tuh-1g.

Effect of temperature on the tuh-1 bristle phenotype:
Studies to determine the frequency of tuh-1h and tuh-1g alleles in wild-type populations showed an increase of tuh-1h in colder climates (JOHNSON and GARDNER 1965 Down). It is therefore of interest to determine the effect temperature has on bristle numbers of tuh-1h/tuh-1h homozygotes and tuh-1g/tuh-1g homozygotes. Two fly strains, v tuh-1h/Y;I127B and FMA3 y 2/Y;I127B were utilized in this study. For each strain, stocks were maintained at 18° and 25°. Adult females were collected at random and bristle number on tergite 7 was determined. At 18° tuh-1h homozygotes possess significantly more bristles on tergite 7 than the tuh-1g homozygotes (data not shown). At 25° the difference in bristle number among the strains is still maintained although the tuh-1g homozygotes show a slight increase in bristle number when compared with homozygotes raised at 18° (data not shown).

Effect of temperature and tuh-1 on Drosophila development:
During the course of this study it became apparent that flies homozygous or hemizygous for tuh-1h developed faster than flies hetero- or homozygous for tuh-1g. To test this observation eggs were collected from v tuh-1h/Y, tuh-1h/tuh-1h, FMA3 y 2/Y and Canton-S females and placed at 18° and RT. Bottles were examined daily for larval activity. At RT larval activity was observed beginning on day 2 in all bottles. Pupae were visible on day 6 and on day 11 flies began to emerge and continued to emerge to day 13. No differences were observed among the four fly strains. In the bottles maintained at 18° larval activity was observed on day 2 in all bottles. Pupal cases appeared on day 8 and 9 in the v tuh-1h/Y and tuh-1h/tuh-1h bottles and on days 12 and 13 in the Canton-S and the FMA3 y 2/Y bottles. Adults started to emerge on day 18 in the v tuh-1h/Y and tuh-1h/tuh-1h bottles and by day 21 all flies had emerged. In the Canton-S and the FMA3 y 2/Y bottles flies slowly started to emerge on day 20 and continued to emerge until day 24. While there was no significant difference in developmental time among the four strains at RT, the tuh-1h strains developed faster at 18°.

Variance of bristle number on tergite 7 in females attributable to the tuh-1 locus in the wild:
The phenotypic variance (VP) for the tuh-1h laboratory strain was calculated as 12.66. The mean for tergite 7 bristles was 56 and the standard deviation was 3.55. At Miami Shores 17 adult females were trapped and analyzed for tergite 7 bristles. The VP was calculated as 1.14. The mean number of tergite 7 bristles was 43 and the standard deviation was 2.3. The genotypic and environmental components of the variance were determined (FALCONER 1981 Down). The results showed that 10.1% of the genetic variance for the bristle phenotype can be attributed to the tuh-1 locus in the wild.


*  DISCUSSION
*TOP
*ABSTRACT
*MATERIALS AND METHODS
*RESULTS
*DISCUSSION
*LITERATURE CITED

The goal of this study was to identify an observable phenotype for the two isoalleles at the tuh-1 locus. Originally the tuh-1 locus was identified as a modifier locus affecting expression of the tuh-3 mutant gene at the BX-C (GARDNER and WOOLF 1950 Down; WOOLF 1966 Down; KUHN et al. 1981 Down; KUHN and PACKERT 1988 Down; KUHN et al. 1993 Down). tuh-1h/tuh-1h; tuh-3/tuh-3 females produce offspring with head defects, while tuh-1g/tuh-1g or tuh-1h/tuh-1g; tuh-3/tuh-3 females produce offspring showing genital disc defects (WOOLF 1966 Down; KUHN et al. 1981 Down). Here we have shown that the two isoalleles at the tuh-1 locus have a spectrum of allelic effects that are totally independent of the BX-C mutant tuh-3.

