- THIS ARTICLE
- Full Text
- Full Text (PDF)
-
All Versions of this Article:
genetics.108.087817v1
179/3/1469 most recent - Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Star, B.
- Articles by Spencer, H. G.
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Star, B.
- Articles by Spencer, H. G.
Originally published as Genetics Published Articles Ahead of Print on June 18, 2008.
Genetics, Vol. 179, 1469-1478, July 2008, Copyright © 2008
doi:10.1534/genetics.108.087817
Evolution of Fitnesses in Structured Populations With Correlated Environments
Bastiaan Star1, Meredith V. Trotter and Hamish G. Spencer
Department of Zoology, Allan Wilson Centre for Molecular Ecology and Evolution, University of Otago, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand
1 Corresponding author: Allan Wilson Centre for Molecular Ecology and Evolution, Department of Zoology, University of Otago, 340 Great King St., P.O. Box 56, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand.
E-mail: bastiaanstar{at}hotmail.com
The outcome of selection in structured populations with spatially varying selection pressures depends on the interaction of two factors: the level of gene flow and the amount of heterogeneity among the demes. Here we investigate the effect of three different levels of spatial heterogeneity on the levels of genetic polymorphisms for different levels of gene flow, using a construction approach in which a population is constantly bombarded with new mutations. We further compare the relative importance of two kinds of balancing selection (heterozygote advantage and selection arising from spatial heterogeneity), the level of adaptation and the stability of the resulting polymorphic equilibria. The different levels of environmental heterogeneity and gene flow have a large influence on the final level of polymorphism. Both factors also influence the relative importance of the two kinds of balancing selection in the maintenance of variation. In particular, selection arising from spatial heterogeneity does not appear to be an important form of balancing selection for the most homogeneous scenario. The level of adaptation is highest for low levels of gene flow and, at those levels, remarkably similar for the different levels of spatial heterogeneity, whereas for higher levels of gene flow the level of adaptation is substantially reduced.