- THIS ARTICLE
- Full Text (PDF)
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Ziemer, A.
- Articles by Campos-Ortega, J. A.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Ziemer, A.
- Articles by Campos-Ortega, J. A.
Genetics, Vol 119, 63-74, Copyright © 1988
INVESTIGATIONS |
Genetic Analysis of Enhancer of split, a Locus Involved in Neurogenesis in Drosophila melanogaster
A. Ziemer, K. Tietze, E. Knust and J. A. Campos-Ortega
Institut fur Entwicklungsphysiologie der Universitat zu Koln, 5000 Koln 41, Federal Republic of Germany
Enhancer of split (E(spl)), one of the neurogenic loci of Drosophila, is uncovered by the deletion Df(3R)E(spl)(R-B251) with breakpoints at 96F8 and 96F13. We describe here the results of a genetic analysis of this chromosomal interval. Thirty-one mutations in genes of this region were recovered during various programs of mutagenesis. In addition, we included the spontaneous mutations E(spl)(D) and groucho (gro), which are known to map to this region, in our study. These 33 mutations define four lethal complementation groups, one of which includes E(spl)(D) and gro. Mutations of the E(spl) group behave as complementing and noncomplementing pseudoalleles, defining different functions. Alleles are classified according to their complementation behavior in two different ways: with respect to their viability as heterozygotes with other lethal alleles and with respect to gro and to E(spl)(D). The phenotypes of these mutations and the pattern of heteroallelic complementation speak in favor of a considerable genetic complexity of the E(spl) locus.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T Lieber, S Kidd, E Alcamo, V Corbin, and M W Young Antineurogenic phenotypes induced by truncated Notch proteins indicate a role in signal transduction and may point to a novel function for Notch in nuclei. Genes & Dev., October 1, 1993; 7(10): 1949 - 1965. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E Bier, H Vaessin, S Younger-Shepherd, L Y Jan, and Y N Jan deadpan, an essential pan-neural gene in Drosophila, encodes a helix-loop-helix protein similar to the hairy gene product. Genes & Dev., November 1, 1992; 6(11): 2137 - 2151. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y Rao, R Bodmer, L. Jan, and Y. Jan The big brain gene of Drosophila functions to control the number of neuronal precursors in the peripheral nervous system Development, January 9, 1992; 116(1): 31 - 40. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y Rao, H Vaessin, L Y Jan, and Y N Jan Neuroectoderm in Drosophila embryos is dependent on the mesoderm for positioning but not for formation. Genes & Dev., September 1, 1991; 5(9): 1577 - 1588. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Vaessin, M. Caudy, E. Bier, L.-Y. Jan, and Y.-N. Jan Role of Helix-Loop-Helix Proteins in Drosophila Neurogenesis Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol, January 1, 1990; 55(0): 239 - 245. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E Bier, H Vaessin, S Shepherd, K Lee, K McCall, S Barbel, L Ackerman, R Carretto, T Uemura, and E Grell Searching for pattern and mutation in the Drosophila genome with a P-lacZ vector. Genes & Dev., September 1, 1989; 3(9): 1273 - 1287. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||