The tuh-1h maternal effect causes an increase in bristle number on the adult cuticle:
All Drosophila strains homozygous for tuh-1h show an increase in bristle number as compared to flies from strains homozygous for tuh-1g. Backcross data collected over a three generation period supported the above results demonstrating that (1) bristle number is increased in the presence of the tuh-1h maternal effect; (2) the tuh-1h maternal effect allele is completely recessive to tuh-1g; and (3) the tuh-1 maternal effects are temperature sensitive, with respect to developmental time.

Two deficiencies, Df GA37 and Df JC4 have been shown to behave genetically like tuh-1h in the presence of tuh-3 (KUHN et al. 1993 Down). Offspring from hemizygous mothers, Df/tuh-1h showed the high bristle number, while offspring from mothers hemizygous for tuh-1g, Df/FM6, consistently showed the lower bristle number. The data suggest that both deficiencies behave like tuh-1h. These results are in accordance with a genetic analysis of the deficiencies in the presence of tuh-3. Offspring from flies hemizygous for either deficiency showed head defects in the presence of the tuh-1h maternal effect allele (D. T. KUHN, unpublished data). Females Df GA37/Df JC4 are homozygous viable, fertile and behave genetically like females homozygous for the tuh-1h allele in the presence of tuh-3. Offspring from females Df GA37/Df JC4 have a high bristle number. These results also suggest that tuh-1h is either a hypomorph or an amorph of tuh-1g. Further analysis of the bristle phenotype showed that the elevated bristle number in offspring from tuh-1h/tuh-1h mothers was not confined to the posterior abdomen. A significantly higher number of bristles were observed on the occipital region of the head and the anterior abdomen. The same trend was not present in the wing blade. However, some bristle patterns have been highly conserved during evolutionary time and it is possible that this is true for bristle number on the wing blade. On the other hand, it is also possible that tuh-1 does not influence the wing. The former explanation is currently favored since the BX-C Ultrabithorax (Ubx) mutant phenotype is extreme in the presence of tuh-1g, yet in the presence of the tuh-1h maternal effect the mutant phenotype is partially rescued, as are other BX-C regulatory mutants. (G. PACKERT and D. T. KUHN, unpublished data).

Bristle number on the adult cuticle of Drosophila is a quantitative trait that has been studied extensively (ROBERTSON 1967 Down; SHRIMPTON and ROBERTSON 1988A Down, SHRIMPTON and ROBERTSON 1988B Down; FALCONER 1981 Down; SLATKIN and FRANK 1990 Down; BARTON 1990 Down; LONG et al. 1995 Down; MACKAY 1996 Down). The ultimate goal of many of these studies was to identify loci responsible for quantitative variations, to determine how newly arising mutations in these loci affect bristle number, to determine the consequences of pleiotrophy and stabilizing selection on quantitative trait loci (QTLs), and to determine long-term as well as short-term selection responses. The studies generally were based on evaluations of highly selected laboratory strains. They were intended to determine relationships between genetic variations of quantitative traits relative to fitness, or to test effects of natural selection on quantitative traits. In this study none of the stock cultures were selected at any time and yet offspring from females homozygous for tuh-1h consistently showed a higher bristle number. The phenotype was independent of the genetic background, suggesting that it can be attributed to the presence of the two naturally occurring isoalleles of tuh-1 rather than newly arising mutations.

A large number of genes responsible for the proper spacing and morphogenetic development of bristles on the Drosophila cuticle have been isolated and characterized at the molecular level. Alleles of bobbed (bb) (FRANKHAM et al. 1980 Down), scute (sc) (YOO 1980 Down), scabrous (sca) (MLODZIK et al. 1990 Down), Delta (Dl) (PARKS and MUSKAVITCH 1993 Down) and insertional mutations in the achete-scute region (MACKAY and LANGLEY 1990 Down) have all been associated with quantitative variation in abdominal bristle number. Mutations at these loci all have pleiotrophic effects involving various developmental pathways. sca also effects eye morphogenesis (MLODZIK et al. 1990 Down) and more recently, LAI et al. 1994 Down showed that variation in bristle number was correlated to DNA sequence polymorphism at the sca locus. GRABA et al. 1992 Down speculate that direct interactions of BX-C genes with cis-acting elements in sca negatively regulate this gene. Interestingly, like homozygotes deficient for tuh-1, the sca homozygotes and deficiencies are viable and fertile with no apparent abnormal phenotype. Dl is a neurogenic locus that effects viability and development of adult bristles and is also expressed during oogenesis. Temperature studies utilizing Dl mutations showed that the phenocritical periods for the development of bristles are during third instar and puparium formation (PARKS and MUSKAVITCH 1993 Down).

