- THIS ARTICLE
- Full Text (PDF)
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Voelker, R. A.
- Articles by Searles, L. L.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Voelker, R. A.
- Articles by Searles, L. L.
FREQUENT IMPRECISE EXCISION AMONG REVERSIONS OF A P ELEMENT-CAUSED LETHAL MUTATION IN DROSOPHILA
Robert A. Voelker 1, Arno L. Greenleaf 2, Henrik Gyurkovics 1, G. Bruce Wisely 1, Shu-Mei Huang 1, and Lillie L. Searles 3
1 Laboratory of Genetics, National Institute of Environmental
Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709
2 Department of Biochemistry, Duke University Medical School,
Durham, North Carolina 27710
3 Laboratory of Genetics, National Institute of Environmental
Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709; and Department
of Biochemistry, Duke University Medical School, Durham, North Carolina 27710
RpII215D50 (= D50) is a lethal mutation caused by the insertion of a 1.3-kb P element 5' to sequences encoding the largest (215 kilodaltons) subunit of Drosophila RNA polymerase II. In dysgenic males D50 reverted to nonlethality at frequencies ranging from 2.6 to 6.5%. These reversions resulted from loss of P element sequences. Genetic tests of function and restriction enzyme analysis of revertant DNAs revealed that 35% or more of the reversion events were imprecise excisions. Two meiotic mutations that perturb excision repair and postreplication repair (mei-9a and mei-41D5, respectively) had no influence on reversion frequency but may have increased the proportion of imprecise excisions. We suggest that these excisions are by-products of, rather than intermediates in, the transposition process.
Submitted on January 4, 1984Accepted on February 7, 1984
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Ghosh-Roy, M. Kulkarni, V. Kumar, S. Shirolikar, and K. Ray Cytoplasmic Dynein-Dynactin Complex Is Required for Spermatid Growth but Not Axoneme Assembly in Drosophila Mol. Biol. Cell, May 1, 2004; 15(5): 2470 - 2483. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Eggert, K. Bergemann, and H. Saumweber Molecular Screening for P-Element Insertions in a Large Genomic Region of Drosophila melanogaster Using Polymerase Chain Reaction Mediated by the Vectorette Genetics, July 1, 1998; 149(3): 1427 - 1434. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Woodruff, J. Blount, and J. Thompson Jr Hybrid dysgenesis in D. melanogaster is not a general release mechanism for DNA transpositions Science, September 4, 1987; 237(4819): 1206 - 1218. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R Levis, T Hazelrigg, and G. Rubin Effects of genomic position on the expression of transduced copies of the white gene of Drosophila Science, August 9, 1985; 229(4713): 558 - 561. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||


