- THIS ARTICLE
- Full Text (PDF)
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Meneely, P. M.
- Articles by Nordstrom, K. D.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Meneely, P. M.
- Articles by Nordstrom, K. D.
Genetics, Vol 119, 365-375, Copyright © 1988
INVESTIGATIONS |
X Chromosome Duplications Affect a Region of the Chromosome They Do Not Duplicate in Caenorhabditis elegans
P. M. Meneely and K. D. Nordstrom
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington 98104
X chromosome duplications have been used previously to vary the dose of specific regions of the X chromosome to study dosage compensation and sex determination in Caenorhabditis elegans. We show here that duplications suppress an X-linked hypomorphic mutation and elevate the level of activity of an X-linked enzyme, although these two genes are located in a region of the X chromosome that is not duplicated. The effects do not depend on the region of the X chromosome duplicated and is stronger in strains with two doses of a duplication than in strains with one dose. This is evidence for a general elevation of X-linked gene expression in strains carrying X-chromosome duplications, consistent with the hypothesis that the duplications titrate a repressor acting on many X-linked genes.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. M. Gladden, B. Farboud, and B. J. Meyer Revisiting the X:A Signal That Specifies Caenorhabditis elegans Sexual Fate Genetics, November 1, 2007; 177(3): 1639 - 1654. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. D. Lieb, C. O. de Solorzano, E. G. Rodriguez, A. Jones, M. Angelo, S. Lockett, and B. J. Meyer The Caenorhabditis elegans Dosage Compensation Machinery Is Recruited to X Chromosome DNA Attached to an Autosome Genetics, December 1, 2000; 156(4): 1603 - 1621. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