It is not clear how tuh-1 interacts with tuh-3 to cause head defects or genital disc defects nor how it affects bristle number. Since tuh-1 is a maternal effect locus it is difficult to envision a direct role for tuh-1 in specification of a morphogenetic trait or neurogenesis. Because of the appearance of head defects and an increase in bristle number in the presence of tuh-1h, the recessive isoallele, it could be envisioned that tuh-1 negatively effects transcription of BX-C genes by interacting with genes that affect the assembly of chromatin complexes. This theory requires the assumption that a functional product is only produced by tuh-1g.

Temperature influences the tuh-1 bristle phenotype:
Quantitative traits, such as bristle number on the adult cuticle, are often influenced by environmental factors. CALIGARI and MATHER 1975 Down showed that chromosome 3 carried many modifiers for sternopleural bristle number. However, chromosome 2 had the greatest influence upon the response to temperature shifts. In another study SCHNEE and THOMPSON 1984 Down showed that genes that determine the response to one temperature are not always linked to genes that determine the response to another temperature. In their study chromosome 3 had the largest effect on mean sternopleural bristle number and also carried genes responding to 18° and 25°, while at 29° chromosome 2 was the most important.

Our results demonstrated that the tuh-1 maternal effect gene influences bristle number on the adult cuticle. The phenotype is temperature sensitive and the biggest mean for bristle number on the 7th tergite in females is obtained in the presence of the tuh-1h maternal effect at 18°. However, in contrast to the two studies cited previously, in our case, both the increase in bristle number and the temperature effect are due to the tuh-1 maternal effect, since the 2nd and 3rd chromosomes of the strains tested were identical.

The ability of a species to adapt to a change in environment is often determined by its ability to maintain flexible control of its phenotype. Temperature dependent expression of polygenic loci may be an important tool in maintaining genetic variability. JOHNSON and GARDNER 1965 Down demonstrated that the gene frequency for the tuh-1h allele is favored at lower temperatures in natural populations and that a balanced polymorphism exists between the two isoalleles. The tuh-1 locus therefore appears to be a prime candidate for a locus that plays an important role in interactions between genotype and environment. These implications are manifested further by the observation presented here that flies homozygous for the tuh-1h maternal effect allele develop to adulthood significantly faster at 18° than flies heterozygous or homozygous for the tuh-1g allele. These results suggest a selective advantage for tuh-1h in colder climates and fit well with the observations by JOHNSON and GARDNER 1965 Down that there is an increase in the presence of the tuh-1h allele in wild-type populations as seasons progress and at higher latitudes. Further, we know from this study that only 10.1% of the genetic variance for the bristle phenotype can be attributed to the tuh-1 locus suggesting that the bristle phenotype has only a minor effect on the maintenance of this polymorphism and may just be a neutral but pleiotrophic side effect of tuh-1.

GARDNER and WOOLF 1950 Down have shown that in the presence of tuh-1h the expression of the tuh-3 phenotype increases progressively when temperature is increased from 18° to 30° while viability decreases considerably. Accumulation of BX-C transcripts are elevated in embryos produced by tuh-1h; tuh-3 homozygous mothers (MACK 1994 Down; KUHN et al. 1993 Down). One could envision a selective advantage for increased transcription in colder climates. In this sense, tuh-1h should have a selective advantage.


