- THIS ARTICLE
- Full Text (PDF)
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Jamison, M. G.
- Articles by Hinkelmann, K.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Jamison, M. G.
- Articles by Hinkelmann, K.
DIALLEL ANALYSIS OF GROWTH TRAITS IN MICE
M. G. Jamison 1, J. M. White 1, W. E. Vinson 1, and K. Hinkelmann 1
1 Department of Dairy Science and Department of Statistics,
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia
24061
Two replications of a complete diallel cross experiment were
performed among four partially inbred lines of mice. These inbred lines originated
from a random-bred ICR strain and were produced by 12 generations of full
sibbing (F
92%). Individual body weight was recorded for each
animal at 12, 21, 42 and 56 days of age. Body weight gain traits were examined
for intervals 1221, 2142 and 4256 days. Simultaneous
least squares analyses of inbred and linecrossed groups were used. Sex differences
were highly significant for all traits. Replicate differences were significant
but made a small contribution to the total variation. Inbred lines differed
greatly. Crosses showed growth trends similar to their contemporary maternal
and paternal inbreds. Heterosis was highly significant for all traits except
21-day weight. Inbreds were heavier at 12 days of age, but linecrossed progeny
were superior to inbreds for all post-weaning weights. General combining ability
was highly significant for 12- and 56-day weights and 2142-day gain.
Specific combining ability was highly significant for 21-day weight, 1221-
and 4256-day gain. Significant maternal effects were found for all
individual weights but not for 1221- and 2142-day gain. Residual
reciprocal effects were significant for all traits. Estimated variances among
linecrossed groups contained a large maternal component, a fluctuating additive
genetic component and consistent non-additive genetic influence on all growth
parameters measured.
Revised on March 11, 1975
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. Reinhold Maternal Effects and the Evolution of Behavioral and Morphological Characters: A Literature Review Indicates the Importance of Extended Maternal Care J. Hered., November 1, 2002; 93(6): 400 - 405. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
