- THIS ARTICLE
- Full Text (Rapid PDF)
-
All Versions of this Article:
genetics.107.077651v1
179/3/1389 most recent - Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
-
Author home page(s):
Manus Patten
David Haig
- Reprints & Permissions
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Patten, M.
- Articles by Haig, D.
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Patten, M.
- Articles by Haig, D.
doi:10.1534/genetics.107.077651
A more recent version of this article appeared on July 1, 2008.
REGULAR RESEARCH PAPERS |
Reciprocally imprinted genes and the response to selection on one sex
Manus Patten 1* and David Haig 1
1 Harvard University
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: mpatten{at}oeb.harvard.edu.
Submitted on June 14, 2007
Revised on August 16, 2007
Accepted on 31 March 2008
We explore the theoretical consequences of limiting selection to males for the evolution of imprinted genes. We find that the efficiency of male-limited selection depends on the pattern of imprinting at an imprinted locus. When selection is strong, the maternally expressed pattern of imprinting allows faster genetic change than the reciprocal, paternally expressed pattern. When selection is relatively weak, the pattern of imprinting that permits a greater rate of genetic response to selection depends on the frequency of the favored allele: the paternally expressed pattern permits faster genetic change than does the maternally expressed pattern at low frequencies of a favored allele; at higher frequencies of a favored allele, however, the maternally expressed pattern is again more conducive to a genetic response. To our knowledge, this is the first theoretical description of a difference between the two reciprocal patterns of imprinting. The selective efficiency bias we identify between the two patterns of imprinting has implications for natural and livestock populations, which we discuss.
Key Words: artifical selection, gametic effect, gametic imprinting, genomic imprinting, selection response