*  ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank CHARLES M. WOOLF for many insightful conversations and WELCOME BENDER for his encouragement throughout the work. We are also indebted to the anonymous reviewers, whose comments have resulted in a much improved paper. Support was provided by National Science Foundation research grants RUI DMB-9023293 and MCB-9418119 to D.T.K.

Manuscript received December 12, 1996; Accepted for publication October 15, 1997.


*  LITERATURE CITED
*TOP
*ABSTRACT
*MATERIALS AND METHODS
*RESULTS
*DISCUSSION
*LITERATURE CITED

BARTON, N. H., 1990  Pleiotrophic models of quantitative variation. Genetics 124:773-782[Abstract].

CALIGARI, D. D. S. and K. MATHER, 1975  Genotype-environment interaction. III. Interactions in Drosophila melanogaster.. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci. 191:387-411[Medline].

FALCONER, D. S., 1981 Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. Longman Group, London.

FRANKHAM, R. D., A. BRISCOE, and R. K. NURTHEN, 1980  Unequal crossing over at the rRNA tandem as a source of quantitative genetic variation in Drosophila. Genetics 95:727-742[Abstract/Free Full Text].

GARDNER, E. J. and C. M. WOOLF, 1949  A maternal effect involved in the inheritance of abnormal growths in the head region of Drosophila melanogaster.. Genetics 34:573-585[Free Full Text].

GARDNER, E. J. and C. M. WOOLF, 1950  The influence of high and low temperatures on the expression of tumorous head in Drosophila melanogaster.. Genetics 35:44-55[Free Full Text].

GRABA, Y. D., P. ARAGNOL, V. LAURENTI, D. GARZINO, and H. CHARMOT et al., 1992  Homeotic control in Drosophila; the scabrous gene is an in vivo target of Ultrabithorax proteins. EMBO J. 11:3375-3384[Medline].

JOHNSON, G. R. and E. J. GARDNER, 1965  Alleles tu-1 and tu-1+ in natural and experimental populations of Drosophila melanogaster.. Genetics 54:149-156.

KUHN, D. T., B. ZUST, and K. ILLMENSEE, 1979  Autonomous differentiation of the tumorous-head phenotype in Drosophila melanogaster.. Mol. Gen. Genet. 160:117-124.

KUHN, D. T., D. F. WOOD, and D. J. ANDREWS, 1981  Deletion analysis of the tumorous-head (tuh-3) gene in Drosophila melanogaster.. Genetics 99:99-107[Abstract/Free Full Text].

KUHN, D. T. and G. PACKERT, 1988  Tumorous-head type mutants of the distal bithorax complex cause dominant gain and recessive loss of function in Drosophila melanogaster.. Dev. Biol. 125:8-18[Medline].

KUHN, D. T., J. A. MACK, C. DUAN, and G. PACKERT, 1993  Tumorous-head (tuh-1;tuh-3) modulates Abd-B Bithorax-Complex functions in Drosophila melanogaster.. Genetics 133:593-604[Abstract].

LAI, C., R. F. LYMAN, A. D. LONG, C. H. LANGLEY, and T. F. C. MACKAY, 1994  Naturally occurring variation in bristle number and DNA polymorphisms at the scabrous locus of Drosophila melanogaster.. Science 266:1697-1702[Abstract/Free Full Text].

LEWIS, E. B., 1960  A new standard food medium. Dros. Inf. Serv. 34:117-118.

LINDSEY, D. L., and G. G. ZIMM, 1992 The Genome of Drosophila melanogaster. Academic Press, New York.

LONG, A. D., S. L. MULLANEY, L. A. REID, J. D. FRY, and C. H. LANGLEY et al., 1995  High resolution mapping of genetic factors affecting abdominal bristle number in Drosophila melanogaster.. Genetics 139:1273-1291[Abstract].

