- THIS ARTICLE
- Full Text (PDF)
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Stewart, F. M.
- Articles by Levin, B. R.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Stewart, F. M.
- Articles by Levin, B. R.
Genetics, Vol 124, 175-185, Copyright © 1990
INVESTIGATIONS |
Fluctuation Analysis: The Probability Distribution of the Number of Mutants Under Different Conditions
F. M. Stewart, D. M. Gordon and B. R. Levin
Department of Mathematics, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island 02912
In the 47 years since fluctuation analysis was introduced by Luria and Delbruck, it has been widely used to calculate mutation rates. Up to now, in spite of the importance of such calculations, the probability distribution of the number of mutants that will appear in a fluctuation experiment has been known only under the restrictive, and possibly unrealistic, assumptions: (1) that the mutation rate is exactly proportional to the growth rate and (2) that all mutants grow at a rate that is a constant multiple of the growth rate of the original cells. In this paper, we approach the distribution of the number of mutants from a new point of view that will enable researchers to calculate the distribution to be expected using assumptions that they believe to be closer to biological reality. The new idea is to classify mutations according to the number of observable mutants that derive from the mutation when the culture is selectively plated. This approach also simplifies the calculations in situations where two, or many, kinds of mutation may occur in a single culture.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. Gerrish A Simple Formula for Obtaining Markedly Improved Mutation Rate Estimates Genetics, November 1, 2008; 180(3): 1773 - 1778. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Durfee, R. Nelson, S. Baldwin, G. Plunkett III, V. Burland, B. Mau, J. F. Petrosino, X. Qin, D. M. Muzny, M. Ayele, et al. The Complete Genome Sequence of Escherichia coli DH10B: Insights into the Biology of a Laboratory Workhorse J. Bacteriol., April 1, 2008; 190(7): 2597 - 2606. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. I. Lang and A. W. Murray Estimating the Per-Base-Pair Mutation Rate in the Yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae Genetics, January 1, 2008; 178(1): 67 - 82. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Q. Zheng Update on Estimation of Mutation Rates Using Data From Fluctuation Experiments Genetics, October 1, 2005; 171(2): 861 - 864. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Oliver, B. R. Levin, C. Juan, F. Baquero, and J. Blazquez Hypermutation and the Preexistence of Antibiotic-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa Mutants: Implications for Susceptibility Testing and Treatment of Chronic Infections Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., November 1, 2004; 48(11): 4226 - 4233. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. J. Saunders, E. R. Moxon, and M. B. Gravenor Mutation rates: estimating phase variation rates when fitness differences are present and their impact on population structure Microbiology, February 1, 2003; 149(2): 485 - 495. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. H. Gillespie Evolution of Drug Resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis: Clinical and Molecular Perspective Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., February 1, 2002; 46(2): 267 - 274. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. R. Levin, V. Perrot, and N. Walker Compensatory Mutations, Antibiotic Resistance and the Population Genetics of Adaptive Evolution in Bacteria Genetics, March 1, 2000; 154(3): 985 - 997. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
B. G. Hall Spectra of Spontaneous Growth-Dependent and Adaptive Mutations at ebgR J. Bacteriol., February 15, 1999; 181(4): 1149 - 1155. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
B. G. Hall Adaptive Mutagenesis at ebgR Is Regulated by PhoPQ J. Bacteriol., June 1, 1998; 180(11): 2862 - 2865. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
J. Radicella, P. Park, and M. Fox Adaptive mutation in Escherichia coli: a role for conjugation Science, April 21, 1995; 268(5209): 418 - 420. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. E. Lenski and J. E. Mittler Response Science, May 28, 1993; 260(5112): 1222 - 1224. [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Lenski and J. Mittler The directed mutation controversy and neo-Darwinism Science, January 8, 1993; 259(5092): 188 - 194. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||