MACK, J. A., 1994 The cloning and characterization of particular Abdominal-B mutants and their interactions with the tumorous head-1 maternal effect alleles. Doctoral Dissertation, University of South Florida, Tampa.

MACKAY, T. F. C. and C. H. LANGLEY, 1990  Molecular and phenotypic variation in the achete-scute region of Drosophila melanogaster.. Nature 348:64-66[Medline].

MACKAY, T. F. C., 1996  The nature of quantitative genetic variation revisited: lessons from Drosophila bristles. Bioessays 18:113-121[Medline].

MIKLOS, G. L. G., L. E. KELLY, P. E. COOMBE, C. LEEDS, and G. LEFEVRE, 1987  Localization of the genes shaking-B, small optic lobes, sluggish-A, stoned and stress-sensitive-C to a well defined region of the X-chromosome of Drosophila melanogaster.. J. Neurogent. 4:1-9.

MIKLOS, G. L. G., M. T. YAMAMOTO, J. DAVIES, and V. PIROTTA, 1988  Microcloning reveals a high frequency of repetitive sequences characteristic of chromosome 4 and the ß-heterochromatin of Drosophila melanogaster.. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 85:2051-2055[Abstract/Free Full Text].

MLODZIK, M., N. E. BAKER, and G. M. RUBIN, 1990  Isolation and expression of scabrous, a gene regulating neurogenesis in Drosophila. Genes Dev. 4:1848-1861[Abstract/Free Full Text].

PACKERT, G., 1995 A Molecular and Genetic Study of the Drosophila melanogaster tuh-1 gene. Doctoral Dissertation, University of South Florida, Tampa.

PARKS, A. L. and M. A. T. MUSKAVITCH, 1993  Delta function is required for bristle organ determination and morphogenesis in Drosophila. Dev. Biol. 157:484-496[Medline].

POSTLETHWAIT, J. H., P. J. BRYANT, and G. SCHUBIGER, 1972  The homeotic effect of "tumorous head" in Drosophila. Dev. Biol. 29:337-342[Medline].

PYATI, J., 1976  Cytological localization of the maternal effect gene tuh-1 in Drosophila melanogaster.. Mol. Gen. Genet. 146:189-190[Medline].

ROBERTSON, A., 1967 The nature of quantitative genetic variation, pp. 265–280 in Heritage from Mendel, edited by A. BRINK. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, WI.

SCHNEE, F. B. and J. N. THOMPSON, 1984  Conditional polygenic effects in the Sternopleural bristle system of Drosophila melanogaster.. Genetics 108:409-424[Abstract/Free Full Text].

SHRIMPTON, A. E. and A. ROBERTSON, 1988a  The isolation of polygenic factors controlling bristle score in Drosophila melanogaster. I. Allocation of third chromosome sternopleural bristle effects to chromosome selections. Genetics 118:445-459[Abstract/Free Full Text].

SHRIMPTON, A. E. and A. ROBERTSON, 1988b  The isolation of polygenic factors controlling bristle score in Drosophila melanogaster. II. Distribution of third chromosome bristle effects within chromosome sections. Genetics 118:445-459.

SLATKIN, M. and S. A. FRANK, 1990  The quantitative genetic consequences of pleiotrophy under stabilizing directional selection. Genetics 125:207-213[Abstract].

WOOLF, C. M., 1960  Male genital disc defect in Drosophila melanogaster.. Genetics 60:111-121.

WOOLF, C. M., 1966  Maternal effect influencing male genital disc development in Drosophila melanogaster.. Genetics 53:295-302[Free Full Text].

WOOLF, C. M., 1968a Completely randomized design, pp. 117–145 in Principles of Biometry. D. Van Nostrand, Princeton, NJ.

WOOLF, C. M., 1968b  Male genital disc defect in Drosophila melanogaster.. Genetics 60:111-121[Free Full Text].

YOO, B. H., 1980  Long-term selection for a quantitative character in large replicate populations of Drosophila melanogaster. I. Responses to selection. Genet. Res. 35:1-17.